Conference Session

FPD IV: Improving Student Success: Mentoring, Intervening, and Supplementing

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Colleen A. McDonough, Michigan State University; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University; Neeraj Buch, Michigan State University; Renée S. DeGraaf, Lansing Community College; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Sarah J. Stoner, Michigan State University; Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University; Claudia E. Vergara, Michigan State University; Thomas F. Wolff, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

sessions, PAL Leaders are required to attend weekly staffmeetings with the PAL Coordinator. The staff meetings provide a venue for PALs to share theirobservations and experiences from classes and tutoring sessions, learn new skills, and assessareas for improvement. Administrative tasks are also discussed, including program advertisingand human resource issues. In order for students to experience the benefits of PAL, they mustfirst attend the tutoring sessions. The program must rigorously publicize the positive, uniqueattributes of the sessions to ensure that session nonattendance reflects a student’s consciouschoice rather than an unknowing one. It is the responsibility of PAL leaders to advertise through

Conference Session

FPD I: Research on First-year Programs Part I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

confirmed by students’ provision on feedback in one dimensionthat is really intended for another dimension. Potential strategies for improving studentparticipation in peer feedback were discussed. Means for improving students’ understanding ofdimensions along which they are to assess peer work and provide peer feedback were alsodiscussed.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by grants from the National Science Foundation (DUE 0717508and EEC 0835873). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research

Conference Session

FPD 8: Engineering Math Issues

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

whole, Figures 11 and 12 show ALEKS performancefor the course. Figure 11. Initial ALEKS assessment pie chart for overall class performance. Figure 12. Final ALEKS assessment pie chart for overall class performanceTable 5 reflects the initial and post assessment results and percent increase for each topic. Theseresults reflect significant growth for the class as a whole for all topics. Table 5. Class performance—mastery of ALEKS topics: initial and final assessment. Class Initial Class Final ALEKS Objectives/Topics % Increase Assessment Assessment

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Virtual Instruction in the First Year II

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lakshmy Mohandas, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

instructor reflects on the day’s work and also talks about thenext meeting and the preparatory work required prior. This pattern generally continues for all the meetings except for the final projectpresentations. It is important to know that student groups also meet outside of class hours towork on projects and complete the prep work. With the outbreak of COVID-19, there was a sudden shift in the design thinking coursedelivery in the Spring 2020 semester. In March 2020, the class was asked to meet online for therest of the semester after the Spring break. The instructional team met before the Spring break tobrainstorm on how to proceed the instruction during the online learning and finalized theirindividual approaches before resuming

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Gerald Gallego Tembrevilla, McMaster University; Susan Nesbit P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Peter M Ostafichuk P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Naoko Ellis P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

providingstudents with “opportunities for reflection to connect thinking and doing” [19] in lecture, labs,and design studio classes help in the growth of students’ metacognition. Specifically, as shown inTable 2, students might appreciate the value of honing their metacognitive skills every step alongthe way if the course (a) offers learning resources (like screencasts) to enrich their understandingof metacognition and (b) students with the help of instructors, teaching assistants, and teammembers find ways on how to apply such skills in coping up with the demands of highereducation which are more challenging than what they have had in their high schools. As onestudent recalled (under postliminal state) that “I saw positive changes in my learning

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Charles Minor, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

values of and relationships among specific components of a mathematical model ● apply mathematical models to authentic, real-world problems ● interpret and draw conclusions from graphical, tabular, and other numerical representations of data ● summarize and justify analysis of mathematical models for problems ● express solutions to problems using an appropriate combination of words, symbols, tables, or graphs.Figure 1 contains an outline of the specific topics covered and the number of 50-minute classsessions dedicated to each. The graphic reflects topics covered during the Fall 2020 iteration ofthe course to provide the most recent picture of the course content.Figure 1. Engineering Math Course Topical OutlineAn additional

