the fall of 2010, the three instructors were brainstorming ideas on how to motivate engineeringstudents to hone their oral presentation skills and showcase their engineering talents in a fun,competitive arena, and Presentation Idol for Engineering Students was born. The first event washeld in the spring of 2011, with over $2,000 in prize money. After the success of the inauguralevent, Idol was held again in May, 2012, and with industry support, the prize pool for the 2012competition grew to over $3,300. The next Idol competition for spring, 2013 is currently beingplanned. Having started as a simple idea for an extra-curricular activity, Idol is now on its way tobecoming an ongoing event at the institute.How does Presentation Idol work?To make
inengineering education must replace problem sets with question sets.” Failure – or refusal – to sotransform risked engineering educators and their alumni “acced[ing] to the longevity of feignedinnocence” all too familiar in their ancestral line.The myth of objective, neutral “rigor” in engineering education [23] is linked to the myth of themasculine, white engineer who built America [24]. Both have contributed to engineering’sexclusivity and tendency to marginalize those who challenge the myths. As Shaun Harperwarned, an education that avoids engaging with social context and, for example, conversationsabout race, risks graduating “accidental racists” [25, 26]. Amy Slaton has examined how specific“conceptions of engineering talent and rigor” have
://qprinstitute.com/ , accessed on Jan13, 2020.[30] Slavich, G., & Zimbardo, P. (2012). Transformational Teaching: TheoreticalUnderpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods. Education Psychology Review, 24, 569-608.[31] SkillsYouNeed, “What are Social Skills?” https://www.skillsyouneed.com/ips/social-skills.html accessed on February 2, 2019.[32] Lopes, D. C., Gerolamo, M. C., Musetti, M. A., and Prette, A. D., “Social Skills: A KeyFactor for Engineering Students to Develop Interpersonal Skills,” International Journal ofEngineering Education, 31(1(B)), pp 405-413, 2015.[33] Waters, C., Chen, H., and Sheppard, S., “Delivering Engineering Education ResearchFindings to the Practitioners: A New Workshop Model Approach, AC 2010-253, 2010 ASEEAnnual
AC 2011-1371: TEACHING THE UNBALANCED EQUATION: TECHNI-CAL OPPORTUNITIES AND SOCIAL BARRIERS IN THE NAE GRANDCHALLENGES AND BEYONDDean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Assistant Professor in Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Insti- tute. His research investigates interdisciplinary technology design practices and strategies for integrating social and technical analysis in design pedagogy.Xiaofeng Tang, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute MS/PhD student in the Department of Science and Technology Studies. Page 22.1406.1 c American Society
majorand by year in school. Right now, these numbers, presented in Table 1, are too small to showany statistical significance. The future accumulation of several years’ worth of data will allowfor a more refined look at the course outcomes.“Enduring Design: The Art of Engineering” was created as a means to provide an appropriatecontext for students in technical disciplines to achieve a better appreciation of the impact andinfluence of art on the world around them. The course certainly met this modest goal andassessment suggests the potential for refinement and possible expansion to reach a broaderaudience.References[1] Lichtenstein, Gary, McCormick, Alexander C., Sheppard, Sherri D., and Puma, Jini, 2010, “Comparing the Undergraduate Experience
AC 2012-4586: ENGINEERING AS A LIBERAL DISCIPLINE: TWO, THREE,OR FOUR CULTURES?Dr. Robert O. Grondin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Robert Grondin has B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Michi- gan. He joined the faculty of Arizona State University in 1983, serving first in the Department of Electri- cal Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering on ASU’s Tempe campus and more recently in the Department of Engineering of the College of Technology and innovation on ASU’s Polytechnic campus. Page 25.537.1 c American Society for
AC 2012-4539: THE COMPLEXITIES OF ENGINEERING DESIGN ANDSYSTEM MODELINGDr. Gayle E. Ermer, Calvin College Gayle Ermer is a professor of engineering at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Mich. She teaches in the mechanical concentration in the areas of machine dynamics and manufacturing processes. Her master’s degree was obtained from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in manufacturing systems engineering (1987), and her Ph.D. from Michigan State University (1994). Her research interests include philosophy of technology, engineering ethics, and women in engineering. Page 25.1279.1 c
AC 2012-5477: PORTFOLIOS TO PROFESSORIATE: HELPING STUDENTSINTEGRATE PROFESSIONAL IDENTITIES THROUGH EPORTFOLIOSDr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs and co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communication Center. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, com- munication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include: interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the cur- riculum in statics courses; a a CAREER award to explore the use of e
Paper ID #21755Measuring the Impact of an Interdisciplinary Experiential-learning Activityon Student LearningDr. Anne-Marie Nickel, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Anne-Marie Nickel is a Professor of Chemistry at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). In 2002, she earned her Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She earned her B.A. in Chemistry at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin in 1997. Dr. Nickel is a member of the ASEE and the American Chemical Society (ACS). e-mail:nickel@msoe.eduDr. Jennifer Kelso Farrell, Milwaukee School of Engineering Jennifer Kelso Farrell is an
