Paper ID #18887Forget Diversity, Our Project is DueMr. Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University - Engineering Education Raised in South Florida, born in Mexico. Half Colombian and half Mexican; proud MexiColombian. H´ector earned his MS in Computer Engineering and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education, both from Purdue University. His research interests are in investigating the experiences of LGBTQ+ students in engineering, tapping into critical methodologies and methods for conducting and analyzing research, and exploring embodied cognition.Mr. Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno
Paper ID #18331Asset-based Design Projects in a Freshman-level CourseDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer
Paper ID #19571Implementing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Design Project in an IntroductoryEngineering CourseDr. Matthew James Jensen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Matthew J. Jensen received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2006. Matthew received his doctorate from Clemson University in 2011 in Me- chanical Engineering, focused primarily on automotive control systems and dynamics. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, the ProTrack Co-Op Coordinator and Chair of the Gen- eral Engineering Program at Florida Institute of Technology
Paper ID #18529Work In Progress: First-Year Student Signature Project - Design an Info-graphic on ”What is Technical Communication?”Dr. Jessica A. Kuczenski, Santa Clara University Dr. Jes Kuczenski joined the engineering faculty at Santa Clara University in 2014. She obtained her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and her B.S. from Iowa State University all in Chemical Engineering. Dr. Kuczenski has been teaching since 2007 and focuses on courses which are commonly found in first years of an engineering education (e.g. introduction to engineering, engineering graphics, statics, and dynamics) or are heavily
Engineering for Honors program, he is heavily involved with teaching and developing laboratory content, leading the in-house robotics controller maintenance, and managing the robotics project development.Mr. Michael Schulz, The Ohio State University Michael H. Schulz is a teaching assistant with the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program at The Ohio State University. He is currently the lead developer of the robot course software development team, of which he has been a member for three years. As a Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) student, he will graduate in May, 2017 with his B.S.C.S.E and a minor in Music, Media, and Enterprise.Ms. Clare Rigney, Ohio State University, Engineering Education Department Clare has
Paper ID #20575Work in Progress: Curriculum Revision and Classroom Environment Re-structuring to Support Blended Project-Based Learning in First-Year Gen-eral Engineering Laboratory CoursesProf. Brandon B. Terranova, Drexel University Dr. Terranova is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. In his current role, he is the lead instructor for the freshman engineering program, and oversees activities in the Innovation Studio, a large-area academic makerspace. He has taught and developed courses in general engineering and mechanical engineering at Drexel. Prior to Drexel, he has taught
Paper ID #19497Work in Progress: Living with the Lab: Building a New Implementation ofthe LWTL Project-Based First-Year Engineering Curriculum at CampbellUniversityDr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is Chair of the ASEE Long-Rangge Planning Committee and the ASEE Strategic Doing Governance Team. She is a past Vice President of Professional Interest Councils for ASEE and past President of WEPAN. Currently Chair of the National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge Scholars Program Steering Committee and an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr
Paper ID #18622Integrating Humanitarian Engineering Design Projects to Increase Retentionof Underrepresented Minority Students and to Achieve Interpersonal Skill-Related Learning OutcomesDr. Elizabeth A. Adams, Chandler Gilbert Community College Dr. Adams joined Chandler-Gilbert Community College in 2014 as Residential Engineering Faculty.Mary Beth Burgoyne Mary Beth Burgoyne is Library Residential Faculty at Chandler - Gilbert Community College (CGCC)(Chandler, AZ). She teaches Information Studies courses and critical college research / information literacy as part- ner faculty within other disciplines. In addition to teaching
in the areas of creative writing and movie making. She teaches ”Script to Screen” workshops to grades K-8 and coordinates the Gifted/Talented program at Oaklawn Elementary School. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assistive Technology for Freshmen Design and K-12 OutreachAbstractThis Work in Progress paper presents on the design of project-based learning approach focusedon assistive technology as applied in a freshmen level engineering course which also integratesoutreach with the local K12 system. The university course targets general education topics as wellas an introductory engineering design experience and includes content on the engineering designprocess, societal
within a freshmanengineering design course in which students are asked to conceive, design,implement and operate a Six-Section Rube Goldberg machine. Often in the firstyear of an engineering curriculum there is a project based class designed tointroduce students to, motivate students about, and retain students within theengineering discipline. They also begin to instill skills such as: 1. Team Work 2. Systems Engineering through Experimentation, Testing, and CAD & physical Modeling 3. Written Communication 4. Oral Communication 5. Time Management 6. Team ManagementAt this institution, project based classes allow students to develop these skills andexpressly enforces two avenues of technical communication: between and
education and project-based learning.Dr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Various Pedagogies on Design Confidence, Motivation, and Anxiety of First-Year Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe content and pedagogies of first-year engineering programs vary widely from institution toinstitution. In the content space, efforts are underway to establish a first-year body of knowledge[1][13][14
designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project
awareness of each other’s thinking and shareddecision making associated with their design process and final reporting. What an effective teamneeds are executive skills for managing a design process that transitions their ideas into a plan,research, build, test and refine cycle. Project management tools can support the processes ifteam leaders know how to track and facilitate the process. One of the goals of this first yearengineering course is to develop these skills in the team members so they can effectively usethem for future design activities like senior design and multidisciplinary projects in industry. In this paper, we present results from a qualitative analysis of student responses to open-ended questions designed to elicit their
. Mahmood Moussavi is currently a faculty member of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, at the University of Calgary. He has over 25 years research and teaching experience in different areas of software engineering and information technology, and he has served over 11 year as Director of the Software Engineering at the above-mentioned department. His general research interest and expertise are summarized as follows: Distributed and multi-agent soft- ware systems Software design and architecture Data mining and database management Dr. Moussavi’s most recent research projects involves: A simulation-based study on software design for connected vehicles and traffic infrastructures, applying agent-based
to the first year Introduction toEngineering course at Arizona State University in order to promote the entrepreneurial mindset.The changes were made to the team-based hands-on design projects to involve customers usingthree different approaches including fictional customers, real world customers but no directstudent-customer interactions, and real world customers with direct student-customerinteractions. Preliminary assessment shows that all three approaches are effective at raisingstudents’ customer awareness, though the third approach which involves real world customer andprovides opportunities for students to engage with customers throughout the design process hasbeen found to be the most effective approach for instilling the
). She particularly enjoys coaching students through the difficult rhetorical situations of open-ended design projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Assessment of Peer Mentoring of Teams in a First Year Design-Build-Test-Communicate ClassAbstractPeer mentoring has been associated with beneficial outcomes in higher education, from increasedretention of minority students[1] and women[2] to learning gains for both mentors and mentees[3].Most of the peer mentoring relationships investigated in the literature are of mentors not tied to aspecific course [e.g.,2]. This paper reports on how one section of a first year, intensive, project-based learning class uses peer mentors to guide student teams
development activities reported. This means that little is known abouthow students progress from concept generation to a fully developed simulation or how to designsimulation development activities that promote active learning.Since 2010, students in a first-year engineering (FYE) course have engaged in a MATLAB-based graphical user-interface design project with a variety of contexts (e.g. games, K-12engineering education tools, course performance monitoring systems).7 More recent projectshave evolved from industry and research center partnerships; these partners have required thedevelopment of simulations backed by mathematical models. Rodgers, Diefes-Dux, Kong, andMadhavan (2015) found that students confuse general user-interactivity (e.g. button
are people with common traits of human nature.Our research questions are as follows: How do team members describe manifestations of trust as a key factor in team success? How can faculty remove barriers to the development of trust among members of student teams?End-of-semester surveys revealed that teams that exhibited a high level of trust often stated thatthe choice of design project did not affect the ability of the team to be successful, while teamswith a low level of trust often blamed the choice of project for their difficulties factors.Successful teams also seem to exhibit a type of “team chemistry” whereby they enjoyedsocializing as well as working together. The trust reinforces this type of
education standards that guide the content anddevelopment of state and local science education standards and practices1. Studies of theincorporation of engineering in statewide educational standards have also shown the widespreadinclusion of engineering in science, mathematics, and technology standards and the developmentof standalone engineering standards2,3.Further evidence of increased opportunities for K-12 students to explore engineering comes fromthe growth of national pre-college engineering programs and curricula. Project Lead The Way(PLTW), the largest provider of K-12 technology and engineering curricula, has been adopted inall 50 states and measures student participation in the millions4. FIRST Robotics, which sponsorsrobotics
resources, opportunities for re- search and design, and collaboration on educational and technological projects. Ms. Jean-Pierre has taught Mathematics, Problem- Solving and Academic Success Seminars at Polytechnic University and Columbia University. In addition to her experience in academia, Ms. Jean-Pierre has practical experience in developing online technology and multimedia products having worked in corporate positions at Google Inc. and iVillage Inc. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Evaluating a Flipped Lab Approach in a First-Year Engineering Design CourseAbstractThis complete research paper will investigate the continuation of a flipped
Paper ID #20525An Integrated First-Year Experience at ECST (FYrE@ECST)Dr. Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering Department at CalStateLA. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has focused on improving student success and has participated in sev- eral teaching workshops, including one on ”Excellence in Civil Engineering Education” and another in ”Enhancing Student Success through a Model Introduction to Engineering Course.” He is currently the PI of TUES project to revamp the sophomore-year experience at the college of engineering
