related to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), specifically investigating treatment outcomes through a combination of FEM simulation and clinical data analysis. Sherry has worked in industry in the role of a senior system design engineer at Lumedyne Technologies, where she developed a software model for a time-based MEMS accelerometer. She then gained significant academic experience through six years of teaching as an adjunct professor at the University of San Diego. Sherry has been collaborating on a bioengineering research project with the Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego since 2016. In addition to technical research, she conducts engineering education research related to project based
. Undergraduate teaching assistants are integral tostudent success in the course. As the first points of contact for students, they assist with contentdelivery, guide students through hands-on labs and projects, and deliver feedback onassignments. Effective undergraduate teaching assistants are peer leaders and mentors to first-year students; through these workshops, we seek to ground their leadership and mentorshipapproaches in principles of global inclusion, diversity, belonging, equity, and access (GIDBEA).In this work, we outline the workshop curriculum. Scaffolded into three parts, the workshop isdesigned to provide the teaching assistants with the ability to recognize and confront bias amongindividuals and within teams, help them develop an
-by or cars of the user’s presence during the day or at night.This point was emphasized at the Division of Homeland Security webpage on Halloween Safety,which stated “Children are twice as likely to be injured in a vehicle or pedestrian accident onHalloween compared to any other day of the year” [2].Figure 1. The Design Brief for the HIHOW project described the main challenge and itsrelated criteria and constraintsDiscussion and Results The following is a composite case study based on the teaching of the InterdisciplinaryEngineering Design module for three consecutive semesters from Fall 2022 to Fall 2023. Ithighlights content and selected topics in the module’s 10-lesson sequence, key pedagogicalapproaches and their impact on student
students' motivation topursue a career in microelectronics differ after this limited curriculum intervention?Literature ReviewThe Role of Interest in Career DevelopmentSocial Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) [9] is an overarching conceptual framework that guidesall of the decisions of the Scalable Asymmetric Lifecycle Engagement (SCALE) project. SCCTemphasizes the role of relevant interests in career development. Within SCCT's Choice Modeland Interest Model, interest directly links self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and career-relatedchoices [9]. Because of this, many studies seeking to affect student's interest in engineeringcareers focus on increasing student self-efficacy and outcome expectations. In SCCT, interestsdirectly relate to choice
learning experience [7], which we hypothesizemay be related to the increased need to self-regulate in remote environments. However, limitedresearch has explored the relationship between how students chose to participate daily and self-regulation in HyFlex learning experiences. Therefore, we used the following question to guidethis research: What is the relationship between students’ self-regulation and their choice of dailyparticipation in a HyFlex class? Methods HyFlex Course Environment and Participants Design Thinking in Technology is a required introductory level course that uses a project-based approach to prompt learners to consider real-world problems through
students. The Engineering+program at Oregon State University exemplifies this approach by combining traditional lectureswith small-group studios and socially relevant projects. Previous research indicates that students'engagement correlates directly with academic progress. This is especially relevant in theEngineering+ setting, where students are in the process of choosing their majors and planningtheir futures. Students take three courses on varying topics to explore their interests and practicefundamental engineering skills during their first year. Therefore, enhancing student engagementin these courses not only aids in a deeper understanding of the offered materials but alsofacilitates social interactions that can inform better decision-making
subdiscipline, 3) design an activity that gives students hands-on experiencetesting that physical concept.With this simple approach in mind, we planned one lecture and one lab for each module. Thelecture consisted of two components: 1) A broad overview of the civil engineering subdiscipline for that module, including discussion of the societal role played by practitioners of that subdiscipline, relevant and well-known projects, and examples of typical day-to-day responsibilities 2) A basic qualitative explanation of physical concepts relevant to that subdiscipline, emphasizing connections to other courses students might already be familiar with, such as chemistry and physicsWe designed hands-on lab
Northeastern University.Dr. Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University Susan Freeman, is a member of Northeastern University’s first-year engineering facutly, a group of teach- ing faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, engaging and hands-on experience for first-year students, hoping to excite and inspire them in the first step of their journey. There is a strong team, continuously improving on project-based curriculum for the first-year and beyond. Sudan Freeman is also the Associate Dean, Undergraduate Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Meaningful
Paper ID #39848Analysis of Student Motivation in an Introductory Engineering TechnologyGateway CourseHernan David Moreno Rueda, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)Kevin Michael SimonsonProf. Jeffrey J. Richardson, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) At Purdue, Professor Richardson teaches courses in electric vehicle technology, prototype construction / project development and management, and courses in embedded microcontroller sequence. In addition to his teaching responsibilities, Professor RichardProf. Eddy Efendy, Campbell University Eddy Efendy currently teaches Mechanics of Materials in the Engineering
Paper ID #37333Work in Progress: Exploring the Use of Faculty and Peer Mentoring as aTool to Support Engineering Transfer Students’ TransitionDr. Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the
