] S. Ghanat and D. Ragan, “Implementing Entrepreneurial Minded Learning in a First-Year Seminar Course,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, OR.[ 6] Pluskwik, Leung, & Lillesve, 2018 [7] N. Duval-Couetil, E. Kisenwether, J. Tranquillo, J. Wheadon, ”Exploring the Intersection of Entrepreneurship Education and ABET Accreditation Criteria,”The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 6, Number 2, pp.44-57,June 2015. https://doi.org/10.7814/jeenv6n2p3. [Accessed Dec 17, 2017].[8] ABET, “Changes in Definitions, Criterion 3 and Criterion 5
instance, C1 performed near the average in Milestone5 and below average in Milestone 6, yet the team maintained a united approach throughout, reflectingtheir commitment to equity.Equity Concerns: F4, F7In contrast, teams F4 and F7 displayed consistently high grades with near-zero deviations in suggestedadjustments, raising potential concerns about collusion in the peer review process. F7’s dramatic drop inperformance during Milestone 3, while maintaining no deviations in peer review data, may indicate aprearranged agreement among members. F4 presents a subtler case, with no single milestone showingsignificant performance deviation that might reveal team inequities hidden by internal agreement, evenshowing a later increase in performance. These
Paper ID #47666Instilling Confidence and Belonging in a First Year Mechanical EngineeringRobotics CourseDr. Jennifer Mullin, UC San Diego Jennifer S. Mullin is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and Faculty Director of Experience Engineering (E4) in the Jacob’s School of Engineering at UC San Diego.Dr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr.Huihui Qi is an Associate Teaching Professor in the department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, at the University of California San Diego.Prof. Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego Nathan Delson
size of minority groups, which prevents a moredetailed empirical analysis by race, first-generation status, and economically disadvantagedstudents.References1 Clayton, A. B., & Worsham, R. E. (2024). Preparing Students for Postsecondary Success: The Effects of College Advising on College Readiness. Innovative Higher Education, 49(1), 1-24.2 2 Vedogbeton, H., Brown, C., Somasse, G. B., & Krueger, R. (2023, June). Improving the Experiences and Retention of Black Students in STEM Education. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3 Kurlaender, M., Reed, S., & Hurtt, A. (2019). Improving College Readiness: A Research Summary and Implications for Practice. Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE.4 Gottfried, M. A
_te/14158.htm[9] Skillfull Learning, 1 - What Is Metacognition and Why Should I Care?”, (2019).[10] P. C. Brown, Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.[11] P. Cunningham, H. Matusovich, D.-A. Hunter, S. Blackowski, and S. Bhaduri, “Beginning to Understand Student Indicators of Metacognition,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 27820. doi: 10.18260/1-2--27820.[12] S. A. Ambrose, How learning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching. in The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[13] P. N. Van Meter, C. M
inDesign Process Experience a miniaturized design process, preparing pairs: each student designs for the them to experience a similar process in longer needs of a partner project(s) in the course A lecturette on design, design Understand that engineering design is one of many thinking, and engineering design Hyperlink design disciplines, and how all design disciplines share common processes, tools, and ways of reasoning about the world in order to create value2. Empathy & Students will
during the class session before each exam. In theactivity, students compete in teams to answer questions quickly. Background music plays forapproximately 1 minute while the teams work to find the correct response. Teams must agree onan answer and turn it in before the music stops. No points are awarded for late or incorrectresponses. Correct responses earn the number of points the team wagered on that response,usually indicating the level of confidence they have in their answer. During the first half, teamscan wager 5, 3, or 1 point(s) once in each round of three questions. During the second half, thewagers change to 6, 4, or 2 points per question per round. Points are recorded in a spreadsheet,and team point totals are announced at half-time
Fall 2023, she began co-teaching Auburn University’s Engineering Orientation (ENGR 1100) course to all first-year students, teaching approximately 1300 students yearly. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 GIFTS: Restructuring a First-Year Engineering Course to Introduce a Variety of Technical Communication ActivitiesMotivation Over the past few years, the Samuel Ginn College of Engineering at Auburn Universityhas been working to restructure the curriculum of the first-year engineering sequence, starting withthe Engineering Orientation (ENGR 1100) course. This course meets once a week for 50 minutesand is a required 0-credit hour Pass (S)/Fail (U) course taken by all
Handouts and Complementary DocumentsInstructional ManualThe instructional manual was structured in six parts: the first four detailed the construction of themechanical components in a sequential joint-by-joint fashion, with the final two parts delineatingthe assembly of the electronic modules on a pre-wired breadboard. Specifically, part one coversthe assembly of the arm base of which contains the stepper motor and principal rotation axisstructure (the “S” joint). Part two requires students to develop the principal forward-backwardcontrol piece (the “L” joint). Part three introduces the secondary forward-backward control via acoupling to the L-joint (the “U” joint). Part four details incorporation of the axes controlling theclaw movement and
. Cooney, K. Alfrey, and S. Owens, "Critical thinking in engineering and technology education: A review," in 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008, pp. 13.344. 1- 13.344. 16.[20] L. Claris and D. Riley, "Situation critical: critical theory and critical thinking in engineering education," Engineering Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101-120, 2012, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2011.649920.[21] A. Godwin, "The development of a measure of engineering identity," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[22] D. Dumitru, D. Bigu, J. Elen, A. Ahern, C. McNally, and J. O'Sullivan, "A European review on critical thinking educational practices in higher education institutions," 2018.[23] C. P. Leão and A
Conference & Exposition, pp. 23-1045. 2013.[4] Jaksic, Nebojsa I. "New Inexpensive 3-D Printers Open Doors to Novel Experiential Learning Practices in Engineering Education." In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 24-932. 2014.[5] Meyers, Kerry L., Andrew S. Morgan, and Brett P. Conner. "3D printing to introduce design in a cornerstone project." Global Journal of Engineering Education 18, no. 1 (2016).
