communication education, engineering student identity and learning motivation, narrative structure in technical communication, and the improvisatory skills of educators.Jiahui Tan, University of California, DavisMichael Raymond Gonzalez, University of California, Davis Michael works as a research assistant at UC Davis’s Center for Educational Effectiveness (CEE), focusing on projects involving engineering students’ motivations around writing. To support this work, Michael applies and utilizes the skills he learned through his time as an English tutor, and his BA coursework in English, with an emphasis in literature, criticism, and theory. In addition to the work he does at CEE, Michael’s passion for education, pedagogy and
an aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering communication education, engineering student learning motivation, and narrative structure in technical communication.Dr. Cibele V. Falkenberg, Auburn University Dr. Cibele V. Falkenberg is a Research Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Auburn University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 “Give Me Every Idea You Have”: Building With Improvisation in Engineering EducationWe engineering educators, as a community, are very interested in active learning pedagogies.Active learning is a very good match to
, engineering students make use of internship opportunities totry on several different occupational settings, and by reflecting on and juxtaposing theirexperiences in these settings they discern what kind of job they want after graduation. Ourinductive analysis generated three types of fit: personal fit, career values fit and intellectual fit,which we operationalize below.Cech et al.8 have operationalized a set of concepts that are similar to our concept of self-assessment of fit. Their analysis builds the concept of professional role confidence, which iscomposed of career fit confidence and expertise confidence. These measures are developed fromlongitudinal survey data measuring students’ confidence, based on their engineering coursework,in a number
, likes, and dislikes towards various aspects of STEM [7]. Persistenceis defined as a passion for persevering through long-term goals [24] [25]. The process of conceptmapping that was used in the development of the tool involved a participatory framework,whereby participation was by consultation, including functional and interactive participation[26]. The STEM stakeholders worked collaboratively as part of a community as they developedmeasures based on their experiences and knowledge from working in the field of STEM andSTEM education. Their professional identities and experiences validate their role, whileproviding representation for their voices on an instrument that was developed in this uniquemanner.FIGURE 1: Conceptual framework for the APT
interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Persistence Through Uncertainty Toward Successful Creative PracticeAbstract: To increase creative practice among students in engineering and other
with the WFU Program for Leadership and Character and many colleagues across the university. With inclusion being a core value, she is proud that the WFU Engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Her areas of expertise include engineering identity, complex problem solving across cognitive and non-cognitive domains, recruitment and retention, PBL, engineering design, learning through ser- vice, character education in engineering contexts, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the
” enables womento develop stronger implicit STEM identities through exposure to positive cues in theirsurroundings. The current study suggests that this valuable work within STEM may be valuablysupplemented by students’ experience in other disciplines. The WGS framework and scholarshipgave the students in our study a different, wider-lens view of engineering itself, and enhancedtheir sense of STEM identity.Pawley [42] argues that “feminist science studies are particularly relevant to engineering andengineering education, namely, for scrutinizing what ‘counts’ as engineering content and why.”Our participants felt strongly that all students should be exposed to the theory and methods ofWGS. They identified ways in which this knowledge was helpful to
can be challenged by threats to an imagined future, and animagined future self can also serve as a motivational resource, as a goal to keep striving towards[32].While the concept of liminal identity has been explored in conjunction with examining identitydevelopment in K-12, higher education and adults [31], discussions of liminal identity are rarewithin the engineering education literature [33]. As such, this paper marks a foray intoinvestigating the connection between liminal identity development and engineering identitydevelopment. We use liminal identity as an organizing concept and analytical tool to highlighthow the identities of engineering students are in transition, informed by their perceptions offuture selves but expressed through
thetraining of their students, it has received almost no attention in engineering education to date.Although VTS might be perceived as too far removed from engineering for relevance, we havedeployed it as a core innovative pedagogical method along with several other artful methods inan experimental graduate course with promising results. The purposes of this paper are to (1)explore how VTS contributes to the development of reflective thinking skills in graduateengineering education, and (2) share insights of interest to educators considering adopting VTSin their courses and curricula.The course in which we have experimented is a 3-credit elective offered through the departmentof civil and environmental engineering. It is led by two co-instructors
to science and engineering communication studies 17,18, 19 and a plethora of advice from scientists and communication scholars about how to write forthe public20. Despite this interest, few university science or engineering programs dedicateformal coursework in public communication to undergraduate or graduate students 21. Whenprograms do offer such training, they are usually limited to teaching students to write intraditional genres such as press releases, newspaper-style articles, and essays13, 14, and fail toconsider more personal, informal, and affective forms of communication such as face-to-faceconversations that can occur through science cafes or street science 22, 23 or to make use ofmultimedia genres such as podcasts, blogs, or