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; David E. Perkins, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Theodore Greene, Wentworth Institute of Technology; John Peter Voccio, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

challenges of the virtual/in personlabs. Student's feedback was collected to reflect their overall lab experience in this special time.1. Introduction and BackgroundLabs are a vital component to learn engineering disciplines, since hands-on labs reinforce thetheory that the students learned in lecture. With the development of modern technology,universities are changing from face-to-face education to remote web-based learning. However, itis a challenge to bring hands-on labs online due to the complexity of the labs, which includevarious equipment, materials, and resources. Setting up a web‐system for e‐education requires asignificant amount of time, as well as the necessity of having a computer and other resources.Especially due to COVID-19, most

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Benjamin Daniel Chambers, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

select examples that are less relatable to campus,or to the region. It is possible, however, that some students will still apply them. The homelessexample was reflected in several submissions about bus stop benches, despite not having ahomeless population around town, and one student also mistakenly assumed Legionella would bepresent in their air conditioning window unit, which was not water-cooled.Misunderstandings were identified in 54 examples, or less than 6% of all examples (Table).Misunderstandings were primarily in the thwarting non-humans category, which represented39% of misunderstandings, or thwarting humans category, with 22% of misunderstandings.While the cause of misunderstanding was not captured in coding, researchers had the sense

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Computation in the First Year

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Ada Barach, Ohio State University; Connor Jenkins, Ohio State University; Serendipity S. Gunawardena, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

statistical report,” The Ohio State University, Tech. Rep., 2019.[14] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019,” 2019, special report NSF 19-304.[15] P. Ring, L. Neyse, T. David-Barett, and U. Schmidt, “Gender differences in performance predictions: Evidence from the cognitive reflection test,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, 11 2016.[16] L. G. Jones and L. P. Jones, “Context, confidence and the able girl1,” Educational Research, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 189–194, 1989. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188890310304[17] L. S. Dix, Ed., Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Virtual Instruction in the First Year III

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

AJ Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University; Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University; Nathan D. Manser, Michigan Technological University; Michelle E. Jarvie-Eggart, Michigan Technological University; Ken Thiemann, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. 81.0% 86.2%The instructor communicated the course material clearly. 67.8% 69.7%The instructor engaged students by encouraging participation 75.9% 73.7%during classThe instructor engaged students by encouraging course preparation, 86.2% 88.8%reflection or other activities outside of class.The instructor displayed a personal interest in students and their 78.8% 81.2%learning.The instructor used technology appropriately 86.1% 85.4%Taking

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Cornucopia

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joshua Bourne Reed, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; Michael F. Young, University of Connecticut

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 “Mapping” the Landscape of First-Year Engineering Students’ Conceptualizations of Ethical Decision MakingAbstractWhen working in a professional world, engineers often encounter problems that involve social andethical considerations that cannot be solved using the technical skills that make up a majority oftheir engineering education. When encountering ethical challenges, an engineer should haveethical awareness and be reflective on the ethical implications of their decisions. It is importantfor universities to focus on improving their students’ ethical reasoning and social awareness if theywant to develop successful engineering graduates

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Major Choice

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amanda Christine Bordelon, Utah Valley University; Susan L. Thackeray , Utah Valley University; Sean S. Tolman, Utah Valley University; Jane M. Loftus, Utah Valley University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

section that claimed the civil-version “did not teach as much basic math and science for their discipline area”.The instructors plan to teach at least one more semester with the discipline-specific version to gather moredata on the student engagement responses. Two years after each version were given, the instructors intendadminister the same survey to the same students in order to determine if the students in reflection felt theirversion of the introduction course was helpful for them to progress in their respective program choice.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to acknowledge the Utah Valley University’s Office of Engaged Learning forfunding the project.References[1] R. Adams et al., “Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski, Fairfield University; Ryan Munden, Fairfield University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

demonstrate effective oral communication of technical content. A lecture focusing on effective oral presentation techniques was presented to demonstrate effective oral presentations. Students presented their IOP in the class [8]. • Writing Assignments: Writing assignments (WAs) were chosen as an assessment method to demonstrate students’ improvements in technical writing. Individual writing assignments included topics ranging from “Explain how something works” to “Reflect on your speaking skills”. Specific content was not as important as demonstrating mastery of writing skills. For example, the first writing assignment was: Understand the roles of engineers in different fields and different industries in