. ● We were just introducing the first concepts of programming (variables, etc). 4 ● We hadn't done any "Computing in the World" readings, reflections, or discussions yet. ● Since then we also did bigger assignments like the "Solar Panel Project" or the "MBTA/Transit Project". ● We've done a lot of data manipulation, analysis, visualization, and interpretation. For this assignment, please reflect on: ● How do you NOW feel about the "Are We Automating Racism?" video? ● Do you have remaining questions about the content? ● Thinking back to "you in Week 02," are your perspectives the
undergraduate pre-engineering program Abstract— This WIP project focuses on the declining STEM proficiency in the UnitedStates, requiring universities to explicitly focus on and understand students' needs. It exploresstudents' learning experiences, attitudes, and challenges in pre-engineering at a publicuniversity in Michigan. College access and success are some of the most pressing issuesconfronting the United States in post-secondary education. This work aims to address andinvestigate the barriers perceived by students while entering pre-engineering, understand theirexperiences during the program and examine pre-engineering through professors' andacademic advisors' lenses. Thus, focusing on the challenge framed: "How might weunderstand students
allows her to apply this work as she coaches students through collaboration, design thinking, and design communication. She is part of a team of faculty innovators who originated Tandem (tandem.ai.umich.edu), a tool designed to help facilitate equitable and inclusive teamwork environments.Gongjun Xu, University of Michigan Dr. Gongjun Xu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Statistics with a joint appointment in the Department of Psychology at the University of Michigan.Rebecca L Matz, University of Michigan Becky Matz is a Research Scientist on the Research and Analytics team at the Center for Academic Inno- vation at the University of Michigan. She directs and supports research projects across Academic Inno
to undergraduate engineers. Past re- search projects include studies of governance in engineering education and the influence of educational technology on engineering education.Prof. Stu Thompson, Bucknell University Stu is an associate professor and chair of the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Buck- nell University, in Lewisburg, PA. His teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer- related electives, and engineering design. His research focus is on the application of mobile computing technology to interesting problems. My broadly he is interested in the continued evolution of engineering education and how the experience can help create graduates who will go on to make
engagement projects, evaluation tools and technology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Ms. Danilo Alberto Gomez Correa, Universidad Andres Bello, Concepcion, Chile Danilo G´omez is an assistant professor at the School of Engineering at the Andr´es Bello University in Concepci´on, Chile. He has a Master’s degree in applied statistics and Industrial engineering. In addition, Danilo has certifications in data science, machine learning, and big data. In his role as a teacher, Danilo specializes in teaching industrial engineering students and carries out academic management activities. His main research areas can be reviewed at: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-7832
marginalized groups [6]. Engineering isone of the fastest growing career paths in the United States and will require the appropriateeducation of a diverse population to fulfill those needs [7]. As the U.S. population keepsdiversifying [8], it is critical we ensure that students from different backgrounds have the supportthey need to transition to a successful path in engineering and other STEM areas.ContextThis evidence-based innovation project is taking place at the University at Buffalo, where thefirst-year engineering seminar EAS199: Engineering Principles takes place. The inception of thecourse re-design was previously reported [11] with the intention of enhancing retention ofstudents at the first year. The overall goal is to provide a better
(62%). This data reinforced the decision to use the placement test for incomingstudents.Curriculum ChangesThe college’s new director of the engineering program arrived in the summer of 2018 and wasasked to review the literature available on improving retention in engineering to identify bestpractices. One of the first papers the director read described the impact observed at theUniversity of Colorado-Boulder (CU-Boulder) of having a “hands-on, team-based, projects-oriented” course for first year engineering students [4]. The CU-Boulder experience showed a10-percentage point increase in the retention of students in engineering after their seventhcollege semester for students who took a hands-on, project-based engineering course in their
the world [4]. In the classroom setting, presentingdiverse perspectives by encouraging students to listen to and consider the stories of their peerscan broaden the students’ understanding of the myriad of experiences that exist directly aroundthem. This positively impacts the class environment as students who feel more connection andbelonging will be more likely to engage in discussions and course assignments in a moremeaningful way [4].ObjectivesThe overall objective of the story sharing exercise is to foster a sense of belonging and promoteinclusivity for first year students. The motivation for the project stems from institutional researchthat shows that pre-major students, women, and students of color at Western WashingtonUniversity have a
, the results of the program will be discussed in detail,as the program has created tangible, measurable, and sustained results over a period of five yearsfor both students and faculty.Retention…and a bit of recruitment tooAccording to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) there are almost 4,000 degreegranting institutions in the US [7], with just over 18.5 million students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions as of 2021 [8]. Projections illustrate enrollment is notexpected to get back to the highs of 2010 and 2011 over the next ten years, and while projectionsfor the number of degree granting institutions are not provided by NCES, this number has beensteadily declining over the last ten years [7] [8]. These
Paper ID #38515How much does readiness matter? An examination of student persistenceintention and engineering identityMr. Syahrul Amin, Texas A&M University Syahrul Amin is a PhD candidate in Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University. He is Experi- enced in conducting numerous STEM education research projects and skilled in working in collaborative environments to collect and evaluate research data for a variety of STEM education projects. He is also experienced in K-16 teaching for over 8 years. His research interests focus on science education, engi- neering education, GT education, and international
