AC 2010-479: TEACHING DECISION-MAKING IN ENGINEERING: A REVIEWOF TEXTBOOKS AND TEACHING APPROACHESSenay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is also the Co-Director of Assessment Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE). She received a Ph.D. and a M.A in Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction from Arizona State University. Her creative research focuses on collaborative learning, design & decision-making, and the role of engineering self-efficacy on student achievement.Jing Chen, Purdue University Jing Chen is a graduate student in the
. Reamon’s research interests encompass the foundations of educational theory, the practical issues involved in curricular improvement, and the assessment techniques required to measure the effectiveness of new methods.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder DANIEL W. KNIGHT is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLL) and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in coun- seling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr
positive impact based on regularassessment results, which include overwhelmingly positive student participant feedback.Changes to the program continue to be made based on student participant needs and interests,with the expectation that they will continue to enrich and enhance their academic andprofessional experience.The EFLC offers a unique college residential living experience through a holistic and integratedapproach to the freshmen experience, and is designed to facilitate students’ transition into theCollege and University communities. The program started in 2002 with 60 students, and quicklygrew to capacity at 220 students, or approximately one third of the entering COE class. TheEFLC is also an integral component of UNC Charlotte’s PFS
paired with critical experiences with diverse students will supportthe development of these engineering students into engineers who are inclusive. Much workremains to be done.EpilogueWe made some changes in spring 2019 to the sequence of activities in the course described inthis study. The faculty implementing these activities are doing so because the activities havebeen integrated into the common curriculum for this course. After some discussions with thefaculty at the end of fall 2018, we moved the panel of engineers to the second course in this first-year engineering series. The faculty felt the content of this activity was a better fit with thecurriculum in the second class. Also, this second class only had three grant related activities
Paper ID #31125Continuing to Promote Metacognitive Awareness in a First-Year LearningStrategies CourseDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the MyEngineeringLab
learning strategies, and positive habits of mind.Dr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the MyEngineeringLab system.Matthew K. Miller, Clemson University Matt Miller is a Senior Lecturer in the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. His back- ground in
providerecommendations for engineering faculty teaching freshman courses who want to explore theblended approach to teaching. Examples for online learning activities and how to integrate themwithin class active learning activities to increase student engagement and success rates areincluded. Key words: Engineering Freshman, Active learning, Blended course Design, & StudentPerceptions. 1. Introduction College instructors aim to craft curriculum and learning experiences which align withboth the needs of the learners and the content they are teaching in order to meet expected courseoutcomes. College instructors are content experts who have a multifaceted role. They serve asdiagnosticians who explore
. Her background in in K-12 education where she has served as a high school science teacher, Instructional and Curriculum Coach, and Assistant Principal. Her research and areas of interest are in improving STEM educational outcomes for Low-SES students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. She currently works as the Project Manager for the NSF faculty development program based on evidence-based teaching practices.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral candidate and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. She is a third year student in the Educational Policy and Evaluation program. Her research interests focus on higher education
Paper ID #32325Towards Identifying Core Computational Literacy Concepts for Inclusionin a First-year General Engineering CourseDr. Darren K. Maczka, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Darren Maczka is a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals program at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. He received his PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Mr. Rehan Shah, University College London Rehan Shah is a third year doctoral student pursuing a PhD in Applied Mathematics at University College London (UCL). He has an MSc in Applied Mathematics from the University of Oxford (St. Anne’s
. Studentsurveys conducted at two different institutions show why students select to become engineers andtheir preference for the different course components.Introduction “Introduction to Engineering” is a core course given to freshmen students of all engineeringdisciplines. The course aims to familiarize students with the engineering profession, the differentengineering disciplines, the design process for exploratory projects, the work in interdisciplinaryteams, the ethics and professional behavior, the lifelong learning, the written and oral presentationof technical concepts, and problem solving. As curriculum often changes, an online research wasconducted on the most current catalogs (2018-2019) of 182 higher education institutions offeringdegrees in
