Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 340 in total
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 16: That Important Decision - Which Engineering Major?
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University; James Warnock, Mississippi State University; Amy Barton, Mississippi State University; Rani Warsi Sullivan, Mississippi State University; Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University; Jane Nicholson Moorhead, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
credible Internet sources and the library’s research databases. Strategies forwriting accurate, vivid technical descriptions were presented using a collaborative in-classactivity in which each group examined the validity of a news story (i.e., Is it real or sciencefiction?). The article examination required groups to research the story and describe the sciencebehind it. In Week 3, the writing module focused on avoiding academic dishonesty and includedtime for peer-review of students’ major paper assignment via draft swapping.Engineering Discipline Panel Sessions: The Associate Dean for Academic Affairs coordinatedthe panel sessions. While the engineering modules were general in nature and did not discuss aparticular engineering field per se, they
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Unique Projects & Pedagogies
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Paul R. Hottinger, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
studies and professional practice, little has been done tointegrate IL to engineering curriculum.Research Questions:Does intentional information literacy instruction impact the quality of research produced by first-year students? Does the type of intervention make a difference?To operationalize these questions, the level of synthesis, quality of citations, as well as thewriting conventions were examined. The writing convention would be the primary level of IL inthe instruction. Can students use proper formatting and write a foundational piece of research.The quality and quantity of the citations, as well as their level of relation to the topic shows adeeper level of understanding and implementation of the IL instruction. The synthesis level ofthe
Conference Session
FPD2 -- Highlighting First-Year Programs
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph Schimmels, Marquette University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
of eachcourse is reflected in their respective titles. The first course in the sequence is titled,“Engineering: The Art of Creating Change”. The title of the second is: “Engineering Projects:The Practice of the Art”.Both courses use assigned reading followed by reflection, writing, and discussion related to adebatable question (or questions) posed by the instructor. Section size is limited to 25 students.A relatively senior member of the regular faculty and one teaching assistant facilitate classdiscussion using Socratic questioning.Both courses also use design projects as vehicles in developing student understanding of keyconcepts. In the first, the course requirements manage student-team project activities; in thesecond, the student-teams
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: It's All About Teams and Teamwork
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jess W. Everett, Rowan University; Jenahvive K. Morgan, Rowan University; Kaitlin Engle Mallouk, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
teamingabilities at the end of the semester, students writing more varied sections of laboratory reports,and more students taking on a leadership role at least once during the semester compared to theTreatment B framework. The Treatment A framework produced no reduction in free riders orincrease in laboratory report quality, as observed or evaluated by students. While the submissionof two draft reports does not appear to have significantly reduced free riding, in combinationwith online peer evaluation it may reduce team conflict.Some of the differences observed between the three Treatment A sections and all thirteenTreatment B sections disappeared when only comparing Professors Morgan and Mallouk’s Aand B-1 sections. This indicates that some of the
Conference Session
FPD V: Increasing Engagement and Motivation of First-year Students
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carrie Robinson, Arizona State University; James Collofello, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
boosts morale and increases community among theUGTAs. Additionally, distinctive polo shirts help to give authority to UGTAs in the classroom,while advertising the program to their peers. The recognition event at the end of each semesterserves as an opportunity for engineering administrators to recognize the efforts of our facultymembers who engage in active and collaborative teaching methods, express appreciation for thededication of the UGTAs throughout the semester, and enables faculty and students to interactoutside of the classroom.Program evaluationData were collected by surveying students enrolled in classes with UGTAs, surveying facultyteaching courses with UGTAs, asking UGTAs to write a reflection paper of their experiences,and examining
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Self Efficacy
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brenda Read-Daily, Elizabethtown College; Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College; Stacey L. Zimmerman, Elizabethtown College
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
EngineerThroughout the Introduction to Engineering I course, students explore the field of engineeringand consider their reasons for pursuing an engineering major. The One-Minute Engineer is athree-part assignment where students first write a 300-400 word essay about why they arestudying engineer, conduct a peer-edit to reduce the word count to approximately 150 words, andfinally, present their One-Minute Engineer orally in front of their classmates. This assignmenthelps students articulate why they want to be an engineer while honing their technical writingand presentation skills. In their written drafts and presentations, students were required to reflecton at least one of their top-five Strengths.Results and DiscussionTeam formationIn general, the four
