a doctorate in engineering educa- tion. She previous conducted research in Purdue University’s First-Year Engineering Program with the Network for Nanotechnology (NCN) Educational Research team, the Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) Educational Research team, and a few fellow STEM education graduates for an obtained Discovery, En- gagement, and Learning (DEAL) grant. Prior to attending Purdue University, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E. in Engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation, where she worked on a team conducting research on how students learn LabVIEW through Disassemble, Ana- lyze, Assemble (DAA) activities.Dr. Jaqi C. McNeil, University of Louisville J.C
ChoiceAbstract:This complete evidence-based practice paper explores the longitudinal impact of a first-yearengineering course designed to help students discern their future engineering major. The purposeof this study was to assess an engineering educational program’s effectiveness in helping studentsto make an informed selection of an engineering major. Effectiveness is relative and based onmeasures of student persistence and major changes after five semesters. The institution studied isa medium-sized Midwestern, urban public institution in which four cohort years were tracked.Two cohorts (2012 and 2013) took a one-credit hour large lecture (200+ students) course to learnabout the engineering majors offered and is contrasted with two cohorts (2014 and 2015
, mathematics, and engineering and technology teacher, as well as several years of electrical and mechanical engineering design experience as a practicing engineer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Swarthmore College, his Master’s of Education degree from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Doctorate in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Ms. Ann Delaney, Boise State University Ann Delaney is the Program Director of the SAGE Scholars scholarship program at Boise State University, which is part of the Redshirting in Engineering Consortium. As part of this program, she collaborates with the Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives
engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering
has published extensively and lectured widely to national and international audiences. Her work has been recognized by the National Science Foundation with numerous research grants. She is equally passion- ate about her teaching and has recently designed and created a seven-MOOC Professional Certificate on C-programming for edX, after previously having designed a MOOC ”Analysis of a Complex Kind” on Coursera. The recipient of the New Hampshire High Tech Council 2018 Tech Teacher of the Year Award, the Binswanger Prize for Excellence in Teaching at Wesleyan University and the Excellence in Teaching Award at the Thayer School of Engineering, Petra has a strong interest in broadening access to high- quality higher
Surveys, Dimensions of Success (DoS) Observation tool, pre/post topic self-efficacy, and survey student interviews. The results showed that engineering design activitieshad a positive impact on attitude towards STEM learning and careers. Integration ofengineering design principles, student demographics and evaluation instruments and resultsare discussed in this paper.IntroductionEngineering is a natural platform for the integration of science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) content into K-12 classrooms, while sparking creativity amongst youngminds. Research around effective learning in K-12 classrooms demonstrates that anengineering approach to identifying and solving problems is valuable across all disciplines.Educators and
Paper ID #26427Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income,Rural STEM Students SucceedDr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
major in one ofthe engineering specialty areas upon matriculation, or soon thereafter. Previous research hasshown that significant factors influencing choice of major for college students include (1)general interest subject; (2) family and peer influence; (3) assumptions about introductorycourses, (4) potential job characteristics, and (5) characteristics of the major. The student'sdecision on choice of major is often difficult because traditional university-aged students havelittle to no direct experience with the engineering profession or practicing engineers. Someuniversities confront this problem with a common first-year engineering experience, whereinengineering majors are given the opportunity to explore the specialty areas and make a
environment. Thereare many opportunities for students to participate in team-based work in various courses andcapstone projects to help them practice teamwork skills. However, in many cases, students are ontheir own to make their teams work and these team-based activities do not necessarily allowstudents to develop effective teamwork abilities. At Arizona State University, two cohorts of firstyear engineering students took Introduction to Engineering and Small Group Communicationtogether during Fall 2018 semester with cohered schedule, content, and assignments, around asmall design challenge and a large design project.The impact of this model on team dynamics in the design projects was assessed using the CAREmodel and assessment tool developed by the
study based on data from the Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD), reporting thatstudents at institutions that were required to take an Introduction to Engineering Course were more likelyto graduate with a degree in engineering than students at institutions that do not require an Introduction toEngineering Course9. Required First-Year Engineering courses do help students either affirm a prior choiceof an engineering discipline or help students to select a major best suited to them, and also influences whichengineering disciplines students are more likely to select9-10.TheorySocial Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) recognizes career development as a process related to self-exploration and
. APPENDIX Survey of StudentsLikert-Scale QuestionsStrongly Agree/Disagree/Neutral/Agree/Strongly AgreeCourse and Project Related Questions 1. In this course we gain an understanding of the design process. 2. In the course project we gained an understanding of contemporary engineering practice. 3. I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 4. I intend to practice, conduct research in, or teach engineering for at least 3 years after graduation. 5. Overall, this class has increased my interest in engineering or computer science. 6. The hands-on experience in this class has improved my confidence in my ability to succeed in engineering or computer science. 7. The