). As an instructor, she was one of the recipients of The Allan Blizzard Award, a Canadian national teaching award for collaborative projects that improve student learning in 2004. In 2005, she was one of the recipients of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Curriculum Innovation Award. She is - as PIC II chair - currently a board member of ASEE. Page 26.1495.1Dr. William Rosehart, University of CalgaryDr. Bob Brennan, University of Calgary c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Team CARE model: Assessing team dynamics in first
Paper ID #10128Improving learning productivity and teamwork skills in freshman engineer-ing students through conative understandingDr. Elizabeth A Adams, Arizona State UniversityMs. Claire Louise Antaya, Arizona State UniversityDr. Thomas P Seager, Arizona State University Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, and Director of the Sustainable Energy and Environmental Decision Sciences (SEEDS) studio.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University Dr. Landis recently joined ASU in January 2012 as an Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built
, manyinteresting and non-trivial electrical and computer engineering problems require a strongprogramming background or knowledge of advanced mathematics.Digital logic, however, is an area of computer engineering that requires more transferableskills—such as critical thinking and problem-solving—than advanced theoretical knowledge.Digital logic uses discrete mathematics instead of the calculus that many students struggle withearly in the engineering curriculum. Although new knowledge has to be acquired in the area ofBoolean algebra, this new content is a very natural extension of the regular algebra that mostengineering students are already very comfortable with. Because of this non-reliance on calculus,digital logic projects make prime candidates for
from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Stanford University. He teaches courses in engineering design, and is interested in integrating the use of design projects and active learning throughout the curriculum to improve engineering education. Page 15.789.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Interactive Learning Using a SPIRAL Approach in a Large Required First-Year Mechanical Engineering ClassAbstractThe use of active learning is being implemented in a large, required first-year MechanicalEngineering two-course sequence that is part of a
Paper ID #31333Work in Progress: Project and Design-Based Introductory EngineeringCourse using Arduino KitsDr. Demetris Geddis, Hampton University Demetris L. Geddis is an associate professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Hamp- ton University. He has extensive research experience in the areas of Integrated optoelectronics, Optics, Microelectronics, and Electromagnetics. He has worked as a Research and Design Engineer at Motorola and Bell laboratories. Also, he worked at NASA Langley Research Center as a NASA faculty fellow for the Nondestructive Evaluation Sciences Branch where he performed research
Paper ID #19528Evaluating a Flipped Lab Approach in a First-Year Engineering Design CourseDr. Jack Bringardner, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is an Assistant Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He studied civil engineering and received his B.S. from the Ohio State University and his M.S and Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary focus is developing curriculum and pedagogical techniques for engineering education, particularly in the Introduction to Engineering and Design course at NYU. He has a background in Transportation
recently, using simulations and games to help facilitate learning. Among other things, she is interested in how students make use of multimedia representations of scientific concepts in games. She is currently the research director for the Epistemic Games Group at the University of Wisconsin - Madison.Golnaz Arastoopour, University of Wisconsin-Madison Golnaz is a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Before becoming interested in education, she studied Mechanical Engineering and Spanish. Golnaz has also worked as a computer sci- ence instructor, high school mathematics teacher, and STEM curriculum designer. Her research interests are how technology can be used as an effective and engaging teaching
, “Scoring conceptmaps: an integrated rubric for assessing engineering education”, Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 105-115, 2004.[48] M. Ruiz-Primo, R. J. Shavelson, M. Li, S. E. Schultz, “On the validity of cognitiveinterpretations of scores from alternative concept mapping techniques”, Educational Assessment,vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 99–141, 2001.[49] Y. Yin, J. Vanides, M. Ruiz-Primo, C. C. Ayala, R. J. Shavelson, “Comparison of twoconcept mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use”, Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 166–184, 2005.[50] K.W. Jablokow, J. F. DeFranco, S. S. Richmond, “A statistical study of concept mappingmetrics”, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses at RIT. She is an active member of the CIS undergraduate curriculum committee and has been the undergraduate program coordinator since 2012.Elizabeth Pieri, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology Second-year Motion Picture Science student at Rochester Institute of Technology. From Syracuse, NY.Ms. Sadie WoltersMr. Michael Glynn Augspurger, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Tech-nology I am a first-year imaging science major in Rochester Institute of Technology. I am part of the university’s honors program, which has given me the opportunity to study the pedagogy of project based learning versus
Paper ID #9805Collaborative cloud-based documents for real-time bi-directional feedback inlarge lecture activitiesProf. Brian M Frank P.Eng., Queen’s University Brian Frank is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, where he has taught courses in electronics and wireless systems. He is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology.Mr. Behnam Behinaein Hamgini, Department of
