AC 2010-1079: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AHIGH-SCHOOL TEACHER.Rod Paton, University of Auckland Rod Paton holds BSc and MSc degrees in physics from the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He has been teaching high-school science and physics since the start of 1994. For the past 12 years he has been Head of Physics at Westlake Boys’ High School, Auckland, New Zealand. Rod has integrated ICT into the school’s physics programs and developed problem-solving books and practical manuals to enhance the skills and abilities of all students. His main research interests are centred on implementing steps to improve the problem-solving and academic-writing abilities of high-school
, selection, orientation, the junior college experience, academicplanning and advising, community-building, curriculum development, and institutional selectionand alignment. A fundamental difference of this program is the number of expectations placedon the student during the Scholars year, spelled out in the written contract and reinforced duringorientation. Some methods of assessment have been presented.References1 Wood, Sandra; Hsia, Steven; Johnson, Pauline; Boykin, Karen; Wood, Sandy; Bowen, Larry; Whitaker, Kevin “Integrated engineering math-based summer bridge program for student retention,” Conference Proceedings, 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007.2 Bielefeldt, Angela, “Introduction to environmental engineering courses aimed
conceptual rigor. It is calledphilosophy and early efforts in iFoundry were devoted to (and continue in) better connecting Page 15.1130.3philosophy and engineering in ways that help change engineering faculty minds through themaking of better arguments.Together, the need for appropriate organizational and conceptual change efforts have played arole in iFoundry’s development from the beginning. However, the coming of the first freshmenin Fall 2009 necessitated more focused thinking about students, their engagement, and how tocreate an experience that would be maximally impactful with modest resources and a relativelysmall footprint in the curriculum
effectively we can impress upon students the benefits ofgrowing grittiness. The discussion will center on EduGuide’s features, accessibility, and reportedeffectiveness.IntroductionThe research of Angela Lee Duckworth that culminated in her New York bestseller Grit: ThePower of Passion and Perseverance [1] brings forth two big ideas: first, that grit (comprised of aperson’s perseverance and passion) can be among the most important predictors of success, and;second, that one’s grit can indeed be self-developed. The popularity of these ideas hasencouraged a conflagration of efforts to incorporate and integrate grit into every facet of theeducation system, from curriculum development to personal and professional development.As posited by Duckworth, the
Education. Engineering in K-12 education : understanding the status and improving the prospects. (National Academies Press, 2009).2. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M. & Rogers, C. Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97, 369–387 (2008).3. Hester, K. & Cunningham, C. Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. in Proceedings of 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2007).4. Bottoms, G. & Anthony, K. Project Lead the Way: A Pre-engineering Curriculum that Works. (Southern Regional Education Board, 2005).5. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. Engineering byDesign. (2011). at 6. FIRST. USFIRST.org. Vision and
Many first- and second-yearengineering students have little to no experience in a professional environment and have hadvery little opportunity to read, let alone write, items of a technical nature. Therefore, to providethem with some guidelines about technical report writing and a topic about which to write canleave the students overwhelmed and unsure where to begin.Studies of technical communication instruction in engineering schools has focused on whichdepartment teaches the technical communication class, whether the classes are required orelectives, and how technical communication in integrated across the curriculum. 5 There is littleinformation about specific methods of teaching technical communication and the effectiveness ofvarious
teaching these graduating, upper-division students, I concluded that, muchearlier in their University careers, students need exposure to the concepts taught in this seniorcourse. They need to develop these concepts into skills through extracurricular activities andelective courses, enhancing their prospects for career success as practicing engineers when theygraduate, and this takes time.As a consequence of my observations, I proposed a new, additional course which would informstudents, preferably freshmen, that an engineering career requires greater understanding of skillsthat are not part of their engineering curriculum. The intent was to provide them digestibleguidance that would help them to engage in activities providing them: 1
