is also helpful for first-year students to understand the methods by whichengineering results are communicated to co-workers, management or the general public:graphs and charts, drawings and diagrams, written communications and oralpresentations. Some general guidelines can be quite useful (e.g., keep in mind theintended audience and their background and knowledge) without having to undertake thecomplete instruction of the students in these modes of communication.CONCLUSIONS It is my thesis in this paper that first-year engineering students should be exposedto a general structure of how engineering is applied by focusing on the general conceptswithout going into a great deal of detail by relying on examples that use high schoolphysics
mechanical. Students entered civil engineeringto build things, environmental engineering to help the environment, and mechanical engineeringbecause they like math and science. Both civil and environmental engineering students changedtheir mind in their senior year and felt that an impact on society was the most important.13Differences seen between disciplines appear negligible for men, but can vary for women.17There have been limited findings on the details of gender differences for choosing engineering.Several studies have found women place a higher value on motivation from mentor or parentalinfluence.12,17,18 These studies have also found that men are more motivated to study engineeringby intrinsic behavior.12,17 Each of these findings provides
help society 26 Innovate such as more efficient computers, technologies that encourage sustainability, or improved medicine." Problem Solving "Engineers help solve problems and work to improve aspects of society. 7 Everything from the design and construction of structures to machines to energy to food, engineers are the problem solvers of society." Leaders "They can play the role as leaders because engineers tend to be open minded 1 and usually are full with ideas that they could apply to society not only by helping but by also encouraging others as well." Table 3. Participants comments about
Paper ID #15752A Qualitative Study Investigating How First-Year Engineering Students’ ValueBeliefs Influence their Choice of Selecting an Engineering MajorMr. Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin - Purdue University, West Lafayette ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is an assistant professor at Universidad EAFIT and served as the Head of the Process Engineering Department from 2010 to 2014. He holds an MS in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany) and is currently enrolled as a graduate student in the Engineering Education Doctoral Program at Purdue
Paper ID #16156Enhancing Critical Thinking in a First-Year Engineering Course using a Hands-On Study of VectorsDr. Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville Dr. Angela Thompson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. Dr. Thompson received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Louisville. Her research interests are in biomechanics and engineering education, particularly related to critical thinking instruction.Dr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of LouisvilleDr. J. C. McNeil, University of Louisville Jacqueline McNeil is an Assistant
online portfolio.Their first project web page will be a part of their portfolio. The web publication is a great tool to encourage engagement and boost creativity in classprojects. Albeit there was a concern that we may miss out the opportunity to generatetraditional technical writing, students’ feedback was rave and agreed that it was a great way toget excited about their projects. The new emerging paradigm is characterized by the conceptsand principle of agility[8]. We face open source movements daily and find numerous technicalsites that share their projects with a great amount of details. Sharing their knowledge online canbe a good opportunity to ignite engineering students’ creativity and innovative mind. The ideasand their
classes, more and more universities are including a design project within their first-yearexperience (9). This gives students an opening to understanding engineering early in theiracademic career and can provide a meaningful touchstone during future engineering coursework. With collaborative, project based design in mind, the University of Notre Damedeveloped a new project for its first-year engineering course sequence. First and foremost, theproject was intended to increase student exposure to design through a hands-on experience. Inaddition, the project was created for the first-semester, where students would be concurrently incalculus and chemistry (physics is not taken until second semester). Therefore, the focus shouldbe on a simple model
persisted in engineering or 38.4%. The data is shown inFigure 2. These persistence rates were evaluated based on spring 2016 major/degree earned. Ifthese rates seem low, keep in mind that any student enrolling in the EPS course is counted asintending to major in engineering, even though at least one third of the students never declare anengineering major. 0.7 2012 NFS 0.6 non-NFS 0.5 Fraction of Students 0.4 0.3 0.2
College of Engineering. Dr. Daher collaborates with engineering faculty to document and research the integration of innovative instructional strategies and technologies in his classroom. His latest collaborative submitted publication discusses Using the Flipped approach in a water resources course.Dr. Stuart Bernstein, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Stuart Bernstein received his Bachelors in Construction Management from Syracuse University, His Mas- ters in Architecture from Virginia Tech, and his PhD in Educational Administration, Leadership in Higher Education from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Dr. Bernstein has taught in the College of Engi- neering for 14 years, teaching classes in construction estimating
