at the University of North Texas (UNT). Our mandatory freshman coursesequence, Mechanical and Energy Engineering Practice, includes exposure to practicing engineersas a significant component of the first-year experience by highlighting activities and responsibilitiesthat engineers encounter after college as they join the profession. Classes are team-taught by theMEE faculty in concert with practicing engineers from local industries. Faculty share their careersas research engineers, whereas practicing engineers expose students to industry work. Through datacollected from students enrolled in this course sequence, we test the hypothesis that educating newengineering students about the responsibilities, activities, and projects they may
from University of Illinois, Urbana. Her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering from University of California at Berkeley in 1992 and 1994. Following graduate school, Amy worked for Hewlett Packard in San Jose, CA and in Colorado Springs, CO. Amy’s research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices.Pat Pyke, Boise State University Patricia Pyke is Director of Special Programs for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman curriculum development, retention, math support, mentoring, and women’s programs. She earned a B.S.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from
Paper ID #19771First-Year Engineering Students’ Perceptions of their Abilities to SucceedDr. Tanya Dugat Wickliff, Texas A&M University Delivering significant results in pivotal roles such as Sr. Consultant to high-profile clients, Sr. Project Manager directing teams, and Executive Leader of initiatives and programs that boost organizational effectiveness and optimize operations have been hallmarks of Dr. Wickliff’s career spanning more than 24 years with leaders in the oil & gas and semiconductor industries. As an expert in the areas of Executive Leadership and Team Development, Strategy Design & Execution
and ASME Best Paper in Materials of 2010 at SPIE Smart Materials/NDE 2011 conference. He is a member of ASME, SPIE, SAMPE and AIAA.Dr. Norman Love, University of Texas, El Paso Norman D. Love, Ph.D.is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Love earned a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas El Paso and completed his Ph.D. at the University of Oklahoma in the same field. Dr. Love’s research interests lie in the areas of propulsion, energy, and engineering education. He has developed flipped classroom modules and also implements project based learning activities in his class activities. c American Society for
Paper ID #28923A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding the Development of DesignSkills, Knowledge, and Self-EfficacyDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological Engineer- ing Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revo- lutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Boot Camp: An Intense, Transformative Program for Incoming FreshmenAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice describes a new summer boot camp program withobjectives to prepare students for the rigors of university courses and increase student retention.This boot camp is a subset of a university wide program specifically for students entering theCollege of Engineering. It is not a remedial course and all incoming freshmen engineeringstudents are encouraged to apply. This is an intense week-long course requiring students toattend lectures, complete homework assignments and projects, take exams, and partake in skillssessions meant to help students adjust to university life and
Paper ID #23514Reported Changes in Students’ Perceptions of Their Abilities to Succeed onthe ABET Student Outcomes During the First-year Engineering ProgramDr. Tanya Dugat Wickliff, Texas A&M University Delivering significant results in pivotal roles such as Sr. Consultant to high-profile clients, Sr. Project Manager directing teams, and Executive Leader of initiatives and programs that boost organizational effectiveness and optimize operations have been hallmarks of Dr. Wickliff’s career spanning more than 24 years with leaders in the oil & gas and semiconductor industries. As an expert in the areas of
room for this discernment module,other content of the course had to be adjusted accordingly. This was accomplished by reducing the lengthof the two group projects delivered during the semester and adjusting the project content to removematerial that was not necessary for success in future engineering courses (as determined by student andfaculty feedback).First, all students were required to attend “Department Days” where 5 consecutive class sessions wereused to introduce each of the 5 departments to all students (Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences,Computer Science and Engineering, Electrical Engineering). This includes a description of the
University Maria Perez-Colon is a program advisor in the Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering at Rowan Univer- sity, NJ. She received her M.A. degree in Higher Education Administration from Rowan University, and B.A. in English from Rutgers University. Her master thesis focused on the effects of Engineers Without Borders service projects on the global-mindedness of student participants. Page 26.693.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Evaluation of a Dual First-year Student Advising ProgramIntroductionDramatic enrollment growth has prompted the College of
, but are very difficult to quantify.1. Introduction Page 26.1221.2The Partnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science(PRIMES) is a University of Louisville cross-college collaboration aimed at reducing attritionamong our STEM majors. This project unites faculty from the College of Arts & Sciences, theJ.B. Speed School of Engineering, and the College of Education and Human Development intackling identified hurdles that contribute to poor retention (and thus low graduation rates) in ourrespective undergraduate STEM programs. PRIMES’ goals are quite simple: 1. Increase by 25% the number of Bachelor’s degrees
