Conference Session

FPD11 -- Multidisciplinary Experiences

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi; Lifford McLauchlan, Texas A&M University-Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

; ^ ‘ “ % ~ / U X L 4 8 I B M 3 b) E R W 6 Q * , 0 1 ; : O 5 N Page 12.24.11 T F Y f) J ? !The message is encoded using the CIPHER according to the following rules. There may berepeated numbers or characters in which case you may choose one of the repeated ones to applythe following rules to.8,9The message is broken into pairs of characters

Conference Session

FPD8 -- Systems, Nanotechnology & Programming

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Helen Burn, University of Michigan; James Holloway, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

problems solved in the programming 230 2.91 0.86 1 4assignments were interesting to me.Treatment Group 118 51.30* Sample included all students who completed the follow-up survey (n = 230)a Standard deviation of sampleThe histogram of residuals appeared approximately normal for both regressions. The Q-Q plotssuggested no severe departure from normality. The scatter plot of standardized residual bystandardized predicted showed mild heteroscedasticity in that negative standardized predictedvalues had associated positive standardized residuals and positive standardized predicted valueshad associated negative standardized

Conference Session

FPD 1: The Path to Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shelley Lorimer, Grant MacEwan University; Jeffrey A. Davis, Grant MacEwan University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

0.85 0.83 0.86 0.89 0.0317 0.46 0.46 0.51 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.47 0.51 0.56 0.47 0.36 0.48 0.5 0.47 0.0518 0.26 0.32 0.42 0.31 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.3 0.32 0.27 0.26 0.31 0.24 0.29 0.0519 0.27 0.23 0.24 0.3 0.28 0.28 0.22 0.22 0.33 0.25 0.26 0.23 0.3 0.36 0.27 0.0420 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.23 0.3 0.19 0.15 0.3 0.31 0.21 0.26 0.3 0.19 0.27 0.25 0.05Table 3 - ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT Question Response Distribution Q 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 AVE STDV 1 0.61 0.65 0.63 0.73 0.66 0.73 0.66 0.67 0.05 2 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.24 0.28 0.03 3 0.61 0.63 0.71 0.55 0.57 0.62 0.63 0.62 0.05 4

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin; Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

% ofstudents attended regularly. The rate of D’s, F’s, Q drops and withdraws (DFWQ rates) for SIstudents was 2.8% in fall 2020, compared to a 9.1% DFWQ rate for SI students in fall 2019. SIstudents who had less programming experience (potentially through systemic educationalinequities) than their advantaged counterparts, also had statistically significant higher courseGPAs when compared to non-SI students who had the same prior experience. The teamdetermined several emerging themes from the survey and interview responses, such as aburgeoning sense of community, comfort with peers over time, accountability and structure, andan awareness of SI session activities as diverse and different than other learning experiences. Wehypothesize these all had strong

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Virtual Instruction in the First Year II

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jaya Dofe, California State University, Fullerton; Sudarshan T. Kurwadkar, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

? *Q#T - Traditional instruction mode; Q#V - Virtual instruction mode Figure 1. Survey Results © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021There was no overwhelming consensus since only 50% of participants appreciated the overallcourse design and project alignments. Of all the projects, most students enjoyed working on thewind turbine project in mechanical engineering. Table 1. Understanding of Major Questions 2019 2020 Before Now Before Now

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Andres Brake, Lamar University; James C. Curry

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

CBIE course (14 CBIE-Civil), and 15students fully completed the survey in the PBIE course (all civil engineering majors). Surveyswere discarded if not fully completed. Tables 2 and 3 show the demographics, college majordistribution, and SAT V+Q scores of the students in the PBIE and CBIE courses.Table 2. Demographics of survey respondents: gender, race, and age Course Gender Race/Ethnicity Age (N=Pre/Post) Asian/Pacific African Male Female Hispanic White 18-24 25-34 35+ Islander American CBIE 58.4% 41.6% 11.0% 17.2

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Retention and Bridge Programs #1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kamau Wright, University of Hartford

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

scheduling and associated modifications asneeded. The acceptance letter also included anticipated benefits and commitments, such as:  Participating in STRIDE sessions held once a week  Reflecting once a month through an electronic journal guided by instructors  Attending meetings for a professional group of your choice recommended by instructors  Receiving training on peer mentoring for future STRIDE cohorts  Demonstrating the use of recommended study methods weekly, for example, through display of out-of-class notes and Q&A with instructor on notes and weekly schedule.It was also explicitly highlighted that there was no cost to students to participate in the program,and contact

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Retention and Bridge Programs #1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Manuel A. Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Oscar Marcelo Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Pedro O. Quintero, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nelson Cardona-Martínez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Anidza Valentin, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, 2013.[5] Matthews, M. (2018). Keeping students in Engineering: A research-to-practice brief [Editorial]. ASSE, Retrieve from https://www.asee.org/retention-project/keeping-students- in-engineering-a-research-guide-to-improving-retention.[6] Teller, P. J. and Gates, A. Q., “Using the Affinity Research Group Model to Involve Undergraduate Students in Computer Science Research”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, pp. 549–555, 2001.

