June 23, 2013
June 23, 2013
June 26, 2013
23.647.1 - 23.647.23
Graduate Engineering Student Perceptions of ePortfolio and the Role of Departmental CulturePortfolios and their electronic incarnation (ePortfolios) are popular in a variety ofdisciplines, including art, medicine, and education, and for a variety of applications, suchas undergraduate assessment and graduate student work showcases. Recently, the field ofengineering has shown interest in ePortfolios, with graduate engineering programsinvestigating the use of ePortfolios for graduate programmatic assessment. However, thetypical culture where ePortfolios have been used is quite different from the wayengineering culture is traditionally described (e.g., rigid, linear, efficient, logical,quantitative, and pragmatic). There is some concern that ePortfolios may not beappropriate within the traditional engineering culture. On the other hand, calls forchange, such as the one issued by the National Academy of Engineering in 2008,encouraged the engineering community to move away from the quantitative,mathematical, and scientific identifiers associated with the discipline. There is evidencethat some departments have embraced this idea, may have broken the traditionalengineering stereotype, and thus may have a more receptive culture for ePortfolios.This study surveys the students of a new engineering graduate department that has anePortfolio requirement in place. We explore student perceptions of ePortfolios andengineering departmental culture through an insider perspective. Specifically, this studyinvestigates: How do graduate engineering students perceive ePortfolio programmaticassessment tools and how do they perceive their own departmental culture? Key findingsinclude: 1) students perceive little value for ePortfolios, 2) students do complete therequired components but do not perceive a learning use, 3) students are resistant tospending more time on the ePortfolio process, and 4) the previous perceptions come froma non-traditional, engineering department. That is, even in a supportive, approachable,and current engineering department, students’ perceptions of ePortfolios trend towardsthe negative. This is worrisome for other, more traditional engineering departmentsinterested in using ePortfolios for programmatic assessment. A significant limitation ofthis work is that we surveyed a single, small, unique, and specific engineering departmentand the department’s ePortfolio implementation may have had an impact on results.However, this study contributes to the discussion of ePortfolios in graduate engineeringeducation by beginning the conversation on how engineering culture influences studentePortfolio acceptance.
Mohammadi-Aragh, M. J., & McNair, L. D. (2013, June), Graduate Engineering Student Perceptions of ePortfolio and the Role of Departmental Culture Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19661
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015