during their firstyear of college, and apply it to their habits for critical thinking and metacognition. Thisknowledge could inform our guided practice in reflection through essays and other prompts. Ourfirst-year engineering design course at a research institution in the southeastern United Statesalready includes practice in certain professional skills, such as ethics and integrity, teamwork andtechnical communication. It is evident that reflective judgment is another important professionalskill that should be initiated early in the engineering curriculum, both for solving ill-structuredproblems and for retaining knowledge.Our research question is as follows: How well do first year students develop higher level thinking skills through
objectives as well as projectoutcomes from the 2005 and 2006 course offerings are provided. Student responses to theexperience are emphasized and the outcomes of this experience on student learning are Page 12.1432.2summarized.Design at UTCThe elements of design are emphasized throughout UTC’s engineering curriculum, beginningwith the freshman year. At least ten credit hours are devoted to teaching (to all engineeringmajors) design concepts in an applied, interdisciplinary setting. At the freshmen level thestudents are introduced to the foundations of design. At the sophomore level the students usedesign concepts to design, build, and test small
tutoring and peer-assisted learning (PAL) programs and provided pedagogical and academic success support to the General Engineering Learning Community. She is also co-developer of a framework of rigorously-documented, self-directed collabo- rative learning called Entangled Learning. Whisler has an M.A. in Music from The Pennsylvania State University and an M.L.S. from Indiana University.Dr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. She is the
students recognize and connect to their potential.Natalie Stringer, Clemson University Natalie Stringer is a senior at Clemson University, graduating in May 2018 with a Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences with a minor in Microbiology. She has worked at the Academic Success Center as an organic chemistry tutor for four semesters. After completing CRLA Level 3 certification, Natalie served the tutoring program in a mentoring capacity as well, acting as a liaison between her colleagues in the sciences and the Assistant Coordinator for Tutoring. Natalie will continue her academic career and research efforts at the Medical University of South Carolina’s College of Medicine after her time at Clemson.Dr. Rachel K
response. To beeligible for enrollment in the course, students must have successfully completed the EE 302course as well as an introductory Physics course, Calculus 1 (derivative and integral calculus)and 2 (series, sequences, and multivariable calculus), with concurrent enrollment in Calculus 3(differential equations and linear algebra).In the fall 2015 semester, 401 students enrolled in EE 302, divided between six lecture sectionswith about 65 students in each section. Of these students, 86 enrolled in EE 411 for the spring2016 semester, which had a total enrollment of 124 students divided between four lecturesections. The majority of the students (83 of the 86) who progressed from EE 302 to EE 411 hadsuccessfully completed EE 302 in their very
serve the anticipated 400 mentees for the fall semester 2005, aformal application and interview process was conducted during the spring semester 2005.Information on the mentor positions was posted on the CoE/CEED web site and sent out in emailmessages over student listservs. Requirements were instated to ensure candidates met certainstandards. To be considered for the program, prospective mentors had to 1) be a Virginia TechCoE student, 2) have completed their first-year of the general engineering curriculum and beaccepted into one of the 11 CoE departments, 3) have earned an overall GPA of 2.5/4.0, 4) be afull-time student in the fall semester 2005, 5) be able to attend a four-hour mandatory trainingsession the Friday before fall classes began
research paper examines first-year student performance and retention within engineering. Aconsiderable body of literature has reported factors influencing performance and retention,including high school GPA and SAT scores,1,2,3 gender,4 self-efficacy,1,5 social status,2,6,7hobbies,4 and social integration.6,7 Although these factors can help explain and even partiallypredict student outcomes, they can be difficult to measure; typical survey instruments are lengthyand can be invasive of student privacy. To address this limitation, the present paper examineswhether a much simpler survey can be used to understand student motivations and anticipatestudent outcomes.The survey was administered to 347 students in an introductory Engineering Graphics
summer of 2013and was integrated into the existing lab project on trigonometry. The current lab project runs fortwo lab sessions. In the first session, students focus on taking angle-versus-length measurements Page 26.659.5with a sun-dial-like instrument and calipers. The simple Plexiglas “sun-dial”, shown in Figure 3,simulates a two-link planar robotic arm similar to that shown in Figure 1. Given an angle,students dial it onto the instrument, then measure the x and y lengths; or vice versa. They alsocreate MATLAB function and script files to cross-check and validate the measurements. Insession two, a computer-controlled humanoid robot called NAO
