on their undergraduate major. This poses significant challenges tograduate faculty teaching these courses and mentoring these students with diversifiedbackgrounds.This paper focuses on our experiences and observations with the course content and structure,teaching methods, evaluation and student performances in these courses with diversifiedgraduate students and their mentoring for the past 3 years. The performances of the students inthese core courses based on the evaluations through tests, projects, etc., using the data collectedfor the past 3 years are correlated to their background and analyzed. Our experiences andobservations of the technical and interdisciplinary maturity from the time of the admission andthe graduation of the students
their respective home university, so that no exchange offunds was involved. Whereas the homework and assignments were given and corrected by thelecturing instructor, the local instructor coordinated the course and assigned grades to studentsaccording to the norms of his or her institution. The final examination for the first courseconsisted of joint projects completed via collaboration among students from differentinstitutions. The results of the project were presented at a national conference on glass where thestudents met with their classmates for the first time.In summary, the concept of MITT has been successfully demonstrated for teaching highly
ofScience (JSPS). ACEEES' mission is to educate next generation doctoral students to becomeglobal energy scientist and engineers by developing their leadership qualities as well technicalknowledge in energy and environmental science through coursework, interdisciplinary projects,research and other activities. The program supports integrated master's and doctoral students’education with quality assurance measures and also provides students a stipend. AlthoughACEEES is an excellent program and has received JSPS highest program evaluation during amid-term review, it is a very expensive educational program to operate and does not issue masterdegrees. To address these issues and as part of the Tokyo Tech educational reorganization thatbegan in April
Paper ID #22509Graduate Student Self and Adviser Ratings on Professional CompetenciesMr. Bret Austin Arnold, University of Tulsa Bret is a doctoral student of Industrial and Organizational Psychology at the University of Tulsa. His re- cent projects concern how personality shapes team-related behaviors and the degree to which antecedents of workplace burnout differ across cultures. Most recently, Bret has joined the University of Tulsa’s cross-disciplinary STEM ProDev team. The team has recently designed and piloted a training program that develops the professional soft-skills of graduate engineering students.Alison
, abstracts, and technical reports. Ted received his B.S. from the University of Wisconsin – Madison and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University, all in mechanical engineering with an emphasis in the thermal sciencesDr. Carolyn J. Lawrence-Dill, Iowa State University Carolyn Lawrence-Dill has devoted the last 20 years to developing computational systems/solutions that support the plant research community. Her work enables the use of existing and emerging knowledge to establish common standards and methods for data collection, integration, and sharing. Such efforts help to eliminate redundancy, improve the efficiency of current and future projects, and increase the availability of data and data analysis tools for plant
, this never happened due to job and family responsibilities.It became apparent that once the student stepped off campus, the probability of finishing theirthesis went to almost zero. As a result, resources allocated to their projects were wasted, andsome funded projects were put at risk. The graduate program was restructured by the newdepartment head to offer a non-thesis option Master of Engineeering (MEng) program for themajority of students in a dual-degree BS/MEng program (and MEng format for those whoalready were BS graduates), and a thesis option for a minority of students in a research-basedBS/MS program (and MS form for those who already were BS graduates). Precious resourcesthat were previously spread thinly over the entire graduate
Pennsylvania StateUniversity. In its eighth year at the time of this writing, the online MSME program hasexperienced significant growth and over the last five years of the online MSME program hasgone from a total of ~40 students in the program to 130 students. Nearly 50 students havingearned their master’s of science degrees via the online program. This growth is in part due toexplicit theory-driven attention to pedagogy, recruitment, mentoring, and facilitated guidance.Similar to our resident students, our online students have faculty research advisors and conductmasters-level research projects. This research element makes our online MSME program unique.While there is increasingly more written about the modest growth in online engineeringeducation
process describe by Sandmann5. The authors contend that evaluation of scholarshipof application must be driven by external practitioners.To that end, Western Carolina University has incorporated in the collegial review process anexternal engagement committee to provide both initial planning feedback to faculty before theyenter into external projects as well as final evaluation of the scholarship at its completion. Thiscommittee is composed of members internal to the Kimmel School as well as external academic,business and engineering leaders from the region. The structure of the committee has stablemembership at its core which is supported and enhanced by an adhoc membership providing thetechnical expertise needed to evaluate the specific suite of
, Boulder Arthur L.C. Antoine obtained a BSc. degree in Civil Engineering from The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago in 2003 then moved on to practice his trade in the Caribbean engi- neering/construction industry. He graduated from Texas A&M University in 2009 with a MSc. degree in Ocean Engineering and subsequently, he returned to the Caribbean region to continue his career and professional development. Currently, he is pursuing a PhD in Construction Engineering and Manage- ment at The University of Colorado at Boulder. His research interests are in the areas of procurement, project delivery, alternative contracting methods and the use of incentive/disincentive strategies to en