AC 2012-3526: INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND SO-CIETY (STS) COURSES INTO THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDr. Wesley Marshall P.E., University of Colorado, Denver Wesley Marshall is an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at the University of Colorado, Denver, and Co-director of the Active Communities Transportation (ACT) research group. He focuses on transporta- tion research dedicated to building a more sustainable infrastructure, particularly in terms of improving road safety, active transportation, and transit-oriented communities. Other recent research topics involve transportation planning, congestion pricing, human behaviors, parking, and street networks. A native of Watertown, Mass., Marshall is a
AC 2011-1507: THE HUMBLE HISTORY OF THE ”BULLET”Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn A. Neeley is an associate professor in the Department of Science, Technology, and Society in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. Her research uses cultural history of science and technology to gain a critical perspective on contemporary communication practices.Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer, 2003) and performs research on effec- tiveness of different slide structures at communicating engineering
, 2010.[41] J. S. Underwood and A. P. Tregidgo, "Improving Student Writing Through Effective Feedback: Best Practices and Recommendations," Journal of Teaching Writing, vol. 22, pp. 73-98, 2010.[42] J. Sims-Knight and R. Upchurch, "What's Wrong With Giving Students Feedback?," presented at the ASEE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2001.[43] M. Ekoniak, M. Scanlon, and M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, "Teaching Peer Review of Writing in a Large First-year Electrical and Computer Engineering Class: A Comparison of Two Methods," presented at the ASEE, Seattle, Washington, 2015.[44] E. Wheeler and R. L. McDonald, "Writing in engineering courses," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, pp. 481-486, 2000.[45] P. Black
AC 2011-2091: EXPLODING PIPELINES: MYTHOLOGICAL METAPHORSSTRUCTURING DIVERSITY-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRESEARCH AGENDASAlice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist
mayexplain the prevalence of the other sources for disciplinary friends.Lack of Participation in Professional OrganizationsOne of the ways for undergraduate students to establish connections to their broader disciplinarycommunity is through participation in a professional organization. These exist for a wide varietyof disciplines and serve to provide connections between industry professionals, researchers,students, and faculty alike. Student chapters exist for many of these organizations and at thestudy institution, there are student chapters of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers(AIChE) and the American Chemical Society (ACS). Though there is no student chapter for aBiochemistry organization, though there is an established club for
1 ACS Project SEED 2 3 Other 1 3Note. Within a year, participants could identify more than one program.LimitationsAs this study focused on student perceptions of professional identity, interdisciplinaryconnections, and skill development, all the data collected was from the students’ perspectives,via intensive interviews or post-program surveys. An extension of this study this coming summerwill be to design a survey or interview protocol to collect faculty perceptions of student gainsrelated to the goals and compare the results with the students’ self-reported data. Anecdotally,faculty and staff
AC 2011-1369: USING BOUNDARY NEGOTIATING ARTIFACTS TO IN-VESTIGATE INTERDISCIPLINARY AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMSKacey Beddoes, Virginia Tech Kacey Beddoes is a Ph.D. student in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech. Her current research interests are interdisciplinary studies of gender and engineering education and international en- gineering education. She serves as Managing Editor of Engineering Studies. She is also co-editor of What is Global Engineering Education For? The Making of International Educators, and Assistant Editor of the Global Engineering series from Morgan & Claypool publishers.Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering
AC 2011-2505: THE TEAMWORK CONUNDRUM: WHAT SHOULD BETAUGHT AND HOW CAN WE ASSESS TEAM LEARNING IN ENGI-NEERING TECHNOLOGYVassilios Tzouanas, University of Houston - Downtown Vassilios Tzouanas is an Assistant Professor of Control and Instrumentation in the Engineering Technol- ogy Department at the University of Houston-Downtown. Dr. Tzouanas earned a Diploma in Chemical Engineering from Aristotle University, the Master of Science degree in Chemical Engineering/Process Control from the University of Alberta, and the Doctor of Philosophy degree in Chemical Engineer- ing/Process Control from Lehigh University. His research interests focus on process control systems, process modeling and simulation, artificial
