in Drama. She has published articles on performance and on communication, and has edited journals and anthologiesMs. Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto Deborah Tihanyi is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto. Page 24.802.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Intersections of Humanities and Engineering: Experiments in Engineering Specific Humanities Electives and Pedagogies1. Introduction:A significant amount of research, reflected in the 2000 ABET requirements, has acknowledgedthe importance
American Society for Engineering Education. Austin, TX, June, 2009.21. Downey, Gary Lee, Juan C. Lucena, Barbara M. Moskal, Rosamond Parkhurst, Thomas Bigley, Chris Hays, Brent K. Jesiek, Liam Kelly, Johson Miller, Sharon Ruff, Jane L. Lehr, and Amy Nichols-Belo, “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2006.22. Carlsen, Christopher R, “Reflection #2,” Globalhub, Page 22.131.12 http://globalhub.org/members/3531/blog/2010/8/reflection-2---carlsen, August 4, 2010, Accessed March 7, 2011.
, this program is important because if students mistake “factual” claims as“value-neutral” claims then they will not be able to reflect upon the value-laden nature ofthe claims.However, the goal of the program in another way is quite modest because it does notpresume to teach students to evaluate ethical questions in depth. Developing in-depthskills to evaluate ethical questions raised by environmental controversies is beyond thescope of this program because there is not usually enough time in the courses that thisprogram targets to devote to teaching deep ethical reflection about environmentalproblems.The program also seeks to develop a teaching module that will allow transferability tofaculty colleagues, who are not trained in ethics, to teach
process and assessment of teams 19-22 However,much work remains to advance our understanding of how students learn to effectively functionon teams and best practices on how faculty can facilitate the team learning.The Importance of engineering faculty beliefs and practicesIn their review article considering the “ABET professional skills,” including teamwork andcommunication, Shuman et al. 23 ask the question, “Can they be taught?” and their answer is “aqualified yes” (p. 51). Noting, for example that the teaching delivery strategy required is not thetraditional lecture format, but rather one that leverages strategies such as active learning andcooperative learning. The extensive body of research on communication pedagogy, moreover,reflects the
25.1122.4surrounding the bridge and the many others like it? Upon reflection, it is less clear where theblame lies; society selected that person to lead, and the politician holds a degree in law from avery well-respected institution. The politician learned what we (those charged with providing anadvanced education) had deemed important: an introduction to science, likely very little onengineering as a discipline, and almost certainly little or nothing about infrastructure.To explore this further, the authors searched for infrastructure courses offered to undergraduatesnot taking a technical degree and came up largely empty-handed. Though the engineeringcommunity is clearly moving to provide infrastructure programs related to civil engineering,sustainability
discuss the weaknesses ofthe topic-subtopic structure, which is reflected in the presentation’s slides: a topic-phraseheadline supported by a bulleted list of subtopics. Heavily influenced by PowerPoint’sdefaults, this structure leads to presentations that are not well focused and do notcommunicate technical information in an effective manner [4]. Second, the mentors teach Page 24.1399.3students an assertion-evidence approach to creating presentations. In such an approach,the presenter builds the talk on assertions, rather than topics, and supports theseassertions with visual evidence rather than with bulleted lists. In their teaching, Utreeteaching
to demonstrate a rudimentary ability to move beyond “opinions” towards informed judgment that is based in facts, sound reasoning, and active Page 24.929.2 reflection. 3) Demonstrated progress in the basic technical proficiencies of higher education, including reading, writing, oral and visual presentation, independent study, teamwork, and seminar-style conversation. 4) Clear evidence of thoughtful reflections about your own learning process as related to your transition to college.In terms of course content, in the year in which assessment data was collected, the course beganwith a focus on environmental ethics
program, despite its clear focus on such experiences. In this section,we highlight some of the definitions, criteria, and characteristics found in the literature whichhave informed the set of characteristics used in this paper.Some discussions of real-world examples might imply that “real-world” necessitates connectionsto people in some explicit, direct or indirect way. For example, Huff writes that in his course,students, “Reflect on how real electrical systems interact with persons, and critique how theseelectrical systems affect social or environmental systems.” [17, p. 6]. In lieu of individual people,human organizations might be engaged, as suggested in the second course described bySubrahmanian and co-authors, which grounds real-world
