rendering.The nomenclature used (Figure 3) in the present work is: spacing (s), pitch (p), height (H),thickness (t), length (L), base width (W), and base thickness (tb) [19]. However, compared toactive cooling systems, passive cooling system have lower heat dissipation rates, andenvironment conditions such as air temperature and wind speed will affect the heatdissipation rates [20]. Active cooling system concludes micro-channels, spray cooling and jetimpingement, Abdolzadeh showed spray cooling could reduce cell temperature from 58°C to37°C [21], however, spray cooling require water usage and the heat from the cell is wasted.The active cooling system is more efficient and more technically feasible if the waste heatfrom cooling system can be reused in
basis.SummaryThis paper presented a multidisciplinary, technology-based Master of Technology degreeprogram. The program includes a multidisciplinary core, a technology-based concentration, andthesis/project practicum. The intent of introducing the program is to integrate different disciplineswithin the College of Technology and provide a degree program to integrate the knowledgecontent, skills, and experiences of today’s professionals.Bibliography1. Keating, D. A., Stanford, T. G. Dunlap, D. D., McHenry, A. L., DeLoatch, E. M., Lee, P. Y., Depew, D. R., Bertoline, G. R., Dyrenfurth, M. J., Tricamo. S. J., Palmer, H. J., Davis, I. T., Morrison, E. R., Tidwell, J. P., Gonzalez-Landis, S. J., O’Brien, J. O., Snellenberger, J. M., Quick
projects or homework, but it not the same as work-related deadlines. The graduate student has to work with others, do part of the work, incorporatehis/her ideas and the ideas of other people in their group, and give the results to others to analyzeand comment on. The student may have more than one supervisor, so s/he will need to allowenough time to make corrections and then turn in a final report. It is important to be able toprioritize the tasks according to their urgency and be organized. Being organized can providedmany advantages in making sure all the requirements are met in a timely fashion.Because of time constraints, the graduate student needs to understand the industry’s research orproject faster to obtain results in a short period of
were expected to attend at least 2 sessions of the Iowa State Conference on Race andEthnicity, which is held on campus every spring. Table 1: Schedule of topics covered during the semester long course. Week Topic(s) 1-2 Introduction to Broader Impacts 3 Explaining the impact of your work 4-5 K-12 engagement 6-7 Broadening Participation 8 Engaging the public 10 Promoting teaching, training and learning 11 Assessment of activities 12-15 Course Project: Objectives and Scope; Project details; Assessment plan and results if piloted
Page 15.952.3tripled from 10,000 to 31,867. This number remained stable during the late 1970s and throughthe early 1980s. After a second period of growth in the mid-80s, 42,637 research doctorates wereawarded by 1986. From 1998-2002, the number of doctorates awarded each year generallydeclined and reached a low point in 2002.By 2006, an all-time high number of doctorates was awarded in the U.S.5 In science andengineering (S&E) fields, this growth was due in large part to degrees awarded to internationalstudents, many who came to the U.S. to study following World War II6. In 2006, U.S. citizensreceived 63% of all research and 56% of S&E doctorates. The percentage of U.S. citizens whoearned a doctorate in engineering was the lowest with
SURF,for giving access to the data for this study.Bibliography1. Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210-230.2. Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36-74.3. Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270-277.4. Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297
Campbell and Campbell (2000)’s study, they concluded the perceived need of facultyand students (referred as protégé in their article) from mentoring relationships[3]. The facultymentor has perceived needs including the altruistic desire to help students (beyond the helpafforded through assigned teaching and advising), need for evidence of activities demonstratingservice to the university (for tenure and promotion decisions), and opportunity for enjoyment ofthe friendship and relationship with students provided by mentoring. On the other hand, thestudent protégé approaches the relationship with expected needs, including help with schedulingand enrollment decisions, help interpreting degree requirements, career guidance, assistance incoping with
, measures, number of participants, teamsize(s), methods of data collection (survey, interview, etc.), methods of analysis (descriptivestatistics, regression, structural equation modeling, etc.), and conclusions with respect to trust.Conclusions related to the relationship of trust and team success were sorted into “trustdescendant conclusions” and “trust antecedent conclusions.” Descendants of trust are defined asvariables or aspects of teamwork and success directly affected by trust. Antecedents of trust arethose variables or aspects of teamwork and success that directly affect trust within a team.Study SelectionAs shown in Figure 1, the initial search generated 140 studies. The 140 studies initially includedwere reviewed first by their title and
