Abilities, Creativity and Ethics in Design [ACE(D)]Lab. Bairaktarova’s ongoing research interest spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance and professional decisions are influenced by aptitudes and abilities, interest, and manipulation of physical and virtual objects.Kacie Hodges P.E., Virginia Tech Kacie Hodges, PE is an Advanced Instructor in the Engineering Education department at Virginia Tech. She holds BS and Master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech with a focus in Hydrology. Kacie is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia and has worked in both the private and public sectors as an engineer prior to joining the faculty at
ethics of service learning. The course was meant to be a part of abroader wrap-around approach for service-learning teams, although the framework at this pointremains ad hoc.26 Like most programs, we are working toward developing a broader, systematicstrategy toward increasing students’ global engagement.Reflections on the Variety of Reentry PracticesThese programs offer a limited, unrepresentative sample of engineering education abroadprogramming. Further, they all come from the United States, which severely limits theirrepresentativeness. Future comparative work in the area would be worthwhile. Nevertheless,these reentry programs do offer a number of approaches to consider. They take a wide variety offorms and address different aspects of the
Paper ID #11783Go Green on Campus Project: A Collaborative International Student ProjectProf. Patricia Fox, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Professor Patricia Fox is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue Uni- versity Indianapolis (IUPUI). Pat has been a member of the faculty for over 32 years. She has previously served as Associate Chair and Associate Dean in the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of
, such as through first-year introduction to engineeringcourses or through required design “cornerstone” subjects throughout the undergraduatecurriculums across the US. This is partly driven by the requirements that ABET sets forengineering degrees. ABET Criteria 3 (a) through (k) include design explicitly, especially Page 26.1362.2through criteria (c) and (e). The ABET criteria also implicitly include design throughrequirements for teamwork, ethics, social context, and other broad considerations. Another driving factor to include engineering design in freshman courses is to increase student interest inengineering, improve retention, and improve
providing better career opportunities.There is also a connection between study abroad programs and increased soft skills in students.Soft skills are moving higher and higher on the list of things employers are looking for in anengineer. CENews published the results of a survey they conducted that supported this claimsaying that “[W]e’ve talked about [what] we need to incorporate perhaps more in the education,so that students [who graduate are] more prepared for a job, and that includes management skills,written skills, oral communication skills, ethics, technical skills, more broad-based knowledge,more emphasis on humanities.” There is evidence that study abroad experiences, particularlysemester long programs, improve soft skills such as writing
; Radiation) Important to know • Fluid (flow) properties • Electrical fundamentals & photo-voltaic effect • Engineering design process • Foundations and ethics of team work • Problem identification and evaluations • Students should use systematic problem-solving method to evaluate and
?Brainstorming As a result of the pre-conference workshop, it was proposed that from the Turabo Declaration acommittee be created to develop the accreditation theme and strategies in LACCEI. A taskforceof 21 professionals, including deans, authorities and representatives of careers of Engineeringdisciplines, organizations and agencies of accreditation agencies from Latin American andCaribbean countries.The taskforce decided that one of the first objectives should be to have conceptual clarity anddefine the principles over which the system or systems will be developed, and determine whatthe final outcomes should be.With this objective in the taskforce defined the following:VisionTo produce engineers for the Americas that are creative, ethical, flexible
, and is one of the best universities in Mexico.The Tecnológico de Monterrey has more than 126,000 registered students and almost 8,000faculty members on its 33 Campuses. The Tecnológico de Monterrey has been accredited by theSouthern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). The mission of Tecnológico deMonterrey is to: form persons with integrity, ethical standards and a humanistic outlook, who areinternationally competitive in their professional fields and will, at the same time, be goodcitizens committed to the economic, political, social, and cultural development of theircommunity and to the sustainable use of natural resources. Given these missions, Tecnológicode Monterrey and its community are committed to contributing to the
interest is in the cultural and religious perspectives in the ethics of emerging biotechnologies for which she was awarded a Fulbright grant to conduct research at the United Arab Emi- rates University. She is the Special Projects Manager in the School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems at Drexel University, and Director of the local and international weServe Program, currently established in the Gambia and Mozambique, (Africa), for which the weServe program recently received a student leadership award from the Jenzabar Foundation. She is a summa cum laude graduate from Thomas Jefferson University with a B.S. in diagnostic imaging. She has presented at MESA, the International Conference on Islam and
