ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 40 in total

← Previous
1
2
Next →

Perceived Advisor Support and Thesis Self-Efficacy: An Instrument Development

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 3: Mentorship and Communication in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Abimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University; Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

teams as part of his thesis work, and had the opportunity to teach undergraduate ME courses. His previous efforts and experiences in engineering education helped shape his overall goal of fostering human-centered education systems, which led him to pursue his PhD at ASU.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underreprDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School of the Ira A

Relevance Score: 0.5043229

Faculty Perception of the GRE as a Graduate Admission Requirement

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 5: Graduate Student Experience and Decision-Making
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; Deborah Moyaki, University of Georgia; John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia; Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

practices affected student motivation.Dr. Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia Dr. Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Faculty Perception of the GRE as a Graduate Admission RequirementIntroductionThe goal of this paper is to describe a study that assesses engineering faculty perceptions of theGraduate Record Examination (GRE) in terms of its usefulness as an application component foradmission into engineering M.S. Thesis and Doctoral programs

Relevance Score: 0.4412825

Identifying Barriers to Recruiting Low-Income Students into Engineering Master’s Programs

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 1: Recruitment and Support in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Tonya L. Peeples, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University; Julio Urbina, Pennsylvania State University; Cynthia Howard-Reed, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

bachelor’s degrees may be eager to enter the engineering workforce. However,in many engineering disciplines, individuals have more earning potential and career trajectoryoptions with a master’s degree. In this paper, we identify several categories of barriers and lessonslearned to launching an S-STEM focused on graduate students at a large R1 public institution thatmay be useful to other such programs. These include discussions on recruitment of this specializedpopulation of students into graduate school, especially those from other institutions, can bedifficult because i) there are structural and legal barriers to accessing financial information aboutstudents to identify low-income students and ii) smaller institutions may not have the

Relevance Score: 0.029400134

A New Personalized Learning Approach Towards Graduate STEM Education: A Pilot in Chemical Engineering

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 6: Programs in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: April A. Dukes, University of Pittsburgh; Valerie E. Kerr, University of Pittsburgh; Susan K. Fullerton Shirey, University of Pittsburgh; Götz Veser, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

have been calls to develop and deploy graduate STEM education modelsthat prepare students for careers outside academia. Few innovations have emerged to meet students attheir current skill and preparation levels when entering their graduate studies while also consideringstudents' individual desired career paths. The U.S.'s current approach to graduate STEM education doesnot emphasize preparing students with professional skills and experience outside the lab. Further,students from differing socioeconomic and underserved backgrounds are often not adequatelysupported. Through a National Science Foundation Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) award, theUniversity of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering is creating and validating a

Relevance Score: 0.020193724

Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying exams

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 1: Recruitment and Support in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Meredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Rose Tawney, California Institute of Technology ; Emily Hope Palmer, California Institute of Technology; James Ragan, California Institute of Technology; Morgan Louise Hooper, California Institute of Technology; Yazmin Gonzalez, California Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

; for example, Chen et. al. states that “[s]tudents from all backgrounds may find theexperience [of an unexpectedly poor academic performance] threatening to their competence, butstudents from minority groups must also contend with anxiety that this performance ‘confirms’negative academic stereotypes attributed to their group memberships”[10].Often, these biases and stereotypes reflect an automatic judgment without an awareness ofindividuals’ specific abilities or experiences [11] [12]. Thus, the format of assessment, rather thanthe rigor, quality, or intended learning can have undue effect on educational outcomes. Forexample, IGEN performed a case study on a top-ranked physics program which noticed its“passage rate [for a qualifying exam] had

Relevance Score: 0.014385512

Integrating and Thriving in the First Semester as an International Graduate Student in the United States

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 8: International Perspectives in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Philip Appiah-Kubi, University of Dayton; Khalid Zouhri, University of Dayton
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

international students for diverse career paths help to make their academic journey morerewarding. To thrive, one must embrace these multifaceted transformative experiences with anopen mind, a willingness to learn, and resilience that will enrich the academic experience andprepare them for future success beyond the classroom. Finally, after creating a welcomingclassroom environment, if faculty members desire to enhance international students' experienceand their ability to thrive, there must be intentional relationship building to help the studentsbecome more comfortable asking for help when needed.LimitationsThis study utilized a limited sample size in a non-randomized survey; hence, the findings maynot be generalized.References 1. S. K. Gardner

