AC 2012-4505: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ HABITS OF MIND AND AC-TION IN ENGINEERING DESIGNDr. Matthew D. Lammi, North Carolina State University Matthew D. Lammi is Assistant Professor of STEM Education.Dr. Theodore J. Branoff, North Carolina State University Theodore Branoff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education at North Carolina State University. A member of ASEE since 1987, he has served as Chair of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and as Associate Editor in charge of paper reviews for the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. He is currently President of the International Society for Ge- ometry and Graphics. Branoff’s research interests include
Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in En- Page 24.826.1 gineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the ASEE Chester Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. He is a fellow of ASEE and the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Investigation of High School Pathways into Engineering (work in progress)AbstractA significant effort has
University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and As- sistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity
AC 2011-1763: EDUCATING ELEMENTARY TEACHERS IN ENGINEER-ING: A DESIGN METHOD AND BASELINEYvonne Ng, St. Catherine University Yvonne Ng, M.S.M.E, teaches computer science and engineering at St. Catherine University. Educated at Princeton University and the University of Minnesota as a mechanical and aerospace engineer, she worked in industry as an automation design engineer and contract programmer. She made computer sci- ence a more appealing topic for her all-women undergraduate student body by presenting this technically valuable course in a project-oriented comprehensive manner. She is currently the director of the Center of Excellence for Women, Science and Technology where she administers the college’s National
University, Canada in 2010. From 2010-2012 he was a Post-Doc at the Department of Signal and Systems at Chalmers University of Technology where he lead the MIMO aspects of the microwave backhauling for next gener- ation wireless networks project. He was also a visiting scholar at the University of Luxembourg in 2012, where he was involved in research related to interference cancelation for next generation satellite commu- nication links. Since August of 2012 he has been an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering at California State University, Bakersfield. Dr. Mehrpouyan has received more than 10 scholarships and awards. He has more than 30 publications in prestigious IEEE Journals and
coursework areas.The combination of these factors can adversely affect the proper selection of an academicdiscipline of study that will provide a stable and satisfying long-term career.Research has indicated that students who are most likely to choose engineering majors andcomplete degree requirements are those who hold positive perceptions toward engineering, haveself-efficacy for the study of engineering, and have interests in science and technology.5, 6, 7, 8 Onthe flip side, lack of confidence in student’s abilities to complete an engineering degree, negativeimpressions of engineering, and little or no enjoyment in studying mathematics and science leadstudents to avoid selecting an engineering major or withdrawing from engineering studies.5, 6
. student at Drexel University in the Department of Computer Science. Concurrently, Bill is pursuing an MS in Science of Instruction in the School of Education at Drexel, with a concentration in Secondary Mathematics and Computer Science in Pennsylvania. His interests include educational outreach and for exposing the K-12 environment to computer science as an application of science, technology, math and engineering (STEM) education. Prior to studying at Drexel, Bill worked for the Upper Darby School District, working with students on both an educational and volunteer basis in the AP Computer Science program from 2002-2004. He has served on the UDSD School Board Technology and Grant committee
Research to Practice K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum DesignAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of a curriculum design-based (CDB)professional development model on K-12 teachers’ engineering knowledge, attitudes, andbehaviors. This teacher professional development approach differs from other training programswhere teachers learn how to use a standard curriculum and adopt it in their classrooms. In a CDBprofessional development model teachers actively design lessons, student resources, andassessments for their classroom instruction. In other science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) disciplines, CDB professional development has been reported to (a)position teachers as
has taught engineering to children in informal settings, and is a partner with Harford County Public Schools (Maryland) on a district-wide project, the SySTEmic Project, to implement elementary engineering instruction within the science curriculum using EiE units of instruction. Her research includes examining the ways in which children and adults critically analyze technologies and investigations of factors that support and those that hinder elementary teachers as they learn to teach engineering. Page 25.686.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
Paper ID #13631DNA Extraction Using Engineering Design: A STEM Integration Unit (Cur-riculum Exchange)Corey A Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Mathis is a Ph.D student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in biology and her M.E.D. in secondary education from Northern Arizona University and is a former high school science and technology teacher. Her research interest includes improving students learning of science and engineering through integrated STEM curricula.Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School
courses in science and/ormathematics thus further preparing them for careers in the science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) related college degree programs3. As a result, there was a 25% drop inundergraduate enrollment reported during 1982-2000 period4. In the same study, it was notedthat over 800,000 students graduated from high schools in 2000; however, only 7,200 of thesestudents graduated with an engineering degree from a four-year institution 4. To furtheraccentuate the problem, the numbers of students in STEM related disciplines in underrepresentedgroups such as women, Hispanics, and African-Americans were at an even greater deficit asthey appear to select careers in programs such as the social sciences or complete their
Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE)chapter, they established a partnership with a physics teacher to bring EPICS into thehigh school environment. The student team developed a prototype, secured a provisionalpatent and has filed for a full patent on an assistive technology device. The percent offemale participants has ranged from 50-70% over the last three years.The success of the pilot motivated a grant from the Corporation for National andCommunity Science (CNCS) Learn and Serve America Program to expand the concepton a national basis. University partners were selected to help identify potential highschools in five states. High Schools were selected in collaboration with the partneringuniversities. The initial high schools were in proximity to
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects, and all havestudent bodies that are primarily from underrepresented minority groups (average 88%), lowincome (average 77%), and first generation to college. The goal “to involve teachers inengineering research” has been accomplished by satisfying 3 objectives linked to the intendedoutcomes and impacts. The objectives are: 1) Provide contemporary engineering researchexperiences and enhance understanding of the nature of engineering; 2) Scaffold teacherdevelopment of authentic inquiry activities for the high school classroom; and 3) Improve publicschool teachers’ knowledge about careers in engineering. Assessment of the program isintegrated into its structure providing regular feedback which is
engineering and science. Improving student awareness ofengineering and science contributes to technological literacy among the general public and alsohelps students make informed career path decisions. A significant body of literature exists on theattitudes of K-12 students and teachers towards science and scientists. This literature hasinformed the development of science education outreach programs. However, a comparablebody of literature about K-12 student attitudes towards engineering and engineers is not yet fullydeveloped.Some work has been done in this area. Yasar1 developed a survey to study K-12 teacherperceptions of engineering, primarily to determine their interest in and comfort level for teachingdesign, engineering and technology in their
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Building a Framework to Evaluate the Inclusion of Engineering in State K-12 STEM Education Academic StandardsAbstractOver the past several years, the increased energy behind the Science, Technology, Engineering,& Mathematics (STEM) integration movement has inspired the addition of more engineeringrelated content to the K-12 landscape. National standards for engineering are also just nowcoming into the landscape. As states begin to add engineering to their standards, the questionbecomes, “What constitutes a quality engineering education at the K-12 level?” Whether withina core math or science course, or as a stand alone program, certain approaches, problem
current national focus on science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) ineducation has created an apt moment for research on factors that can improve STEM instruction.In November 2009, President Barack Obama declared an “all-hands-on-deck” directive toimprove STEM education in America2. This mandate came from the recognition that STEMfields are “highly-paid, highly-rewarding fields” (both personally and nationally) and that ourstudents are now in the “middle of the pack” globally in STEM subjects (p.1). President Obamalaid out a list of four priorities to improve STEM education including the recruitment of 100,000new and effective STEM teachers, the closing of the achievement gap in STEM education,increased funding for STEM education, and
for the lesson’s design challenge. Movies, pictures, and a relevant story help create a context for the students where they will act as engineers and solve real problems with sophisticated technologies. Page 15.1336.5B. One of the RoboBook’s main navigationalpages uses an interactive “Engineering DesignProcess” map, which students can click on to getsupport doing different design processes. Forinstance, selecting the Research link will providethem with tutorial pages on the needs of users
, exploring subgroup variations.Mariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mariana Tafur is a Ph.D. candidate and a graduate assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a M.S., in Education at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia; and a B.S., in Electrical Engineering at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia. She is a 2010 Fulbright Fellow. Her research interests include engineering skills development, STEM for non-engineers adults, motivation in STEM to close the technology literacy gap, STEM formative assessment, and Mixed-Methods design.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue
, Drexel UniversityDr. Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University Page 25.587.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Evaluating the Acquisition of Engineering Confidence and Skills Through Robotics1 - IntroductionIn recent years there have been a number of studies that have cited the declining number of USstudents graduating from 4-year colleges and universities with degrees in science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM)1. Going along with this trend is a declining interest in scienceamongst US middle and high school students. Many educators are
Paper ID #8493STEM Summer Institute Increases Student and Parent Understanding of En-gineeringDr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Harpeth Hall School and Vanderbilt University Dr. Stacy Klein-Gardner began as the Director of the Center for STEM Education in April 2011 just as the Center began. An engineer by training and in her ways of thinking, she received a BSE in biomedical and electrical engineering from Duke University in 1991. She then earned her M.S. from Drexel University in 1993 and her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Vanderbilt University in 1996. Dr. Klein-Gardner’s career focuses on K-12 science, technology