convincing research gap in the introductory sections of the documents. Table 3shows the themes designated as Broader Impacts. These were determined by the NSF definitionof Broader Impacts, which was included in the Introduction, as well as open coding from theactivities that the participant described as contributing to the broader impact.Table 3: Broader Impacts Themes, Definitions, and Participant Examples Evaluation Criteria: Broader Impacts Theme Definition Example(s)K-12 Education Mention of outreach to “As I did as an undergrad during Engineering for Kids, I willand Outreach school-aged children, expose basic aspects of my
created a special connectivity between students, theirdepartments, their senior peers and campus offices during very unsettling and anxious times oftransitioning to graduate study, let alone in COVID virtual times.ReferencesAlmanazar, R .R., Hapes, R., & Rowe, G. (2018, March). Strategies for a successful graduatestudent orientation program. Academic Advising Today, 41(1). Retrieved fromhttps://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View-Articles/Strategies-for-a-Successful-Graduate-Student-Orientation-Program.aspx#:~:text=An%20effective%20new%20student%20orientation,graduate%20students%20whom%20they%20advise.Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: WH Freeman andCompany.Barker, S., Felstehausen, G
. Smith, and J. Strohl. Projections of jobs and education requirements through 2018. June 2010. [2] National Science Foundation. What level of education do U.S. S&E workers have? https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/data/workforce-04.html. [3] K. Luchini-Colbry, K. Wawrzynski, R. Mangiavellano, and E. McCune. Guiding them to graduate school: Professional development for undergraduates participating in engineering research programs. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/21442. [4] M. Lagoudas and B. Yalvac. A model for multidisciplinary experiences for undergraduates that promotes retention and pipeline to graduate school. In 2011 ASEE
Cyberspace) universities are offering graduate degrees in cybersecurity,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 26–26, Jun. 2014.[2] A. Bicak, X. (Michelle) Liu, and D. Murphy, “Cybersecurity Curriculum Development: Introducing Specialties in a Graduate Program,” Inf. Syst. Educ. J., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 2015.[3] S. A. Kumar and S. Alampalayam, “Designing a graduate program in information security and analytics,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology education - SIGITE ’14, 2014, pp. 141–146.[4] M. Ardis and N. R. Mead, “The Development of a Graduate Curriculum for Software Assurance,” in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2011.[5] M
? What specific topics or information do you hope will be covered as part of the professional development activities during this summer research experience?The focus of the post-experience survey was to assess academic and developmental outcomesassociated with program participation, as well as students’ experiences. Many of the questionsfrom the pre-experience survey were repeated in the post-experience survey, which alloweddirect comparison of individual answers across the 10-week program. The post-survey alsoincluded a set of open ended questions: What part(s) of the summer program did you find most valuable or helpful? What part(s) of the summer program did you find least valuable or helpful? Please share any
master’sthesis students were more concentrated above the mean. As such, master’s thesis students aremore likely to associate with this factor when considering their ideal mentor. While the samplesize for the master’s student population is small, this finding still may hold true, and warrantsfurther analysis with larger samples to ensure its validity. Figure 2: Mann-Whitney U Test Independent-Samples Histogram comparing Graduate Degrees to Value me as a person and my professional goalsRace/Ethnicity: In the demographics, students were asked to select the race(s) that they mostidentified with. Of the responses obtained, students identified as either African American orBlack (n=4), Asian (n=18), White (n=26), and Other
Environmental Engineering (GT EnvE) ≠ Jenny Eaton, Administrative Coordinator for GT EnvE ≠ Kuo-Jen Liao, GT AEES Dialogue for Academic Excellence Committee (DAEC) ≠ Emily Lantrip, GT AEES DAECLast, but certainly not least, the authors would like to sincerely thank the entire GT EnvE studentpopulation and the GT EnvE faculty and staff who have been supportive in understandingstudent needs and concerns. Page 14.1237.15References1. Rogers, S., Noonan, J., Baek, J., Lee, S., Tezel, U., Michalski, G., Hou, C.-H., A successful student-initiated assessment method for an environmental engineering graduate program. Proceedings from ASEE's