students at UNC Char- lotte and 2) seperately enhancing a core Geotechnical Engineering course by implementing interactive curriculum tools and creating an interactive learning environment in the classroom.Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Peter Thomas Tkacik is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte with a Motorsports focus. His areas of research are teaching, visual based experimental methods and fluid dynamics. He has advised 6 Graduate Students, 38 under-graduate (UG) seniors, 8 UG summer research experiences, 48 high school summer program kids, and has been the advisor for three UNC Charlotte student race teams
a similar opportunity for first-year engineering students to engage inactivities that might occur in industry. In the Cornerstone of Engineering at NortheasternUniversity, a similar opportunity is provided to the first-year engineering students and the resultsare discussed in this article.BackgroundCornerstone of Engineering is an integrated design and problem solving through programmingcourse for first-year students at Northeastern University. The course consists of two 4-creditclasses either given over two semesters or stacked into one, depending on a given student’sneeds. The work done for this paper will examine students’ experiences from the ‘stacked’course, where all learning objectives are met in one semester by meeting with the
AC 2007-658: FRESHMAN PROJECT: AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE(AUV)David Ye, Polytechnic University David Ye is a senior head teaching assistant in General Engineering. He expects to receive his BSEE from Polytechnic University in June 2007. His interests include robotics. He interned at Symbol Technologies researching wireless protocols and Power LEDs.Ilya Brutman, Polytechnic University Ilya Brutman is a teaching assistant in General Engineering. He expects to receive his BSCompE from Polytechnic University in June 2008.Gunter Georgi, Polytechnic University Gunter W. Georgi is an Industry Professor at Polytechnic University. He received his BS from Cooper Union and his MS and
, System Integration and LEAN Process Improvement (technical and business), Dr. Wickliff is passionate about Organizational Wellness and the Holistic Well- ness of individuals. She is also a professional Facilitator and Motivational Speaker. Dr. Wickliff earned a PhD in Interdisciplinary Engineering from Texas A&M University where she combined Industrial En- gineering and Organizational Development to conduct research in the area of talent management and organizational effectiveness. She also completed an executive MBA from the University of Texas-Dallas and a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Houston. She is founder of a nationally rec- ognized pre-college initiative program, FreshStart, which has
matriculation status on major selection,” Proceedings of the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, October 18-21, 2009.[15] B.M. Olds and R.L. Miller. (2004). “The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 23-35.[16] M.K. Orr, C.E. Brawner, M.W. Ohland, and R.A. Layton. (2013). “The effect of required introduction to engineering courses on retention and major selection,” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.[17] V. Bhuria and R.K. Dixit. (2015). “Selection criteria of college and course in engineering education
Paper ID #18170Assisstive Technology for Freshman Design and K-12 OutreachDr. Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin, Stout Devin Berg is an Associate Professor and Program Director of the B.S. Mechanical Engineering program in the Engineering and Technology Department at the University of Wisconsin - Stout.Mr. Matthew Wigdahl, Oaklawn Elementary School Matthew Wigdahl is a National Board Certified 5th grade teacher using Design Thinking to empower his students to solve problems. He has taught elementary grades for 17 years.Ms. Charis Dawn Collins, Oaklawn Elementary School Charis Collins is a writer and teacher, specializing
organization that provides basic financial education to hispanic individuals and their families in New York and the tri-state area, in order to foster their financial security and improve their standard of living. Professor of the ”Teaching Competencies Workshop” at the School of Education. Radio host from the program ”Conexiones: hablemos de innovaci´on y de futuros” that explores the future of higher education. Bachelors Degree in Pedagogy form Universidad Panamericana. Graduated with honors. Research topics center on soft skills, the future of higher education, education innovation projects and faculty development.Mr. Armando Alem´an-Ju´arez, Universidad Panamericana Armando has experience in the area of
engineering student performance and retention, and how to best teach work skills throughout the engineering curriculum.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She also has an associate appointment in Chemical Engineering. Dr. Ralston teaches under- graduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of Tablet PCs in engineering education, the incorporation of critical thinking in undergraduate engineer- ing education, and retention of engineering students. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process