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Cornucopia #1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kevin J. Lindsay, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Meg Harkins, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Rachael Ohu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Sherman Mumford, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Linda A. Thurman, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, and WE Engage! in 2019, were developed to complement existingfreshmen student support programs, with a focus on specific target populations whose numbershave been historically low relative to the larger university population and surrounding areas.Engage ME! is a diversity and inclusion program developed to recruit, retain, and graduatemulticultural COE students. While open to all students, Engage ME! emphasizes engagementwith African American, Hispanic/Latino and Native American students for personal, academic,and professional development. Although the UNC Charlotte student body reflects the diversity ofour community, the same cannot be said for the COE. Underrepresented students from ethnicand racial minorities account for 41% of the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenell Wilmot, University of Texas, Austin; Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

population, and attendees weremore interested in understanding the material and working with others than the fall population,who identified more interest in securing a passing grade. The spring SI attendees also reported amore favorable view of engaging in small group work, which is an integral component topedagogical foundation of SI.The notable difference in motivation may be reflective of the differences in class environmentbetween the fall and spring semesters. With the spring semester’s smaller student population,there may be a different sense of community and accessibility to resources than is experienced in    the larger lectures during the fall. No longer in their first semester, spring

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Tuesday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Petra Bonfert-Taylor, Dartmouth College; Vicki V. May, Dartmouth College; Holly Wilkinson P.E., Dartmouth College; Alicia Betsinger, Dartmouth College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. (2003). Efficacy of using a single, non-technicalvariable to predict the academic success of freshmen engineering students. Journal ofEngineering Education, 92, 41−48.Meyers, K.L., Silliman, S.E., Gedde, N.L., Ohland, M. (2010). A Comparison of EngineeringStudents’ Reflections on Their First-Year Experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2). 169-178.Montgomery, R., Follman, D., and Diefes-Dux, H. (2003). Relative Effectiveness of DifferentFirst-Year Seminars. Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, CO.Mourtos, N.J. and Furman, B.J. (2002). Assessing the Effectiveness of an Introduction toEngineering Course for Freshmen, Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, MA.NSF (2015). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Sunday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield; Charles Lam, California State University, Bakersfield

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

’ current major,mathematics progression, and overall academic progress during future terms. Additionalinterviews and follow-up with the participants will also be explored.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1430398. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.BibliographyAlvarado, C., & Dodds, Z. (2010). Women in CS: An Evaluation of Three Promising Practices. ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Milwaukee, WI.Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Colleta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Tuesday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana; Arthur L. Chlebowski, University of Southern Indiana; David J. Ellert PE, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Section of their Rube Goldberg Machine (Outcome C). As part of this work-in-progress, feedback will be obtained regarding Outcomes C, D, and G from these students duringtheir Senior Capstone. Students will be asked to reflect on their comments and if they were usedin the execution of their Senior Capstone. Students will also be assessed on the impact theirfreshman design course had on their ability to design a system, component or process, tofunction on a multidisciplinary team, and to communicate effectively.ConclusionsIt is suspected that there is a positive impact on student learning using the techniques described.Students were successful in their projects. They took ownership of their individual RubeGoldberg sections. There were NO complaints

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Professional Skill Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

rationale for each form. At the end of the semester, students wereasked to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of whatever grouping technique was used intheir section. A qualitative analysis of all of these data has led to a description of the experiencefrom the perspective of the students. Further, the trends that emerged from these engineeringstudent descriptions were compared to and contrasted with the benefits described (largely byinstructors) in implementations in mathematics courses elsewhere.Course Background, Description, and SettingThe work described was situated in the first-year engineering honors program [17]. Thisprogram, which has enjoyed a rich history, typically serves between 350 and 450 students peracademic year. Almost all of

