with just themselves. Therefore, having to collaborate across three institutionsand two countries presented some new challenges, which the guidelines addressed. Over thetime that the authors have collaborated, they have worked wholly or in part on several proposalsand peer reviewed collaborations.Guidelines for CollaborationProtection of Ideas and Intellectual ContributionThis collaboration should represent a safe space where ideas can be freely shared and respected.Therefore, it is critical that the ideas generated by individuals (aka idea owners) are protectedand used only with explicit permission ● Ideas or intellectual contribution shared by one collaborator cannot be used by another collaborator without explicit permission from the
boards, discussion forums, web contentpresentation areas, and peers sharing files with other peers. WebCT, Blackboard, and ANGELeach have distinct features that allow the students and instructors to build this collaboration witheach other and with groups, see Table 1. It also frequently reduces questions and email toinstructors.Technology can strengthen faculty interactions with all students, especially with shy studentswho are reluctant to ask questions or challenge the instructor directly. This may be done byplacing a more “distant” source of information and guidance for students. It is often easier todiscuss values and personal concerns in writing than orally, since inadvertent or ambiguousnonverbal signals are not so dominant. As the number
Paper ID #8503A New Vision for Enginering EducationDr. Hamid R. Parsaei PE, Texas A&M University at Qatar Hamid R. Parsaei is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Texas A&M University (College Station) and also Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at Texas A&M University at Qatar. He is a registered professional engineer (PE) in Texas and a Fellow of the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE). He has published more than 200 articles in peer-refereed archival journals and conference proceedings. He also served as editor for three international academic
research for this Chinese Information Technology Bachelor’s program believes that one ofsolutions to achieve all the educational objectives and sustain student knowledge for a long termis to develop learning experiences to meet student's educational and professional needs byencouraging student intentionality, discussion and involvement through lab demonstration,discussion, presentation, document co-creation, micro-sharing, peer critique, and evaluation.This belief helps determine the goal of this research is to identify and test new teaching andlearning methods to effectively improve and sustain student learning outcomes. The fundamentalchange in this research is to shift students from passive learners to be their own masters in labdesign
global workforce, which includes theability to travel to other countries, respect other cultures and understand engineering through theeyes of other cultures. Additionally, the WCOE believes this requirement will improverecruitment of top freshman and transfer students from peer institutions and other high qualityprograms.Historically, the WCOE has had approximately 100 students per year participate in faculty-led oralso referred to as faculty-directed programs. Less than 20 students per year have participated inreciprocal or affiliate programs.The WCOE demographics are as follows. The WCOE has eight different departments providing10 different undergraduate degree programs including chemical engineering, civil engineering,computer engineering
school.This course has six outcomes, assessed as part of the ABET process, that all sections must meet.The course outcomes are:―After completing the course, students will be able to: 1. Identify and describe the engineering field of specialization. 2. Explain the different career paths for engineers. 3. Practice the engineering approach to problem solving. 4. Identify the engineer’s ethical and societal responsibilities. 5. Practice technical writing and presentation using computer tools. 6. Work in a team.‖ Page 15.293.4Term project & how it relates to course outcomesThe course grade is based on assignments, an exam, and a term
an ASEAN regional standard.4While both ABET and AUN-QA are nonprofit, non-governmental organizations, they featurevery different organizational structures (it should also be noted that AUN is a much youngerorganization than ABET and its predecessors). ABET limits its membership to technicalsocieties, currently 35 members, that represent related professions. The bulk of the work withinABET activities is done by volunteers from academia, government, and industry.5 The membersocieties nominate individuals to act as these volunteers, who are key participants in ABET’sacademic program peer-review process. Programs accredited by ABET range from the associatedegree to master degrees, depending on the accreditation commission. ABET is divided
, carrier flow and small-signal models; (iii) light emission and detection with semiconductor junctions. Students received videos weeks before the class and the average length of the video was 23 minutes. Some concepts were covered over 2 or 3 videos (to be discussed in a single class). The class was organized as described in the figure below.Before class In class After class Watch the videos Quiz Students Take notes Discuss about Check their understanding Write question questions from video Extend their learning Group activity