Paper ID #17216Can a Five-Minute, Three-Question Survey Foretell First-Year EngineeringStudent Performance and Retention?Stephanie M. Gratiano, Roger Williams University Stephanie Gratiano is a Junior Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Roger Williams Uni- versity. She is an officer of both the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Engineers Without Borders (EWB) Chapters at the university. Her future career interests include Product Design or Mechanical Design, and she wishes to further her education in Industrial Design after graduating.Dr. William John Palm IV P.E., Roger Williams University
students feltthese helped them decide on a major), the decrease could simply be due to the fact that thesecame later in the semester and a majority of students had already made up their mind aboutwhich major to pursue. Additionally, students’ confidence increased in their choice of majorsuggesting that the company panels were effective. Survey comments provided specific feedbackregarding which aspects of the activities students found most helpful and insight into changesthat might improve the activities in future semesters.1.0 IntroductionAt our university, approximately 30% of students in engineering programs switch majors withintheir first year. Students that switch engineering majors after their first year often have to makeup classes for that
mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark has a BSS from
next year.10) Overall, I benefited from being in a major-specific section of ASC 1000.11) I would recommend the General Engineering program to a new, incoming student.12) I would recommend the General Engineering program to a new, incoming student because of the collaboration between EGN 1000 and ASC 1000.13) What, if any, benefits do you feel you received from being enrolled in ASC 1000 with fellow General Engineering majors?14) What topics, if any, do you feel were covered in both EGN 1000 and EGN 1000? (Coverage of topics did not have to occur simultaneously.)15) Keeping the collaboration in mind, what would have been cool to see/do in either class?Questions 4-12 used a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to
are advisers and peers. With this in mind, McCormick decided to hire four advisers that also taught classes in the FirstYear sequence. This decision was key in developing a AdvisingasTeaching Model. The advisers teach sections of Design, Thinking and Communications I and II, the Cornerstone Design classes, departmental service classes, or Engineering Problem Solving classes. The goal is to get the advisers in front of the students in either FirstYear, Basic Engineering, or Departmental Core Classes. While it would have been easier to hire professional advisers, but the administration thought the advisers would have more credibility if students interacted with them as professors
Creative Thinking) creativity exercises thatmeasure creativity primarily by discrete, non-judgmental tasks that focus on fluency of thought,flexibility of thought, originality of thought and elaboration on one’s own thinking. Theseactivities were followed up by a discussion of creativity in engineering design. The instructor ofthe second section provided opportunities for small group and individual creative problemsolving throughout the semester. In both sections, students were encouraged to keep theprinciples of creativity in mind as they worked through their design projects.E101 Common Rubric AssignmentWhile some differences existed in the strategies employed in both sections the common rubricassignment was the same. Students’ prior experiences
Paper ID #16964Leadership in Practice: A Model for Building Strong Academic Foundationsin a Residential Learning CommunityMs. Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona Noel Hennessey is the Coordinator for Outreach, Recruitment and Retention in the College of Engineer- ing at the University of Arizona. She is responsible for first-year experience through residential education, student development and retention, and designing outreach activities and events for undergraduate recruit- ment. Noel earned a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education from the University of Arizona in 2015 and is currently pursuing a
. Through iSTEM Dr. Dagley works to promote and enhance collaborative efforts on STEM education and research by bringing together colleges, centers, and institutes on campus, as well as other stakeholders with similar interest in STEM initiatives. Her research interests lie in the areas of student access to education, sense of community, retention, first-year experience, living-learning commu- nities, and persistence to graduation for students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs.Dr. Cynthia Y. Young, University of Central Florida Cynthia Young is the Interim Vice Provost for Faculty Excellence and International Affairs and Global Strategies and a Pegasus Professor of Mathematics at UCF. She is
Paper ID #15127Motivation and Learning Strategies of High School and University StudentsDr. Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan - Flint Dr. Quamrul Mazumder is currently an associate professor of mechanical engineering at University of Michigan-Flint. His areas of research include computational fluid dynamics, multiphase flow, quality in higher education, metacognition, motivation, and engagement of students. He is a Fulbright scholar travelled around the world to promote quality and globalization of higher education.Miss Vasudha Kilaru, University of Michigan - Flint Department of Computer Science, Engineering and
Paper ID #14751Through the Lens of the Reviewer: Information Literacy, an LMS, and PeerReviewDr. Wendi M. Kappers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Wendi M. Kappers has a Ph.D. in Instructional Technology from the University of Central Florida (UCF). Her thesis work explored how educational video game effects upon mathematics achievement and mo- tivation scores differed between the sexes. During her tenure at Seminole Community College working as a tenured Professor and Program Manager of the Network Engineering Program, she was Co-PI for the CSEMS NSF grant that explored collaborative administration and