Paper ID #30464Results of an Intro to Mechanics Course Designed to Support StudentSuccess in Physics I and Foundational Engineering CoursesProf. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of engineering education projects. He is currently the Director of the First-Year Experience program at ECST (FYrE@ECST) and coordinates engineering education activities
engineering, if such courses even exist. At the same time,universities are often interested in providing their students with diverse learning opportunitiessuch as service learning, both domestically and internationally. However, students often lack theproper experience or training to deal with complex ethical, cultural, or societal situations thatwill likely be encountered or the resources to properly participate while carrying out service-learning projects [1].Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the impact of various pedagogical andcurricular approaches on the transfer of knowledge in ethics and social justice in STEMdisciplines, often with disappointing results [2]–[5]. However, it may be that we are notmeasuring concepts of ethics
courses. Several schools have adopted project-based or laboratory-basedapproaches to incorporate active learning. For example, the University of Florida converted theirlecture-based Introduction to Engineering course into a series of labs focusing on the variousdisciplines. They found that the active learning approach was preferable and saw significant increases inretention6. Other schools have taken similar approaches by having students participate in bothdiscipline-specific and multidisciplinary projects7,8,9. At North Carolina State University, student teamswere asked to conduct research about a particular discipline and give short (5-10 minute) presentationsto the rest of the class10. Additionally, students were required to attend at least
. Page 15.1143.2So can we attribute part of the success to the “smarter” students we are selecting? To our talentsas faculty? To the support programs? Considering that it is likely a combination of all of theelements listed above –and some others that are less apparent– this new research takes anothertack. The hypothesis, stemming from psychological research, is that success is better predictedby grit than measures of academic skill. The operational definition of grit involves the ability –or propensity– to overcome obstacles, topersist through setbacks, maintain commitment, and to stick to projects and goals over longperiods, even if interest wanes or the going becomes difficult. It is reportedly possible to quantifysome aspects of this
relationship with retention and satisfaction rates.Many students enter the program with little knowledge on some of the engineering disciplinesoffered at Quinnipiac University. Some are cognizant of their unawareness. Throughout thesemester, the students go through several lessons on each of the four disciplines as well as ahands-on project. By the end of the course, the strong majority of the students are aware of thenature of each of the four engineering careers.Due to the small size in the current data set, we are not able to draw any other statisticallysignificant conclusions. However, our analysis does provide support for some of our hypothesis.One such example is the course further strengthening the students’ interest in the major of theirchoice
and is currently coordinating the Engineering Graduate Attribute Development Project, working with National Council of Deans of Engineering and Applied Science and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, to develop national guidelines and resources for outcomes assessment in engineering education. Page 23.1364.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Web-based audience response system for quality feedback in first year engineeringAbstractThe paper will describe the pilot of a commercial web-based audience response system toenhance
their non-ELC peers.BackgroundPrior research has suggested several potential contributing factors to lower rates of academicsuccess and retention within undergraduate engineering. These include lack of support andrecognition [2], inadequate advising [3], and feelings of disconnection to peers and faculty [4]–[6]. In addition to these factors linked with negative student outcomes, research has alsoidentified a host of best practices linked to positive student outcomes. Called high-impactpractices, these include learning communities, first-year seminars, writing-intensive courses,problem-based learning, collaborative assignments, and research and service opportunities [7].Specific to engineering, the use of hands-on collaborative design projects
-brick assembly Students assemble building bricks from front, top, and side-view images. 4 Building-brick sketches Students create 3-view sketches of building brick structures, and assemble building blocks based off a classmate’s sketches. 5 Worksheet Students complete a worksheet containing orthographic projection exercises. 6 Post-intervention measurements Students complete the last 12 questions of the Vandenberg MRT and create 3-view sketches of pipefittings.Table 1 outlines our six-day intervention to improve the mental
“worth it” overall but not freshmen seminar class. Page 11.1404.8 Content analysis ‚ worked with peers in study groups and projects; from reflective ‚ made friends; reports ‚ perceived Teniwe as helping them make the transition to college primarily through friends and ready-made study groups; 5 ‚ majority of students in dualistic phase as categorized by Perry
important factor in persistence to degree completion. For example, somestudies report that the diversity gap in STEM participation may be attributed more to perceptionsand beliefs than to academic preparation or achievement levels [1-5]. To the extent that suchperceptions and beliefs form an inaccurate (or “negative”) vision of a future engineering career,curricular approaches that aim to form a more “positive” vision may be warranted. Theseapproaches can be pedagogical, such as collaborative and project-based learning [6-8], content-based by aiming (for example) to expose the positive contributions of engineering to society [9-12], or both. All other things being equal, curricular features than can foster among students amore positive