) (Dalian, China). Qin has broad teaching and research interests in the ethical, historical-cultural, and policy perspectives of engineering practice and ed- ucation. His research has drawn on theories, methods, and practices from a wide range of fields including philosophy of technology, engineering ethics, engineering education, and Confucian ethics. His work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Engineering Studies, History of Education, and Technology in Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Global Engineering Competency: Assessment Tools and Training StrategiesIntroductionAs many
of emphasizing criticalthinking, developed the curricula. The goal was to have friendly and respectful classroomatmospheres where students engage actively in class discussion and collaborate with peers. Thefocus was to build basic skills in the following areas: ▪ Mathematics. The curriculum followed an incremental learning approach. It introduced the concepts of the tool-box and the master musician to improve problem-solving through practice and pattern recognition. The material included numbers, operations, fractions, algebra, geometry, and trigonometry concepts. ▪ Spanish. Activities focused on improving reading and writing skills, introducing students to the analytical thinking process. Dominican history
continued technological and economicsuccess for nations such as ours will rely on scientists and engineers able tocollaborate with peers, partners, and competitors from many locations around theworld. Engineering educators acknowledge that this era of globalization hasextensive implications for the curriculum and are thus experimenting in search ofappropriate changes to keep the next generations competitive. Many internationalprogram models for engineers are emerging at campuses across the country, withfocus on language and culture study, study abroad, student exchange, internationalprofessional internships, projects carried out by global student and faculty teams,distance learning partnerships with schools abroad, and so on. Another sign of
Learning Objectives and OutcomesDeveloping, formulating, and writing objectives is a key to the success of any education.Without clear objective, it is impossible to reach any goal in education. Use of objectives hasbecome commonplace in higher education. Higher education often uses instructional orbehavioral objectives in teaching and learning. In order to affirm the value of objectives it isimportant to incorporate objectives within the curriculum and specific units of study and makeconnections between objectives and learning outcomes.3,4Instructors often use a standard protocol to develop objectives for their students. Althoughobjectives are not difficult to write, the challenge is how to write instructional objectives forstudents that clearly
arrive at the foreign labwith a well defined work plan and the necessary technical background to perform the requiredtasks with supervision but minimum instruction. In addition to the technical aspects of thetraining, the student will be encouraged to register in a Spanish course and familiarize with theculture and geography of Spain.Specific tasks in the student training will include the following: Page 13.189.5Before travel to the foreign institution (6 months) 1. Read the current NSF award and major works referenced therein. 2. Perform a literature search on the topic of confluence welds and write a report 3. Work at the MSU casting lab
thistechnology.Project 3: Performing a mock hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee for Energy and NaturalResources to approve the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative on a specific parcel of public land. Theclass would be split into different groups with differing opinions on the subject, such asInvestors, Locals, Policy Makers, Environmental Protection agency, etc. The students were askedto research and strategize and then in class debate their side of the initiative.Project 4: In groups of 3, the students are asked to design an alternative energy proposal for acity. They are asked to propose a plan to reduce the amount of fossil fuels that a city uses forboth electricity and transportation. They are asked to write a proposal to the major of the cityexplaining the
and writing for academic purposes,and research papers preparation. Furthermore, in order to facilitate the transition of the 1+2+1students to EWU the ELI and the International Education Office provide the possibility to matchthe 1+2+1 students with International Peer Advisors, Cultural Mentors and InternationalAdvisors. One of the approaches taken to enhance the learning experience of the 1+2+1 studentsis a high level of cooperation with native speakers. Towards this end, 1+2+1 students areencouraged to partner with American students in the various laboratory classes. It was noted thatthere was a significant improvement in the academic performance both of the 1+2+1 studentsand the native speakers. One of the intangible benefits is the