Conference Session
FPD VIII: Crossing Bridges and Easing Transitions into the First Year
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Danny King, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Laura Masterson, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
numerous benefits received from enrollment in a LC. Most notably,they report the following 5: 1. Making connections with other students, peer mentors, faculty, and advisors, 2. Academic advising (e.g., knowledgeable, available when needed assistance), 3. Experiencing environment that promotes and respects diversity, 4. Becoming familiar with campus and academic support resources, 5. Deciding on a major or future career, 6. Adjusting to college. The Summer Bridge (SB) program is a specific type of LC intended to bridge the gapbetween high school and college. The intensive 2 week SB program, developed as an additionalsupport for incoming, first year students, provides a high-impact, high-touch experience tostudents in a major
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicholas Andres Brake, Lamar University; James C. Curry
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
were assigned based on the total group and individual performance(assessed using peer evaluations). The topics covered in the course are summarized as follows:  Introduction to Civil Engineering  A Guide to Student Success in Engineering  Introduction to Microsoft Excel: Plotting, computations, optimization with solver  Introduction to Technical Writing: Investigative report and technical posters o Discussed formatting and content requirements of written investigative technical reports; provided sample reports and sample technical posters  Impact Force Attenuation: Wall barrier optimization o Assembled track and connected force sensors recorded impact
Conference Session
Potpourri
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Summer Dann Johnson, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; John Scalzo, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Sarah Jones, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Kelly Rusch, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Warren Waggenspack, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, Yr 1 45 Participants 80/20% male: female 5 Peer Mentors 22% minority E2 Camp, Yr 2 84 Participants 82/18% male: female 18 Peer Mentors 6% minority ENGR 1050, Yr 1 56/ 3 sections 69/31% male: female 33% minority ENGR 1050, Yr 2 74 74/26% male: female 28% minority ERC, Yr 1 110
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Paying Attention to Retention
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary E. Goodwin, University of South Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
’ development, achievement, and persistence through encouraging the integration of social and academic lives within a college or university and its programs, and through quality interaction with peers, faculty members, and the campus environment5. (pp. 49–50)Learning communities help students to make friends right away so that they can then settle inand focus on academics. Johnson et al8, wrote about how using cooperative learning in learningteam environments helps to reduce anxiety, helps to increase motivation, and promotesemotional bonding. In the learning teams, the first year seminar course, and the academicstrategies course students are asked to reflect and write about their experiences. Research asshown the importance of
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: First-Year Experiences
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Miriam Howland Cummings, University of Colorado Denver; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Gregory Edward Simon, University of Colorado Denver; William Taylor Schupbach, University of Colorado Denver; Michael S. Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman, University of Colorado Denver; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
their non-ELC peers.BackgroundPrior research has suggested several potential contributing factors to lower rates of academicsuccess and retention within undergraduate engineering. These include lack of support andrecognition [2], inadequate advising [3], and feelings of disconnection to peers and faculty [4]–[6]. In addition to these factors linked with negative student outcomes, research has alsoidentified a host of best practices linked to positive student outcomes. Called high-impactpractices, these include learning communities, first-year seminars, writing-intensive courses,problem-based learning, collaborative assignments, and research and service opportunities [7].Specific to engineering, the use of hands-on collaborative design projects
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ma Zenia N. Agustin, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville; Marcus Agustin, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville; George Pelekanos, Southern Illinois University; Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
student’s decision toremain an engineering major or even to stay at a university. It is therefore imperative to providestudents with a strong foundation in the first semester Calculus I and to provide the necessarysupport in order for them to be successful.Active learning, engagement in the classroom, and peer-to-peer collaboration have deliveredpromising results in freshman level STEM courses.4-7 For math courses, two of the mostcommonly used approaches are supplemental instruction (SI) and peer-led team learning (PLTL).The SI approach, developed at University of Missouri-Kansas City, focuses on at-risk coursesand consists of voluntary sessions led by undergraduate students. At-risk courses are gatewaycourses which historically have failure or