in courses and curricula ontheir own campuses. The paper originally was submitted in January 2025. In revising, we haveadded an Appendix that discusses conditions in April 2025, which represent an abrupt change innational conditions related to DEIJ topics as compared to Fall 2024 when the teaching activitieswere conducted.IntroductionEngineering programs continue to adapt to changing stakeholder demands for better integrationof diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) into both classrooms and curricula. Forexample, ABET’s approved new Criterion 5 will require programs to offer curricula “thatensure[s] awareness of diversity, equity, and inclusion for professional practice consistent withthe institution’s mission” [1] (note that this
. Douce, D. Livingstone, and J. Orwell, "Automatic test-based assessment of programming: A review," J. Educ. Resour. Comput., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4–es, 2005, doi: 10.1145/1163405.1163409.[2] C. Daly, "RoboProf and an introductory computer programming course," SIGCSE Bull., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 155–158, 1999, doi: 10.1145/384267.305904.[3] R. S. Pettit, J. D. Homer, K. M. McMurry, N. Simone, and S. A. Mengel, "Are Automated Assessment Tools Helpful in Programming Courses?," presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015/06/14, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/23569.[4] MATLAB Grader. (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com
? How do you feel today about the What are you hoping to learn from What was (or is) your high school decision-making process you used this course? GPA? in selecting your major? I am strongly considering pursuing What is your current academic How has ENGR 1000 impacted the following minor(s) to go along level? your choice of major? with my major of choice. Are you currently a full-time What do you think
Paper ID #47949Immersive Summer Transition Program: Exploring the academic performanceof first time in college engineering studentsDr. Courtney Green P.E., University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Courtney S. Green, P.E., is an assistant teaching professor for the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering within the Williams States Lee College of Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She holds an M.S. in Engineering and a Ph.D. in Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation from UNC Charlotte.Dr. Catherine M. Blat, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Engineering at Auburn Universityhas been working to restructure the first-year engineering sequence, starting with the EngineeringOrientation (ENGR 1100) course. This course meets once a week for 50 minutes and is a required0-credit Pass (S)/Fail (U) course taken by all incoming first-year engineering and computer sciencestudents. Two sections of the course are offered each semester, and there is a maximum enrollmentof 410 students per section. Traditionally, this course served as an introduction to college life,campus resources, facilities, academic advising, and engineering departments/programs offered oncampus. To better serve students at the beginning of their engineering academic curriculum andcover more fundamental engineering topics, the
, 2019.[5] K. Eagan, S. Hurtado, T. Figueroa, and B.E. Hughes, “Examining STEM pathways amongstudents who begin college at four-year institutions,” Washington, DC: National Academy ofSciences, 2014.[6] X. Chen, “STEM attrition: college students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Statisticalanalysis report. NCES 2014-001,” National Center for Education Statistics, 2013.[7] E. Seymour, and N.M. Hewitt, “Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave thesciences,” Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[8] D. Bressoud, “Book Review: Talking about leaving revisited: persistence, relocation, and lossin undergraduate STEM education,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 67, no.9, pp. 1375-1379, October 2020.[9] B. Geisinger, D.R. Raman
W. & Susan F. Boyd Foundation Inc. is thanked for their financial contribution to theGeneral Engineering Learning Community.References[1] J. Minor, E. Stephan, and A. Stephan, “Implementing an Engineering Math Curriculum Sequence: Preliminary Results and Lessons Learned,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021, p. 37301. doi: 10.18260/1-2--37301.[2] S. Firouzian, Z. Ismail, R. A. Rahman, Y. M. Yusof, H. Kashefi, and F. Firouzian, “Mathematical Competency of Engineers and Engineering Students,” in 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, Kuching, Malaysia: IEEE, Apr. 2014, pp. 216–219. doi: 10.1109
, this contract grading system appears to at the very least dissipate stress and anxietyfor incoming engineering students, and optimistically may lead to further enhanced learning.[1] Gloria Fragoso-Diaz, Billy Gray “An Analysis of Student Retention Efforts in EngineeringTechnology Programs”, Paper ID #36933, ASEE Conference, 2022.[2] A.M. Lucietto and S. E. Leach, “Main Campus and Remote Campus Engineering TechnologyStudents: How Are They Different?”, 2017. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Columbus, Ohio.[3] Robin L. Flanigan , “Engineering Students Quit, But Retention Tactics Abound”, ASME,April 10, 2024.[4] USG Enrollment Reports, https://www.usg.edu/research/enrollment_reports[5]Nancy Reichert, “Practice Makes Perfect