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Using Video, Games, and More in the First Year

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Kathleen A. Ossman, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Mean Change Z SignificantProblem Deviation Deviation 2013 2014 In Mean Value α = 0.01 2013 2014 P3 8.90 2.37 9.32 2.18 +0.42 4.06 YES P6 10.09 2.64 10.75 2.08 +0.66 5.77 YES P7 9.89 3.04 10.76 2.20 +0.87 6.56 YES P8 7.17 3.13 8.27 2.75 +1.1 8.09 YESTable 4 lists the topics covered in each exam problem and reflects the increased emphasis anarrays and loops

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Focus on Student Learning, Lifelong Learning, and the Whole Student

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Jacob T Allenstein, Ohio State University; Robert B. Rhoads, Ohio State University; Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

the characteristics thatlifelong learners would possess.Mourtos7 developed a different strategy for looking at the definition of lifelong learning and itsrelationship to the ABET student outcome. In his work, he divided the ABET outcome into thetwo parts of: • recognizing the need for lifelong learning and • the ability to engage in lifelong learning.Mourtos7 developed 14 attributes to measure lifelong learning in students in both of thesecategories. These measures were then used in course design to ensure that lifelong learning wasincluded and assessed in the curriculum. The methods of assessment included student work,student course reflections, and student surveys. Mourtos7 recognizes that the 14 attributes oflifelong learning

Conference Session

FPD7 -- Service Learning

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Pagano, Western Michigan University; Amanda Rossman, Western Michigan University; Kendall Vasilnek, Western Michigan University; Betsy Aller, Western Michigan University; Edmund Tsang, Western Michigan University; Andrew Kline, Western Michigan University; Edward Brabandt, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

experience went, and, we believe, will continue to reach, farbeyond the first year of college.Acknowledgements and DisclaimerFunding for this project was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation and theLearn and Serve America program to the Engineering Design Center for Service-Learning atWestern Michigan University. Opinions and findings presented in this article are those of theauthors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation nor Learn andServe America. Page 12.750.11Bibliography1. “Bragg’s Law.” X-ray diffraction. 2002. The Cavendish Laboratory, The University of Cambridge. Retrieved 10 Oct. 2005

Conference Session

FPD3 -- Professional Issues for First-Year Courses

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Light, University of Washington; Russell Korte, University Of Minnesota; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Deborah Kilgore, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

address specific engineering problems devised first toelicit responses that reflect aspects of their engineering knowledge and skills, and second, toreveal how they apply this learning to engineering design practice. One of the problems given tostudents in the first year was a closed-ended question about the information they would need todesign a playground. Figure 1 contains the text of the question. You have been asked to design a playground. You have a limited amount of time and resources to gather information for your design. From the following list, please put a check mark next to the FIVE kinds of information you would MOST LIKELY NEED as you work on your design: - Availability of materials - Body proportions - Budget

Conference Session

FPD10 - Freshman Engineering Introduction to Design

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Montgomery, University of Michigan; Rodney Johnson, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

in the body of the report they submit. A meeting with course stafffollows to provide teams with feedback on their plans.Typical errors seen in team Gantt charts include failing to divide the work between members, or,at the opposite extreme, assigning tasks so atomistically that a coherent overall vision is lost.These typically are symptomatic of deeper problems—wanting to work together on all aspects ofthe project, for example, often comes from a lack of trust and confidence in one another, whereastotally compartmentalizing the project between team members may reflect a generalunwillingness to lead on the part of individual team members. In these cases, the project plan canserve as a diagnostic for team problems and a reason to