future, research questions 1-4 will be addressed using the weekly studentparticipation logs and actual course performance. The results of this analysis will provideinsights into the transition of study habits of the students over the semester and identify anypossible high-impact course engagement behaviors.LimitationsThe main limitation of this study, and the self-reflection participation logs in general, is thereliance on self-reporting and accurate self-evaluation. It has been shown that self-assessmentand instructor-assessment of in-class participation are often not in agreement [1], [5], [19]. Someauthors have discussed combining self- or peer-assessment scores with instructor-assessmentscores to avoid inflation [2], [19], but this assumes
of Spanish statements to provide facultymentors with an overview of the class, and to determine the preliminary linguistic andcultural preparation of each student regarding the project. Students were cautiouslyconfident about their grammar preparation, as well as their comprehension of writtenand technical Spanish. Students expressed strong agreement about the importance ofworking in groups with class peers, “consultants,” and professors in order to accomplishthe project. They recognized that engineering projects have social and ethical impacts,and that sustainability—a slippery term to define, depending on whether one defines itfrom the perspective of the developing or developed regions—is important to all projectsrelated to engineering
learning is not only knowledgeacquisition or participation in a social community but also about knowledge creation as in thecase of project based learning. Similarly the new developments in electronic media are leading toenormous challenges for teachers in regards to the role digital devices can and should play in thelearning process. For some educators, the view is that technology should only be utilized as atool to help facilitate student understanding and mastery of the current curriculum. Whereas forother educators, technology is as fundamental to learning as reading and writing and thereforemust become an integral segment of the school curriculum. The paper also discusses new trendsand teaching methodologies to help improve the state of
& Koca, 2013). The project illuminates CTcompetencies (e.g., pattern recognition, data collection, data analysis, simulations) thatpotentially may empower STEM teachers’ instructional practices and improve their students’understanding of CT. In addition, though the project includes students from the United States, its scope isinternational and numerous nationalities are represented. Students around the globe are requiredto observe the moon and by identifying patterns, as one of the CT competencies, to gain a deeperunderstanding of an integrated STEM modeling through observing the nature. Students write anessay about their daily observations and exchange with their peers anonymously from differentcountries in opposite (northern and
Maryland’s PROMISE AGEP,LSAMP, and LSAMP-BD delegations demonstrated a clear need to assist the global community.They were particularly interested in working on problems related to industry innovation,infrastructure, gender equality, sustainable cities, and communities. Students realized thatapproaches to solutions could not be centralized to their own country, and that their proposalshad to be feasible and logical for other parts of the world. As an example, challenges withbringing clean water to remote regions and approaches to sanitation required a need to take timeto learn from peers from other countries. Students were asked to provide ubiquitous solutions tothe problems. They were asked to consider themselves as part of the respective
working-class families. Value isplaced on students’ leadership experience and potential as we expect the GTI fellows to sharetheir learning and influence their peers after their study-tour. So, the impact goes beyond the 21-25 GTI fellows we select each year.2. Evolution of GTISince 2004, we have sent over 180 GTI fellows to Asia through the GTI program1 2 3. The firstthree cohorts (2004-2006) visited Taiwan and China, the next three traveled to India (2008-2010), the next three visited Taiwan and China (2011-2013), and the last cohort (2014) visitedTaiwan. During this eleven-year period, we have made four programmatic shifts. First, in 2005,we extended the scope of GTI from a focus on the global economy to include environmental andenergy
theteacher and organized around defined problems. The problem is the initial and focal point of thelearning process. POL is complex problem-based in the context of a team working together toreach a project goal that is typically highly challenging and includes individual and groupactivities, discussions, and a writing process. POL additionally teaches project management andteamwork competencies4. Mills and Treagust5 summarized the main differences of PBL andPOL. Some of the major differences they observed included project tasks are closer toprofessional work and thus use a longer period of time in comparison to PBL, POL is more Page 26.154.2focused
engineering education Focus Possible ImpactsStudent Knowledge Facts, procedures, connections, metacognitionStudent Skills Design (application, invention, creation), communication (speaking, writing, listening, visual), observing, needs assessment, resource assessment, problem definition and analysis, collaboration, interpersonal, intercultural, project management, impact analysis, feasibility, foreign languageStudent Attitudes and Identity Confidence, empowerment, engineer as citizen, ethics
