Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, K-12 outreach, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, service learning, and curriculum innovation for introductory computing courses.Prof. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, engineering education, engineering leadership, and
solution and evaluate the desirability of the solution. 6. Deliver results from the study through a professionally structured document and an oral presentation based on the research to stakeholders.Capstone Project EvolutionWhile the capstone project was always a part of the program for over 20 years, the structure,format, and process has evolved. The program went through a complete curriculum update in2019-2020. Several courses were fully updated. One of the major changes in the capstone formatwith a unified syllabus, deliverables, and due date across all advisors. The second upgrade wasthe content (presentations and resources) and support system for the student. A staff capstonecoordinator support was added to help manage the LMS, student
Paper ID #43390Increasing Teaching Efficacy in Engineering Graduate Students through theDevelopment and Facilitation of Summer Middle and High School STEMExperienceDr. Jamie R. Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a faculty member in the Engineering and Computing Education Program. She is the Associate Director STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT). She also serves as the Director for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to
promising findings of this research and the encouraging feedback of the student community motivated him to pursue this line of research in his NSF CAREER award in 2017. Since then, he has built a coalition within the university to expand this work through multiple NSF-funded research grants including IUSE/PFE: RED titled ”Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Because of the importance of neurodiversity at all levels of education, he expanded his work to graduate STEM education through an NSF IGE grant. In addition, he recently received his Mid-CAREER award through which, in a radically novel approach, he will take on ambitious, transdisciplinary research integrating
effectively ona team, integrate information from multiple sources, communicate with written and visualmaterial, and make connections across disciplines 18 .PBL is not inherently transdisciplinary or convergent, but PBL can be used to teach and addressconvergent problems. While PBL is not the only way to learn convergence methodologies, it canbe an efficient “means” to the “end” which is understanding and implementing convergencemethodologies. It emphasizes the process of question identification and framing as much asproblem solving, encouraging students to iterate and seek feedback, and to reflect on theirapproach and proposed solution. Additionally, outcomes of PBL are similar to the skills neededfor the future of convergence research in industry
2021 and spring 2023. In the NRTCapstone course, trainees built upon the systems thinking framework taught in the IntegratedFEW Systems course. The NRT Capstone integrated theory and practice. Students worked ininterdisciplinary teams and learned how to integrate research across disciplines. For a finalproduct, students completed an original interdisciplinary research paper in one of the NRT threeresearch themes: innovations for soil, water and microbial systems in the face of drought;hydrologic science and water conservation systems for efficient food production; and anaerobicbioreactors to transform animal waste into usable energy, water, and/or fertilizer.NRT students could also work towards a graduate certificate on Innovations at the
education.At the beginning of the 2023-2024 academic year, two professors, Professor A and B, decided topilot a new STEM Ed version of the course. Three engineering education students, Students A,B, and C, enrolled in the seminar course. A description of each is provided in Table 1. Table 1. Description of each participant in the STEM Ed seminar course. Participant Description Professor A Professor A is a tenured faculty member who is the engineering education Ph.D. program coordinator and director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC). Professor B Professor B is an early-career, tenure-track faculty member who completed the STEM education Ph.D. program at Louisiana Tech University in
program and their current use of PM skills?Literature ReviewProject management is valued by employers [7], specifically in STEM [3]. Research focused onthe development and implementation of PM training suggests that integrating PM training intothe undergraduate curriculum can be beneficial for prepping their future career [8], [9], [10],[11], [12]. Specifically, some studies highlighted their curriculum designs in helpingundergraduate students to gain PM experiences [8], [9], [10], and assess and understand students’learning experiences with PM knowledge [9], [11]. However, there’s a lack of studies that werefocused on STEM (e.g., software engineering [9], chemical and biological engineering [10]).Castañón–Puga et al. [9] assessed students' user
startedlooking into the feasibility of making the graduate engineering program more accessible. Thiswould not only allow us to meet the growing demand for engineers in West Michigan, but itwould be well aligned with our program’s student-centric focus. To prepare the students for thegraduate-level engineering work, an exhaustive list of prerequisite undergraduate classes thatstudents must take has been approved. While each applicant’s curriculum is tailored, GVSU’sSchool of Engineering developed a general plan to onboard students from a variety of non-engineering undergraduate backgrounds. Applicants are granted conditional admission to thegraduate program predicated on completing the prerequisite classes with a B or better grade.These plans allow the
, where $3000 wasgiven on day 1 of the program. The overall goals were to provide (1) Resource Recognition by introducing students tothe various academic and personal resources available on campus, (2) Personal Preparationthrough programming on subjects such as personal finance and mental health, (3) CareerPreparation through writing workshops and curriculum vitae editing, and (4) Network Buildingby connecting students with current graduate students. Students were also matched with facultyto conduct summer research in their field of interest. After a successful pilot in 2021, theprogram was conducted with a larger group of students in the summer of 2022.Program Structure:GREaT GradS Timeline – GREaT GradS runs on an accelerated
IIT Delhi for undergraduate studies and Cornell University for graduate work. He worked for nearly 15 years as a materials scientist at the DuPont company and moved in 2004 to Lehigh University. His research interests are in interfacial mechanical properties.Zilong Pan, Lehigh University Zilong Pan is an assistant professor of teaching, learning and technology, his research focuses on emerging educational technologies and innovative methodological approaches in educational practices and studies in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) disciplines.Nathan Urban, Lehigh University Nathan Urban is Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs at Lehigh University. Urban earned his PhD