students”, ”Development of Student Assessment Software”, and ”Improving Student Engagement through Active Learning”.Miss Olivia Tronchin c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using LEGO® Mindstorms and MATLAB in curriculum design of active learning activities for a first-year engineering computing courseThis paper is an evidence-based practice research study to improve course delivery in computerprogramming. Courses and materials in computer programming tend to be abstract, which canlead to many students having difficulties learning and being engaged with the material. With amore hands-on practical approach, students may find themselves immersed in the material andmotivated to understand and
included in the “In Engineering” category as this indicated that they were stillpursuing an engineering degree but had not officially declared an engineering major in the Fallof 2018.As a note, intercepts for logistic regressions will be reported but will not be discussed. For eachlogistic regression, the intercept does not provide conceptually relevant material. In traditionalregressions, the intercept would be the average y-value when x is equal to zero which may haveconceptual value. This is not true for our case; however, it is best practice to report all regressionvalues.ResultsMajor Confidence and Retention in MajorWe began by first visually examining the distribution of confidence in major choice for studentswho enrolled in their initial
issues with engineering identity. Therefore, the professors should also look into other areasto improve retention such as mentoring and tutoring [2], [3].Bibliography[1] M. Matthews, “Keeping students in engineering: A research-to-practice brief.” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, pp. 1–7, 2016.[2] B. L. Yoder, “Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students,” Washington, DC, 2012.[3] M. Atwater, “Why students leave engineering,” Engineering.com, Mississauga, Ontario, Jul-2013.[4] M. Yatchmeneff and M. Calhoun, “Exploring engineering identity in a common introduction to engineering course to improve retention,” in
student transition support [8], [9].This paper examines the various impediments that contribute towards first-year student attritionfrom the engineering major. Further, it provides a case study of a summer bridge program calledthe Successful Transition and Enhanced Preparation for Undergraduates Program (STEPUP)created specifically to address the above challenges. The paper will propose STEPUP as ageneralized program model and best practice to be utilized by colleges and universities to promotethe success of first-year engineering students in general, and USP, in particular. 3 Figure 3. Framework for admission and retention of USP at public universities.Overview of the STEPUP ProgramHistoryIn
,increasing research participation, increasing student retention and increasing student graduationrate have been taken into consideration. For example, Yoder [8] identified summer bridgeprograms as a best practice for retention in engineering. Pickering-Reyna [9] also showed thatstudents who participate in summer bridge programs are more likely to be retained in their major.Tomasko et al. [10] found that URMs who attended the summer bridge program had higher third-year retention rates in their STEM discipline in comparison with the general population of studentsadmitted to STEM majors at the same university. Strayhorn [11] reported that these programs wereespecially beneficial for low-income, academically underprepared students. Moreover, Brown [12
a worthwhile endeavor for learning andmaintained positive beliefs about their skill development. However, the students’ perceptions ofthe course’s potential impact on personal values remained relatively the same. This suggests thatthe curriculum was effective considering its course outcomes. Ultimately, this paper provides anexample for curriculum design and evaluation that may help frame service-learning courses inthe future and encourage future research on attitude change in similar contexts.BackgroundIn 1979, Robert Sigmon defined service-learning as an educational approach reliant on“reciprocal education” achieved through interactions in the community [4]. Other early uses ofthe term described service-learning as a learning experience
maximize their academic skills; contribute to and benefit from productiveuniversity communities; offer best practices to help them navigate their college careers; andwork individually and collectively to further promote the goals of the program. The effortsdescribed in this study may provide a model for a wide range of retention and success programs,based around diverse populations and affinity groups, or general cohorts of students. Aggregateresults indicate that this cohort was able to achieve significantly higher GPAs and complete ahigher number of credits as compared to similar populations of students. This paper furtherdiscerns the impact on the engineering students, who coincidentally made up over 40% of thegroup, showing that first year
operations, highway safety, and geographic information systems. His research interests include: constructing spatial databases for bet- ter management of transportation infrastructure, improving transportation design, operation, safety and construction, understanding long-term effects of urban development patterns, and advancing active living within the built environment for improved public health. He teaches courses in interchange design, trans- portation engineering, highway design. engineering management, geographic information systems, and land surveying. He has served in numerous leadership positions in ITE, ASCE and TRB.Dr. Kevin C. Bower, The Citadel Dr. Kevin Bower is a Professor and the Associate Provost for
University of Minnesota Morse Alumni Award for Teaching.Prof. Joshua M. Feinberg, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Joshua Feinberg is a Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Minnesota. His research is focused on magnetic materials. He has developed courses and undergraduate majors at the departmental and college level, and runs a national multi-user facility at the University of Minnesota.Prof. Russell J. Holmes, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Russell J. Holmes is a Professor and the Director of Graduate Studies for Materials Science and Engineer- ing in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota
