, navigating graduate study Travel Grant and Documents showing interest in Written throughout the Ph.D. Fellowship application and yearning for professional program. materials development and growth opportunities. Performance Review, Collection of writings that target Written at different formal Preliminary/Qualifying research interests and career milestones in the Ph.D. Exam Reflections planning. program (if applicable) Ph.D. graduate portfolio The portfolio targets the Work-in-progress throughout development of our graduate the program
understand the overlap betweenbehaving in an ethical manner and conducting high-quality scientific research. This ethics lessonevolved from an earlier exercise on accuracy and precision in scientific measurement, which hasbeen used successfully with large and small groups of high school and college students, and aspart of professional development activities for engineers and scientists. The EnSURE studentswho completed this exercise at MSU in 2015 found the experience to be an engaging and helpfulway to explore some of the ethical considerations of data collection, and the instructor plans tocontinue offering the lesson in future EnSURE programs. This paper includes the handouts andcase studies used in this summer program, and interested educators
residential building construction was adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, and public works.Mr. Chi Xu, University of Florida Ph.D. in Civil Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (Begins in Jan
term project by completing several intermediate writing anddiscussion assignments. Intermediate writing assignments are brief, typically requiring fewerthan three pages. The goal is to encourage direct, specific responses to the assignment, makingthe student’s thinking as clear as possible. Development of more expansive text in the style of ajournal article comes later (primarily in Course 2). Typical assignments include the following: 1.Develop a list of preliminary readings and keywords; 2. Write and present a 1-page descriptionof the specific topic of the planned literature review; 3. Post, for class discussion, a recentresearch paper, and analyze it using the critical thinking framework; 4. Prepare and presentcritical summary and
is to develop advanced level practitioners in industrywho are interested in developing green knowledge to meet evolving workforce demands,seeking professional development, expanding opportunities for professional advancement,or pursuing a managerial position9-12. To support this goal, the new course is intended toenable students to make green decisions when selecting and implementing a sustainabledesign plan for a particular industrial application through an in-depth understanding ofcurrently available and newly emerging green manufacturing. The course is currentlyoffered entirely online. One of the key challenges in developing the online course is anemphasis on life cycle assessment simulation experience for enhancing online studentlearning
scholarly research, in which thesustained contributions and the scholarship of the doctoral degree recipients play a crucial role.Lacking a crystal ball, the academic vision and foresight of the thesis advisor is also seen to playan important role in the long term impact of the thesis.From the authors’ perspective, the use of a rubric is to be considered essential for evaluating theoutcomes of all doctoral theses. The authors plan to use the rubric for a variety of additionaldoctoral theses to validate and refine the approach.References:[1] ABET, Inc. http://www.abet.org[2] Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Page
• Perceived value of Skill • Quality of Activity Reflection Skill Assessment • Open-ended reflection on • Collection and evaluation of learning outcomes and added student products from every value of the activity activity Figure 3: TESP Evaluation Plan Page 24.1281.10reflection. Finally, for every activity, samples of student work, including mind maps, inventiondisclosures, and publications are collected and analyzed to
students varied greatly in terms of their current stage of the graduate process.A few students had started participating in the Program as undergraduates, while others wereclose to the time when they planned to complete their qualifying exams. This heterogeneity,combined with the Program Director’s basis in engineering, made it more difficult for theseminar to fulfill the same role as it had with the first cohort. Furthermore, the bench sciencemajors in the second cohort already had support groups in the form of their lab groups. Thestudents who lacked this support—such as the lone African American woman in the mathematicsdepartment, a program in which students often work in solitude—were subsequently unable torely on the seminar in the same way
, HI, June 2007.73. A. Johnson, A. Dixon, K. McMullen, C. Espaillat, and J. Oguntebi, Empowerment, outreach and harmony:working together to improve the entrance and retention rate for women of color pursuing advanced degrees, Proc.2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 2007.74. D. Reese and T. Stevenson, Planning for diversity at all levels, Proc. 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago,IL, June 2006.75. S. Nambisan, Improving engineering graduate student experience through team-based efforts, Proc. 2007 ASEEAnnual Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 2007.76. AGEP, http://www.nsfagep.org/ Accessed 02/29/2008.77. GEM, http://www.gemfellowship.org/ Accessed 02/29/2008.78. ATT, http://www.research.att.com/academic/alfp.html79.. Elaine P. Laws
giving students a broad view ofhigher education and the practices necessary to modernize higher education for the 21st century.III.2. Global Perspectives Program: pre-trip meetings In addition to completion of the PFP and GEDI courses, students are required to enroll ina three-credit Study Abroad course and attend regular meetings throughout the spring semesterleading up to the GPP experience. During these meetings, students learn about and discuss topicsrelevant to understanding the educational structure in European institutions and the local cultureof the regions visited during GPP. The meetings also allow students to develop individualresearch topics related to higher education that they plan to investigate during GPP. For the