Conference Session

FPD4 - Teaching Methods for First Year Students

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Roger Parsons, University of Tennessee-Knoxville; Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee-Knoxville; J. Elaine Seat, University of Tennessee-Knoxville; Thomas Scott, University of Tennessee-Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. There are sixteen four-letter MBTI types. Example descriptionsof two of the sixteen types follow:ISTJISTJ is the most common type among practicing engineers. They are usually quiet andcan appear withdraw because of the I, but most of them make good use of their quiet timeby thinking of ideas and how facts go together. As S’s, they concentrate on executing thejob at hand, using logic (a T trait) to figure out the solution. Their J preference enablesthem to schedule and plan ahead, and they don’t like to have to adapt and change oncethey start down a path. ISTJs are dependable, organized, goal-oriented, and focused onthe facts.INTJINTJs combine their love of personal reflection with a structured and logical assembly ofendless possibilities. They

Conference Session

Retention Tools and Programs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University; Amy Hamlin, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

students in their declared major as they enterENG1102 in the spring of 2005 and 2007. This data looks at all the first-year engineeringstudents enrolled in ENG1102 in the spring 2005 and 2007 semesters. As expected, the percentof Engineering Undecided (EGN) students retained in their original major is close to zero forboth study groups, which reflects the fact that these students are switching into a degree grantingmajor. More than 57% of the students are still in their originally declared engineering major atthe end of their third year, with most of the majors retaining between 75 and 85% of theiroriginal students. With the exception of EGE, EME, EMSE, and non-engineering majors, thepercent of students retained in their original major is lower

Conference Session

Goal Specific First-Year Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University; Bill Elmore, Mississippi State University; Arash Salehi, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

traditionally assessed in academe. However, this must beaccompanied by a meta-cognitive ability to reflect, assess and regulate one’s engagement inlearning. For a learner human agency constitutes a foundation upon which new knowledge isassembled and integrated into a framework for choosing and adequately performing vocationalpursuits. Our students bring these traits to bear upon their decisions when choosing a vocationand the requisite educational training/certification necessary to enter this vocation. Unquestionably, causal factors (e.g. prior knowledge, socio-economic factors, psychological―tenor‖) influence ―agency‖—thus our current study of these factors. The centrality of one’sbeliefs about individual capabilities to control events affecting his

Conference Session

FPD3 -- Professional Issues for First-Year Courses

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University; Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

interactive” … “Encourage more class involvement”Incorporating any of these suggestions will involve additional time outlay from the class, yetwill likely enhance the quality and variety of the OMEs. Professors can make their owndetermination of which adjustments are appropriate according to their own course schedule,class dynamics, and timing.Professors. As educators, a few additional advisory thoughts emerge from the data, feedback,and our reflection on the OME to further improve it as a design course asset. Some furthermodifications may involve the following: (1) Identify the main objectives clearly to thestudents at the beginning of the semester and emphasize supplemental goals for the OME,beyond the details of administration and assignment

Conference Session

FPD4 -- Real-World Case Studies & Projects

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Yao, East Carolina University; Gene Dixon, East Carolina University; William Howard, East Carolina University; Ric Williams; Keith Williamson, East Carolina University; Geoffrey Dieck, East Carolina University; Steve McLawhorn, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

taughtduring lectures based on faculty cohort discussion. Figure 4. Two Examples of Robot Designs and Their Solid Models.Recommendations Page 11.1465.12Upon reflection, opportunities for improving future freshman projects are evident from the ECUengineering program robot projects. In addition to logistical considerations (large groups,limited resources), not enough attention was paid to the management of the projects by thestudents. While a course in project management is required later in the curriculum, some basicconcepts – creating a timeline, regular progress reports, etc. – could be effective in helping thestudents plan and execute

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

was supported by the National ScienceFoundation (EEC Grant # 1550961). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationsdo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards. (Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS, 2013).2. Carr, R. L., Bennett, L. D. & Strobel, J. Engineering in the K‐12 STEM Standards of the 50 US States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent. Journal of Engineering Education 101, 539– 564 (2012).3. Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W. & Kersten, J. A. NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K-12 state science standards. J Res Sci Teach 52, 296–318 (2015).4