National Societyof Professional Engineers (NSPE) 1935 Code of Ethics specified a duty to “seek to promote thepublic welfare” [3], emphatic recognition of social responsibility did not consistently appear inethical codes until the third phase, which began post-WWII and continues today.A defining feature of the current phase is that all engineering codes of ethics explicitly prioritizesocial responsibility in their first canons: “hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of thepublic” [1]. Differences exist among codes to reflect unique areas of technical focus, and codesare updated periodically in response to changing social and professional values. For example, in2003, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) added “and protect
which has long dominated discussions around STEMdiversity.The pipeline metaphor has been the object of critique because it focuses on restricting valves(like math requirements) and on the patching of leaks in order to maintain a “neatly linear marchthrough set academic gatekeepers” [5]. This image not only reduces the complexity of STEMexperiences but leaves the “pipeline” itself—that is, the cultures of STEM—unseen andunchallenged. Lacking sociocultural context, it is “an ill-suited frame to understand STEMidentity formation, particularly for women and underrepresented minorities” [5], and it does notacknowledge that traditional scientific culture reflects learning styles associated with white men[6],[7]. Since identity is generally understood
shown below. 4 Table 1 Current ABET Minimum Standards Review year Semester hours of Semester hours of engineering science science and mathematics 2018-2019 [23] 48 32 2019-2020 [24] 45 30These changes reflects a change in approach. The minimum number of hours was once definedin terms of numbers of years (1.5 years of engineering science and 1.0 years of math/science). Ithas now been changed to just require a certain number of semester hours
historical actors clearly understood theirefforts along these lines, we want to suggest that from another perspective the division betweendescriptive and prescriptive efforts may be somewhat blurrier. Responsible dam engineerswould no doubt heed the ethical mandate for public safety, health and welfare, which mandatepresupposes the possible co-existence of dam and safe public. Any dam is projected as comingabout either through safe or unsafe engineering practices, and in a non-trivial sense this isprecisely how dams come to be. Yet, consider that both the safe and the unsafe dam exclude thefreely flowing river from reasonable existence. That engineering codes of ethics have never, toour knowledge, included instructions to “reflect on who benefits
, implement integrated water resources management at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate 6.6 By 2020, protect and restore water‐related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, wetlands, rivers, aquifers and lakes The next section begins by explaining the theory of change underlying the USPCSAW project and guiding its activities. It then introduces the project components and describes their alignment with the Water SDG targets. The subsequent section presents the multi‐level assessment approach and results. The final section discusses the challenges and successes of the USPCASW project with particular reflection on the benefits of having a
additional projectdata in combination with the survey data, ensuring that students understand that their instructorsare not performing the detailed survey analysis will help to mitigate concerns that students mayanswer in the manner that they believe they are expected. The influence of different instructorswithin a specific class is outside of the scope of this paper.The survey alone is not well-suited to assess which specific pedagogical elements were moreinfluential in promoting sociotechnical thinking or shaping engineering habits of mind. Instead,the other data sources generated within the overall project – namely, focus groups, assignmentdata, and faculty reflection logs – are being analyzed to better answer this question. Analyzingthese data
student language reflect or challenge entrenched ideologies in the engineeringcurriculum? Do student’s perceptions of Con/Decon problems help us gain insight into how theyprescribe a proper engineering education? What do students believe to be a complete education?In Cech’s [19] phrasing, what is supplemental and what is fundamental?Our primary study questions are as follows:R1: Given that students are conditioned to work with decontextualized problems, what is theirattitude towards contextualized ones?R2: What strategies are students using to create context?4Research Design and MethodologyIn fall 2018, we adapted the Problem Rewrite Assignment (in an engineering ethics course,ENEE200) in order to better understand how students perceive
