forman integral part of graduate school in higher institutions as they serve as mentors, advisors, andexpert guides to graduate students during their academic journey. In many institutions, they alsoplay an integral part in determining who gets accepted into engineering graduate programs. Forthese reasons, we consider the perception of faculties to be an influential factor to be studied forthis research, as they are the central point of contact and decision-making for any graduatestudent. They are also a major support system to graduate students and play a pivotal role insteering their academic and professional journey. The role of faculty goes beyond providingacademic guidance; they also assist with funding opportunities, mentor students
on two broad areas: achievement/retention in STEM and comprehension of illus- trated scientific textDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Dale RobbennoltAnne Hart, University of Tennessee, Memphis ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Exploring the Landscape of Stressors Experienced by Doctoral Engineering
theory and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate programs; the identity development and experiences of interdisciplinary engineering graduate students and faculty; and the decision-making processes and factors impacting implementation of interdisciplinary graduate education initiatives. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
personal connections they may notshare with a more senior mentor. Near-peer mentors are often perceived as more in tune with thestruggles of their mentees [1] and more approachable than an individual who identifies as an“expert” scientist [2]. Examples of near-peer mentoring relationships in academia include anupper-level student and a first-year student, an undergraduate student and a graduate student, or agraduate student and a new faculty member. Near-peer mentoring can positively affect both the mentor and the mentee. Studentmentees have stated that they feel more comfortable asking a near-peer mentor for academic helpthan they do a professor [3] and believe access to near-peer mentors promotes success in theircoursework [4]. Students
forthe sake of the institution’s reputation, the desire to protect their most prolific and well-knownscientists, and the fear of being sued by the targets of bullying” 31 . Furthermore, the kind of negativerelationship between PhD student and advisor discussed in Narrative 3 can be a major contributingfactor to a students’ decision to either leave the PhD program or to complete the PhD programbut abandon a faculty career 32 . A 2018 Nature editiorial stated “[we] will never know how manypromising scientific careers around the world have been brought to a premature end because youngresearchers felt they could not continue to work under a bullying senior figure” 33 . Another author of this work had a very similar experience in their previous
not to answer/Others 2 0 0 0Note: 1East Asian includes Chinese, Korean, Japanese, etc.; 2South Asian includes Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi,Sri Lankan, etc.; 3Fellowship/scholarship/grant indicates gifted monetary award that students do not need to repay;4 Self funded indicates personal finances and/or savings; 5Student loans indicate money borrowed from a financialinstitution that must be repaid; 6Others include money borrowed from family/friend with an expectation to repay orfrom parents, and foreign (non-U.S.) support.Data Analysis The first goal of this study—To understand similarities or differences in the student’sidentified stressors between engineering graduate student
; domestic students organizational part of a group of life or its graduate students who members' provide each other with perception of academic support and/or and attitudes encouragement. towards those dimensions"Institutional 4 dimensions: motivation: bouncing ideas off each engineering alumni and no mixed: [63]climate" historical, mastery climate; other; support from current grad students interviews structural, faculty & peers
of president appointed members. The two-party system in the USmeans that with a change in administration, the decision of graduate students as employees alsochanges. Most recently, the National Labor Relations Board has decided that graduate students atprivate institutions are in fact employees and deserve all the rights that employees in the US areentitled to, including unionization [20]. For graduate students at public universities,determination of graduate student workers as employees is left up to state legislature and/or theuniversity depending on how the state law is written. Sometimes state legislature will allowuniversities themselves to classify graduate student workers and other times, the state legislaturewill explicitly exclude
. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her primary areas of research include engineering ca- reer pathways and decision-making, undergraduate student persistence, professional engineering practice, and faculty mentorship. Brunhaver graduated with her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Perceived Advisor Support and Thesis Self-Efficacy: An Instrument DevelopmentAbstractThe path to degree completion for graduate students in engineering disciplines is fraught withchallenges, but one factor that
vulnerable to equating productivity with self-worth—is particularly relevant, as theseself-beliefs directly reinforce behaviors that can either help (i.e., help-seeking, proactive goalsetting, skill-acquisition) or hinder (i.e., social withdrawal, engaging in avoidant behavior,lowered aspirations) personal advancement and career prospects [6]. In this capacity, self-efficacy was identified as an emergent theme and subsequently coded for in the data.The academic pipeline and graduate student attritionThe path through graduate school is neither straightforward nor logical, with many pushes andpulls that may advantage some and disadvantage others. Despite the depoliticization culture andsocialization of engineering particularly among the STEM
could be made more explicit and potentially broadened to include a wider rangeof communication styles and ways of being.We envision any departmental reform process, qualifying exams and beyond, to be a collaborativeone with faculty working alongside students. The Carnegie Foundation’s book, “The Formationof Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century” explores manyavenues of growth for higher education. One of their key highlights is the importance of studentinvolvement in evolving an educational program. Students are “the secret weapon for change”,and they found that when faculty were asked to work alongside students while reforming theirprograms, the faculty’s most transformative
promising findings of this research and the encouraging feedback of the student community motivated him to pursue this line of research in his NSF CAREER award in 2017. Since then, he has built a coalition within the university to expand this work through multiple NSF-funded research grants including IUSE/PFE: RED titled ”Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Because of the importance of neurodiversity at all levels of education, he expanded his work to graduate STEM education through an NSF IGE grant. In addition, he recently received his Mid-CAREER award through which, in a radically novel approach, he will take on ambitious, transdisciplinary research integrating
campaigns for all SHPE members and connections with faculty and currentgraduate students were also used to spread the word.Fig. 1, shown on the next page, is an example of a LinkedIn post that was created. It was sharedmainly by SHPE staff that have connections with those noted as candidates for both mentors andmentees.The majority of participants heard about the program through personalized mail merge emails.All mentee candidates that could be supported were accepted. Only one was declined due to thetiming of when that applicant was planning to apply to graduate school. A wait list was createdfor those mentee applicants that the program did not have enough mentors to accommodate, andthose applicants were the first invited to participate in the
channels. E-mentoring can be beneficial for graduate students who may not have easy access to mentors in person. 6. Reverse Mentoring: In this type of mentoring relationship, the mentee takes on a mentoring role for the mentor. This can be useful when the mentor is seeking to learn more about the experiences and perspectives of the mentee, such as when a senior faculty member mentors a graduate student from a diverse cultural background.There are several types of mentoring relationships that can be used to support graduatestudents in STEM fields. Each type has its own advantages and can be used in differentsituations depending on the needs of the mentee and the goals of the mentoring relationship.Components for successThere
to receiving NSF funding, the researchers piloted the journey mapping methodologywith a small group (n=8) of doctoral students attending a summer seminar in June 2021 at aResearch-Intensive state university in the Southwest United States (#IRB2019-58). Doctoralstudents in two graduate engineering programs housed within the same department were invitedto participate. (The course in which the research was conducted is required for one of the degreeswhile students in the second doctoral program may take the course as an elective.) After studentswere informed of the research goals and methods, they were asked for consent to participate.After they consented, one researcher, who is not a member of the students’ program or thedepartment in which
leadership and policy decision makers. NRT trainees and faculty visited with keylegislators and policy-making groups about water governance/water policy in Kansas. In spring2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 NRT trainees met with legislatures and policy-making groups aboutwater governance and policy in Kansas. NRT trainees were prepared to this activity during NRTSeminar where they had an overview of the state legislature and received tips on how tocommunicate with the legislators.To explore different career pathways and to create a professional community, the NRTleadership team established a team-based faculty and peer mentoring to provide vocationalcounseling and career planning for NRT trainee to pursue industry, government, and academiapositions and