had a chance to practice engineering in a global context,whether through an international internship, a service-learning opportunity, a virtual globalengineering project or some other form of experience, and can effectively deal with ethical issuesarising from cultural or national differences.”5 Downey et al. report a similar conclusion aboutstudent outcomes in that students should be able to demonstrate “substantial knowledge of thesimilarities and differences among engineers and non-engineers in different countries; an abilityto analyze how people’s lives and experiences in other countries may shape or affect what theyconsider to be at stake in engineering work; and a predisposition to treat co-workers from othercountries as people who have
Paper ID #8790Assessing Metacognition During Problem-Solving in Two Senior ConcurrentCoursesMiss Sheila Reyes Guerrero, Universidad de las Am´ericas Puebla Sheila Reyes Guerrero is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches Databases, Networks & Telecommunications, Contem- porary Ethics, Basic computer, Internet protocols, Legal Aspects of Information Technology Information Technologies, Foundations of educational technology.. Her research interests include faculty develop- ment, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning
; Argentina & Brazil, 2003;Turkey, 2005; China, 2007; and Egypt, 2008-2009; UK and Netherlands 2010)5 to introducethem to the realities and complexities of global water and environmental issues. A summary ofthe previous destinations is provided in Figure 1. The course seeks to provide in-depth exposureto technical, cultural, social, economic, environmental, and ethical issues and the associatedinterlinking complexities that influence major water resource projects in countries outside of theU.S.8. The course participants, structure, and unique itinerary make IPWRSM a stand-aloneclass that goes beyond the technical aspects of engineering, putting water resources engineeringwithin the context of a different culture24.Most IPWRSM registrants are
ups; ≠ knowledge and skills in the fundamentals of engineering practice; ≠ knowledge of selected professional-level skills commensurate with students’ future field and/or area of specialization; ≠ a strong oral and written communication skills; ≠ a focus on design issues involving life–cycle economics, environmental impact, sustainable development maintainability, applicable standards and ad hoc concerns; ≠ an awareness of business practices in the Region and elsewhere; ≠ an understanding of nontechnical forces that affect engineering decision-making; ≠ a perception of social, ethical, and political responsibilities; ≠ an awareness of the evolution of human civilization in general, with an emphasis on
solving problems within their field of study; 3. have the ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their field of study)to inform judgments that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues; 4. can communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialist andnonspecialist audiences; 5. have developed those learning skills that are necessary for them to continue toundertake further study with a high degree of autonomy.” In 2005 the EU Commission introduced the EQF-LLL / European QualificationsFramework for Lifelong Learning, to provide a common reference to facilitate therecognition and the transferability of qualifications, based mainly on knowledge, skills and
Wright, Brigham Young University Geoff Wright is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholarship centers on programming, multimedia pedagogy, and technological literacy. He has published and presented on these and many other technology and engineering related topics.Ronald Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholarship centers on pedagogy, student learning, technology literacy, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education
through human interaction, such as how tocompromise, inspire, persuade; how to build a life of high ethics and moral value;how to work creatively with people of different backgrounds; when, and how, tospeak — and when, and how, to listen. The university of the future should offerthe best of both worlds, integrating the best ways to learn online with the bestways to learn in person (Reif, 2012). Schools should blend new educationaldelivery methods with their traditional, hands-on model to make residentialeducation even more effective. Ideally, by adopting the new technologies to helpimprove education, the cost of residential education can be lowered whilesimultaneously improving its quality (Reif, 2012).Universities and colleges should act and
industry expertratings for each dimension (ordered from highest rating to lowest rating): Appreciate othercultures (understanding and avoiding ethnocentrism); Work in teams of ethnic and culturaldiversity; Communicate across cultures (understand cultural differences); Practice engineeringin global context (international internship, service learning, virtual global engineering project,etc.); Deal with ethical issues that arise from cultural or national differences; View as citizens ofthe world (appreciate challenges facing mankind: sustainability, environmental protection,poverty, security, and public health); Understand connectedness of the world, global economy;Understand cultural issues on product design, manufacture, and use (understanding of
international counterparts] want to validate is, can Itrust you as person… that you’re going to be honest with me, and you are ethical … until theproper level of trust and respect is validated, your international counterpart will be somewhatskeptical.”Interviewee 2 echoes this recommendation, stating, “Well, I think you always, no matter what Page 26.1068.13part of the world, you always have to build trust.” Further, as she continues, “And you knowtrust is a different definition to different people. I’ve never done business in Poland, or theUkraine, or Russia, but I’m going to guess that trust means something different there than it doesmaybe in the