Skills (primarily aimed at sophomores and seniors) • Creating Your Unique Personal Development Plan: Explore Your Options (primarily for sophomores) • How to be an Effective Sophomore (primarily for sophomores) • Effective Oral/Written Communication (primarily aimed at juniors) • Developing Research Skills in Engineering and Science (primarily for juniors) • Writing and Presenting an Engineering-Based Business Case (primarily aimed at juniors) • “Good Enough for Government Work?” Ethics and Professionalism in Research (primarily aimed at juniors) • General Graduate School Information and Where to Find It (primarily for juniors/seniors) • Seven Habits of Highly Effective People (primarily aimed at seniors
models of study abroad including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students. Maria started working at Texas A&M in 2005 as Assistant Director for Latin American Programs and in 2009 she was promoted to Program Manager for South America in the same office. During her time at the Office for Latin America Programs she created, managed and developed projects to enhance the presence of Texas A&M University in Latin American and to support in the internationalization of the education, research, and outreach projects of the university. She was charged with the development and implementation of a strategic plan for Texas A&M
the results. Each report is limited to one page, and will include a one paragraph executive summary followed by a detailed analysis of the problem. Problem Statements 1. Your customers have specified that a new part you plan to carry must weigh between 95g and 105g. The supplier you generally use says they can provide that part for you. They measure a sample of 40 parts and create a 95% confidence interval on the mean that spans from 97g to 101g. A normal probability plot of the sample confirms the weight of the parts is approximately normally distributed. What should your company do? 2. Your company maintains a fleet of delivery trucks. Fuel cost is a significant expense for the company and your fleet averages 14.9 miles
enrollees based on attributes of applicants selectedfrom 2009 to 2015 admission applications; and quantitative and qualitative observations of theprogram’s domestic applicants, admits, visitors, and enrollees based on post-admissionrecruitment event attendance from 2011 to 2015. The observations and descriptive analysis givespecial attention to student groups of interest including URMs, low SES, and Top 20 students.Finally, practical strategies and plans for future improvements are discussed.Application data from domestic applicants (N=802), admits (N= 230), visitors (N=207), andenrollees (N=111) in the doctoral program from 2009 to 2015 were analyzed. Internationalstudents were not included in the analysis for two reasons. First, only a small
, to their classes. How do they learn to do thesepresentations, and how do they know if they are communicating effectively? This is where peerreview can help.This paper provides a summary of the limited literature on peer review of oral presentations,including information on rubrics and other tools available to conduct peer reviews. Thesummary is followed by detailed descriptions of three contexts in which peer review has beenemployed to improve engineering graduate students’ oral presentations. The paper concludeswith a discussion of what was learned in those three contexts and plans for future studies of peerreview of oral presentations.Literature ReviewAlso known as peer evaluation or assessment (although sometimes these words may
Paul andElder model of critical thinking specifically, the University of Louisville adopted it specificallyas the core of their Quality Enhancement Plan for undergraduate education, e.g. [10] As far aswe have determined, the present work is the first to apply the Paul & Elder approach to theteaching of critical reading and writing to engineering graduate students.The Course 1/Course 2 sequence was originally implemented in the University of South CarolinaCollege of Engineering and Computing (CEC) as part of the graduate curriculum in BiomedicalEngineering, which was established in 2008. Since that time, the courses have evolved into theircurrent form and have been taken by students in all CEC PhD-granting programs. The CT modelis, of
programs address this need at the entry level.Bibliography1. “Engineering Education,” National Society of Professional Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia, 20012. Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, American Society for Engineering Education,Washington, D.C., 20113. Amendments to Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations, Sacramento, California, 20004. “California Master Plan for Higher Education,” Sacramento, California, 19605. “Engineering education initiative” National Society of Professional Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia, 20116. “Policy Statement 465 - Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice” American Society ofCivil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 20077. “Educating the Engineer of 2020
conducting research. The TAs‟ experiences as course instructorsstrengthened Bianca and Susan‟s interest in teaching, and led Hank to be interested in includingteaching in his future plans. In his words: “…I‟m interested in research in general, which is why I pursue my PhD,…I‟d wanna do research whether it was in academia or industry, but…academia particularly appeals to me because I really enjoy teaching, and…the teaching that I‟ve done as a TA and as an instructor [course instructor] this summer…has really…sort of exposed me to that and I‟ve found I‟ve really enjoyed it, so…the added role of the teacher in academics is what appeals to me there.” (Hank, Individual Interview, 36)Finally, the learning opportunities