for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the MyEngineeringLab system.Dr. Bridget Trogden, Clemson University Bridget Trogden holds a Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Illinois and was an Assistant, then Associate, Professor in the Department of Chemistry at Mercer University for twelve years. She received Mercer’s Innovations in Teaching Award and was a
assignments for students that were more advanced or for students thatrequired additional resources.Future work in curriculum design will focus on scientific communication. Although shortlaboratory reports and two presentations were required and graded, there was not explicitinstruction or feedback given on writing. Instead, a majority of the focus of technicalcommunication instruction was on developing clear and well formatted plots and tables.Integrating an additional writing assignment explicitly designed with a revision process couldgive students an idea of what college level scientific writing looks like.Section Lecture/Activity Excel + Computer Math Laboratory
Ohio State University and the University of Akronwith instructors at both sites providing a coordinated curriculum. The major topics and activitiesfor the course are shown in Table 1. The modeling and simulation competencies were designedto meet those associated with the Introduction to Modeling and Simulation course being offeredas a part of an undergraduate minor program at The Ohio State University. The full descriptionof the minor program and those competencies can be found online. 14 Table 1: Summary of Major Course Topics and Competencies Topic Abbreviated Competency Activity/Assignment Explain the role of modeling in engineering
isbelieved to promote students’ motivation and engagement in an engineering education setting[4]–[7]. For the first-year engineering students, experience project-based learning from the earlyage of the engineering curriculum help students improve teamwork, leadership, communication,and relevant knowledge [8]. Further, the learning through a collaborative project can beintegrated into later years of the engineering curriculum [9]. Project-based learning is widely implemented in teaching design thinking in theengineering curriculum [10]. However, just forming a project-based learning environment doesnot automatically guarantee enhanced engagement due to the nature of teamwork [11], [12]. Theindividual, contextual difference in engagement may
an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Kentucky Ex- tended Campus Program in Paducah, KY. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engi- neering from the University of Kentucky in Lexington, KY. After obtaining his B.S., he spent three years working in the Plastics Division of Eastman Chemical Products, Inc. He entered his current position in July 2000.Dr. Neil Moore, University of Kentucky Neil Moore is an assistant professor (special title series) in Computer Science at the University of Ken- tucky, where he teaches in the First-Year Engineering Program.Dr. John F. Maddox, University of Kentucky Dr. John F. Maddox is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at
- ticipants involved in the reforms. She is involved in several research projects focusing on competencies- based curriculum redesign and implementation aimed to integration across curricula; increasing the re- tention rate of early engineering students; providing opportunities for STEM graduate students to have mentored teaching experiences.Mr. Theodore Demetrius Caldwell M.Ed., Diversity Programs Office/College of Engineering/Michigan StateUniversity BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES THEODORE D. CALDWELL, DIVERSITY DIRECTOR Contact Information Michigan State University Cell: (517) 614-3528 Diversity Programs Office Office: (517) 355-8310 College of Engineering Facsimile: (517) 355-2293 1108 Engineering Building E-mail: tc
, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the MyEngineeringLab system. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 (PREP)ARE: A student-centered approach to provide scaffolding in a flipped classroom environmentAbstractThis complete
motivation andinterest in course content and improve retention.5-6 Through computing, instructors can bringtogether concepts and ideas from mathematics, science, and engineering and allow students tointeract with them, helping to form the cross-disciplinary mental connections necessary for moreexpert-like understanding.7-8In the fall of 2012, the University of Cincinnati converted from a quarter system to a semestersystem. This conversion provided an ideal opportunity to review the first-year curriculum for theengineering and engineering technology students and make changes to help improve retentionand performance of students in the College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS). Thecollege faculty agreed on an almost common first year (Table 1
Paper ID #6447Web-based audience response system for quality feedback in first year engi-neeringDr. Brian M Frank, Queen’s University Brian Frank is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, where he has taught courses in electronics and wireless systems. He is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology. He is a co-founder of the Canadian Engineering Education Association
or STEM degree.The program also provides students with opportunities to excel academically by integrating honorsprogramming opportunities and resources.Recruitment and Selection of CandidatesThe NSF award notification was received in December 2017 with the grant beginning in January2018, thus the recruitment cycle, which normally begins the preceding August was shortened byfive months. Nevertheless, although a quality pool of candidates was identified. The PTG teamworked with the Office of Admissions, which provided a comprehensive list of University ofArkansas applicants who met the PTG recruitment criteria (intended major in an NSF S-STEMapproved STEM field (engineering and physical sciences, but not premed), high school GPA of3.5+, ACT 23