primarily focused on introduction to and practice with fundamental engineering skills. Thesecond component, Engineering Methods, Tools, and Practice II (ENGR 111), was essentiallybuilt from “scratch” and is primarily focused on application and integration of the fundamentalskills learned in ENGR 110. Fundamental skills that has been integrated within this course include3D printing, basic research fundamentals, circuitry, communication, critical thinking, design,engineering ethics, hand tool usage, problem solving, programming, project management,teamwork, and technical writing.ENGR 111 culminates in team-based Cornerstone projects that all students demonstrate andpresent at the end of the semester. Throughout the semester up to Cornerstone
engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of
Paper ID #21854A Strategic Plan to Improve Engineering Student Success: Development, Im-plementation, and OutcomesDr. Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University Jerome P. Lavelle is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering economic analysis, decision analysis, project management, leadership, engineering management and engineering education.Dr. Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University Matthew Stimpson is the Director of Assessment in the Office of Undergraduate Academic Affairs at NC
Paper ID #13134Retention of First-Year Undergraduate Engineering Students: Role of Psy-chosocial Interventions Targeting First-Generation College StudentsMs. Jennifer Maritza Paz, The University of Texas at Austin, Cockrell School of Engineering Jennifer Paz is a graduate student of the Department of Educational Psychology at The University of Texas at Austin. She received her Bachelor’s Degree in Psychology from Texas State University in 2011. She is currently working with Dr. Mia Markey in the Biomedical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin in a project aimed at improving retention rates of first
. During the programstudents learn about the STEM field, participate in leadership development, and connect withpeers and faculty. USC’s program is a 4 week program for engineering students (by participatingin the program students can actually earn college credits). During the program studentsparticipate in lectures, fieldtrips, and projects, and learn about the field of engineering as awhole.Though most of the summer bridge programs that were researched are significantly shorter, anddon’t require students to complete college-level courses, much of the co-curricular programming,such as workshops, team building activities, and field trips, proved to be useful in designing theUniversity of Portland summer bridge program.In addition to existing best
University Jennifer Francis is a graduate student at West Virginia University in the College of Education and Hu- man Services in the Education Research and Evaluation master’s program. Her research interests include mathematics education, project/problem based learning, and evaluations of a variety of educational pro- grams. Page 26.418.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Creating Inclusive Environments in First-Year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retention and LearningIntroductionA new NSF-funded experimental study seeks to incorporate
curriculawhile the AEV sections were the traditional sections. Quantitative data included pre- and post-collection of Kashdans’ Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale, which measures students’ curiosity inthe following areas: joyous exploration, deprivation sensitivity, stress tolerance, social curiosity,and thrill seeking [4]. Assessment of EML skillset related to creating value and creatingconnections, defined as the ability to integrate information from many sources to gain insight,were measured using students’ grades for project assignments. Technical learning was assessedusing four common engineering graphics exams and one lab proficiency quiz.ResultsWith IRB approval, we conducted the consent process with 1,072 students in 16 sections (8 AEVand 8 ITS
overall critical thinkingprogram, how this relates to ABET outcomes, and the critical thinking goals of the Introductionto Engineering course. Section three describes the critical thinking instructional component ofthe Introduction to Engineering course, including changes made based on analysis of previousyears implementation. Some conclusions and future directions for the ENGR 100 course arediscussed in Section four.2. A critical thinking agenda for the School of Engineering.The i2a initiative is a broad and comprehensive multi-year plan to improve the overall criticalthinking abilities of students that spans general education courses, discipline specific courses,capstone projects, and community engagement1. Dr. Joe Hagerty, of the Civil
process, with a one-semester design project 5. Introduction to engineering problem solving with an introduction to principles from circuits, statics, and thermodynamics (Eide et.al. 4) 6. Introduction to engineering thinking and engineering skills (Stephan et. al.-Thinking Like an Engineer 5 )Our goal became to combine the best of each approach while focusing throughout the course onthe question, “What do engineers actually do?” Previous studies by Trevelyan and others haveserved to define what an engineer does in the course of executing their professional duties6. Acomposite list of tasks that engineers tackle became central to the goal of introducing as many“real engineering tasks” as possible into the course. These tasks were
Officer and the Construction Officer. In this latter capacity, she was the Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) as well as Civil Engineering Project Manager for the Academy’s $5.2 million dollar construction program. In 2003, she was selected for graduate school and attended the University of Texas, Austin where she earned a M.S.C.E with an emphasis on Construction Engineering and Project Management. In December 2004, she joined the USCGA faculty as an Instructor. During her time at the Academy, she has been the advisor for both the American Society of Civil Engineering and Society of American Military Engineers student chapters, a member of the SUPT Gender Policy Group, and worked with CGA Admissions