- Conference Session
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 1: Recruitment and Support in Engineering Graduate Programs
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Meredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Rose Tawney, California Institute of Technology ; Emily Hope Palmer, California Institute of Technology; James Ragan, California Institute of Technology; Morgan Louise Hooper, California Institute of Technology; Yazmin Gonzalez, California Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
could be made more explicit and potentially broadened to include a wider rangeof communication styles and ways of being.We envision any departmental reform process, qualifying exams and beyond, to be a collaborativeone with faculty working alongside students. The Carnegie Foundation’s book, “The Formationof Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century” explores manyavenues of growth for higher education. One of their key highlights is the importance of studentinvolvement in evolving an educational program. Students are “the secret weapon for change”,and they found that when faculty were asked to work alongside students while reforming theirprograms, the faculty’s most transformative
- Conference Session
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Julie M. Rieland, University of Michigan; Shamalee Goonetilleke, University of Michigan; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Michigan; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
, andaccumulative lived experience. Through cultivation of this reflexive knowledge, we developeddeeper insights into the participants lived experiences and how that knowledge emerged [51].The third author is a White cisgender woman with research experience related to engineeringgraduate students’ mental health. The fourth author is a White cisgender man with extensiveundergraduate teaching experience and research experience in cognitive human factors duringhis Ph.D. and, since then, design-based engineering education research focused on mid-yearengineering science courses. The third and four authors served as a point of triangulation,challenging the rigor of the data analysis processes and interpretation of the findings. All authorsengaged in discussions
- Conference Session
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kelli Cargile Cook, Texas Tech University; Fabiola Liliana Carrion-Anampa, Texas Tech University; Diego Alejandro Polanco-Lahoz, Texas Tech University; Jennifer A. Cross, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Nanyang Technological University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
they are housed, provided students with an overview of journey mappingmethods and modeled the journey mapping process using a persona the researchers developed.Participants were then asked to map their researcher identity development by semester. The mapswere designed to be completed in table form with columns for the semester, activity, emotionalresponse (ranging from very negative to very positive), and explanation of how this activitypromoted or hindered researcher identity development. (Figure 1 is a screenshot of a journeymap students created during the persona training session.) Figure 1: Sample journey map for a participant’s third semester in a doctoral program. Following this assignment, participants completed their individual