Professor of English in the Department of English at Carnegie Mellon. His current research interests include pedagogy of communication and design for students and professionals in the technology/engineering disciplines, and computer-aided rhetorical analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Making the Invisible Visible in Writing Classrooms: An Approach to Increasing Textual Awareness using Computer-Aided Rhetorical AnalysisIntroductionWriting requires countless composing decisions that are typically beyond the writer’s consciousgrasp. For students, writing can feel like a process that they have little control over, and a skillthat only a certain few possess. Much of the skill in being
for MMW was informed by a number of institutional educational initiativesand programs at BC, including BC’s identity as a Jesuit, Catholic institution, its Renewed CoreProgram, and its development of a new Human-Centered Engineering Department.First, as a Jesuit, Catholic university, BC is committed to educating the “whole person” andembraces courses that advance aspects of social justice. Particularly in the Fall of 2020, whenlayered crises of COVID, racial injustice, climate disruption, and the presidential election placedhigh burdens on universities to respond, we were encouraged by the university administration toembrace these challenging topics in class. We emphasized the humanity of the engineeringdesign process and profession
] ratherthan their intergenerational wealth [19] and privilege [20]. Students learn these cultural cueseither through overt or implicit messages passed onto them by faculty, the curriculum,institutional cues, or other forms of professional identity socialization [21].Engineering education reinforces the dualism between the social and technical dimensions ofengineering. The social dimensions, partly required by ABET accreditation through engineeringethics, remain segregated from 'real' engineering [22]. In many of these standalone ethicsmodules or courses, students internalize their 'dis(integration)' from engineering and have ratedethics as "the least interesting, the least useful, and the most trivial" part of their engineeringcurriculum [7], [23. p
documents an ongoing engineering education project that partners the development ofa new method for teaching engineering writing through the lens of mathematics, with theadvancement of a university assessment initiative. Since spring of 2013, the project has beenstaging system trials in both a writing class for engineers and an engineering machine designclass. In the latter case, the strategy is to thread compact Just in Time (J.I.T.) instructionalmodules into technical units of study that require status report memos or a final report. Thisaspect of the project is a partnership between the author—an engineering communicationspecialist and experienced mechanical engineer who now teaches for a university writingprogram—and a senior mechanical
, launched in 2017. The program, Sustainable EngineeringManagement for International Development (SEM4ID), has enrolled between 8 and 13 studentseach year from both engineering and non-engineering backgrounds, and provides a mix ofclasses in technical engineering and liberal education topics. While the different disciplines worktogether, there are separate learning outcomes for the engineers and non-engineers. Theengineering strand of the program is accredited by the UK Engineering Council.Students engage in experiential, problem-based learning (PBL) through international servicelearning (ISL) projects in Sierra Leone or Zambia, where they are connected to previouslyestablished community-based contacts. Throughout the year-long program, students
National Academies Press, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24821 [2] C. R. Johnston, D. J. Caswell, and G. M. Armitage, “Developing environmental awareness in engineers through Engineers Without Borders and sustainable design projects,” International Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 501–506, Aug. 2007. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230701382198 [3] N. Dukhan, M. R. Schumack, and J. J. Daniels, “Implementation of service-learning in engineering and its impact on students’ attitudes and identity,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 21–31, Mar. 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701746132 [4] A. Bielefeldt, K. Paterson
currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech
2015, she shared her instructional materials, including a scoring system eval- uated for reliability, with over 400 schools from the U.S., Australia, Germany, and South Korea. Dr. Norback has studied communication and other basic skills in the workplace and developed curriculum over the past 30 years—first at Educational Testing Service; then as part of the Center for Skills Enhance- ment, Inc., which she founded, with clients including the U.S. Department of Labor, the National Skill Standards Board, and universities. Since arriving at Georgia Tech in 2000 her work has focused on oral communication for engineering students and engineers. Dr. Norback has published over 20 articles in the past decade alone, in the
Fellow, and an MIT Chemical Engineering Communication Lab Fellow.Mr. Alex Jordan Hanson, University of Texas at AustinJennifer M. SchallDr. Jesse N Dunietz, Massachussetts Institute of Technology Jesse Dunietz is an educational designer for the MIT Communication Lab, an artificial intelligence re- searcher, and a freelance science writer. He develops training materials for the engineering graduate students who join the Communication Lab to serve as communication coaches for their peers. He holds a bachelor’s in computer science from MIT and a Ph.D. in computer science from Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity.Amanda X Chen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Biological EngineeringRohan Chitnis, Massachusetts Institute of
of Research ethics, the MIT Kaufman Teaching Certificate Program (KTCP) course, and un- dergraduate genetics. She believes in the power of peer-coaching as a method of improving an entire community’s ability to communicate effectively.Dr. Marina Dang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Marina Dang holds a PhD in Chemistry from Brandeis University, where she also served as an instructor for the Science Posse Boot Camp program. She taught chemistry at Emmanuel College and later became a STEM curriculum developer for an educational startup. In 2014, she joined the MIT Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering to serve as its first Communication Lab manager. As the Communication Lab model spread to new