Relevance Score: 0.013970679

Cultural Adaptation and Advising Dynamics: Insights from International Engineering Graduate Students

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 8: International Perspectives in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Himani Sharma; Ann F. McKenna, The University of Iowa; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

advising dynamics of education while highlighting the critical rolesadvisors play in constructing the academic life and future of the international student [5]. Thishas caused a dramatic change in the composition of Ph.D. enrollments in the U.S.The importance of cultural understanding in advising international students cannot be overstated,and several studies have highlighted this fact. For instance, Vakkai et al.'s research has shownthat international students' cultural backgrounds and values cannot be ignored, and havingadvisors who are more attuned to these aspects can significantly impact an individual's academicsuccess [6]. Similarly, Liu et al.'s study highlights the need for increased attention and guidancetowards international students

Relevance Score: 0.01313488

Skill Development of Engineering and Physical Science Doctoral Students: Understanding the Role of Advisor, Faculty, and Peer Interactions

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 5: Skill Development in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Abdulrahman Alsharif, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Maya Denton, University of Oklahoma; David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Our research paper examines the role of climate (e.g., interactions with others) in the skilldevelopment of engineering and physical science doctoral students. Skill development ingraduate school often occurs related to students’ primary funding mechanism, in which theymight interact with a research group or teaching team. Advisors also play a pivotal role in theengineering doctoral student experience; however, less is known about how positive mentoringinfluences skill development for engineering doctoral students. We investigated the followingresearch questions: 1) How, if at all, do interactions with advisor(s), faculty, and peers predict skill development (associated with primary funding mechanism) for engineering and physical

Relevance Score: 0.01313488

Understanding Ecosystems of Interdisciplinary Graduate Education through an Ecological Systems Approach

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 4: Interdisciplinary Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Margaret Webb, Virginia Tech ; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Relevance Score: 0.0129343355

Development of a Climate Survey for Engineering Doctoral Students from an Intersectional Approach: First-Round Validity Evidence

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Graduate Student Experiences
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati; Julie Aldridge, The Ohio State University; Nicole Else-Quest, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Joe Roy, American Society for Engineering Education
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Relevance Score: 0.012348453

Engineering Graduate Leadership Fellows – Mentored Projects to Build Community

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 8: Professional Development for Graduate Students
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sandy Christlieb; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Fellow role(s) interested them and why. All of the candidates wereinterviewed and, based on those conversations, we decided to add two more Fellowship roles:  The EnSURE Fellow would help organize the Engineering Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (EnSURE) program  The Recruiting Fellow would assist in identifying and connecting with prospective graduate students through on- and off-campus recruiting activitiesIn addition to these six Engineering Graduate Leadership fellows, we decided to partner with theGraduate School’s Leadership Fellows program to co-sponsor two additional roles: a GraduateStudent Life and Wellness Fellow, focusing specifically on the needs of Engineering graduatestudents, and a Women in STEM

Relevance Score: 0.012224344

Graduate student myths: interpreting the Ph.D. student experience through the lens of social media, memes, and stereotypes

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Julie M. Rieland, University of Michigan; Shamalee Goonetilleke, University of Michigan; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Michigan; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Relevance Score: 0.011899266

Unveiling the Crisis: Decoding the Working Conditions of Doctoral Engineering Students and the Call for Decent Work

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Graduate Student Experiences
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rafael De Leon, The Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., The Ohio State University; Rosalyn Stoa, Colorado State University; Alexa Jayne, Colorado State University; Bailey Underill, Colorado State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