failure: An introduction to forensic structural engineering,” Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2010.11465051.[3] C. Reynolds, “Rewriting the Curriculum: a Review and Proposal of Forensic Engineering Coursework in U.S. Universities Background,” Forensic Engineering (2003), pp. 307– 319, 2003.[4] N. Delatte, “An approach to forensic engineering education in the USA,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 123–129, 2012, doi: 10.1680/fen.[5] S. E. Chen and R. Janardhanam, “Forensic Engineering Education Reform,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic
Higher Education 25, 255-26,(2000).[5] G. E. Becker, J. Cashin, T. T. Nguyen, & P. Zambrano. Expanding Integrated Competency-Focused Health Worker Curricula for Maternal Infant and Young Child Nutrition. EducationSciences, 12(8), 518, 2022.[6] D. Ifenthaler & R. Hanewald. Digital knowledge maps in education. Technology., 2014.[7] W. W. Boehm. Curriculum Study. Social Casework, 37(7), 348-349, 1956.[8] M. Roach and H. Sauermann. “The Declining Interest in an Academic Career” PLOS ONE,12(9), 2017, September. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992096or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2992096.[9] B. L. Benderly, B. L. (2013). THE NEW Ph. D. ASEE Prism, 22(5), 31, 2023.[10] B. Hynes, Y. Costin, and I. Richardson. "Educating for STEM
in order to assess and organize an overall approach to Smart Manufacturing training" [17]• Knowledge transfer on cybersecurity threats o "Overall, the paper and the proposed curriculum hold the promise of contributing to the ongoing effort to bridge the knowledge/skill gap by educating the future engineering and security workforce on protecting the ICS and CI from cybersecurity threats and attacks" [23]• Project management o "A key feature to the Artemis ground operations at KSC is the deployment of Artemis and the Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) teams working together to ensure that assembly and integration handoffs are well defined and coordinated. This
consistent with an academic literacies approach [7] to support students’development of a researcher-writer identity. Course activities are designed to grow studentawareness of the “disciplinary conventions of writing in one’s field” [1, p. 10], requiringconsistent practice of critical reading and writing processes, including note-taking, planning,drafting, revision, and providing/integrating feedback. However, this course is not required andonly recently has begun consistently enrolling EER students from the PhD program.Though the PhD program includes structural supports for integrating research-writer intostudents’ growing collection of identities, students’ sense of the impact of these supports may befurther influenced by program structure and
whoengaged in the process willingly participated in the critical conversation. This may not be the casein all scenarios based on an individual’s disposition towards being conflict-averse or not. Thesecond limitation is the nature of the existing mentoring relationship. The first three authors thatengaged in this process have a respectful and positive relationship. Not all research groups operatein this manner, nor have the same level of trust built. The third limitation is the small sample sizewhich limits its transferability. However, the researchers hope to introduce a participatory,collaborative process tested on themselves first to showcase what can be possible with a STEM-ME and pro-Black approach [13], [14], from a hidden curriculum lens [6
. • LPE 853 Engineering, Law and Policy Systems: An interdisciplinary course co-taught between the School of Engineering Design and Innovation and the Law School, providing a broad exploration of the relationship between engineering, policy, and law. From driverless cars to AI-powered systems, engineering is transforming public and private spaces. This course identifies the legal and political constraints engineering solutions must satisfy to be implemented within complex engineering systems. • EDSGN 558 Systems Design: The course is designed to immerse students in the principles, practices and application of systems engineering within the design, development, integration and deployment of complex
course activities, but did not integrate the IDP into their personal approach toprofessional development. Only one student in cohort one described updating their IDP. Asdescribed earlier, the instructor revised course activities and lectures/lesson plans for the secondcohort to emphasize the value of periodically reviewing and updating IDPs. We hoped to seemore statements in the course reflections that described an intent to review and update IDPsoutside of the course. Ideally this commitment would expand beyond graduation. In fact, severalstudents in the second cohort mentioned updating their IDP. They indicated that updating theirIDP was a helpful and/or planned activity, like the single student in cohort one. Each studentwho described an
resolved toleverage evidence from faculty development literature, an eye toward program assessment, andcontinued administrative support to “renovate” the program to reinforce and sustain the school’steaching-supportive-while-research-active culture.Program redesign approachBecause the program operates as a learning experience similar to coursework, we chose a well-known (re)design approach: backward design. In a modified backward design process forlearner-centered course design, designers consider 5 stages in an approximately linear butiterative fashion: situational factors (context), goals/objectives, assessment/feedback, activities,and integration[15], [16]. We, the program administrators, focused on the desiredobjectives/goals/outcomes and the
of Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering. A PECASE awardee, she has led multiple pioneering efforts in engineering education including multimodal methods in engineering education using sensor technologies and biophysiological tools, hidden curriculum, mentoring, active learning, professional identity, among others. She is a renowned national and international leader in engineering education earning her multiple accolades and honors through professional organizations such as the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE, and ASEE. She integrates her multiple experiences as a Chemical Engineering, Biological Engineer, Analytical Cell Biologist, and Engineering Education Researcher
certified as an EFL and ESL teacher as well as a School Principal. Ari’s research and language revitalization interests include Mikasuki, Salish Ql’ispe (aka Salish-Pend d’Oreille, Montana Salish, and Flathead Salish) and Safaliba. His ethnographic work documents situated practice in grassroots policy initiatives and school-based activism among the Safaliba in rural Ghana. His language documentation includes conceptual metaphors and formulaic language in Salish Ql’ispe and Safaliba. He also explores applications of task-based language teaching in the pedagogy of revitalization. His practitioner papers analyze integrated content and language instruction, academic English instruction for graduate students, and asset-based