and graduate students through their engagement in laboratories,discussion sections, and mentoring activities. It is essential to train graduate students in effectivepedagogy, including teaching methods that promote student-centered learning, reflective teachingpractices, and engagement of a broad diversity of students. This investment in graduate studenttraining pays dividends in an enhanced learning environment for students now and in the future asgraduate students go on to careers that often include teaching and mentoring as core skillsets.This paper details an instructional improvement project targeting a pedagogy course for first-yeargraduate students in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at a large, public, research
of future STEM generations.IntroductionThe changing landscape of academia presents challenge in ensuring graduate trainees areproficient in the development of professional skills outside of the research environment [1]. Thisincludes capacity for knowledge translation of research outcomes to a non-expert audience,curriculum development, and effective project management [2]. Consequently, in preparingfuture faculty to assume academic roles and responsibilities successfully, post-secondaryinstitutions have shifted greater focus to providing teaching development programs for traineeprofessional development [3]. This is particularly important given the competitive nature ofsecuring an academic position. With increasing diversity of academic
engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Dr. Suely M. Black, Norfolk State University Page 24.1087.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Snapshot of an Interdisciplinary Graduate Engineering
the US Army Corp of Engineers Engineering Research and Development Center on the development, design, and implementation of groundwater treatment technologies. His research interests are the development of technologies for the remediation of contaminated media and the development of non-traditional feedstocks for producing biofuels. Dr. Hernandez has over 80 technical presentations at state and national conferences and over 15 peer reviewed publications. He is the principal investigator on projects funded by the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and private industries
providepedagogical feedback to engineering laboratory graduate teaching assistants. The project beganwith use of the VaNTH Observation System, a direct observation instrument which providesfeedback about the extent to which an instructor’s interactions with students fit within thedimensions of the “How People Learn” framework, a model of effective teaching and learning aspresented in the National Research Council monograph, How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School. Preliminary findings revealed challenges to the use of this instrument ina first-year engineering laboratory course taught by graduate teaching assistants. To provideinformation for the adaptation of this instrument for use in the laboratory environment and to aidin developing new
refer back to if conflicts arise.33 Mentor-mentee contracts should be reviewed andupdated regularly; in an academic environment, revising once per year at a minimum – or even atthe start of a new semester – helps to ensure that mentors and mentees remain focused on theircommon goals. Specific elements that may be helpful within a mentor-mentee contract include: Goals. The goals statement should identify (1) the overarching goals for the project or timeframe (e.g., what is the purpose of the research, or what are the key goals to accomplish during the upcoming semester?); (2) the mentee’s personal and/or professional goals for the project/timeframe (e.g., to complete certain experiments, to submit a journal
numberof times in the presentations and papers of Mihail Roco 1 of NSF who has projected thatapproximately 2 million nano-related jobs will be created by 2015 (40% of them in the US) andif typical multipliers are used the number of Nano-related jobs would be substantially more. Thiscorrelated with the predictions made by Lux Research (a well known contract research firm) thatnanotechnology will contribute $3.1 Trillion to the world's economy by 2015. We expect JSNNgraduates to find positions in industrial, academic and government research labs in fieldsincluding pharmaceuticals, defense, materials and electronics companies. The Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering (JSNN) currently offer twodegree programs (a Professional M.S. in
having hands-on experiences and developingpractical skills such as project management or finance analysis skills. Similar to the academia-only group, the participants from the industry-only group also emphasized the importance ofestablishing working mentoring relationships between students and their advisors. Participantsfrom industry highlight the importance of obtaining critical feedback from peers either onresearch ideas or presentation skills. They also stressed the importance of encouraging studentsto present regularly at different venues, to interact with people beyond their traditional researchcircles, and to attend professional conferences.The key points in their recommendations to engineering graduate education relate to anintroduction
82Grade, % 80 78 76 74 0 5 10 15 20 25 No. of ethical exercises Page 22.385.8Appendix 1. CASE STUDIESGroup 11. Software Testing(Web Page on this Site) Numerical CaseA project team is developing new software for airplane altitude controls combined withnavigation. How is the software to be tested? How are the results to be interpreted, and what arethe expectations and goals for the quality of the software? Suitable for courses in statistics,software engineering, reliability engineering, levels 3-4.2. Risk, Tradeoffs, and Informed Consent: "The Hundred
research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE).Cyndi Lynch, Purdue University Cyndi Lynch is the Director of Fellowships and Graduate Student Professional Development in the Graduate School. Cyndi is a registered veterinary technician, focusing on animal behavior. She holds a bachelors degree in Animal Science and a Master of Science degree in Curriculum and Instruction from Purdue University. Research interests focus
passion project. My energy for this project stems for the deep desire to alter the stigma of mental illness in higher education. Your path does not need to be direct. There are opportunities and learning experiences in each segment of your journey. These moments are valuable, they help to make you who you are, and they help you grow. Make sure to take them with you.297 I was diagnosed with autism as an adult. When I was married, we saw coping mechanism mental illness/autism under represented/parent 77.78% someone about me after one of my kids was diagnosed. It’s harder to coping mental under represented diagnose in adults, because I