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Experiential Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University; Hunter Lovvorn, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

technical symposium on Computer scienceeducation. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 402-406, 2008.[4] S. Lee, S. Kastner, and R. Walker. “Mending the Gap, Growing the Pipeline: Increasing Female Representationin Computing,” in Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Gainsville, FL, 2015.[5] G. Skelton, Q. Pang, W. Zheng, and H.R. Shih. “Using robotics for teaching critical thinking, problems solvingand self-regulated learning for freshmen engineering students,” in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.[6] T. S. Hall and P. W. Munger. “Integrating robotics into first-year experience courses,” in Proceedings of 2011American Society for Engineering Education Southeastern Section Annual Meeting

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Online Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Christina Frederick, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Caroline Liron, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Li Ding; Lei Gu, Georgia State University; Andrew Calvin Griggs II, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Paula Sanjuan Espejo, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Paula Sanjuan Espejo, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Imaging,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Hyderabad, India, 2014, pp. 378–389.[2] R. Ellis, The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, 1994.[3] S. D. Krashen, Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.[4] K. J. Krahnke, “Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition,” TESOL Q., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 300–305, Jun. 1983.[5] S. D. Krashen and T. D. Terrell, The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. The Alemany Press, 1983.[6] J. N. Williams, “Memory, Attention, and Inductive Learning,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 1999.[7] C. Frederick and L. Sun, “Work in Progress

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Core Skills

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wujie Zhang, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Gina Elizabeth Mazzone, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Anne Alexander, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jill Meyer, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. The Chemistry in Engineering lectures 50 minuteslong twice a week and are mandatory. The Chemistry Preparation lectures are only mandatory ifthe student has not yet learned the ALEKS® topics in the current objective. Each ChemistryPreparation lecture is held 12 - 24 hours before the ALEKS® objective deadline. Lectures focuson problem-solving strategies and Q&A for problem types encountered in ALEKS®.Motivation Research ProcedureMotivation is important as it plays an important role in students’ conceptual change processes,critical thinking, learning strategies, and science learning achievement [9]. A survey has beendeveloped to measure students' motivation toward chemistry learning (Appendix A). Backgroundquestions (Q1-3) are used to gain

Conference Session

FPD 9: First-Year Engineering Courses, Part III: Research, Sustainability, and Professionalism

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leonardo Bedoya-Valencia, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Ding Yuan, Colorado State University - Pueblo; Jane M. Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Opportunities to Excel (PROPEL) center atColorado State University - Pueblo. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of theentire Faculty at the Department of Engineering in developing the sustainability module.Bibliography1. Allen, D., et al. (2008). “Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report.” Grant X3-83235101- 0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Page 23.726.92. Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Mihelcic, J., and Vanasupa, L. (2008). “Civil and environmental engineering education (CEEE) transformational change: Tools and strategies for sustainability integration and assessment in

Conference Session

Mentoring First Year Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rose Marra, University of Missouri; Whitney Edmister, Virginia Tech; Bevlee Watford, Virginia Tech; Barbara Bogue, Pennsylvania State University; Chia-Lin Tsai, University of Missouri; Fleur Gooden, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

readily available. m. The information I received about the activity before it began helped me to participate successfully. n. This activity was well organized. o. This activity should be continued. p. My participation in this activity led me to a better understanding of engineering. q. My participation in this activity led me to a better understanding of my own career goals. r. My participation in this activity makes me more confident in my ability to succeed in engineering. Five-point scale ranging from “strongly

Conference Session

Introducing Programming in the First Year

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Virgilio Gonzalez, University of Texas, El Paso; Eric Freudenthal, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

(SIGCSE), ACM, 2005.3. Guzdial, Narrating Data Structures: The Role of Context in CS2, The Journal of Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), ACM, 2008.4. Eric Freudenthal, Mary K. Roy and Ann Q. Gates, Work in Progress – The Synergistic Integration of an Entering Students Program with an Engaging Introductory Course in Programming, Proc, Frontiers in Education, Fall, 2009..5. Eric Freudenthal, Mary K. Roy, Alexandria Ogrey, Tanja Magoc, and Alan Siegel, A Computational Introduction to Computer Science, Proc. Annual Symposium of the Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (ACM SIGCSE), 2010.6. Hestenes, Wells, and Swackhamer, Force Concept Inventory, The Physics Teacher, Vol. 30, March 1992