groups due to thelow response rates. There are also other validity concerns that are more specific to particularstudies.Table 1. Responses generated by some recent engineering education survey studies. Author(s) Response Rate Napp2 109 21.8% St. Clair & Baker3 369 14.8% Zydney et al.4 155 43.7% Baker et al.5 45 40.9% Brawner et al.6 586 (511 usable) 36.2% Puerzer & Rooney7 96 46.2
benefits and deeply heldcultural beliefs within some organizations about the negative connotations of a doctorate degreein engineering. Participants also described how university policies, such as partnership degreeprograms or inconvenient course times and modalities might compliment or conflict withemployer policies and further shape an employee’s decision to earn a PhD. These findings offersome initial insight into the employer-level factors that could inform returners’ thinking thatreturners, employers, and universities may want to consider in future decision making. References[1] Baker, S., Tancred, P., & Whitesides, S. (2002). Gender and Graduate School: Engineering Students Confront Life
crossed a threshold of 2.8 V) triggers ahardware interrupt which starts Clock, while a falling edge (indicating that available powerhas dropped below 2.4 V) triggers a second hardware interrupt to stop Clock. The Powermodule is configured to automatically send the system into LPM3 as soon as the systementers an idle state. This will happen while the system is waiting for the Battery OKhardware interrupt and in between Clock ticks. This idle, low-power state accounts forabout 98.6% of overall runtime. The Semaphore module provides an inter-thread signalingmechanism within the RTOS. In this project, a semaphore is posted every 2,000 Clockticks, or every 2 s. The semaphore unblocks the data collection/transmission loop insidethe main system Task
experiences that caused them to see themselves as differentiated from the broader group ofresearch engineers. This within-group differentiation appears to be grounded in fairly routine experiencesas a member of an under-represented group in a STEM field. Ironically, despite the clear disempoweringimpact that these experiences can have, there is also some evidence that they may promote thedevelopment of alternative value structures and feelings of purpose related to STEM fields for membersof underrepresented groups. 15ReferencesAlexander, C. (2011) Learning to be lawyers: Professional identity and the law school curriculum. Maryland Law Review, 70(2), 465-483.Ancis, J. R., & Plillips, S. D
). Sydney, Australia: IEEE.10. Cole, D.J., Ryan, C.W., & Fran, K. (1995). Portfolios across the curriculum and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.11. Cyr, T., & Muth, R. (2006). Porfolios in doctoral education. In P. Maki & N. Borkowski (Eds.), The assessment of doctoral educational (pp. 215-237). Sterling, VA: Stylus.12. Strivens, J. (2007). A survey of e-pdp and e-portfolio practice in UK Higher Eduction. Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.recordingachievement.org/higher-education/articles.html13. Lorenzo, G., & Ittleson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/LibraryDetailPage/666?ID=ELI300114. Delandshere, G., & Arens, S. A
. Fifty years ago, the biggest regionalcompanies included International Harvester, General Electric, Westinghouse, Magnavoxand ITT Communications Division. Today, the largest employers of engineers andtechnologists include ITT Aerospace /Communications Division, Raytheon Net CentricSystems, General Dynamics, Undersea Sensors Systems Inc., Zimmer, Biomet, DePuy,General Motors, Dana Corp, and International Truck & Engine. These companies neededucational resources to grow their local talent.The lack of graduate programs in urban areas such as Fort Wayne is rooted in the legaciesof the land grant college system. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, the U.S. governmentgave states allotments of federal land with which to create an endowment to
). Retrieved March 24, 2016, from http://catalog.mtsu.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=19&poid=5815&returnto=2677[2] Graduate Education: The Backbone of American Competitiveness and Innovation. (2007). In Council of Graduate Schools[3] Foroudastan, S. (2014). Engineering Management Creating Strong Partnerships between Future Graduates. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, American Society for Engineering Education, 1-10.[4] Foroudastan, S. (2015). Master of Science in Professional Science 2014-2015 Institutional Effectiveness Achievements Report. Middle Tennessee State University.[5] Foroudastan, S. (2015). Domestic Internationalization Developed Through Collegiate