Resources Engineering and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, while working with the Austin chapter of Engineers Without Borders as a volunteer and project lead for a project in Peru. She has published and presented on incentivizing decentralized sanitation and wastewater treatment, on sustainability of coastal community water and sanitation service options, as well as on integrating liberal arts and STEM education, currently through the vehicle of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She has co-designed workshops oriented toward educational change for Olin’s Summer Institute and the joint Olin College-Emerson College event: Remaking Education.Dr. Selin Arslan, Lawrence Technological
Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.[26] J. R. Aaron, W. C. McDowell, and A. O. Herdman, “The Effects of a Team Charter on Student Team Behaviors,” J. Educ. Bus., Jan. 2014.[27] D. C. Davis and R. R. Ulseth, “Building Student Capacity for High Performance Teamwork,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013, p. 23.260.1-23.260.26.[28] M. Koretsky, “Back to the Future: Learning Chemical Engineering through Engagement in Disciplinary Practices.” ConocoPhillips Lectureship in Chemical Engineering Education, Stillwater, OK, 2017.[29] M. W. Ohland et al., “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self- and Peer Evaluation
were doing it to satisfy their own intrinsic values. While they still believed that good writingwas important to an engineering professional, the lack of continuity in the curriculum madewriting seem far less important to an engineering student.Compounding this devaluation, students often received negative social messages from otherstudents and even faculty about the value of communication coursework. Some students hadbeen told by peers to expect their writing class to be tedious, and mostly just a meaninglessrequirement. One student reported that in a subsequent class with a communication component,the instructor explicitly messaged that the students were there to get an easy grade on thatcomponent and pass through to more important work.The
engineering faculties and educators. First, there is a need forwhat Stevens refers to as “socio-technical engineering education” [22], which combines the socialand technical development of engineering students, in order to better prepare them for the transitionfrom university to employment. The three graduates were able to build their social knowledge andskills through co-curricular rather than curricular activities, which do not prioritize the socialdevelopment among students and are, as Stevens, Johri, and O’Connor argue, “the bastion for thetechnical rationalist view of engineering” [23, p. 133]. By incorporating the social aspect intocurricular activities, engineering educators can strengthen the stock of capital among all studentsand
Transdisciplinary Design Studio EnvironmentAbstractMany scholars have cited the importance of integrating humanities and social science contentinto engineering and technology education, noting the value in building students’ deepcompetence in communication and interpersonal skills, including an understanding of howtechnology is intertwined with societal and human needs. However, there is relatively littleguidance as to how viewpoints and content from liberal education perspectives might beintegrated systematically into a single, transdisciplinary learning experience that allows studentsto view the world through different lenses from a variety of disciplinary perspectives whilelocating and synthesizing information crucial to solving interesting and
will better equip future socialand political leaders to balance scientific and technological impacts on societal institutions andmake well-reasoned decisions. Further, this course acknowledges that no single discipline cansolve society’s most complex problems. Through coursework pedagogy and topics covered, thiscourse encourages society’s problem solvers to value the importance of multidisciplinary teamsand equips them with the tools to collaborate and communicate effectively across disciplines.The development of this course addresses the critical gap in engineering education concerningthe role and potential of engineering in creating a sustainable world. After the course is piloted,an analysis of the course design and the curriculum will be
engineering profession, and through this coursework, to learn frameworks for analysis: a policy or an economic framework, for example. These courses are also open to (and popular with) nonmajors, leading to interdisciplinary discussions and project teams. The curriculum builds to a unique capstone experience (e.g. Rossmann and Sanford Bernhardt, 2015).Engineering students at Lafayette College also take approximately one-third of theircourses outside STEM subjects, in the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Thesedistribution requirements introduce engineering students to alternate “ways of knowing,”comprising a liberal education. However, these requirements are not necessarilyintegrative; they may provide opportunities for
9what that means in practice, and what role the Engineering Studies Program should play increating and sustaining that culture. Too often, the program has been understood in terms of whatit is not, and the ways it diverges from our ABET-accredited BS majors, rather than for theunique combination of disciplinary methods it combines. This was damaging to the identity ofour AB students. Worryingly, the program’s existence can sometimes permit other Collegeprograms to abdicate their own potential contributions to interdisciplinary integration. Weunderstand from both the history of engineering education, and history itself, that a single“bridge” is insufficient. The program continues to work hard to communicate effectively withprospective and
focuses on career, work-life policy, resilience, gender, and engineering design. She received ICA’s Mentorship Award and the Provost Outstanding Mentor Award at Purdue, where she was University Distinguished Professor and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulke- ley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. She has worked with Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, four EPICS teams including Transforming Lives Building Global Communities (TL- BGC) in Ghana, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design and professional formation of engineers through NSF funding. [Email: pmbuzzanell@usf.edu; buzzanel@purdue.edu
include develop- mental psychology; sociocultural theories of communication, learning, and identity; qualitative methods; and discourse analysis.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management and PhD in civil engineering. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis as related to equity in education. She has been involved in the new pilot Engineering Math course at CU-Boulder since the start.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan is founding co-director of the Engineering Plus