characterizes our students, alumni, faculty, staff and graduates, and itwill let us join the knowledge society in an increasingly more effective way.The international dimension emphasizes these activities and include: the development ofalliances and agreements with universities and research centers abroad; the presence in ourundergraduate and graduate programs of visiting teachers, visiting and advising of academicprocess; exchanging teachers and researchers with academic peers of other higher educationinstitutions; having our teachers complete their studies abroad; exchanging of undergraduate andgraduate students with similar international universities by dual degree programs, exchangeprograms, foreign language studies, apprenticeships, research and
new member. Inorder to obtain this required knowledge and skill base, students participate in lengthy degreeprograms and/or apprenticeships. During these experiences, students observe the behaviors,norms and attitudes that are prevalent among the profession’s practitioners. During this time,students begin to craft their professional identity by “trying on” possible images of themselves tosee how well they fit 11. One way these images are established is through the individual’sprofessional developmental network, and the relationships students have with members of theirprofession and learning community (e.g their department or research group) 12. Sweitzer12explored how other members of the student’s developmental network (friends, peers, and
six credits and took two courses, an engineeringelective taught by a University faculty member and a humanities elective taught be an Indianprofessor. The University of Texas at Austin has also offered several six-week, six creditprograms4. Students are encouraged to travel while studying abroad since the program isarranged to have no classes on Friday through Sunday.Many universities and colleges have long offered semester study-abroad programs often throughthird party organizations. Grove City College has participated in such programs throughout theyears; however, engineering majors have never been able to take part without significant issuesassociated with transferring of credits and remaining “in sync” with their peers. LafayetteCollege
served as a key leader and member of the UW OMA&D Outreach and Recruitment Unit that contributed to two consecutive years of increased underrepresented freshmen student enrollment at the UW. In her current capacity as the Director for the Pacific Northwest Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Pro- gram at the UW, she strives to increase the recruitment, retention and graduation rates for underrepre- sented students in STEM disciplines while providing experiential and research opportunities. Through the LSAMP Program she was able to co-write the OMA&D/UW College of Engineering STEM focused study abroad seminar to Brisbane, Australia. This was selected for a best practice model workshop at
12.1207.3initiative, ‘Users as Producers’, was introduced providing an opportunity for the students tolearn and develop skills in video and media production. The students were introduced tocamera skills, the language of television, interview techniques and editing skills. Each groupproduced their own video asset which was either embedded within a PowerPointpresentation, or placed into the Blackboard VLE for peer review. As well as developing skillsin media production there was also an opportunity for students to develop key skills such aspresentation techniques, project management skills and conflict resolution (whilst workingtogether in groups).The first student section related to materials, manufacturing or environmental processes.The second student
2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 320 Robotic Systems and Material Handling 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 340 Applied Dynamics 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00ENGD080 Writing Lab 2010-2011 Not Transferred 1.00ENGD090 Writing Workshop 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00PHI 194 Global Ethical Viewpoints 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00AELP000 Non-Credit/American English Lang 2010-2011 Not Transferred 0.00CHE 120 General Chemistry I 2010-2011 D Transferred 3.00CHE 120L General Chemistry I Lab
, professional development, and both peer and facultymentoring [3, 6, 10, 14, 20, 21]. A typical summer bridge is four to six weeks long and takesplace in the summer after high school and preceding the students first fall semester. Students areselected at a certain math SAT range, enter the program as a cohort, and live in a residentialcommunity on campus. Days are filled with math-intensive course work and team orientedprojects. Bridge programs are typically offered at a deeply discounted cost (or none at all) to thestudent’s family. A pseudo college environment is created to prepare the student for the skillsneeded to be successful as a first-year student in engineering or other STEM fields. Uponcompletion of this program, students continue their