Conference Session
Research on the First Year I
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Cassady, University of Arkansas; Gigi Secuban, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
communicating their solutions to engineering problems, ≠ meaningful experience on diverse teams in applying the engineering design process and Page 15.178.2 communicating their designs, ≠ the essential and motivating information about the engineering disciplines so that they make an informed choice about their engineering major, are capable of functioning on multi-disciplinary engineering teams, and appreciate the role of engineering in modern society, and ≠ proactive and high-quality academic advising, professional development opportunities, peer mentoring, and peer tutoring,and we strive to produce a large
Conference Session
Bridge Programs Connecting to First-Year Engineering
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rezvan Nazempour; Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois, Chicago; Peter C. Nelson, University of Illinois, Chicago; Renata A. Revelo, University of Illinois, Chicago; Yeow Siow, University of Illinois, Chicago; Jeremiah Abiade
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs, Pre-College Engineering Education
Standards and Technology.Dr. Peter C. Nelson, University of Illinois, Chicago Peter Nelson was appointed Dean of the University of Illinois at Chicago’s (UIC) College of Engineer- ing in July of 2008. Prior to assuming his deanship, Professor Nelson was head of the UIC Depart- ment of Computer Science. In 1991, Professor Nelson founded UIC’s Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, which specializes in applied intelligence systems projects in fields such as transportation, manufacturing, bioinformatics and e-mail spam countermeasures. Professor Nelson has published over 80 scientific peer reviewed papers and has been the principal investigator on over $30 million in research grants and con- tracts on issues of
Conference Session
FPD IV: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-year Courses
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robin A.M. Hensel Ed.D., West Virginia University; Ordel Brown Ph.D., West Virginia University; Mary L. Strife, West Virginia University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
three 50 minutes classes that included in-class activitiesand incorporated online exercises into the regular assignments associated with the students’projects.In each section, the engineering faculty taught the general technical report writing content,including parts and content of technical reports.The timing of the information literacy sessions within the course structure was critical. Forinstance, the sessions on navigating the internet to find peer reviewed articles, utilizing theSTEM databases and other library resources, citing references and avoiding plagiarism wereconducted before the first technical report was due. The three information sessions were: Week 2: Introduction to Information. This session covered how to determine if the
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski, Fairfield University; Ryan Munden, Fairfield University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, and were required to demonstrate proper technical citation using the IEEE citation style. For most students, this was their first experience with technical writing. They quickly realized that it was different from the writing they had done before in high school English, history, and other non-technical courses. Furthermore, they went through a writing revision process in which their paper went through three iterations of review: self, peer, and instructor review. All reviews were done prior to the final grading of the paper [7]. • Individual Oral Presentation: The second project, early in the semester, was an individual oral presentation (IOP) of the ITW paper. This project’s objective was to
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 3: Diversity and Multicultural Influences in the First Year
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Maritza Paz, The University of Texas at Austin, Cockrell School of Engineering; Margo Cousins, University of Texas, Austin; Cindy D. Wilson, University of Texas, Austin; Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
activities of the module include the Values Affirmation Intervention as a writingexercise, and the Difference-Education Intervention in the form of a student panel.The Values Affirmation Intervention (VAI) was first pioneered by Cohen, et al. in 2006 tonarrow the academic achievement gap between racial and ethnic minority middle school students(Blacks and Hispanics) and their white peers. This writing activity has been proven to promoteself-integrity and self-worth, which can help with better performance on challenging tasks19. TheVAI contains a broad list of values not directly related to academic performance that have beenvalidated by past research20. To complete the activity, students are instructed to circle two orthree values from a list that
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 2: Identity and Sense of Belonging
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Damji Heo Stratton, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dayoung Kim, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
active team member. We used CourseMIRROR mobilelearning system to collect students’ reflections during an academic semester. We also evaluatedeach student reflection based on its quality. The reflection quality here refers to specificity orvagueness of reflections. Based on our prior research on the significance of the reflection qualityon student learning [1], we developed a coding schema to specify the degree of reflection’squality. We further used the Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness(CATME) for peer and self-evaluation on five dimensions. Initial findings reveal statisticallysignificant relations between five aspects of CATME and reflection’s quality. We also conductedlinear regression analyses to explore how these five