on a leadership role in their respective communities.The paper will conclude with a discussion of the results of anevaluation of the program which was used to gather both studentand teacher/mentor input at the symposium, a listing of lessonslearned, and plans for the future development and extension of theprogram. Page 11.959.1IntroductionNavy’s civilian science and technology (S&T) workforce numbersome 22,000 strong. Of those some 4,000 charge 50% or more oftheir time to actual S&T projects and are considered to be the corepractitioners of S&T for the Navy. Almost half of those 4,000 holdPh.D.s1 with about half working at the Naval Research Laboratory(NRL) and
AC 2007-375: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO TEACHING ASSISTANTTRAINING AND ORIENTATIONRonald Kane, New Jersey Institute of Technology Ronald S. Kane is Dean of Graduate Studies and Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Before that he had been Dean of Graduate Studies, Research, and Continuing Professional Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology and before that served as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Manhattan College. He has industrial experience in the energy and aerospace industries and worked for a number of years on nuclear safety and alternative energy systems, with focus on modeling and
AC 2007-378: THE DOCTORAL PATHWAY, AN INSTITUTIONAL JOURNEY OFDEVELOPMENTRonald Kane, New Jersey Institute of Technology Ronald S. Kane is Dean of Graduate Studies and Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Before that he had been Dean of Graduate Studies, Research, and Continuing Professional Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology and before that served as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Manhattan College. He has industrial experience in the energy and aerospace industries and worked for a number of years on nuclear safety and alternative energy systems, with focus on modeling and
researchfindings. This may be alleviated in the future as the technology improves. The majority of theeffectiveness of online programs is still dependent on the instructor and the design of the coursecontent.Bibliography 1. Dunn, L.S., Poirot, J. L., & Rice, J.W. (2005). Instituting a distance-delivered doctorate in educational computing: PHDifferences, not just a higher-lever masters degree. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. pp. 385-390. 2. Kongrith, K., Aberasturi, S., & Maddux, C. (2004). Are online master’s degree programs replacing the traditional master’s degree programs? Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education
beenintroducing the student participants, who are earning Ph.D. degrees in research Page 15.532.2universities, to the possibility of more teaching-focused careers in institutions servingundergraduates. At UC, practical experience and mentoring in a teaching-focusedprogram could be obtained by PFF participants in the University's College of AppliedScience, which offers two-year and four-year technology degrees in many fields. Butchanges in career prospects for new engineering Ph.D.'s, along with major changes inacademic programs at UC, are providing the impetus for changes in the PFF program.We describe some motivating factors in the changes we have made and are
intendedobjective. We had at least two translations per questions that were compared, which resulted inCATS-S v1. For the second activity, ten (10) graduate students from civil engineeringparticipated in a pilot study. They were asked to answer all 27 items of CATS-s v1, rate theclarity of each question, and provide suggestion to improve unclear questions. Nine (9) of thestudents completed their BA at a Hispanic University from Latin America. CATS-s v2 was thencreated after analyzing their responses. Finally, the third activity completed so far consisted oftesting the protocol to identify if bilingual students exhibit the same misconceptions (commonerrors) than those currently identified in CATS. Ten (10) Hispanic senior students from the civilengineering
with the industry executives and work as an “outside consultant”. Some of the otherbenefits as noted in the survey were as follows: • Formed program structure that kept students on task • Opportunity to visit the University campus, understand the traditions, and tour the campus including the foot ball stadium • Ability to review real world operations and recommend best practices to a real company • The seven S processes that can applied to any other businesses beyond distribution Page 22.1191.7 VII. ConclusionsAlthough the law and business schools worldwide have been using the analysis of real world orpseudo case studies
so importantly to the work reported in thispaper. This article is based on my work as a member of the Evaluation and Research Team forCIRTL. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. DUE-0717768. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation (NSF).References1 National Science Board. (2008). Science and Engineering Indicators 2008, Volume 1. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistiscs/seind08