consistently shapes their persistence and success is their advisingrelationship. The way students perceive the support they receive from this relationship caninfluence their self-efficacy concerning the competences needed to finish their dissertation, thesisor applied project report. Understanding the relationship between the student’s self-efficacytowards their culminating tasks and their perception of their advisor’s support is essential, asfrom a motivational standpoint, it can serve as a closer proxy for degree completion.This research paper presents the development and validation of the Advisor Support and Self-efficacy for Thesis completion (ASSET) survey, which measures two constructs: Thesis Self-efficacy and Advisor Support. The former
item-difficulty. SD P(i) = standard deviation of item-difficulty. Md P(i) = median of item-difficulty.In result, only one item (V13), with item-difficulty P(13) = .79, is in the desired value-range todifferentiate between participants. The other items are agreed to unilaterally throughout, meaningthat all participants show very high ratings in teaching self-efficacy.4.2.2. Corrected item-total correlationsThe part-whole-corrected item-total correlation r(i,total-i) of an item i indicates how much theitem i measures the same psychological construct as the other items combined (total-i). Valuesbetween 0.4 and 0.7 are preferred [15]. Table 4 gives an overview of item-total correlations ofthe 18 items taking the sub-scales and the aggregate scale
structured interviewdata collected through an extracurricular student project. We investigated three key aspects ofgraduate school, particularly experiences with 1) work-life-balance, 2) imposter syndrome, and3) burnout. To develop the survey and interview instruments, we developed a pool of memes andgraduate student oriented advice columns then used thematic analysis to identify 9 thematicquestions about the graduate student experience. For this work, the data set was abbreviated toconsider only the 3 most salient topics. We found that students generally disagreed with thenegative themes identified and that memes tended to exaggerate these features of graduatestudent experience. However, emergent themes of self-efficacy in our analysis demonstrated
opportunities? Modified Measure of Engineering Identity Student's Survey (MEI) survey scientific Modified Sense of Belonging Scale (SoBS) 3. Did students find the identity, survey program to stimulate their sense of Modified General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) scientific identity, sense of belonging, Measuring Undergraduate Students' belonging, and self-efficacy? and self- Engineering Self-Efficacy Survey (MUSES) efficacy Modified Student
(3) Provide support to BD Fellows beyond BD funding in preparation for graduation andcareer. Our theoretical framework, further described above, values (1) self-efficacy, (2)science/research identity, and (3) social cognitive career theory model to recruit, enroll, andgraduate 12 LSAMP Fellows with STEM doctoral degrees. Our goals, then, are to (1) evaluateour intervention’s success on the three stated objectives and (2) measure the stated constructswithin the theoretical framework to test our theory of change.Approach to assessment.Evaluation of the BD Program will utilize both internal and external expertise. Thiscollaboratively managed evaluation will have a mixed-methods approach emphasizing the designof several survey instruments
. Sigmon, “Service-Learning: three principles,” Synergist, 1979.[25] S. DeChenne, L. Enochs, and M. Needham, “Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics Graduate Teaching Assistants Teaching Self-Efficacy,” Journal of theScholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 12, pp. 102–123, Jan. 2012. 17
intheir studies than students who procrastinate or have no planning and revisionstage for their writing (Sverdlik et al. 2018, p. 377-378). Finally, student successis tied to their academic identity (Sverdlik et al. 2018, p. 378-380). Students whoshow self-efficacy, that is confidence in their work, leads to positive outcomesin career trajectory and more competence in core abilities (Sverdlik et al. 2018,p. 379-380). This is also tied to student’s self-worth. Student’s who feel successas a result of their accomplishments as a graduate student are more likely tohave continued motivation (Sverdlik et al. 2018, p. 379-380). This can also,however, cause major determent to some students. Students whose identity istied to academic success and then find
feedback. In Meeting 1 (Figure 1) co-instructors are invited toconsider their positionalities as they relate to each other [19]. How will the pairs address theinherent power differential between them? How will they approach differing opinions in theclassroom in real time? What are their preferences for giving and receiving feedback to eachother, and how can the mentor instill a sense of self-efficacy and advocacy in the mentee?Overall, we consider the redesigned program as a more intentional, more supportive, and highertouch experience for both mentors and mentees.OutcomesOwing to the continuous adjustments made in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and criseswithin our community, our program implementation proved to be a moving target, and we
thecultivation mode of "bachelor's degree and master's degree integration" in thecontext of new engineering[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (SocialScience Edition),2019,21(06):171-176.DOI:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2907. [29] WANG Xinhong,ZHANG Junfeng,HE Maogang. An empirical study oflong-study direct students from selection to exit[J]. Research on HigherEducation,2016,37(06):50-58. [30] WANG Xinhong,LI Wenhui,ZHANG Junfeng et al. Academic stress,self-efficacy and academic persistence of long-study direct students[J]. Degree andGraduate Education,2016(10):56-61.DOI:10.16750/j.adge.2016.10.012. [31] Niu Menghu. Exploration of disciplinary paths of reforming therecruitment method of doctoral students in China--an analysis
who do not consider mentoring apriority, it should be noted that they were at least interested enough in mentoring or incentivizedsufficiently by the travel grants earmarked for students to have bothered completing thisvoluntary mentoring survey.Mentorship Seminar SeriesTo enable successful mentor-mentee relationships between graduate students and facultymembers, it is important to first understand how to start, build, and maintain one as well asrecognize what factors can contribute to failed mentoring. However, graduate students,especially minority graduate students, often lack this knowledge, significantly impacting theirresearch productivity, academic and research self-efficacy from experiencing unsatisfyingmentoring without the ability to
] K. Levecque, F. Anseel, A. De Beuckelaer, J. Van der Heyden, and L. Gisle, “Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students,” Research Policy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 868-879, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008.[11] D. Jairam, and A. Cribbs, “The graduate writing self-efficacy scale: Validating a new component specific assessment,” in American Psychological Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, Aug 8-11, 2019.[12] E. O. McGee, D. M. Griffith, and S. L. Houston, “‘I know I have to work twice as hard and hope that makes me good enough’: Exploring the stress and strain of black doctoral students in engineering and computing,” Teachers College Record, vol. 121, no. 4, pp
Journal Yes ResearchUses term mentor triad, “Near peer” (i.e. student to Other/None Conference Nosurface level descriptor student)Other/None Other/None Other DiscussAssessing the quality of included articles is an important, but often overlooked step in systematicreviews [13]. In this systematic review on mentoring triads, we include all articles (qualitative,quantitative, and mixed methods studies) that meet the inclusion criteria outlined above. Giventhat we have considered all types of research studies for inclusion in our review, there is not onestandard measure of the quality of these
theprogram. The third action, supporting students' self-actualization and actively motivating them, isimportant because it helps students to develop a sense of agency and self-efficacy. This can beachieved through encouragement, positive feedback, and support for their personal andprofessional growth. The fourth action, contributing to the development of the student's professional andacademic network, is critical because it can help students build valuable connections andopportunities for their future careers. This could include introducing students to relevantprofessionals in their field, helping them network at conferences or other events, or providingguidance on how to build a strong professional brand. Finally, the fifth