AC 2011-2287: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AS NOVICE DESIGNERSNathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant profession in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University
the US by looking at engineering educationsystemically as a continuous, developmental experience from post-primary education throughprofessional practice.The initial questions posed in the curriculum analysis research presented here are predicated onthe major needs identified in the NRC (2007) report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm9: TheUnited States must compete in the global economy by optimizing its knowledge-based resources,particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and by sustaining themost fertile environment for new and revitalized industries and the well-paying jobs they bring(p. 4). In response to this report, more than 1700 high schools in 49 states are implementing new,integrated courses such as
Knowledge Test was 1.0. The post EIDS scores indicatedgains in academic and school identities, and knowledge of the work of engineers which alsoappeared in her interview responses: “An environmental engineer does things to help the outdoors, like the environment, and the thing it mainly works to keep clean or help is water, soil, and the air.” “[Mechanical engineers]…probably design a better way, like, they had…on the news this morning that was talking about engineers and how they were, they needed engineers to find better technology to get the bumpers and the parts of their car stronger so they can, so they don’t crash and it damages that much, and the damage is less
ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, and the International Journal of Mechanisms and Machine Theory. He is the Principle Investigator for the de Vinci Ambassadors in the Classroom, the Galileo Project. Page 11.229.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Are Concepts of Technical & Engineering Literacy Included in State Curriculum Standards? A Regional Overview of the Nexus Between Technical & Engineering Literacy and State Science FrameworksAbstract The use of technology in the classroom has been a driving force behind developing
look at trends in attitudes in the teacherpopulation towards teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology (DET), and is referred to asthe DET Teacher Survey. The authors found that elementary teachers were less interested inteaching DET than teachers of upper grades, that less experienced teachers were less interestedin teaching DET, and that women saw DET as more valuable to their students than men. A laterre-evaluation of the DET instrument with a new sample of teachers suggested a newinterpretation of factors but was largely consistent with the original instrument [3].An additional 2011 research study using the DET Teacher Survey sampled only elementaryschool teachers. With a sample of 192 teachers drawn from teachers who volunteered
curriculum development project, Technology for Science, and an NSF-funded teacher professional development project, Design in the Classroom. Dr. Crismond’s main research interests revolve around the issues of K-12 design cognition and pedagogy, and teacher professional development in science and pre-engineering. Page 13.1259.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Case Studies on the Role of Diagnostic Reasoning in Engineering DesignIntroduction Design activities have been used in K-12 classes to contextualize student learning of STEMideas, to raise interest in
AC 2012-3769: ENGINEERING AS A CAREER CHOICE AMONG RU-RAL APPALACHIAN STUDENTSMr. Matthew Boynton P.E., Virginia Tech Matthew Boynton is a doctoral student in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech. Before entering Virginia Tech, he earned a B.S. and M.S. in civil and environmental engineering, and an Ed.S in instructional leadership from Tennessee Technological University. His engineering work experience includes work within a rural telecommunications service provider and an environmental consulting firm. While working toward his M.S. and Ed.S, Boynton worked with the Extended Education Department at Tennessee Technological University teaching Project Lead the Way engineering courses in rural high
. Previously, she was employed as the Director of Outreach & Redshirt Engineering at the UAB School of Engineering in Birmingham, Alabama (2000-02) and as the Science, Math, and Relevant Technology (SMART) Coordinator at Girls Incorporated of Central Alabama (1999-00). Her current level of involvement in the UA Freshman Engineering Program includes assisting with academic advising, mentoring, retention, and freshman level curriculum instruction. During the summer months, she also assists with the development and instruction of high school students and teachers in UA’s engineering outreach programs and with incoming freshman student orientation and registration. Prior
design.Stephen Thompson, University of South Carolina Stephen Thompson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Instruction and Teacher Education at the University of South Carolna. He teaches and conducts research in the areas of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Page 12.785.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 GK-12 Engineering Workshop for Science and Math TeachersAbstractThis paper describes the implementation and outcomes of a summer workshop for middle schoolmathematics and science teachers. The focus was on engineering-oriented activities thatintegrated
post test.Key Words: design process, instrument developmentIntroduction Interest in introducing engineering concepts and teaching design as a process toelementary school aged children has continued to increase in recent years for a variety offactors. In some cases, stakeholders are concerned about students learning engineeringcontent for a competitive advantage in the global marketplace 1, 2. Other stakeholders areconcerned by a decline in students’ interest in pursuing engineering during and after college 3.Still others are interested in promoting elementary engineering instruction in order topromote engineering and technological literacy 4, 5. Recent studies have also providedevidence that learning engineering content, especially