calls for alternative doctoralpedagogies for students planning to succeed in industry.It is difficult to directly compare the results of this study with numerical results shown in similarstudies. We are particularly interested with comparing our numerical findings through thissurvey with numerical findings about the most important skills for Ph.D.-holding engineeringgraduates in academia and industry. However, most studies look particularly at the experiencesand employer expectations of baccalaureate-level engineers entering the field. For example,Lang et al. (2009) conducted a survey of engineers in industry regarding the necessary attributesfor entry-level (baccalaureate) engineers using a survey instrument asking participants about
to directly assess theimpact of the advising relationship on various measures of student success. Our future plansinclude the analysis of the larger survey to better understand returners’ decisions to pursue aPhD, the unique challenges they face, and coping strategies they utilize and how these compareto those of direct pathway students. We also conducted in-depth interviews with 53 returning anddirect pathway students from across the country and plan to analyze that data for a betterunderstanding of the development of students’ research and how their past experiences influencetheir PhD work. Finally, we will conduct focus groups with various stakeholders in industry,government, and academia, including faculty advisors, to better understand
studyinghumans. The faculty provided stories of these challenges as well as the strategies theyused to overcome them. As Corey explains, “I wanted to find out how everyone dealtwith situations that I had difficulty in…I want to be prepared for my research, and Ifound it helpful to know obstacles are presented to all of us.” Similarly, Catherine shareshow toward “the middle of the semester, as we became more comfortable withmethodologies through other courses, I became more interested some of the issues withthe research that didn’t go as planned.” Molly and Emilie provide a broad overview ofthe kinds of “realities” faculty shared: “Getting to talk candidly with the authors of these papers made EER seem much more accessible, but also opened my eyes
discussions surroundingthe photographs. Facilitators must be invested in allowing social change to occur while beingattuned to any political and power dynamics at play; it is recommended that there be more thanone facilitator with at least one being a part of the community of interest [31]. Not only will thisbe beneficial for the planning stages of the project, but this will help provide buy-in and buildrapport with participants. After forming the study team, the next task is to reach out to membersof the community to participate in the project. Recruitment of participants can vary with moststudies ranging from 8-12 participants given the involved nature of the project and intense datacollection [31]. Before data collection begins, it is typical to
included writing code,designing software architecture, and teaching corporate education. His writing in industryincluded design documentation, test plans, proposals, standards documents, process documents,user documentation, and some business documentation. His audience for these documents wasgenerally his peers, and the documentation was intended to be informative, used for training andoccasionally for decision-making. He said that in his industry experience, “everyone assumesyou must already know how to write” because of being a university graduate. He also mentionedthat he modified his writing based on the audience, including their preferences for format, anddiscussed the issue of length and level of detail. In his experience, design documents
students to write, all in a learning community setting. A scarcity ofresources should not prevent an engineering school from providing scientific writing assistanceto graduate students, as they can encourage the growth of a peer learning community.5.2 Future workAs stated earlier, our learning community has been growing and continues to grow organically tomeet the needs expressed by students. Therefore, we plan to continue to develop new ideasarising from student feedback and hope to recruit more and more students, faculty, and staff intothe learning community.In the near future, we intend to develop online toolkits for students to organize and animateactivities on their own. For example, if a group of students would like to organize a
,reported, and given information on getting assistance, students did not seek out the assistanceand the weaker students tried to avoid it, even when referred. Often those referred studentswould set up appointments then not show, and simply did not reschedule or answer followups.[10]The author believes that well planned, multiple interventions will have an impact on plagiarismwith an international graduate student population. It also makes sense, as formerly cited researchsuggested, that academic integrity is clearly something that “cannot be imposed on students; itmust be accepted by them.”[21] The question then remains how to best accomplish thisacceptance. There seems to be two distinct approaches shown to have a positive effect onacademic
research. In a subsequent reflective question response, she describesthe working environment she creates with Annie: I’d like to keep the experience positive and manageable but sometimes I feel like I have trouble determining the right balance…when we have a short meeting things don’t go quite as planned I get concerned that the student is having a discouraging research experience…I try to welcome and explain all my student’s questions.Mia’s consideration for Annie is clear in the importance she places on keeping her experiencebalanced and not too boring or too complex. The focus is on Annie’s interest in the research, noton the research itself. Mia continues: She [Annie] has been doing good work and I feel like