Paper ID #38463Preparing Women in STEM for Faculty Careers through a Job SearchWorkshop SeriesDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State
, TX, USA Author Note:This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No 1902072.Authors are listed in the order of their contribution to the manuscript.Correspondence regarding this manuscript should be sent to Magdalena G.Grohman at magdalena.grohman@unt.edu.AbstractMultiple studies report the benefits of authentic research experiences in STEMeducation. While most of them focus either on course-based research projects oron undergraduate students’ experiences, few document authentic learningexperiences unfolding in real time among and between graduate students inresearch laboratories. Therefore, we situate our study in the context of authenticresearch experiences in
Paper ID #37470The Impact of a 16-Week Preparation Course on the TechnologicalPedagogical Content Knowledge of Graduate Teaching Assistants inEngineeringDr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Saadeddine Shehab is currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He works with a group of under- graduate and graduate SCD scholars at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates the practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and in- formal
Paper ID #41393Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT): Addressing the National AcademiesRecommendationsDr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant-funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEM teaching and learning.Praveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Charlotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational
Laboratories (1991-1999) and the AT&T Labs Fellowship Program (1996-2006). At Bell Laboratories Dr. Thompson created with the Vice President of Research and Nobel laureate, Arno Penizas, the W. Lincoln Hawkins Mentoring Excellence Award (1994). This award is given to a member of the research staff for fostering the career growth of Bell Labs students and associates. This award is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #39627 ¨ os highest honor for mentoring contributions. In 1998, AT&T Labs instituted a similar award ResearchAˆ named for Dr. Thompson. Charles
studies.The workshop series included major stakeholders and leaders of doctoral training. Specifically,there were 111 participants from 33 universities, including the ones ranked in top 50 universitiesoverall and top 50 in number of engineering PhDs granted; and 19 companies, including Fortuneand Global 500 corporations. Additional participants represented NSF, the National Academies,national laboratories, national non-profit organizations with interest in STEM doctoral training andworkforce development (American Chemical Society, American Society for EngineeringEducation, Council of Graduate Schools, Graduate Career Consortium, National GEMConsortium).The participants agreed that the US system trained PhDs well in subject matter expertise but notso
Paper ID #38901Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying examsMeredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology This author was an equal first author contributor to this work. Meredith Hooper is an Aeronautics PhD student studying under Professor Mory Gharib in the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). Meredith is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, leader within the GALCIT Graduate Student Council, and Co-Director of the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching (CPET). Her PhD research uses a combination of machine learning and
practicality,innovation, and problem solving. engineering PhD students typically progress frommastery of basic courses and laboratory skills to deeper involvement in specificprojects or research. This process involves various factors, such as mentoring,laboratory culture, teamwork, and even interaction with industry. Relevant studieshave shown that environmental factors play a significant role in the development ofprofessional identity among doctoral students.[16-18] Compared to other disciplines,engineering Ph.D. students may place more emphasis on practical applications andindustrial collaborations, which may also be part of their professional identity. Theprofessional identity of engineering students is the driving force that keeps themlearning and
research groups [7]. The interactions of thesetwo factors (e.g., advisors and peers) play a crucial role in a student's performance in researchenvironments [7]. Graduate students are often engaged in faculty-led laboratories (or research groups) andcollaborative teams as students develop both their teaching and research skills [7, 16, 17].Depending on the size of the research group, faculty advisors' roles and interactions might vary(e.g., large-size, mid-size, or sub-size) [7]. Crede and Borrego found that there were substantialdifferences in the perceived roles and interactions between faculty and graduate students acrossdifferent sized labs [7]. In particular, large-sized groups appeared to be run more like smallbusinesses (i.e
collective impact activities that expand the national pipeline into STEM careers. College student development and Faculty career development are central themes across her body of work.Dr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant- funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEMPraveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Char- lotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
lacks proper internal oversight. A lack ofemphasis on selecting PIs who are well-equipped to lead supportive and diverse laboratories cou-pled with a lack of diversity in the researcher and PI populations frequently leads to an unhealthywork environment that Black PhD students have the burden of navigating throughout their entiredoctoral program. We hope that sharing our experiences will serve as a reference point in the refor-mation of the graduate engineering education system. By challenging biases and fostering a moreinclusive academic space, we aim to see an improvement in the graduation rates of Black doctoralcandidates.Introduction Academic spaces are experiencing an influx of diverse students feeling empowered to pur-sue higher
we used the first and second strategies, we narrowed down the articles/papers by using a listof ideas and keywords we wanted to be present in their text. For example, we wanted thesearticles/papers to include concepts such as “mentor,” “graduate student,” “undergraduate,”“triad,” and others as seen in the following section, Selection.In the case of the first and second strategies, the topic of mentoring relationships in STEMdisciplines is a universal educational research topic that has publications in disciplines other thanEngineering describing the relationships seen in their laboratories, educational articles discussingthe educational outcomes of mentoring relationships, or even behavioral science fields discussingthe mentoring
the Impact of a Teaching Methods Course for International Teaching Assistants in an Inquiry-Based General Chemistry Laboratory,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 2393–2402, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00239.[9] C. J. Fong, J. Gilmore, T. Pinder-Grover, and M. Hatcher, “Examining the impact of four teaching development programmes for engineering teaching assistants,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 363–380, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1361517.[10] C. Neill, S. Cotner, M. Driessen, and C. J. Ballen, “Structured learning environments are required to promote equitable participation,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 197–203, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1039/C8RP00169C.[11] S. C