, students, workers, or something in between? Though Ipersonally believe that doctoral engineering students exist outside of this binary discussionbecause of their important societal role in contributing to knowledge, within the binary they docontribute economically and do work that they are not sufficiently compensated for. They dowork, plain and simple.I am not alone in this line of thinking. Legally, the classification of graduate students asemployees has gone back and forth since the 1990’s. At private institutions, this dispute fallsunder the National Labor Relations Act. Specifically, the decision as to whether or not graduatestudents at private institutions are employees falls under the National Labor Relations Boardwhich is a board made up

Relevance Score: 0.011880945

"Ima Nmadu": Building Academic Success Through Relationships—A Black Civil Engineering Ph.D. Student's Autoethnographic Insights

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 1: Onboarding and Community Building in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mary Ifeoma Nwanua, University of Florida
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Relevance Score: 0.0117796725

“How You Got Me Messed Up”: A Critical Analysis of Doctoral Engineering Education through the Lens of Black PhD Candidates

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Graduate Student Experiences
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Crystal Alicia Nattoo, Stanford University; Crystal E Winston, Stanford University; Rachel A. G. Adenekan, Stanford University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Relevance Score: 0.011432445

A Scaffolded Approach to Active Learning in the Graduate Classroom

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Learning in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sarah A. Goodman, Stevens Institute of Technology; Gail P. Baxter, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

continue to collect data during each semester in which the course isoffered. In future iterations of the course, student performance on course assessments can becorrelated with implementations of active learning and community building strategies.References:[1] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[2] E. National Academies of Sciences, Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. 2018. doi: 10.17226/25038.[3] P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss, “Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory

Relevance Score: 0.011317544

Expectations Versus Reality: Understanding Women STEM Doctoral Students' Perceptions and Experiences on Doctoral Mentoring Relationships

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Graduate Student Experiences
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Marah C. Lambert, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Lisa Merriweather, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Dilara Yaya Bryson, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Edith Gnanadass, The University of Memphis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Charlotte Lisa R. Merriweather is an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She received her PhD in Adult Education with a graduate certificate in Qualitative Inquiry from the University of Georgia in 2004. Her research focuses on issueDr. Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Cathy D. Howell is a Clinical Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Community Health and Masterˆa C™s degree in Health Education at East CarolinaDilara Yaya Bryson, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDr. Edith Gnanadass, The University of Memphis Edith Gnanadass has a Ph.D. in Lifelong

Relevance Score: 0.011317544

Work in Progress: Exploring the Landscape of Stressors Experienced by Doctoral Engineering Students

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 6: Challenges and Coping Strategies of Engineering Graduate Students
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joseph Francis Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jennifer Cromley, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan; Dale Robbennolt; Anne Hart, University of Tennessee, Memphis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Percentage of participants Coping strategy Coping strategy using strategy (N=55) using strategy (N=55) Music/art/performance/ Alcohol use 11% (n = 6) 4% (n = 2) movies (not at home) Caffeine use 5% (n = 3) Pet(s) 7% (n = 4) Eating to relax 35% (n = 19) Planning or scheduling 24% (n = 13) Errands/shopping 4% (n = 2) Reading 16% (n

Relevance Score: 0.011201462

Engineering graduate students’ perceptions of challenges and stressors: A comparison of master’s vs. doctoral students and domestic vs. international students

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 6: Challenges and Coping Strategies of Engineering Graduate Students
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Eunsil Lee, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Susan Sajadi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

of astudent’s perceived inclusiveness within an academic unit, provides empirical evidence of theunwelcoming culture of engineering graduate education. According to Gardner et al. [3],engineering graduate students reported a relatively lower sense of belonging within theiracademic department compared to students in other disciplines. O’Meara et al.’s [4] research onSTEM students’ sense of belonging echoed this claim, highlighting that there are fewerfacilitators (e.g., a critical mass of women, micro affirmations) for creating an inclusiveenvironment in STEM graduate programs compared to those in non-STEM disciplines. Theseauthors collectively emphasized the need for investigating engineering graduate studentexperience and integration

Relevance Score: 0.010945733

Investigating the Need for Forensic Engineering Graduate Program to Meet the Growing Workforce Demand