engineering education and how their experiences reflect broader structural andsocietal inequalities present in engineering education.Dr. Suren Jayasuriya is an assistant professor in the Arts, Media, & Engineering program atArizona State University, and serves as Madeleine’s mentor on multiple projects. Hisbackground and research are in electrical engineering and computer science, although he has newresearch projects in engineering education, including epistemologies and student experiences ininterdisciplinary engineering and the arts/humanities programs. His subjectivity in this projectmostly focused on the application of queer theory and philosophy in the works collected in thisliterature review, including analyzing how effectively those ideas
team’sproject partner was prioritized as the primary stakeholder. However, students clearly consideredother additional stakeholders in reflecting on who the project was being design for or impactingon some level, and this in general related to the aforementioned feeling of responsibility as anengineer.From a collective standpoint, when asked to further describe the team interactions specificallythroughout the design process, Samantha discussed the difference between previous groupexperiences with her team: You just need to have teamwork skills in each team that you are involved in. The difference is just the project that you’re working on, that you serve the community, so you need to ensure that your team is working on that. You are
sucheducational opportunities13. Students participating in “science communication activities inauthentic settings, creating written, oral and visual science messages suitable for various non-technical audiences, and engaging in fruitful dialogues with those audiences”13 (p. 288).Reviewing articles that report on public science communication learning, Baram-Tsabari andLewenstein13 found that academic programs attend to goals ranging from “affective issues,content knowledge, methods, reflection, participation, and identity” (p. 285). Ideally, a scienceprogram gives students an opportunity to speak, think, and do as scientists and engineers withreal audiences if they are to make inroads to attain these goals 12. This means students andaudiences negotiate
profession have come to a growing recognition of the importance engineers’communication skills, the teaching of these skills has steadily moved from the periphery to thecenter of engineering curricula guidelines. Yet the growing body of research in this areaindicates that too often communication learning is still relegated to service courses or is taught ina manner that does not reflect current knowledge about writing pedagogy. Faculty may bereluctant to incorporate writing assignments into their courses or do it in an ineffective mannerbecause of time constraints and large courses, especially at the lower levels. This research beginsan investigation of the use of peer review to mitigate some of these concerns while incorporatingcontemporary writing
through experience and reflection, 39 throughencountering different ways of knowing. There is no room for critical thinking and reflectiveaction. 40 Most important, lifelong learning is foremost about a love of and passion for learningitself, rather than focusing exclusively on the discrete knowledge that is acquired. As Deweywrote “The most important attitude that can be formed is that of desire to go on learning. Ifimpetus in this direction is weakened instead of being intensified, something much more thanmere lack of preparation takes place” (48). 41 With these reductionist misconceptions aboutknowledge and learning, it is clear that a concept like lifelong learning didn’t stand a chance.Many of these omissions are in fact related—one needs
Moving toward a system of learning outcomes assessmentDuring the 2009-2010 academic year, the English department drafted course and programoutcomes that reflected the then ongoing conversation about revising the core curriculum. Thegoal of drafting the new outcomes was to write them so that they both align with the newoutcomes based core document for eventual implementation into the new core curriculum, andcan also used to assess and improve the program in the meantime.The new learning outcomes for ENL 1310:Students will: • Demonstrate an ability to read actively, analyze, question, and respond to readings. • Recognize the importance of audience for their writing: identifying their audience, evaluating its needs, and applying those needs
needed for making connections betweendisciplines and from faculty’s primary discipline to innovation. Other goals require increasingfaculty understanding of the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration, the power of reflection and Page 22.725.13other pedagogies used in the liberal arts. Examples of practical skills are recognizingopportunities for innovative curricular, co-curricular and/or civic activities, and using modernsoftware to build case study scenarios. Several of the integrated project examples used in thefaculty development work connect to the environmental and community issues that appeal tounderrepresented groups of students. All