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joanne Kay Beckwith, University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for

Conference Session

FPD VII: Research on First-year Programs Part II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Doug Bullock, Boise State University; Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

? knowledge? Students Engr Prof Math ProfFigure 2. Frequency and effectiveness of collaborative work in a study group.(1 = none or not effective, and 4 = tremendously, all homework, or extremely effective)Finding #3: Perceived effectiveness of instructional methods (Q10-Q13) Page 25.267.13What do the students think about the instructor’s teaching strategies and characteristics?During the class, the engineering professor observed the math professor using severaleffective instructional methods – e.g., having a Q/A session in the beginning of eachclass, providing warm-ups exercises, showing a sense of humor, and having

Conference Session

FPD VII: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-Year Courses

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Plouff, Grand Valley State University; Deborah Morrow, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Virtual Instruction in the First Year II

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lakshmy Mohandas, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778.[11] L. Watts, “Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication in Distance Learning: A Review of the Literature,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ. Charlotte, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23-32,56, 2016.[12] M. M. M. Abdelmalak, “Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities: students’ perspectives,” Online Learn. J. OLJ, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87-, Mar. 2015.[13] “70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.” Accessed: Feb. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.[14] S. L. Walker and B. J. Fraser, “Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Doina Bein, California State University, Fullerton; Jidong Huang, California State University, Fullerton; Yu Bai, California State University, Fullerton; Sudarshan T. Kurwadkar, California State University, Fullerton; Paulina Reina, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

handling and coping skills. The informal gathering took place in fun places in campus, the bowling arena and pooltablezone, where food, drinks, and opportunity drawings were gifted to the students. The workshopsfor on-campus resources, time management and financial planning took place in differentmonths, at least one month appart, at different hours of the day, in the same large classroom withround tables, and consisted of oral presentations, roundtable discussions, printed brochuresoffered to the students, food, drinks and opprtunity drawings. The forum with faculty andindustry professionals took place in a medium sized classroom and consists of a panel discussionfollowed by Q&A. b) Undergraduate Research Experiences To increase the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter L.L. Walls, Dunwoody College of Technology; Jonathan Aurand P.E., Dunwoody College of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

offering incorporating this project, we will collect data on retention andpersistence of this first cohort in a longitudinal study. The baseline groups will be the cohortsfrom fall 2018 and fall 2019 when a different project focused on robotics was used.References[1] Abrams, L., & Altschuld, J. W., & Lilly, B. W., & Mendelsohn, D. A. (2012, June),Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: A Course in Progress Paper presented at 2012 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—21609.[2] Dolan, C. (2005, June), Introduction To Engineering At The University Of Wyoming Paperpresented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—15220.[3] Halyo, N. & Le, Q. (2012, October), “Results of Using

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Using Video, Games, and More in the First Year

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Kathleen A. Ossman, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Education, pp. 267-274, July 2002.4. R. Talbert, “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. K. M. Kecskemety, B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. M. Stickel, S. Hari, Q. Liu, “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self-Efficacy,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014). Page 26.1698.127. N. K. Lape, R.L. Levy, D. H. Yong, K. A. Haushalter, R. Eddy, N

Conference Session

FPD9 - First Year Learning & Assessment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Johnson, Valparaiso University; Doug Tougaw, Valparaiso University; Kenneth Leitch, Valparaiso University; Barbara Engerer, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

equations that they could use to solve theproblems but were not told which equations to use and how to apply them.The first question involved applying the continuity equation to a water flow problem through apipe (Learning Objective #3). The actual exam question given was: Water flows from left to right in the pipe below. The velocity in the 1 m section of pipe is 1.4 m/s. Find the velocity in the 2 m section of pipe. Q 1 m diameter pipe 2 m diameter pipeThe students were asked to show all of their work as they completed the problem. The problemwas graded on an eight-point scale and the students could receive partial credit. After thestudents’ exams