capabilities in first yearengineering students.IntroductionFor decades, the engineering education community has researched factors contributing to theretention and attrition of engineering majors. Studies have consistently shown that a large Page 24.829.2fraction of students leave undergraduate engineering programs before the second year ofenrollment. Several factors have proven to be strong predictors of engineering student retentionand success; some are pre-college attributes or measures, while others are observed during thefirst year of enrollment in an engineering program. Key pre-college indicators are related toquantitative ability, namely
-0836861). This project requires students to design, build, test, and analyze a lab-scalehorizontal axis wind turbine. The goals of this project were to create project modules that couldbe easily adaptable to various curriculums and applications, including K-12 programs.1In 2010 – 2012, three project modules were integrated into the first-year curriculum at MichiganTech: aquaculture, biomechanics, and wind energy. For the aquaculture module, students built,tested, and analyzed their own aerator or used 3D modeling to develop a new impeller for anexisting pump to use in water circulation. Students working on the biomechanics module createda prosthetic leg device and analyzed the motion and forces generated during the kickingmovement. Students
Assistant Dean for Inclusive Excellence, she leads the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center, overseeing efforts to attract and prepare students for the rigors of engineering study and careers, and to improve student performance and graduation rates. Appointed in January 2014, Miller comes to CU-Boulder from the National Science Foundation, where she worked in STEM education as a American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow. Sarah believes that every child deserves an excellent education. She has worked in inner-city public schools, both as a teacher and as an administrator, and in the admissions office of Amherst College, where she earned a B.A. in Chemistry. She holds a PhD
to do STEMoutreach by giving presentations and demonstrations using an interactive humanoid robotthrough community events and school visits.A simple drag-and-drop graphical programming interface called Choregraphe that came with theNao robot made it possible for students without much programming experience to put togethersimple demonstrations. Over the years, different components like music, dance moves,impersonation, simple dialogues, storytelling, interactive games, etc. have been added to acollection of demonstrations which engaged the audients especially the school-aged-children.In the fall semesters of recent years, the Nao outreaches were integrated with the freshmen teamdesign projects conducted in another course: EGR101 Introduction
Thermo-Fluids and High Speed Aerodynamics for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at ASU. His interests include student pathways and motivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. Recently, he has developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Redesign of the Introduction to Engineering Course and its Impact on Students’ Knowledge and Application of the Engineering Design ProcessAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the changes made to a 2-credit introduction toengineering course at Arizona State University to teach the
have identified peer adviceas more valued by students than advice from formal sources.7 Students are, in some sense, morequalified than formal sources to give advice to undergraduate science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) students. Many counselors and advisors were not STEM studentsduring their undergraduate program. Faculty, while more often STEM students asundergraduates, are likely to have been elite students, who underestimate the challenges facingthe average student.The advice expressed by our 185 interviewees, most of whom are upper division, derives fromtheir actual lived experiences, reflecting on the challenges they have faced in the context ofsuccessfully negotiating an engineering curriculum. Most perceptions of
engineering design class. Each of the learning modes and activities were describedin a previous paper by the authors along with an assessment of related learning2. This workprovides examples of evaluating individual course components, identifies characteristics of someof the ostensibly successful learning modes, and proposes solutions to components and modespresently not hitting the mark. The hope is that other educators may identify with these learning-engagement patterns in their own courses and find opportunities to make considered adjustmentsin the interests of their course content and their population of learners.IntroductionHaving passed through multiple evaluations and iterations of our first-year engineering coursesat Northeastern University