wouldalso be valuable. Lastly, future research could explore how giving students the autonomy toselect their scenarios influences their motivation, engagement, and overall learning experience.References[1] J. D. Ortega-Alvarez, C. Wallwey, B. D. Chambers, D. Newcomb, and D. Gray, “Stakeholder-Informed Review of a First-Year Engineering Program,” Montreal, Canada, Jun. 22, 2025.[2] B. D. Chambers, H. Murzi, M. James, D. Gray, and H. M. Matusovich, “Course Development in a First Year Engineering Program: The Interplay of Autonomy, Peer Relationships, and Content,” development, vol. 10, p. 11, 2021.[3] M. Seren Smith, S. Warnes, and V. Anne, “Scenario-based learning,” in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL
professional skills in engineering job advertisements. Journal of Engineering Education, 2024, Vol. 113, Issue 2, pp. 251–279.[10] Y. Y. Koh and P. L. Chong, “Incorporating student feedback into curriculum review according to outcome based education philosophy,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 541-556, 2019.[11] N. B. Robbins and R. M. Heiberger, Plotting Likert and other rating scales: Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Statistical Meeting, Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 2011, Alexandria, Virginia. pp. 1058–1066.[12] S. E. Harpe, “How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data,” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Vol. 7, Issue 6
; Chirikov, I. (2020). The role of the first-year experience in student attrition. Quality in Higher Education, 26(3), 307-322.[4] Kerby, M. B. (2015). Toward a new predictive model of student retention in higher education: An application of classical sociological theory. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 17(2), 138-161.[5] Belfadel, D., Zabinski, M., & Munden, R. (2020, June). Walking on Water Term Design Project in Fundamentals of Engineering. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.[6] Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. 1989, 18(1), 32-42.[7] Brallier, C. (2020). The effects of student engagement on academic
through class lectures, it is not a mandatory design constraint within this project. This decision acknowledges the inherent variability in students' technical skills, background knowledge, and the limited time frame of a one-credit-hour course. • The assembled wind turbine must fit within the dimensions of the KidWind Tunnel [4], a 48” x 48” enclosure equipped with four industrial fans generating an average wind speed of 3.6 m/s at 30 cm from the tunnel opening. • The wind turbine must be designed to generate power irrespective of its orientation within the wind tunnel. • Total project cost is limited to $25, including the $6 generator. Free components require instructor
Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Trainingand Education, San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer, 2012.[7] K. Squire, Video Games and Learning: Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age, New York, NY,USA: Teachers College Press, 2011.[8] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, andhealth,” Can. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 182–185, 2008.[9] S. Nicholson, “A recipe for meaningful gamification,” in Gamification in Education and Business, T. Reinersand L. C. Wood, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 1–20.[10] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, “Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence isthere that it works?” Change, vol. 30, no. 4, pp
reforms and pedagogical innovations,” ArXiv:1811.09676 [Physics], 2018.[9.] J. J. Selingo, “The Future of Gen Z: How Covid-19 Will Shape Students and Higher Education for the Next Decade," Chronicle of Higher Education Report CHE-R-FGZ-21-7-D 32, 2021.[10.] K. Moore, C. Jones, and R. S. Frazier, “Engineering education for Generation Z,” American Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 8 no. 2, 2017, pp. 111-125. 11
, 2023. https://peer.asee.org/44846[5] D. Belfadel, I. Macwan, and J.F. Drazan. "Full paper: Engaging First-Year Engineering Students Through Team-Based Design and Peer Review: A Service-Learning Approach". 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee, 2023, July. ASEE Conferences, 2023. https://peer.asee.org/44822[6] S. Wang, E. Obst, and B. Richards. "(Full Paper) Enhancing Sense of Belonging in First- Year Engineering Students through Integrated Project-Based Learning and Communication Skills Development". 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE), Boston, Massachusetts, 2024, July. ASEE Conferences, 2024. https
. Students not only ask for more challenges but actually complete them,evinced in challenge completion rates: on average, student-teams achieve 25% more pointsduring the final challenge than required for an A grade. At the end of the quarter(s), 60% oflearners expressed strong interest in joining the university’s SlugSecurity student club andcontinue working within this community of practice to advance their skills and experience.“Thank you for teaching this class. It was a great experience, and I hope to attend Slug Security eventswhen they align with my schedule. You guys are truly knowledgeable and are great teachers, especiallyfor underclassmen.” -Learner response from internal surveyA combination of