Paper ID #25743Examining Epistemological Views of Engineering among First-Year Engi-neering StudentsProf. Yang Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is Assistant Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Educa- tion, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida Interna- tional University. Her research interest include quantitative research design, retention and advancement of women in STEM fields, motivation and self-regulated learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Examining Students
), effective learning strategies (e.g. organizing information graphically,using the textbook, following the study cycle, extending test preparation across five days), andhabits of mind for success (e.g. grit, mindfulness, positivity, growth mindset). The courseincludes periodic assignments to practice the skills and culminates in a portfolio.This paper is an overview of the course and our integration of the Skillful Learning series aboutmetacognition [3]. We conducted a mixed-methods analysis on a survey of student responses tothe videos. The research questions we sought to answer were: 1. What were the first-semester freshmen able to understand about metacognition from the Skillful Learning series, which was designed for more advanced
University. She teaches the Cornerstone of Engineering courses to first- year students as well as courses within the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. She is a recent recipient of the Outstanding Teacher of First-Year Students Award and is interested in research that compliments and informs her teaching. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preparing First Year Engineering Students for a Career where Communication Skills MatterAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper describes the techniques used in the project basedfirst-year Cornerstone of Engineering courses at Northeastern University to address the need forbuilding communication
personal level to the students and their families, those who attempt afour-year degree program but are unsuccessful have expended their limited resources.Additionally, as technology becomes a larger portion of our modern life, the need for individualswith technical skills grows. Therefore, the inability to retain students who could becomedegreed, practicing engineers has a detrimental impact on society as a whole. Retention ofstudents who are interested in a career in engineering is therefore a way to both reduceexpenditure of resources and while also increasing the supply of skilled workers for tomorrow’sjob market.II. The Challenge of Increasing RetentionStudents leave the difficult path of an engineering education for a variety of reasons
is supported through National Science Foundation Grant Number 1317651.References[1] National Science Board. The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential, Publication NSB 03-69, 2003.[2] Augustine, N. “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future”, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP), 2007.[3] Herzog, S. “Measuring Determinants of Student Return vs. Dropout/Stopout vs. Transfer: A First-to-Second Year Analysis of New Freshmen”, Research in Higher Education, pp. 883-928, December 2005.[4] Krauss, R., Fries, R., Karacal, C. “Evaluating the Impact of a Revised Introductory Engineering Course: Student
course will include further instruction and explicit feedback on writing.STEM engagement studyIn addition to assessing their competence in course material, students completed a questionnaireat the end of the course designed to measure whether their attitudes towards STEM had changed.Specifically, we were interested in whether students were more interested in STEM relatedtopics, and whether their career choices were impacted by taking the course. The results for thequestions on engagement for the 2018 cohort are shown in Figure 3. The 2017 cohort reportedresponses on a 4-point scale, and 2018 students reported on a 10-point scale, however, resultsfrom the 2017 cohort (not shown) mirrored the trends shown in Figure 3.Figure 3: Results from student
see future careeror volunteer roles and can become more engaged volunteers and citizens through service.Thoughts for future research could investigate: the possibility of future roles being tied to thecommunity and community partner, whether the type of service completed is impacted by theincoming identity status, and whether there is growth in identity during service.Campus Compact [11] is known for their studies in S-L, and this one contains a great summary ofwhat has made partnerships truly good and successful for all stakeholders. The paper walksthrough the process, the research, and the practicalities of how to build successful partnershipsand research in S-L. A set of great lists allow us to look for where we have done well or whatwe
Paper ID #25985A Qualitative Investigation of Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in a Spa-tial Visualization CourseMrs. Adetoun Yeaman, Virginia Tech Adetoun Yeaman is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). She received her MS degree in 2013 in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering and her BS degree in Biomedical Engineering in 2011, both from Virginia Commonwealth University. She is currently a Graduate Teaching Assistant. Her research interests include empathy, design education, spatial visualization and multimedia learning. Address: Virginia
minors complementary to the major or participation in the Grand Challenge Scholar Program. Any faculty time not directly related to mentorship efforts is considered non-value-added. Examples include showing thestudents how to register for courses on Self Service, the course management system, orwhere to find the list of Humanities courses, a subset of which are graduation requirements.The overall duration and variance of advising sessions is reduced through two generalcategories of effort. The first focuses on value-added activities, with the goal of capturing thebest practices across the faculty. To demonstrate consider faculty members A and B whodiscuss the benefit of having a Mathematics minor with their advisees. Faculty member Aholds a
: Use the works best for your program (e.g. test questions, questionnaire, focus Academic Motivation construct within the "Identity" instrument. group, design presentations, lab reports, etc.) instrument. ESII. (1d) Evaluation (2d) EvaluationFor each assessment measure it is important, a priori, to determine your For each assessment measure it is important, a priori, to determine your goal/standard for each measure. goal/standard for each measure.Figure 1: A proposed framework for assessing a first-year engineering program(1b) Student-Learning Outcomes and