." Finally, BD Fellows can participate in the Annual GraduateResearch Symposium and compete in the Three-Minute Thesis (3MT) competition for a cashaward.Student support (finance)An important aspect of this program is the support students will receive financially. This is ofcritical importance because one of the key factors or influences that prevents students fromcompleting graduate degrees is the shortfall of financial packages provided. This often leavesstudents with an outstanding bill and requires them to seek additional employment, often awayfrom their laboratory or campus in general. Such jobs can in fact reduce the critical time spentworking on research or studying. To address this problem, the program will offer a stipend andfunding applied
, Florida, 2019.[2] S. Papert and I. Harel, Situating Constructionism: Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory., 1990.[3] C. Hayes and Y. Graham, "Understanding the building of professional identities with the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® method using situational mapping and analysis," Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, vol. 10, pp. 99-112, 2020.[4] C. Nerantzi and S. McCusker, "A taster of the LEGO(R) Serious Play(R) method (LSP) for Higher Enducation," in OER14 Building Communities of Open Practice, Newcastle, UK, 2014.[5] P. Kristiansen and R. Rasmussen, Building a Better Business using the LEGO Serious Play Method: Wiley, 2014.[6] A. R. James, "Lego Serious Play: a
23-315, National Science Foundation, 2023. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd[2] M. Beck, J. Cadwell, A. Kern, K. Wu, M. Dickerson, and M. Howard, “Critical feministanalysis of STEM mentoring programs: A meta‐synthesis of the existing literature. Gender,Work & Organization,” vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 167-187, 2022.[3] Cole, M. W, “Turning the STEM tide: An approach for mentoring young women on how tothrive in STEM careers”, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Laboratory, 2014.[4] B. Ülkü-Steiner, B. Kurtz-Costes, and C. R. Kinlaw, “Doctoral student experiences ingender-balanced and male-dominated graduate programs”, Journal of Educational Psychology,vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 296 - 307, 2000. Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022
, and engineering education.Dr. Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Nanyang Technological University Dr. Mario G. Beruvides is the AT&T Professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of the Laboratory for Systems Solutions in the Industrial Engineering Department at Texas Tech University. He is a regis- tered professional engineer in the state of Texas. He holds a BS in mechanical engineering and an MSIE from the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida and a PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) in Blacksburg, Virginia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Applying User Experience (UX) Methods to
Meeting, New York, NY: American Educational Research Association, 2018. Accessed: Apr. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://tinyurl.com/y9rlaaxa[35] M. A. Maher, A. M. Wofford, J. Roksa, and D. F. Feldon, “Finding a Fit: Biological Science Doctoral Students’ Selection of a Principal Investigator and Research Laboratory,” LSE, vol. 19, no. 3, p. ar31, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0105.[36] B. A. Burt, “Toward a Theory of Engineering Professorial Intentions: The Role of Research Group Experiences,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 289–332, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0002831218791467.[37] E. Crede and M. Borrego, “Learning in Graduate Engineering Research Groups of Various Sizes
positions in the industry ornational laboratories. Students learn to leverage storytelling to showcase their strengths andexperiences to potential employers effectively. Additionally, the course introduces graduatestudents to the NACE career competencies and guides gaining experience in these areas. Thiscourse collaborates extensively with the Center for Career Development (CCD). Students receiveassistance crafting resumes, curriculum vitae, and LinkedIn profiles and practicing interviewingskills and utilizing the learning modules on each of these topics prepared by the CCD. They canprogress through these materials at their own pace and participate in the discussion boards onBlackboard with their peers to edit and share their revised resumes and
://tennesseelookout.com/2022/02/21/suicides-at-vanderbilt-highlight-demand-for- mental-health-services/[10] B. L. Benderly, “Explosions in the Lab,” Slate, May 22, 2009. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://slate.com/technology/2009/05/what-makes-so-academic- laboratories-such-dangerous-places-to-work.html[11] A. Cohen and Y. Baruch, “Abuse and Exploitation of Doctoral Students: A Conceptual Model for Traversing a Long and Winding Road to Academia,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 505–522, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04905-1.[12] P. Hutchinson, “Health insurance is a make-or-break cost for LSU graduate assistants,” Louisiana Illuminator. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https
whether or not graduate students are agood fit in their program or laboratory. Ted, a student with ADHD, anxiety and depression,points out that the mindset of faculty advisors is crucial to determining student success in aresearch group, as he says, “Not every advisor knows that people are different and can't just allwork the same way. And then you know, maybe they don't care. Maybe they're just like, if youdon't fit, you don't fit.”Ronnie, a graduate student with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), points out the importanceof clear expectations to mitigate confusion and enhance productivity. “I really like environments where I have really clear roles and things to do. And as a graduate student, there's nobody saying you need to
, The Boeing Company (Space Division), Alcatel, USA (Alcatel-Lucent) and the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). My professional goals consist of achieving the position of Senior Executive Service (SES) member within the Department of Defense (DoD). Afterwards, I would like to pursue either a research position at a national laboratory, think-tank, or board of directors and/or academia as a second career. I am a certified scuba diver, I enjoyed skydiving, trying different foods/eating, traveling the world, live sporting events/comedy shows, attending events such as Homecoming at Prairie View A&M University, spending time with my family, friends, fraternity brothers, and love ones!Dr. Janie M. Moore, Texas A&M
Research Groups. With the firstmentorship seminar, the goal was to introduce the College of Engineering Mentoring Fellows,the purpose behind the Mentorship Seminar Series, explain how important the state of graduatestudent-faculty member relationships can be, give a break-down of mentor and mentee roles andresponsibilities, introduce the IDP as a tool for mentorship and teach graduate students howcreate their own IDP. The second seminar aimed to initiate the discussion about poor mentorshiprelationships, what it might look like, for example in a laboratory space, what factors cancontribute to inefficient mentoring, and educate attendees on how to improve their reactionstowards any mentoring problem that may arise to avoid creating further