essentialengineering skills while at the same time scaffolding progression towards a comprehensiveCornerstone Project(s) that all students present at the end of the semester. ENGR 111 features ahigh level of faculty interaction with students during class time, with a minimum of fivepersonnel (a combination of faculty and teaching assistants) manning six different coursesections of 60-90 students per section. ENGR 111 exclusively employs various forms of activelearning, including collaborative, cooperative, problem-based, project-based, and discovery-based learning [46-54]. The course includes numerous features that have the potential to increasestudent interest in engineering.1.4 The Current StudyTaken together, we hypothesize that course features studied in
drink redeemable at the department’s cafe.Collected responses were divided into two groups based on whether or not students completed theassignments. For each, plots were constructed to represent the responses to Likert items. Shortresponses were subject to multiple rounds of inductive coding. Axial coding was then utilized togroup related codes into thematic groups where appropriate. A researcher experienced withqualitative analysis but external to the project was given the resulting codebook and a randomsubset of student responses. Interrater reliability was calculated using Krippendorff’s Alpha andfound to be 0.84, well exceeding the accepted minimum threshold of 0.68 [23, 24].ResultsThe results of the study are divided into four categories
sizeable enrollmentranging from 150 to 225 students per semester, the ECE Discovery Studio program relies heavilyon the utilization of Peer Leaders (PLs), a cohort of 15 to 20 upper-level EE and CmpE studentsselected to a stipend-eligible academic-year-long fellowship. The Peer Leader Fellowship (PLF)is facilitated in parallel to ECE Discovery Studio with the goal of providing easily accessiblementorship from students who have gone through similar experiences and have commonacademic interests within the expansive ECE curriculum. Each PL is assigned a mentee group of10 to 15 ECE Discovery Studio students and the course is designed to promote networkingamong small groups through interactive studio activities, peer reviews, team projects
, and non-traditional students(veterans and returning learners) with over a year gap in the last math course they have taken.This bridge program provides individualized math plans, rigorous math review, and hands-on,project-based learning (PBLs). Program participants showed improvement in math performanceand math persistence as compared to the baseline data and showed a promising starting point foraddressing the obstacles facing these at-risk student populations.Baseline student populationThe baseline student population includes any students at Lipscomb University with an intendedmajor of Computer Science (CS), or Civil (CE), Electrical and Computer (ECE), Mechanical(ME), or Software Engineering (SE) beginning with cohorts starting at the
project the format of key scientific genres: 1020 students write a Design Report and 2030 students write a Technical Report. Focus: scientific arguments and how to deploy scientific evidence. Critical Reading Comparative Students read a variety of rhetorical analysis
Paper ID #38349Work in Progress: Insight into the strengths and personality types ofthose involved in a first-year engineering programDr. Melissa M. Simonik, State University of New York, Binghamton Melissa received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Union College (Schenectady, NY) in 2014 and her M.Eng. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University (Ithaca, NY) in 2015. Melissa started at Binghamton University in 2015 as a Mechanical Engineering doctoral student. She served as a teaching assistant (TA) for Watson Capstone Projects for two years. She continued as a TA for the Engi- neering Design Division in
teaching and uses active learning techniques to help students achieve an expert-like level of thinking. She guides students in bridging the gap between facts and usable knowledge to solve complex engineering problems.Prof. Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego Curt Schurgers is a Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project-based learning. He also co-directs a hands-on undergraduate research program called Engineers for Exploration, in which students apply their engineering knowledge to problems in exploration and conservation.Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego Minju Kim is a
education- ally based research projects with an emphasis on statistical analyses and big data. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Use of Transfer Student Capital in Engineering and STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review1. Introduction This complete research paper presents a systematic literature review that synthesizes theuse of Laanan’s theory of transfer student capital in postsecondary vertical college transfers,specifically focusing on use in engineering and Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) education [1]. The motivation for this research stems from a need to betterunderstand the theory of transfer student capital, which
these students, 14 students were recruited. Student participants were askedto share information about their experiences as a first-year student in Seaver College, includingtheir challenges and struggles. Their techniques and strategies to overcome those challenges andstruggles were supplemented with the results from students who were not struggling or did notreceive midterm deficiency grades (n = 5) but rather thrived throughout the semester. For thesefive student participants, the authors received recommendations from professors. The semi-structured interviews were conducted in spring 2022, ranged from 9 to 36 minutes (M = 21.8, SD= 7.5), and were recorded and later transcribed using a third-party transcription service provider.This project is
, construction safety, and control room management. Dr. Harvey has worked with the Federal Aviation Administration, the United States Air Force, Roche Diagnostics, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Louisiana Department of Economic Development, and the National Science Foundation on projects. Before joining the academic community, Dr. Harvey was a consultant of business process reengineering for KnowledgeWare where he worked with Whirlpool and Ford Motor Company. Before that, he was the manager of business process reengineering for the Student Loan Marketing Association where he was responsible for the reengineering involved in the implementation of a $55