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Wednesday Potpourri

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabel Cristina Jimenez-Useche, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Stephen R. Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. J. Couns. Psychol. 2012, 59 (3), 424.(9) Jimenez-useche, I.; Hoffmann, S. R.; Ohland, M. W. In 7th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference; Roanoke, VA, 2015; pp 1–6.(10) Layton, R. A.; Loughry, M. L.; Ohland, M. W.; Ricco, G. D. Adv. Eng. Educ. 2010, 2 (1), 1.(11) Ohland, M. W.; Loughry, M. L.; Woehr, D. J.; Bullard, L. G.; Finelli, C. J.; Layton, R. A.; Pomeranz, H. R.; Schmucker, D. G. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2012, 11 (4), 609.(12) Oberg, K. Pract. Anthropol. 1960, July-Augus, 177.(13) Liu, O. L. ETS Research Report Series 14-15. 2014, 14 (15), 1.(14) Ockey, G. J.; Koyama, D.; Setoguchi, E.; Sun, A. Lang. Test. 2014, 32 (1), 39.(15) Brooks, L.; Swain, M. Lang. Assess. Q. 2014, 11 (4

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 468–487, 2019.[15] R. R. Fowler and M. P. Su, “Gendered Risks of Team-Based Learning: A Model of Inequitable Task Allocation in Project-Based Learning,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 312–318, 2018.[16] L. Q. Prendergast, “Retention, success, and satisfaction of engineering students based on the first-year experience.” Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick, 2013.[17] L. A. Meadows and D. Sekaquaptewa, “The effect of skewed gender composition on student participation in undergraduate engineering project teams,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[18] S. Ingram and A. Parker, “Gender and modes of collaboration in an engineering classroom: A

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering in the First-Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; David Jacob Taylor, Arizona State University; Ian Derk

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Multidisciplinary Engineering

the data, e.g., when only one or two out offour members completed the assessment, and incorporating qualitative research methods such asfocus groups, interviews, and observations for a more thorough analysis.References[1] National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering inthe New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[2] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 - 2019," ABET, 2018.[Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/. [Accessed 30 Jan 2019].[3] Bodnar, L. J., & Lagoudas, M. Z., & Hodge, J. Q., & Smith, T. A., & Orozco, J. A., & Corso,J. G., & Sanchez, C

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joan V. Dannenhoffer P.E., Syracuse University; Sinead Mac Namara, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

slim majority (54%) of studentsreported that their sketches got better over the course of the semester. Very encouragingly, 95%of students reported that it will be important for them as they go through their engineeringeducation to take advantage of any opportunity to improve their representation skills. Figure 12 Post-Survey Q 4- 7: Do you agree/disagree with the following statements Q4 - After this semester I have an INCREASED appreciation for the value of sketching, drawing, making diagrams etc in helping me… Q5 - After this semester I have an INCREASED appreciation for the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Mathematics in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; Ma Zenia N. Agustin, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; George Pelekanos, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Mathematics

satisfaction with your assigned mentor 6 14 46 21 Your overall satisfaction with all aspects of the mentoring 9 13 48 17 program.The peer-mentoring program also included periodic visits by the engineers from localcompanies. Several students attended the organized events and interacted with the engineers toform a better idea about the engineering profession. Many of the engineers shared theireducational experiences, gave insightful advice and tips on time management and priorities. Thecasual interaction with the visiting engineers after the Q&A sessions typically received highmarks from the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4A: Retention Programs and Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Bracey, Temple University; Keyanoush Sadeghipour, Temple University; Carnell Baugh, Independent; Shawn Fagan, Temple University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

strategies for retaining engineering, engineering andtechnology and computer science students. Retrieved from ASEE websitehttps://www.asee.org/search?q=going+the+distanceDuckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passionfor long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.Duckworth, A.L., & Seligman, M. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting academic performance inadolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944.Hughes, B., Garibay, J. C., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, M. K. (2013). Examining the tracks that causederailment: institutional contexts and engineering degree attainments. AERALent, R W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying

Conference Session

First Year Programs Division Poster Session: The Best Place to Really Talk about First-Year Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

predictive mathematical models,” Computers & Education, 61, 2013, pp. 133- 143.[5] R. White, “Predicting likely student performance in a first year Science, Technology, Society course,” International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 12(1), 2012, pp. 72 - 84.[6] L. Lackey, W. Lackey, H. Grady, and M. Davis, “Efficacy of using a single, non-technical variable to predict the academic success of freshmen engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 2003, pp. 41-48.[7] Q. Jin, P.K. Imbrie, J. Lin, X. and Chen, “A multi-outcome hybrid model for predicting student success in engineering,” 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada.[8] A. Olani

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Cian, Clemson University; Michelle Cook, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 29.9. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361.10. Doolen, T., & Long, M. (2007). Identification of retention levers using a survey of engineering freshman attitudes at oregon state university. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 721-734. doi:10.1080/0304379070152078411. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.12. Strobel, J., & Pan, R