investigated different combinations ofthe electrical components creating varying types of circuits, progressing to constructing theirown homemade switches from the household objects. PICO Cricket kits were introduced andstudents used the PICO software to program and design intelligent reactions to mechanicalactions. Continuing with the PICO Cricket Kits students constructed creations (autonomous artinstallations) that would respond to stimuli from their surroundings (e.g., sound, movement,touch, and light). Individual and class discussions fortified the relationships betweeninputs/outputs and chain reactions. Ultimately, the entire cohort engaged in the creation andexecution of a large-scale chain reaction (Rube Goldberg Machine). Students were placed
hands-on activities, the lessonsapply otherwise complex mathematical and scientific concepts in ways that students can relate toand understand. For example, during the “Speed” curriculum, teachers and mentors implement a“Motion and You” PowerPoint and interactive lesson that provides instruction based onNewton’s laws of motion. Teachers and mentors pair the abstract knowledge learned from thelesson with an activity in which students measure the motion of different types, sizes, shapes andweights of mobile objects as they race down a car track. Additionally, new lessons and activitiesare continuously being developed by teachers and mentors based on noted student interest,advisory board feedback, teacher/mentor areas of expertise and evolving
Bedford, Indiana supported by Prof. Ed Coyle (co-founder of EPICS) andCrane Naval Surface Warfare Weapons Center 28. The EPICS High School team produced adesign for an assistive technology device that received a provisional patent and placed second ina national entrepreneurship competition. The class attracted a high percentage of women withenrollment of females exceeding males most semesters. The success of the pilot EPICS HighSchool motivated an expansion into five states supported by a grant from Learn and Serve Page 25.484.4America.The program has continued to grow and this paper will provide a description of EPICS and howit is implemented at
attractiveness to female students as a way ofincreasing the overall number of women in the engineering pipeline.Outside of summer camps in computing and computer science very few reports have been madeon single-discipline and single-sex summer camps in engineering8, 9. As a result, the purpose ofthis paper is three-fold: 1) to provide an overview of the development of a single-discipline,single-sex pre-engineering camp; 2) to discuss a formative evaluation plan for assessing the pre-engineering camp; and 3) to reveal anecdotal lessons learned to assist future camp directors. Inthe next sections, this paper uses CheME & YOU @ OSU as an exemplar single-discipline,single-sex pre-college engineering outreach program designed to attract young women
, and encouragingthem to pursue their interests.Volunteers from IndustryIndustry serves as a valuable resource for bringing engineering education to the K-12 classroom.Employees of engineering and technical companies, make ideal mentors and helpers in theclassroom. Volunteer programs at these companies can support teachers in bringing hands-onengineering lessons to their students by providing volunteers as classroom helpers, makingdesign projects more manageable. These volunteers are active in engineering and research on adaily basis, and thus are freshly knowledgeable with engineering concepts. The volunteer-teacherteam collaborates to develop and implement interactive engineering lessons, with a focus onintegrating the engineering content
expertise of an urban school of engineering, school ofmedicine and school of education. The BMERET program has provided middle schooland high school science teachers in urban settings with opportunities to engage withpremiere researchers in BME laboratory settings at a top tier research university. Withthe combined expertise of the BME scientists and education faculty, BMERET teacherparticipants are creating powerful curriculum to use in their middle school and highschool science classrooms. The teacher participants have experienced greater scienceteaching efficacy then their non-participant teacher peers, which may be as a result of thecollaborative RET experience. Sixth through twelve grade teachers have benefited greatlyfrom bringing the BME lab
AC 2011-2082: ENGAGING K-12 TEACHERS IN TECHNOLOGY TOOLSTO SUPPORT ELECTRONIC AND MOBILE LEARNING THROUGH ANONLINE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSEMeltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Research Scientist in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluat- ing programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from multi-level evaluation plans designed to assess pro- gram impact to
aim of these workshops is to enhance the teachers’ repertoire of engineering lessonsthat are available for elementary and middle school teachers, and help them to adapt andimplement these lessons in their classrooms. For instance, teachers used the Design Squad’slessons to learn the engineering design process. In the engineering design process, the learnersengage in asking questions, imagining possible solutions, planning, creating, and improvingdesigns to solve a problem (see Appendix D). Classroom support visits were another componentof the program intended to ensure success of the teachers implementing what they learned fromthe courses into their classrooms. Site visits were also used to document and assess the needs ofteachers and
national attention. Some include indices that correlate resources to specific state ornational academic standards. Most improve convenience and accessibility by at least an order ofmagnitude over conventional Internet searches.Our purpose here is to recount how program assessment and lessons learned over three years offielding the portal have helped us to identify PRISM’s core competencies for transforming middleschool STEM teaching and learning.1.0 PRISM: A Portal with a PurposePartnerships between K-12 and collegiate institutes have proliferated over the last two decades.Add the power of the Internet, and you have many vertical alliances hoping to transformeducation. We believe PRISM represents one of the best of its category. PRISM addresses
Engineering Education, 2012 I2D2: Imagination, Innovation, Discovery, and DesignAbstractA large-scale collaborative learning project involving first-year engineering students at a privateresearch university and fifth graders from local schools was developed and implemented duringthe fall of 2010. Entitled “I2D2: Imagination, Innovation, Discovery, and Design,” theprogram’s success in the first year has inspired program continuation during the 2011 schoolyear and beyond. The program focuses on creativity and innovation, and using experimentationto test ideas. While this could be classified as an outreach event, the program was developedwith an intended dual benefit of both college and intermediate school students. The collegestudents
development; cognition; learning;achievement; informal education; non-formal education; mentor; out-of-school; after school;enrichment; and extracurricular.Overall, multiple searches in the formal education, informal education, and cognitive areasuncovered over 500 reference citations. The abstracts of these articles were reviewed to gleanmore information about content and relevance. Papers were initially included if the programdescribed or studied integrated at least two STEM subjects. Four other criteria were alsoconsidered: Does the integration include engineering as one of the integrated subjects? Does the article provide empirical evidence regarding the impact of the program or a review of research on
. Of the 135 EiE teachers who began the project, 114 completed the first year of datacollection. Of the 114, 73 taught the EiE curriculum to only one classroom of students duringyear 1, while 41 taught the EiE curriculum to two or more classrooms of students. In total, 3620students learned the EiE curriculum during the first year of the project. A subset of 26 E4 Project teachers were selected at the beginning of the first year of datacollection for close observation to gather qualitative data regarding teacher instruction, teacherfidelity of implementation, student engagement and teacher-student interactions. Theirclassrooms are “Case Study Sites” where E4 Project team members: video-record classroomactivity and student team group