criteria wouldbe returned without review10. This amendment to the proposal granting process emphasized NSF’scommitment to funding projects that connect science and engineering to society, via broaderimpacts.In 2010, the America COMPETES Act11 reauthorized the National Science Foundation, mandatingthe retention of the Broader Impact criterion, and requested that NSF issue a report to Congressregarding the effects of this criterion. One of the requirements requested in the report by Congresswas to provide evaluations performed by the Foundation to assess the degree to which the Broader Impact aspects of research proposals were carried out and how effective they have been at meeting the goals described in the research proposals
come to illustrate how self-imposed decisions at one time can constrain future ac-tions. We know from a long line of psychological studies that when we make decisions in themoment, they are not always well thought out and may in fact be detrimental to us in the fu-ture 8,9 . And even when we make a decision beforehand, if it is too easy to break that decisionwhen it matters, it is an empty decision. Constraining our future actions in such a way that wecannot change that decision has becoming known as a Ulysses Contract (sometimes also calledSelf-Paternalism 10 ). The canonical example comes from the therapy of addiction, where an alco-holic will pour their liquor down the drain in a moment of clarity to prevent drinking at a latermoment of
engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a research professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic.Thomas A. De Pree, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Thomas De Pree is a PhD student and HASS Fellow of Science and Technology Studies in the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. Trained in sociocultural anthropology, he received a BA in Anthropology and Psychology from the University of New Mexico in 2010, and a MA in Anthropology and Education from Teachers College, Columbia University in 2015. Before pursuing his master’s
attributes and accreditation ac- tivities, and engineering students’ identities.Dr. Sandra Ingram, University of Manitoba Sandra Ingram, Ph.D., is a SSHRC award-winning scholar and Associate professor in Design Engineer- ing, Associate Chair (NSERC Design Engineering) and adjunct professor in Biosystems Engineering at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. Dr. Ingram is responsible for teaching the engineering communication course in the faculty as well as an integrated approach to communication in the Biosys- tems Engineering department. Her research interests include professional skills in engineering, interna- tionally educated engineers, co-operative education programs, women in engineering, and post-graduate
AC 2011-635: HIGHER TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION IN ENGLANDAND WALES 1955-1966. COMPULSORY LIBERAL STUDIESJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Ed- ucation. During the period of the paper was a lecturer in radio communication at Norwood Technical College, Senior Research Fellow in Higher Technological Education at Birmingham College of Advanced Technology, and Leverhulme Senior Research Fellow at the University of Lancaster respectively. he has an MSc in Engineering Education from the University of Dublin Page 22.776.1
AC 2011-634: HIGHER TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION IN ENGLANDAND WALES BETWEEN 1955 AND 1966. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THEBRITISH ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY TO ITS DEVELOP-MENTJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Ed- ucation in the University. During the period of this paper was a lecturer in radio communications at Norwood technical College, Senior Research Fellow in Higher Technological Education at Birmingham College of Advanced Technology, and Leverhulme Senior Research Fellow in Higher Education at the University of Lancaster. Has an MSc in Engineering Education from the University of Dublin
AC 2011-1170: PROJECT-DIRECTED WRITING ASSISTANCE IN CON-STRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMElena Poltavtchenko, Northern Arizona University Elena Poltavtchenko is a Ph.D. candidate in the Applied Linguistics program at Northern Arizona Univer- sity. She is a graduate teaching assistant at NAU’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Elena obtained her B.A. in Russian Linguistics and Literature in Novosibirsk State University, Russia, and M.A. in English Applied Linguistics at the University of Houston, TX. Her current research interests lie in the area of writing in the disciplines, with a specific focus on writing in engineering.John Tingerthal, Northern Arizona University John joined the Construction
- Hannifin Aerospace and Hewlett-Packard Inkjet. Henderson was featured in the eBook—Engineers Write! Thoughts on Writing from Contemporary Literary Engineers by Tom Moran (IEEE Press 2010)—as one of twelve ”literary engineers” writing and publishing creative works in the United States. Henderson’s current project is an engineering writing textbook which pioneers a new, math-based teaching method using algebraic equations and computer algorithms to develop language skills in engineers and other left- brain thinkers. Page 23.15.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
AC 2011-1117: LIBERAL LEARNING REVISITED: A HISTORICAL EX-AMINATION OF THE UNDERLYING REASONS, FRUSTRATIONS, ANDCONTINUED PROSPECTS FOR ENGINEERING AND LIBERAL ARTSINTEGRATIONAtsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is a historian of engineering education and an associate professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer. His publications include Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineering, and Computers during the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research (MIT Press, 2006) Page 22.1015.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011