international teaching assistants In engineering evaluate undergraduate writing,” in 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2002.[11] N. Hayes and L. D. Introna, “Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning,” Ethics Behav., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 213–231, 2005.[12] J. Zhou, “What is missing in the international teaching assistants training curriculum?,” J. Fac. Dev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 19–24, 2009.[13] D. Trebing, “International teaching assistants’ attitudes toward teaching and understanding of United States American undergraduate students,” ProQuest, 2007.[14] E. Arshavskaya, “International teaching assistants’ experiences in the US classrooms: Implications for practice,” J
aninternational survey that included faculties, engineering students, and industrial leaders in aneffort to define the key attributes that best characterize the global engineer and itscompetencies. A sample of the list provided by Chan and Fishbein [5] contains the following: • superior communication skills and understanding across different cultures and languages; • a facility for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary teamwork; • a well-developed sense of social responsibility and ethics, with due consideration in his/her personal and professional activities; • being entrepreneurial; and • an ability to deal with complexity and systems thinking. As it stands out, communication skills, international
Paper ID #21574Understanding Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions: Barriersto Study Abroad ParticipationDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability with the mindset of using nature as a design inspiration The ability to function on multidisciplinary teams by using resources and references from biology, life sciences, and multiple engineering disciplines The ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems by using nature as a mentor for design concepts The ability to communicate
learning style. An interesting question is: How does the way youlearn influence the way you teach? It is equally important to contemplate different Page 25.996.6approaches to accommodate different learners, particularly after having learned aboutone’s own learning style. An instructor with some understanding of differences inlearning styles is well on his/her way in making his/her teaching more effective (19).A viable learning style model must be grounded in research, periodically evaluated, andadapted to reflect the developing knowledge base (11).Implementation of learning stylepractices must conform to accepted standards of ethics, and be carried out
AC 2011-1860: A STUDY ABROAD IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC:MENTORING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AS THEY PREPARE AND TEACH6-12 GRADE STUDENTS TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING CONCEPTSSteven L Shumway, Brigham Young UniversitySClaudina Vargas, Complex Systems Optimization LabGeoff Wright, Brigham Young UniversityRon Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholar- ship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education. Page 22.108.1 c American
ofparticipation leads to a lack of community “ownership”, wasted resources and a discouragedcommunityIf the necessity of interdisciplinary work has been well established, the process by which it isaccomplished remains poorly understood. For example, in a textbook intended to guideengineering students in the design of community-based service-learning projects instructsstudents that “.. people should be involved in the engineering process. You should always knowyour community partner, your stakeholders …. and their needs and desires. Frame yourengineering project within these parameters, and work with these groups throughout the project.”The text goes on to talk about understanding the project from historical, cultural, ethical, societal,educational
(Downey et al., 2006 as cited in [11].Those with cultural humility recognize that there are multiple technical approaches and thatwhile they may have a preference for one way of defining a problem over another as well as oneway of justifying a solution over another, they have the flexibility of mind and command oftechnical knowledge to be able to adjust and adapt to multiple ways of defining as well asresolving problems [11]. Cultural humility also means recognizing when we do not have thetechnical knowledge to accomplish a task and having the wherewithal to acknowledge thisdeficit and seek out this knowledge either through bringing in outside expertise or additionaleducation, as called for in the Code of Ethics of a Professional Engineer [11
!, by Blanchard, Lacinak, Tompkins, Ballard14. A Passion for Excellence, by Tom Peters15. Leadership is an Art, by Max De Pree16. The Servant Leader, by Blanchard and Hodges17. Lincoln on Leadership, by Donald T. Phillips18. The West Point Way of Leadership, by Larry Donnithorne19. The Functions of the Executive, by Chester Irving Bernard20. Leadership: Theory and Practice, by Peter G. Northouse21. Primal Leadership: Learning to Lead with Emotional Intelligence, by Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee22. What Leaders Really Do, by John Kotter23. The Leader's Companion: Insights on Leadership Through the Ages, by J. Thomas Wren24. The Rules of Work, by Richard Templar25. The Seven Signs of Ethical Collapse, by Marianne Jennings26. Leaders