New Jersey MARJORY F. PALIUS is Assistant Director of the Robert B. Davis Institute for Learning at the Graduate School of Education of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. She conducts research, supports development of new projects, coordinates collaborative research projects and professional development programs, and manages fiscal and administrative operations for the grant-funded institute. She is also a doctoral student in mathematics education at Rutgers and has worked on studies of middle school students’ informal mathematics learning in after-school programs and of teachers making the transition from practitioner to researcher. Her primary research interest is the role of
to change everything and it was a little too much”, so Saul and theprofessor worked together to find a balance. In all, Saul feels that the amount of support he getsfrom his advisor is “right. It‟s perfectly right”, and Saul is empowered to make his own changes,write exams, and develop projects for the students that meet the goals of the class.In summary, most participants report relatively low feelings of autonomy with Saul as anexception. Knowing that beliefs can impact practices, to understand GTA teaching experiences Page 22.757.8we also need to look at how perceived levels of autonomy translate to teaching actions.Autonomy in Decision
projects that focus on opportunities for, and retention of, K-20 students in STEM areas, majors and fields. She also conducts education research focusing on questions about professional development for educators and how educators support student learning in STEM. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Rapid Model: Initial Results from Testing a Model to Set Up a Course Sharing Consortia for STEM Programs at the Graduate LevelAbstractSkilled candidates with graduate training are in critical need in the wind energy industry. Toprepare for employment in the industry requires both general training (e.g., an engineeringdegree, a business degree, etc.) and
alienationexperienced by children with autism spectrum disorder. In terms of higher education studies, a2017 study used photovoice to understand the pursuit of leadership experiences by women inSTEM [30]. Although the prompt was not directly related to mental health experiences,discussions included conversations about personal and professional costs of these pursuits, theneed for resiliency, and reliance on social supports [30]. These studies have shown theapplicability of photovoice to answer descriptive research questions about mental healthexperiences.Conducting a Photovoice StudyPhotovoice projects involve several stages, starting with forming the study team. Central to thisteam is the facilitator, or the person leading the training, collection, and
probably looked at everything as its own project of how do I manage this? How do I get it done? What‟s the timeline? What are the critical tasks? – Ethan I also learned the lesson that you have to value peoples‟ life experiences beyond just what their degree, or what their … credentialed criteria might be. – Emma I‟ve also learned some of the flags for what, when interviewing for people where you kind of go … I should probably look into that a little more or should ask more about it or, beginning to understand where that line is on people who volunteer too much information and, when have they really… okay, this is beginning to show a personality issue that‟s going to be beyond where I want to
. Students were required to visit campus during the first week of each semester to connect with faculty and with each other and learn the technology 4. Utilization of Blackboard, the web-based course management tool to post assignments, turn in homework, and record grades. 5. A plan of study would allow the student can finish in five semesters or 21 months. 6. The students have the option to do the directed project or thesis option.Specific course topics were developed from past graduate courses which had been offered in thedepartment combined with research conducted during the development of the program. Courseswere to be relevant and applicable to a wide range of backgrounds. A weekend master’s programfor general technology
and Com- puter Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Inte- grated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a National Science Foun- dation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, curriculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and
theseanalyses, our research team will be involved in helping devise more targeted survey items forfuture data collection as opposed to relying on secondary data. New survey items will seek tounderstand how students considered funding when selecting their graduate program of study andwhether they actively seek different kinds of funding once they have been admitted. Surveyitems will also be better aligned with a theoretical framework in future administrations. We alsohope to link survey responses to individual students so that their participation and responsesmight be tracked over time, thereby producing a longitudinal data set.Beyond this specific project, our research team is in the process of launching a five-year,national-scale project funded by the
activities with the expectation they wouldincrease engagement during the sessions and enforce learning of the skills to be taken away forfuture use. Physical resources included the room set-up, iClickers™, flip-charts, flash-cards,scratch cards, a quiz and a final survey.2.1.1 Room SetupTables seating a maximum of five participants were arranged in a staggered or “V” pattern suchthat no person had his vision obscured for the front or sides of the room (Appendix C - FigureC1). The front of the room was used for projection of the questions and the sides for posting theflip-chart results (see Appendix C – Figure C3). This gave everyone full access to the content asit was presented and encouraged a higher level of contribution.2.1.2 iClickersThe
Paper ID #9708Training for Student Teaching Fellows at Rowan UniversityDr. Linda M Head, Rowan University Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer EngineeringMs. Melanie Basantis, Rowan University Ms. Melanie Basantis (Director, Engineering Outreach Office) earned her MBA from Widener Univer- sity and dual degrees in Industrial Engineering and Business Management from The Pennsylvania State University. Ms. Basantis spent 15 years in industry at the Boeing Company working as an Engineer on projects related to defense aircraft including the V-22 Osprey and CH-46 and CH-47 tandem rotor heli- copters along with