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Learning in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University; Claudia Calle Müller, Florida International University; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Mohamed ElZomor P.E., Florida International University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

current state of forensic engineering education.AcknowledgmentOne of the authors was funded by FIU University Graduate School Dissertation Year Fellowship,and this support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the FIU University Graduate School.References[1] W. DeWitt, L. Geddes, F. Johnson, and L. Reader, “A master of science curriculum in forensic engineering,” in 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37193), 2001, pp. F2B-8. doi: 10.1109/fie.2001.963696.[2] R. J. Heywood, “Responding to

Relevance Score: 0.01056084

Initiating and sustaining international ethnic engineering education scholarly communities in the United States

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 8: International Perspectives in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Moses Olayemi, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

communities of engineering education research scholars,” in Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2006.[3] L. Zheng and S. Wei, “Institutionalizing Engineering Education Research (EER) in China under the context of New Engineering Education: Departments, programs, and research agenda,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 353–368, 2023.[4] K. Edström, A. Kolmos, L. Malmi, J. Bernhard, and P. Andersson, “A bottom-up strategy for establishment of EER in three Nordic countries-the role of networks,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 219–234, 2018.[5] E. Matemba et al., “Reflecting on a community of practice for engineering education research capacity in

Relevance Score: 0.01056084

Applying User Experience (UX) Methods to Understand Identity Development in Doctoral Engineering Students

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kelli Cargile Cook, Texas Tech University; Fabiola Liliana Carrion-Anampa, Texas Tech University; Diego Alejandro Polanco-Lahoz, Texas Tech University; Jennifer A. Cross, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Nanyang Technological University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

(OP): comments with this code reference program recruitment, enrollment, matriculation, or other overall curricular design • Projects & Assignments (PA): comments with this code reference projects and assignments students completed in a course and may include class activities, readings, tests, papers, etc. • Scholarship (S): comments with this code reference publications or presentations students have published or submitted for publication. • Research Experience (R): comments with this code reference research experiences in classes or with faculty (but not specific to publications or presentations) • Courses (CO): comments with this code reference specific courses taken, not assignments

Relevance Score: 0.010478009

Increasing Teaching Efficacy in Engineering Graduate Students through the Development and Facilitation of Summer Middle and High School STEM Experience

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 6: Programs in Graduate Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jamie R. Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Michael M. Malschützky, Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Germany; Neha B. Raikar, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Yarazeth Medina, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

untrained GTAs.Limitations of this study include the lack of pre-assessment data in Cohort 1. Ongoing collectionwith Cohort 2 will include a post evaluation to determine growth in their teaching and learning,to improve test-power. Further, Cohort 1 peers are acting as mentors to Cohort 2. Providinglearned experiences to their peers and additional help with their curriculum development.References[1] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, Eds., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, andAssessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Complete ed. New York:Longman, 2001.[2] National Research Council (U.S.), S. R. Singer, N. Nielsen, and H. A. Schweingruber,Eds., Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving

Relevance Score: 0.010331456

Graduate Research Experience and Transitioning to Grad School (GREaT GradS): A New Approach to Graduate-School Onboarding for Marginalized Groups

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 1: Recruitment and Support in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alyssa V. B. Santos, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah J. Boehm, Pennsylvania State University; Fadi Castronovo, California State University, East Bay; Tiffany A. Mathews, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Relevance Score: 0.009900788

Writing in discipline-appropriate ways: An approach to teaching multilingual graduate students in mechanical engineering

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 4: Mentoring Programs in Graduate Education
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Xixin Qiu, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

user of English3.1 Articulate effective linguistic choices to each otherThe C-BLI approach posits that for learners to internalize (i.e., they can use the newknowledge on their own) a scientific concept, it is important to have them verbalize in class.Through an instructor’s mediation, learners should explain communicatively theirunderstanding of the concept(s) they are learning to each other. In this spirit, the last tutoringsession was devoted to individual presentations of their understanding and reflection of thefour linguistic concepts and corpus techniques. It was found that every participant wascapable of applying the linguistic concepts to their own writing (see Table 4). While Vihaanand Shyla chose to apply all four linguistic