programs24,25. Both were studies of the idealized, or intended curriculum, andtherefore address only the static plan that is put forth in the printed materials used for the course.Although conducted separately, and with different objectives, these curriculum analysesprovided some remarkably similar findings. In their analysis of the PLTW high school intendedcurriculum, Nathan and colleagues24 examined the absolute and relative frequency with whichPLTW addresses the mathematics standards (as obtained from the National Council of Teachersof Mathematics26) in its three core courses (Introduction to Engineering Design, Principles ofEngineering, and Digital Electronics), and compared this to the mathematics curricula that highschool students experience
Georgia Tech’s Center for Educa- tion Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluat- ing programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from multi level evaluation plan de- signed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring designed to facilitate program improvement. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Department of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU).Sunni H. Newton, CEISMCMr. Jeffrey
engineeringscience requirements in higher education, but unlike the fundamentals-first approach, EiEstudents engage science content through a simple engineering design process. In this process,students are taught to iteratively “ask, imagine, plan, create, and improve” to meet the goal of arange of engineering design challenges.17 The design challenges in EiE work to engage studentsthrough real-world application of engineering design, often in cross-cultural contexts.Unit-by-unit, EiE students explore different science topics by applying engineering design toproblems that are contextualized in countries from Ghana to Denmark.18 In the physical science(iii
studentsworked through the two components of the C3STEM system: CTSiM (Computational Thinkingusing Simulation and Modeling) and C2SuMo (Collaborative Cloud-based Scaled up Modeling),present the experimental study we conducted, and discuss the results in detail. We end the paperwith a summary of our accomplishments, and directions for future research.1. IntroductionThe Next Generation Science Standards place significant emphasis on combining the learning offundamental concepts with scientific and engineering practices that help students develop usea-ble knowledge that they can apply across multiple problems. In more detail, the standards em-phasize that students develop the skills to build and use models, plan and conduct experiments,analyze and
on a well-defined set of concepts in science. All lesson plans include a final designchallenge. The middle school students must use the scientific and mathematical knowledge andmethods they have learned to design, build, and test a working artifact to achieve a goal.Teachers felt that improvements could be made with each kit to enhance student engagement andlearning, and some teachers enacted changes during their course of teaching with the kit.Teachers perceived that all three kits increased students’ engagement and learning in science.Students enjoyed each of the three kits, thought learning with them was fun, and understood theteachers’ learning objectives. Students thought that the best part of the entire unit was the designand
Page 12.1198.4 engineering major throughout their years in the program; Career Exploration Workshops I helps students take career interest inventories, learn about engineering and science careers through guest speakers and discuss financial aid options. Parental activities (such as picnics and workshops) were sponsored to enhance a parent’s ability to 3 monitor their child’s academic performance and assist with college planning; Cultural Awareness is designed to help students embrace and value diversity; and Individualized peer-mentoring between high-achieving University of Pittsburgh students and the 11th-12th grade high school students. Selected University of Pittsburgh upper class
accommodate the variation in math and science preparation, theITE instructors design a curriculum that is challenging yet feasible for participants with differentlevels of grounding. The professors and teaching assistants that serve as instructors for the ITEclasses are drawn from the various relevant disciplines at UVa and all have extensive experienceteaching during the academic year.The calculus workshop is based around a hands-on topic that can be completed in the week spanof the program, assuming no prior knowledge of calculus. In 2005, the instructor used theexample of running a banana split stand in order to teach calculus-based optimization. Thestudents were tasked with coming up with a plan to maximize the profits of the commercialenterprise
passes the challenge, then it is shared with the other groups what they have done and which method they have used to do so. I think I have a good relation with my partner and the organization team members. I worked with my partner over night to solve the challenges as friends. Meantime, the atmosphere at the camp was warm enough to develop friendship with other participants and even with undergraduate students. Elif: I did not see such competition either. Instead, we developed friendship although we came from different school at different locations across the country. We talked about ourselves, our schools and our future plans after high school.Robotics activities as a means to nurture student interest in
the same scope andsequence and develop lesson plans. Although the delivery may have varied slightly, the sametypes of notes, activities, handouts, assignments, and exams were used. The geometry curriculum was based on the Texas Essential of Knowledge and Skills5(TEKS) and followed the scope and sequence set forth by the school district. The primaryresource for practice problems for the students was found in the Holt Geometry textbook15 Thegeometry scope and sequence had 12 total units with one unit specifically focused on spatialability and its application. The unit was seven class days in length, six of which were instructiondays. The unit began by introducing students to 3D figures using nets (developments) and crosssections
materials and professional development process tomake the project available to more teachers at a lower cost per teacher.The extension plan includes reaching out to new teachers through regional science centers forface-to-face workshops, followed up with online webinars and instruction--for a total of tenhours of professional development associated with each sensor. The recruited teachers will beable to decide which sensor they would like to build and implement in their classroom. The Page 25.1194.22teachers will be provided with the necessary equipment and will be required to report data to theproject evaluator. In addition, the classroom
and reliably. Thus, Team M2’s use ofmathematics extended beyond programming into the planning process itself, and appears to havebeen an integral part of their competition success. Table 3: Points Breakdown Analysis for Maximum Possible Score and Team M2’s Winning Round (bold values are summed to indicate the max possible points) Max Possible Team M2 Description Value Number Points Number PointsPing Pong Balls Gutter 5 18 90 9 45 End Zone 4 18 72 9 36 Loose 1
program withstudents.SENSE IT teachers will eventually complete 120 hours of professional development byparticipating in two summer institutes (two week institutes during the summers of 2009 and2010) and four professional development days (two during the 2009 – 2010 school year and twoduring the 2010 – 2011 school year).The summer institutes are two week experiences. The first week teachers attend to learn themodules’ content for implementation during the upcoming school year. They are given time towork through all of the lessons themselves to firmly grasp the material and begin to deviseimplementation plans for their own classrooms. During the second week of the summer institute,teachers are invited to bring two students to accompany the
good work ethic can achieve success in a STEM-related field. To helpalleviate these preconceived, negative stigmas about engineering, the STEM teachers plan tospend more time informally educating their school staff about the field of engineering, that it isfor any student who is willing to work hard and dedicate themselves to it; it is not just for “reallysmart” people who are good at math.Limitations of Study/Further QuestionsThe findings of these analyses should be placed within the limitations of this study. The cohortof participants is drawn from students attending Skyline High School in Longmont, CO. Studentsself-select into the program at this high school by applying to the STEM Academy during their8th grade year. While 8th grade