. This also presents the greatest challenge for IE educators tomaintain a curricula core for the discipline and profession.End NotesThe views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official positionof the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References1. ALDRICH, J.G., 1912. “The Present State of the Art of Industrial Management,” Trans. of the ASME, Vol. 34, Paper 1378, pp. 1182-11872. BILLINGS, C., J.J. Junguzza, D.F. Poirier, and S. Saeed, 2001. “The Role and Career of the Industrial Engineer in the Modern Organization,” Ch. 1.2, Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, Ed. K.B. Zandin, Ch. 1.2, pp. 1.21-1.373. EMERSON, H.P. and D.C.E. Naehring, 1988 , Orgins of
://internetofthings.fiu.edu/. [Accessed February 2, 2018].[11] J. Lacayo “FIU to offer first Internet of Things in U.S.,” June 27, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://news.fiu.edu/2017/06/fiu-to-offer-first-internet-of-things-degree-in-u- s/112824. [Accessed February 2, 2018].[12] J. Pickard, T. Broach, P. Lunsford, and M. Angolia, “Building a Sustainable ICT Remote Access Lab through Student Lab Worker Projects,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Zone II Conference, San Jose, Puerto Rico, USA, March 2 – 5, 2017.[13] NDG NETLAB+ System Overview, Available: https://www.netdevgroup.com/support/documentation. [Accessed November 6, 2017].[14] Rockwell Automation Industrial Internet of Things Curriculum, Available: https
of a larger pool of industrial engineering projects that could be shared andperfected by many outreach organizations.Bibliography1. Anderson, Lisa S., and Kimberley A. Gilbride. "Pre-university outreach: Encouraging students to consider engineering careers." Global J. of Engng. Educ 7.1 (2003): 87-93.2. Specking, Eric; Rufaidah Almaian,; Heather Nactmann,. “An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Engineering Outreach Decisions.” IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings. Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc. (IIE). 2013.3. Jeffers, Andrew T., Angela G. Safferman, and Steven I. Safferman. "Understanding K-12 engineering outreach programs." Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice 130.2 (2004): 95
teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology 2006;37(6):825 -840.9. Bhoyrub J, Hurley J, Neilson GR, Ramsay M, Smith M. Heutag ogy: An alternative practice based learning approach. Nurse education in practice 2010;10(6):322-326.10. De Jong T, Linn MC, Zacharia ZC. Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science 2013;340(6130):305-308.11. Bonwell C, Eison J. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom AEHE-ERIC higher education reports. 1991.12. Chiang VC, Leung SS, Chui CY, Leung AY, Mak Y. Building life-long learning capacity in undergraduate nursing freshmen within an integrative and s mall group learning
Industrial Engineering Division Program Chair and reviewers for their constructivefeedback.References[1] A. Gray, “The 10 skills you need to thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the- fourth-industrial-revolution/ Online; accessed October 13, 2019.[2] S.A. Atwood and J.E. Pretz, “Creativity as a Factor in Persistence and Academic Achievement of Engineering Undergraduates,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 540–559, 2016.[3] J.P. Guilford. The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, 1967[4] W.F. Motte, Jr. Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature, Dalkey Archive Press, 2015[5] O.P. John and S
course.Shouldn’t the amount of study be tied to the amount of time necessary for a person to master thecontent and shouldn’t that be less for a person with background in the major? The secondproblem is with the total time. We haven’t been requiring a person to work 74 hours per weeksince the ten hour day-7 day work week of the 1880’s and prior. In 1880 the job with these workrules was probably in the mines. Page 11.696.9The workload analysis of Figure 4 is built on the model that holds all courses equal. It is basedon the 40 hour work week, the same standard that we apply to a faculty. Predetermined Timesanalysis will apply as heavily in developing the
statisticalsignificance. This work will inform modifications to enhance the course in future semesters.Modifications to the course will be monitored and impact on performance and perception will bequantified. 1. Twigg, C.A., “Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Redesigning Large-Enrollment Courses”, The Pew Learning and Technology Program, Troy, New York (1999). Available from Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute http://www.center.rpi.edu. 2. U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Washington, D.C., 2010. 3. WileyPLUS, http
general overview of productdevelopment process (see Table 3). Students form a start-up company and design a newproduct, develop a (rough) design of processes to manufacture this product, build acorresponding financial model and a business plan. This course is described in details in nextsection. Stage 2 is divided into two semesters: during the first semester lectures cover ProcessDesign and students are learning hands-on fundamentals of specialized software platform(s)for process modeling and simulation. Based on the knowledge and experience gained in the PPI class, in the following semesterstudent groups contact local companies, develop project proposals, and carry out projectsaccording to the joint agreement. Student teams offer services
Teaching and Learning, v11 n2 p76-90 Apr 201117. Khalid, A., Nuhfer-Halten, B., Vandenbussche, J., Colebeck, D., Atiqullah, M., Toson, S., Chin, C., ‘Effective multidisciplinary active learning techniques for freshmen polytechnic students,’ Intellectbase International Consortium Academic Conference, Atlanta, GA., October 13-15, 2011 Page 25.1229.13
. Assessment criteria can include: (a) Whether the problem was accurately defined (the Problem as State & Problem as Understood)? (b) Did the solution(s) solve the problem? (c) Did the student engage in critical thinking? (d) How is the solution going to be implemented? (identify concerns). (e) During student presentations: evaluate the use visuals, and presentation preparation & skills. (f) During group/team presentations: evaluate the quality of collaboration and initiatives undertaken by individual team members.(3) Student input should be part of the assessment process: Use class discussions to evaluate/critique PBL assignments/activities. Select