informants begin with “lay” myths about engineering. Asthey progress through their engineering programs, their experiences raise questions about thecore values of engineering. For some, these questions lead to critiques of engineering and itsorganizing values. Through their diary entries we learn that many question whether engineeringis in fact committed to meaningful social change and humanitarian work; in their experiences atwork sites during internships, they reflect on whether engineering tasks are often too mundanewhere one only has the opportunity to focus on a small, technical problem of a larger and oftenuninteresting project; others describe a workplace dominated by men who display a tendency tobe dismissive toward (particularly young
computerengineering technology, have remained stable in their enrollment. This trend is not reflected inenrollments of engineering technology degrees across the United States. Since 2005,engineering technology programs have shown increasing enrollment.7 Figure 1: Fall Enrollment in Engineering Technology and Engineering Programs at SPSU from 2008 – 2012 ET Programs 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Apparel/Textile Eng Tech 32 38 42 45 41 Civil Engineering Technology 395 376 262 195 150 Computer Eng. Tech. 166 144 143 133 168 Electrical
was an unknown quantity to ourstudents, a disproportionate number of women M.E. students enrolled in it, both graduate and undergraduate.Since then it has been so popular with both male and female students that it fills up immediately, and itsdemographics reflect our student population. The hypothesis that women might be influenced by the aestheticsof mechanical engineering is supported by recent work by Cheryan et al, 30,31 who found that women instereotypically male environments (containing ‘Star Trek’ posters and soda cans) , either physical or virtual,were much less interested in computer science careers than women in environments that conveyed ‘ambientbelonging’, such as water bottles and art on the walls. We summarize our
NGOs decision-makingwith respect to the communities they serve. So it is ultimately their commitment andaccountability to their values (see 4.1.1.1 above) and accountability practices that determinetheir downward accountability with communities.Three key variables determine how NGO accountability to communities is reflected inpractice: depth, openness and frequency. Depth is related to communities' access to NGOmanagement, what knowledge communities have of NGOs, how relevant topics discussed atmeetings are to communities, who gets to speak at these meetings, and how controversialissues are handled at these meetings. Openness is reflected on meeting’s agenda, format andconduct. Can community concerns be formally aired during meetings with them
ethnoracial minorities remain under-represented in engineering education andpractice [22]. Despite constituting just over half (51.5%) of the US population, women compriseonly 40% of the science and engineering workforce, and just 13% of professional engineers.African-Americans, though 12.3% of the general population, are underrepresented within scienceand engineering (7.7%) [23]. Underrepresentation is a concern for both utilitarian reasons ofeconomics and prosperity [e.g. 24] and also for moral reasons: it is simply unjust for the world tobe constructed by a professional community that does not reflect the demographics of that world.Interventions and investigations over many years have identified some factors that improve theexperience and increase
, the characterization of asbestos ascarcinogenic, and the Challenger explosion—forced professional engineers to reflect on their role insociety and their ethical responsibilities for humans and the environment1. After a decade ofproducing accreditation requirements ABET responded to a confluence of pressures, issuingEngineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) that broadened the scope of learning outcomes and cededassessment practices to educators and school administrators. Engineering education institutions drewupon expertise from ethics, history of technology, science & technology studies (STS), philosophy,and professional practitioners to develop new curriculums in response to these requirements.Engineering schools also engaged in efforts to
qualitative sensibility was selected to describe the personalexperiences associated with the issue of liberal arts in higher education engineering courses andprograms. The rationale is that a narrative study affords an opportunity to tell the story throughteacher reflection [17]. The story is a chronological [17], first-person, autobiographical account[18] with prompting from archived annual review documents and subsequent validation fromcolleagues. The classroom settings included one public land-grant and one private institutionwith a mixture of engineering and architecture students in opposing degree granting programs.The narrative context is threefold as it describes a broad timeframe and scope, and then narrowsto experiences in and out of the