some of these concepts, making their transition intosophomore year much more difficult. In order to help better prepare these students, facultymembers at Notre Dame developed a set of videos covering topics that students may needadditional guidance and practice. These videos were released to students before the start of thefall semester and were completely voluntary. This paper will review initial findings from thatrelease and detail some future directions for expanding this project as a first-year to sophomorebridge.In starting this video site, faculty members from a number of first-semester sophomore courses.were asked to provide guidance on what pre-requisite concepts students would need to besuccessful in their classes. In each case, the
(2015-2016) I have the privilege of being a Course Assistant for three classes at Stanford: (1) E14: Introduction to Solid Mechanics; (2) BIOE51: Anatomy for Bioengineers; (3) BIOE80: Introduction to Bioengineering and Engineering Living Matter. I also have pleasure of serving as the Safety and Operations Manager at the Volkswagen Automotive Innovation Laboratory, which includes managing the machine shop and teaching students how to use the machinery. In this role I am able to advise and educate students on design choices for their personal and research projects from ideation phases to functional products, with an emphasis on design and manufacturing techniques. c American Society for
engineering education research interests focus on learning through service-based projects and using an entrepreneurial mindset to further engineering education innovations. He also researches the development of reuse strategies for waste materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First Year Engineering Courses: Results of a National SurveyAbstractThis paper summarizes the results of a national study that asked engineering and computingfaculty to report the types of courses where they incorporated ethics and/or societal impacttopics. An online survey was conducted in spring 2016, with 1216 responses from
ways of thinking)” (p. 2). Theyimplemented a studio requirement each year, where project based learning, community service,and reflection are highlighted. Kellam et al.8 drew from student reflections and focus grouptranscripts in their evaluation of this long-term integration. Guthrie et al.6 used quantitativestudent self assessment and collected student comments to gauge the effectiveness of theirinterdisciplinary capstone design course. Rhee et al.9 in “A Case Study of a Co-instructedMultidisciplinary Senior Capstone Project in Sustainability” discussed a senior capstone coursewhere students engage together with specific shared projects, share classroom space and meetingtimes. Mentors from several engineering and non-engineering disciplines
Kong and Taiwan 2. The language proficiency of East Asian students and their adaptation to the activelearning style of American classrooms is frequently questioned. Students from these countriesseem to be very quiet and take some time to respond when participating in active learningactivities such as discussions, hands-on activities, team projects, etc. 3. Students reticence tospeak in class has been associated with low language proficiency, students’ attitudes towards theuse of English, differences in classroom teaching styles, and student’s individual personality 3,among others. Language and non-verbal communication differences between American and East Asianstudents can lead to difficulties in teamwork. Low English proficiency
behaviorTo help guide students in designing their individualized process they are asked to implement athree step process: 1. Where a “world-class” engineering student would want to be on each item. 2. Where you are currently on each item. 3. What you need to do to move from where you are to where you would need to be to become a “world-class” engineering student.Linking the coverage of student development topics in a first-year engineeringcourse/lab/seminar and the assignment of the "Design your Process for Becoming a World-ClassEngineering Student" project is key, so that students recognize what a “world class” engineeringstudent would do to be successful. This allows students to develop their individualized process tobecome successful
thislarge, midwestern institution, as well as best practices learned from introduction to engineeringcourses at other institutions. In particular, the final project was based on Ray Landis’ work(Landis 2013). The weekly assignments were 1-page essay assignments. We asked students toreflect on the course’s assigned in-person activities, reading, and videos and to create a personalplan that would set themselves up to becoming a successful engineering student. To the best ofour understanding, this is the largest implementation of “Design Your Successful EngineeringPath” that has been able to grade final reports at this scale.Weekly assignments were assessed with Divide-and-Conquer style grading. Student assignmentswere divided by last name into three
, SJSU was notwhat they expected, family or personal problems, and not feeling connected to campus. Thispaper reports on one project at SJSU, Project Succeed, which was funded under theStrengthening Institutions program from the U.S. Department of Education in 2014. ProjectSucceed is focused on increasing the sense of belonging for freshmen at SJSU.The Project Succeed plan is designed to strengthen SJSU’s campus climate and providefreshmen and sophomores with a culture that promotes academic and social success. This kind ofcampus climate will also promote undergraduate success with the goal of increasing retentionand graduation rates, as well as closing the achievement gap for Under-Represented Minority(URM) students at SJSU. SJSU’s Title III
Paper ID #19038Exploring Engineering Identity in a Common Introduction to EngineeringCourse to Improve RetentionDr. Michele Yatchmeneff, University of Alaska Anchorage Michele Yatchmeneff is Unangax (Aleut) who grew up living a traditional subsistence lifestyle in rural villages along Alaska’s Aleutian chain. She earned a BS in Civil Engineering in 2005 and an MS in Engineering Management in 2009 at University of Alaska Anchorage. After earning her BS she began working in Alaska’s construction and engineering industry, specializing in water and sewer projects in remote villages across the state. She also worked as the