. (1995). The problem-based learning approach as an enhancement factor of personal meaningfulness of learning. Higher Education, 29(1), 93-101. 7. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-‐Bass 8. Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessments to identify motivational patterns and facilitate behavioral regulation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 7: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 57–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 9. Ford, M., & Smith, P. (2007). Thriving with
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDCA15 Deming, W. E., Out of the Crisis, MIT Press, 1986.16 Cognitive Map, Wikipedia. Retrieved August 5, 2017 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_map17 Fuzzy Logic, Wikipedia. Retrieved August 5, 2017 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_logic18 Bloom, B. S., ed. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I, Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay, 1956.19 Rasch, G., Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research), 1960, expanded edition with foreword and afterword by B.D. Wright, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.20 Ishikawa Diagrams, Wikipedia. Retrieved August 5
Assessment of Tools, Methods, and Approaches for the 21st Century Security Environment, ISBN: 978-0-309-29871-1, The National Academies Press, 2014.11. DARPA, Open Manufacturing, http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/Open_Manufacturing_%28OM%29.aspx, (Accessed, 2015).12. Watson, J., Schomaker, M.G., “Introduction to Cooperative Education-The Course,” Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.13. Rangan, S., Natarajarathinam, M., “How to structure an internship that is great for the intern and the manager?,” 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.14. Ermer, G.E., “The Four Pillars of
students to identifyopportunities where OR could be used to create positive change is discussed. This exercise alsorevealed important gaps in student understanding of the types of problems that can be addressedusing OR. This misunderstanding will be used to drive changes in the future offerings of thecourse, and serve as a reminder that faculty sometimes make assumptions about student learningthat are not correct.Background on the University of San DiegoThe University of San Diego is a private school with a liberal arts tradition. Addressing socialissues in the classroom is an important part of the school’s identity. Community service-learninghas been practiced since the early 1990’s, USD is recognized as a Community EngagementInstitution by the
the selection process is made by the students.Like we saw in our results, the students’ motivators tend to change throughout the years, thismainly because of how they get to know their field, through enrolling specialized courses in theirmayor, and levels of maturity. All of these factors can and will be tabulated to get a betterunderstanding of how the students tend to think, when it comes to selecting a mayor.V. References 1. Kierkegaard, S. (1962). The Point of View for My Work as an Author: A Report to History. New York: Harper Torchbooks. 2. Gonzales-Barreto, D., Gonzales-Quevedo, A., Applicant’s Profile Study for Improving Undergraduate
Research,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2013.3. Kellog, S., “Developing Online Materials to Facilitate an Inverted Classroom Approach”, 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.4. Toto, R. and H. Nguyen, “Flipping the Work Design in an Industrial Engineering Course”, 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009. Page 24.616.135. R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and M. Prince, National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI), Charlotte, NC, June 2012.6. Kahn Academy website: https://www.khanacademy.org/ accessed 12/20/13.7. R Core Team R: A language
, No. 1, pp.7-24, 2010.3. W.L. Johnson, N. Wang and S. Wu: “Experience with Serious Games for Learning Languages and Cultures”, Proceedings of SimTecT Conference, Australia, 2007.4. V. Brezinka and L. Hovestadt: “Serious games can support psychotherapy on children and adolescents”, Proceedings of the 3rd Human-computer interaction and usability engineering of the Austrian computer society conference on HCI and usability for medicine and health care, 2007.5. M. Mayo: “Games for Science and Engineering Education”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 31 – 35.6. R. Van Eck: “Digital Game-Based Learning: It’s just not the Digital Natives who are restless”, Educause Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 17 – 30.7. D. Charsky: “From
in 1975, and his master’s in civil engineering from UAA in 1999.Dr. Neal A. Lewis, University of Bridgeport Neal Lewis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Management, School of Engineer- ing at the University of Bridgeport (Connecticut). He has more than 25 years of industrial experience, having worked for Procter & Gamble and Bayer. Along with coauthors, he has received the 2005 Ted Es- chenbach award for the best article in the Engineering Management Journal and the 2009 Grant Award for the best article in The Engineering Economist. Neal received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Missouri, Rolla (now Missouri S&T) in 1974, M.B.A. from the University of New
of the attempt scores for each homework assignment. Thenumber of attempts and range of attempts were calculated after manipulating the submission dataexported from ANGEL to Microsoft Excel®. The homework submission variables describingthe students’ interaction with the online homework included the time between the first and lastattempt of the homework assignment and the time between the first attempt and the due date ofthe homework assignment. These variables show when students started the online homeworkassessment and how long they took to complete their homework attempt(s). These data werecalculated by using the submission time stamp data from ANGEL for the time of eachsubmission. A macro was written in Excel to transform submission time