Conference Session
Learning as a Community
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janet Meyer, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis; Patrick Gee, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis; Laura Masterson, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
received from enrollment in a LC. Most notably, they reportthe following7: 1. Making connections with other students, peer mentors, faculty, and advisors. 2. Academic advising (e.g., knowledgeable, available when needed assistance). 3. Experiencing environment that promotes and respects diversity. 4. Becoming familiar with campus and academic support resources. 5. Deciding on a major or future career. 6. Adjusting to college.As part of “making connections,” LCs also provide a chance for students to create a network atIUPUI since LCs consist of an instructional team of a faculty member, academic advisor,librarian, and peer mentor. Tinto illuminates the importance of student engagement andnetworking on campus, “The frequency and
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Best Papers
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew H. Phillips, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
empowermentwhile instructing in the classroom.IntroductionThis paper will discuss adjustments to the training of teaching assistants and how empowermenttheory was used to analyze the results of the training changes. Teaching assistants (TAs) arecommonly used in first-year engineering classes to provide instruction, grade student work,provide peer mentoring, and assist in course content delivery and development. In this large first-year program specifically, TAs are relied on heavily due to the high number of students. TheOhio State University has a teaching model that includes Faculty members, Graduate TeachingAssociates (GTAs), and Undergraduate Teaching Assistants (UTAs) in its first-year engineeringprogram. These GTAs and UTAs perform a wide range of
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: The Transition from High School to College
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie M. Hasenwinkel, Syracuse University; Kathryn R Pynn, Syracuse University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
curriculum.2-5 Ingeneral, women and underrepresented minority students are less likely to persist in engineering.6Reports also indicate that the persistence of women and underrepresented minority students inengineering may be adversely affected to a greater degree by their experiences within theengineering climate than their majority male counterparts. Here “climate” indicates perceptions ofstudent belonging and interpersonal interactions between student peers, students and faculty (bothin and out of the classroom), and individual compatibility with pedagogical styles in theirclasses.2,7 An undesirable climate also has the greatest impact on student retention in the first yearsof engineering study.8 Most students who leave engineering do so within
Conference Session
FPD 2: Building Community
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Betsy F. Willis, Southern Methodist University; David A. Willis, Southern Methodist University; Mark Fontenot, Southern Methodist University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
numerous interventions and programs is reported in the literature onengineering education and higher education more generally. Outside-the-classroom interactionswith faculty members, meaningful interactions with peers, and on-campus living-learningcommunity involvement have been shown to positively affect student persistence in college.2Astin indicates that student-faculty interaction has a positive correlation with a large number ofareas related to personal growth, intellectual growth, and behavioral outcomes includingintellectual self-esteem, leadership, and an orientation towards helping other students ortutoring.3 Vogt studied the effects of approachability and accessibility of faculty on students inthe areas related to academic self-efficacy
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Focusing on Student Success
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nisha Abraham, University of Texas, Austin; Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
respectively. Her teaching interests are in the area of circuits and devices, computing, and logic design. Dr. Telang works closely with success programs for freshman engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Effectiveness of the Supplemental Instruction Program in First Year Engineering Courses - A Longitudinal Report (2015-2018)AbstractThis Complete Research Paper examines the effectiveness of the Supplemental Instruction (SI)program implemented at our university in first year engineering courses from its inception in thefall semester of 2015 through the fall semester of 2018. The program offers two sessions perweek outside of the course that incorporates peer and
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Student Perceptions and Perspectives
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
George James Lamont, University of Waterloo; Stephanie Mutch, University of Waterloo; Chimdindu Ohaegbu, University of Waterloo ; Hamza Z. Butt, University of Waterloo; Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo; Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Paper ID #33359Examining In-Person and Asynchronous Information-Seeking BehaviorInstruction Among First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. George James Lamont, University of Waterloo George Lamont is a member of the Department of English Language and Literature at the University of Waterloo. George is one of many instructors who teach first-year communications courses to engineers and sciences, in addition to courses in writing and rhetoric.Ms. Stephanie Mutch, University of Waterloo Stephanie Mutch works in Information Services and Resources at the University of Waterloo Library. Stephanie holds an MA in Criminology and
