Paper ID #18296Stepping out of the Comfort Zone - and the Country: Facilitating In-DepthStudent Learning through Nontraditional Communication AssignmentsMr. David Bowles, Louisiana State University David ”Boz” Bowles is a technical communication instructor and Engineering Communication Studio coordinator in the Chevron Center for Engineering Education at Louisiana State University. He earned a baccalaureate degree in English and a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing from Virginia Common- wealth University.Ms. Paige Davis, Louisiana State University Paige Davis has 22 years of experience in the College of Engineering at
Whitaker Foundation, CDMRP, NIH, NSF, aswell as industrial sponsorship her research program has had more than 60 mentees and has national collab-orations with Michigan State and Mayo Clinic as well as international collaborations with Trinity CollegeDublin and Queens University Belfast. Dr. Haut Donahue has more than 65 peer-reviewed publicationsand is current Associate Department Head for Undergraduate Studies for the Mechanical EngineeringDepartment at CSU. Dr. Haut Donahue was awarded the Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnson Jr.Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award from the American Society of Engineering Education forexceptional contributions to mechanics education. Dr. Haut Donahue is a fellow of the American Societyof Mechanical
innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. His current research interests are engineering education, software engineering, and developing innovative entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. He has been chosen as one of the five outstanding engineering educators by IUCEE (Indo-universal consortium of engineering
, carrier flow and small-signal models; (iii) light emission and detection with semiconductor junctions. Students received videos weeks before the class and the average length of the video was 23 minutes. Some concepts were covered over 2 or 3 videos (to be discussed in a single class). The class was organized as described in the figure below.Before class In class After class Watch the videos Quiz Students Take notes Discuss about Check their understanding Write question questions from video Extend their learning Group activity
, professional development, and both peer and facultymentoring [3, 6, 10, 14, 20, 21]. A typical summer bridge is four to six weeks long and takesplace in the summer after high school and preceding the students first fall semester. Students areselected at a certain math SAT range, enter the program as a cohort, and live in a residentialcommunity on campus. Days are filled with math-intensive course work and team orientedprojects. Bridge programs are typically offered at a deeply discounted cost (or none at all) to thestudent’s family. A pseudo college environment is created to prepare the student for the skillsneeded to be successful as a first-year student in engineering or other STEM fields. Uponcompletion of this program, students continue their
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
abroad,participants also increased their agreement that they have received positive feedback about tasksthey expect to need to perform in the future to succeed in an international research environment(Pre Mean=4.03, Post Mean=4.34).When asked to rate themselves against their peers on 12 items related to international researchskills, participants increased their self-rating on half (numbers bolded) and decreased their self-rating on the other half. The scale was from well below average (1) to well above average (5),with the average rating registering as a three. It should be noted that for all items on whichparticipants decreased their post-test self-rating, they never rated themselves below average. Allpre- and post-test means were still above
will help me improve and grow as a person. SRA18 While abroad, I will be able to function effectively in most any situation. SRA19 I am ready to interact with my foreign peers, colleagues, partners, etc. SRA20 I have sound reasons for deciding to go abroad.1 From Jesiek, Haller, and Thompson (2014)We distributed the SRA following a pre/post-test design; however, because the SRA was used asa measure of travel “readiness,” the survey was only given at the beginning and end of the classand not after the international module. 90 of 92 students also completed both distributions of theSRA, representing a 97.8% response rate, and we conducted paired samples t-test analyses aswith the CQS. 5 of the 20 SRA items
Computer Systems for 20 years in various positions including the head of innovations, NMIMS as the director Shirpur campus, and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. His current research interests are engineering education
performs the role of challenging the group’s assumptions and conclusions. • a problem solver who works to arrive at both technical and interpersonal solutions. • an outreach communicator who is tasked with being the liaison to the other groups.On campus, before the program begins, students read Bruce Tuckman’s description ofteambuilding 8 to aid in developing highly effective team dynamic upon their arrival in Florence.Once in Florence, two peer reviews are performed to help students evaluate how effectively theirgroups are performing as cohesive research unitsAll groups are initially given the task of viewing Florence in light of six major elements of acity’s infrastructure: • water • transportation