Conference Session
FPD III: Innovation in Design in the First Year
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ann Saterbak, Rice University; Mark Embree, Rice University; Maria Oden, Rice University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
evaluate solutions. Student teams prototype and testtheir solutions in the OEDK, a multidisciplinary design workshop at Rice University. Recentprojects have included modifying a wheelchair for a boy with arthrogryposis, building a medicalexamination bed for a clinic in Nicaragua, modifying a surrey bicycle for the facilities staff oncampus, and developing an elbow mannequin for physicians to practice reduction for pediatricpatients with nursemaid’s elbow. Written and oral communications are strongly emphasized inthis course. Student teams write weekly technical memos and give two oral presentations ontheir progress. Apprentice Leaders support freshman students in developing teamwork skills,providing feedback on written or oral reports, and
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Experiential Learning
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville; Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; Jaqi C. McNeil, University of Louisville
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
engineering curriculum, it was expected thatmany of the students had never written a technical (engineering) report. Thus, some instructionin technical writing was provided, and students were given the opportunity to receive formativefeedback on their reports through peer assessment. Student teams swapped project reports andevaluated the reports (as a team) using an instructor-provided rubric based on the PE framework(Figure 2). In particular, this rubric asked students to evaluate whether the authors’ purpose, keyquestions, concepts, assumptions, and conclusions were clearly stated, accurate, and sufficientlyexplained. In addition to identifying whether the report met described criteria (exemplary,satisfactory, or needs improvement) for each element
Conference Session
FPD 10: Teamwork
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura K Alford, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
particulartasks and avoid others (e.g., CAD modeling, report writing), an issue when course outcomes areassessed at the team-level but skills are developed at the individual level.Though students perceive participation on diverse teams as “real world” and thereforebeneficial,9 their behaviors and experiences on diverse teams can be more problematic.10,11 Forexample, students of different genders tend to take different roles on teams, with females morelikely to complete project planning and communication work and males more likely to dotechnical planning and hands-on building.10 It is unclear in the research whether students chooseto take on gender-specific tasks or are pushed by teammates into those roles.Team discussions tend to privilege some students
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation #2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
the Dissertation Institute, a one-week workshop each summer funded by NSF, to help underrepresented students develop the skills and writing habits to complete doctorate degrees in engineering. Across all of her research avenues, Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 12 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award with her share of funding be ingnearly $2.3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 21 journal publications and more than 70 conference papers. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty, an Outstanding Teacher Award and a Faculty Fellow Award. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University, an M.S. in Materials Science
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Laurel Whisler, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
MyEngineeringLab system.Laurel Whisler, Clemson University Laurel Whisler is Assistant Director and Coordinator of Course Support Programs in Clemson Univer- sity’s Westmoreland Academic Success Program. In this capacity, she provides vision and direction for the Tutoring and Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) programs and provides support to the General Engi- neering Learning Community. She is also co-developer of Entangled Learning, a model of rigorously- documented, self-directed learning in communities of practice. She has an M.A. in Music from The Pennsylvania State University and an M.L.S. from Indiana University.Ms. Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University Abigail Stephan is a doctoral student in the Learning Sciences program at
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Paying Attention to Retention
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth A. Adams, Chandler Gilbert Community College; Mary Beth Burgoyne
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
a competency gap between graduates’ soft skills (social,leadership, workplace diversity) and what is needed by employers. Students have the content andtechnical knowledge, but they lack the skills and experience to share that knowledge in anaccessible way, with diverse groups and in multiple modes as dictated by the nature of theproject or workplace. Jollands, Jolly and Molyneaux’s 2012 research on engineering curriculumthat requires multiple technical writing, presentation and communication opportunities, thatincludes peer and faculty feedback, better prepares their graduates for the workplace. AnEconomist Intelligence Unit Report, Driving the Skills Agenda: Preparing Students for theFuture (2015), states that the most highly sought after