AC 2012-4282: AIDING AND ABETING: THE BANKRUPTCY OF OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION AS A CHANGE STRATEGYDr. Donna M. Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Associate Professor and a founding faculty member in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College. Her research interests include liberative pedagogies, engineering ethics, engineering and social justice, and exclusionary structures of power in engineering education. Page 25.141.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Aiding and ABETing: The Bankruptcy of Outcomes-Based Education as a
out ABET’s accreditation practices, and their underlyingcauses, as a way of assisting ABET, their volunteers, and the academic institutions that rely on1 Formally incorporated as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, ABET has presented itself asABET and ABET Inc. since 1980.their services to improve upon their practices and outcomes. We close with several, stillpreliminary recommendations addressed to these three audiences.MethodThe data presented in this study is the product of a broader, exploratory study of changeprocesses and governance in U.S. engineering education. Organized around a basic, multi-sited,multi-scale research design, our research team carried out 277 semi-structured interviews at 43academic organizations
, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from UCLA in 1992. He is currently pursuing an M.A. in Biblical Literature from Oral Roberts University. His current research interests involve contributions from the field of engineering to the current science/theology discussion, reverse engineering of natural systems, and the preparation of scientists and engineers for missions work within technical communities.Hon. Peter Wesley Odom Mr., Oral Roberts University P. W. Odom is currently an undergraduate student of Engineering Physics at Oral Roberts University. His intentions are to begin graduate work in modern physics and engineering after graduation with the eventual goal of obtaining a Ph.D. and becoming a professor of
to change to environmental awareness. He is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Chi Epsilon (XE), Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE), and Engineering Education Graduate Student Association (ENEGSA).Miss Jessica Erin Sprowl Jessica Sprowl is currently a graduate student at Purdue University, pursuing a master’s degree in School Counseling. She earned her B.S. in mathematics teaching from Purdue University, Fort Wayne, in 2009. She worked as a high school math teacher for two years before returning to Purdue to continue her ed- ucation. She is actively involved in Chi Sigma Iota, an international honor society in the field of school counseling. She is also
up to a computer design,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, pp. 853–855, 1993, doi: 10.1109/FIE.1993.405385.[28] S. Shapiro, “Degrees of freedom: The interaction of standards of practice and engineering judgment,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 286–316, 1997, doi: 10.1177/016224399702200302.[29] A. Johri, B. M. Olds, and K. O’connor, “Situative frameworks for engineering learning research,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 47–66.[30] R. A. House, R. Layton, J. Livingston, and S. Moseley, “Engineering ethos in environmental public policy deliberation,” IEEE Int. Prof. Commun. Conf., vol. 2015- Janua, 2015, doi: 10.1109
Effective written communication skills are essential for engineers, as is widely recognized inthe field of engineering education and by US and international engineering professional andprogram accreditation organizations [1]–[3]. Since implementation of the EC2000 criteria,communication has been also been explicitly required by ABET accreditation criteria forengineering programs. Specifically, criterion 3g states that programs must demonstrate that theirgraduates develop “an ability to communicate effectively” [1]. While the ABET change in criteria push communication skills from the periphery to a centralcomponent of the engineering curriculum, the implementation of writing activities in engineeringcourses is often lacking. Best practices of
Murzi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. Natasha B. Watts
Paper ID #15219Making History Active: Archival Interventions for Engineering EducationDr. Christopher Leslie, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Christopher Leslie is a Lecturer of Science, Technology and Media Studies at the New York University Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York, and he is codirector of the Science and Technology Studies program there. Dr. Leslie’s research considers the cultural formations that surround technology, science, and media in the 19th- and 20th-century United States. He is the head writing consultant for the Introduction to Engineering and Design course, and
experience at K&A Wireless as a research associate in Albuquerque (USA). Additionally, he has profes- sional experience at Hitachi Automotive Systems America as an Intern in Research & Development in Detroit (USA) and Senior Product Engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in Brazil. He served as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED). Before joining SPEED, Claudio served as co-founder of the Student Chapter of the Brazilian Automation Society. Among his many achievements, his project was awarded the Best Student Initiative for Engineering Students pro- moted by Cengage Learning. He received the Leadership Award by ISTEC, and the Young Scientist Award supported by
Paper ID #15937The Revealing Effect of Disasters: A Case Study from Tulane UniversityMr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Tech Andrew Katz is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds a B.S. in chemical engineering from Tulane University and M.Eng. in environmental engineering from Texas A&M University. Most recently, prior to beginning his doctoral studies at Virginia Tech, he taught physics in Dallas, TX. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Revealing Effect of Disasters:A Case Study from Tulane UniversityIntroductionIn the wake of Hurricane
finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate
questioned those practices to be an equitable instructor and researcher.Avneet is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program at BostonCollege. She was a graduate student in Purdue’s School of Engineering education from 2014 to2018. After Purdue, she worked in the corporate sector at MathWorks for a year and a half. Afterthat, she returned to academia, first as a Research Scientist at MIT, and then in her current role asan inaugural faculty member of a new undergraduate engineering program in a Jesuit LiberalArts College. Avneet grew up in several cities in India and considers her father’s military serviceand mother’s work as an educator and social worker to have influenced her life’s values. Shebelieves that her time at Purdue
sociotechnical issues in the context of engineering practice. • They were conducted by researchers whose primary or core expertise was not in the disciplines that contribute most directly to the professional skills, more specifically, almost exclusively by people with advanced engineering degrees. Their engagement with the professional skill-related outcomes is an example of the expansion of horizons and concerns that EC2000 sought to promote. Nonetheless, it limited the depth with which they could articulate their evaluation criteria. As the outline for a scenario designed to assess understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (reproduced below from McCormack et al. 2014, table 6
at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
Engagement and Service Learning as a Pedagogical Practice in EngineeringDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Dr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is Lead for the Connecting Us Team of the Board Strategic Doing Ini- tiative; a candidate for PIC III Chair; past chair of
-technical audiences are too significant to ignore. In this time of ongoing discord betweenscientists, policymakers, and the public, the ways in which scientists communicate with thoseoutside of their profession is critical to improving scientific literacy [14], [15]. As Chan [16]argues, “In order for the lay public to shape an informed opinion of scientific discoveries andcontroversial developments, it is critical that scientists can communicate about research and theimplications of that research to promote awareness, clarity, as well as to respond to publicconcerns. These are the abilities that are lacking amongst many new science graduates.”Currently, there is a dearth of research regarding undergraduate students’ creative explanationsin their
Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World, the artist, design researcher, and OlinCollege professor Sara Hendren writes, “Engineering is not the science of the laboratory alone…It is fundamentally applied, which means its results live in the world. It belongs to people, notjust as ‘users’ but as protagonists of their dimensional lives” [1, p. 23]. Hendren’s invocation of avision of engineering as radically human-centered provided the philosophical and humanisticcore to our interdisciplinary teaching team as we embarked on designing a new course forfirst-year students at Boston College (BC). Our course, Making the Modern World: Design,Ethics, and Engineering (MMW), situated engineering practice and knowledge within its social,political, and
theABET Criterion 3 a-k outcomes, engineering faculty from around the United States who werewell versed in education research imagined the best way to get to those outcomes if they couldstart from the ground up.5 Given that the outcomes are used to establish values, pedagogicalapproaches that support learning all outcomes in an integrated fashion make sense. In a contextof solving ill-structured, open-ended problems to complete a project, defining technical contentat a curricular level makes less sense. The implementation of that vision uses project-basedlearning to teach engineering design, professional skills and technical competencies to upper-division students. Reflecting values also held by the greater community, the programs alsoinclude
modalities for the transfer and co-creation ofknowledge, requirements, and possibilities for change in operational models and tapping into theboundary-breaking opportunities fostered by digital ways of teaching and learning. This studyaims to provide a future-proof pathway for the engineering education ecosystem to better equip itfor solving real-world problems with a multi-disciplinary approach to create new value forsociety. In the process, the study also sheds light on relevant new research avenues.1. IntroductionNeeds-driven innovation (also known as needs-based innovation) has been in use in the field ofBio-design for nearly 20 years now. [1]. One of these innovation techniques is framed through a'why or what and how' approach by Kate
inaccurate portraits of andperpetuate misconceptions about engineering but also how these misconceptions create barriersto participation for those who might not identify with those stereotypical, albeit false,perceptions of the profession.Changing the ConversationTrevelyan calls for a re-conceptualization of engineering in ways that position it as “a muchbroader human social performance than traditional narratives that focus just on design andtechnical problem-solving” (Trevelyan, 2010, p. 175). Given what we understand about the kindsof work engineers do and the skills needed to solve modern engineering problems, engineersneed to understand the broader scope of their practice as well as its impacts within a largersociety. In changing the
. As a result, it is critical thatengineering graduates understand the impacts that technology has on individuals, society, and theenvironment. This paper discusses two Science, Technology, and Society (STS) courses in thearea of cultural diversity and international perspectives. This paper briefly overviews science,technology, and society (STS) as an emerging field, describes the content and purpose of the twoSTS courses at the University of Colorado Denver, discusses the research that has emerged fromthese courses, explains how the courses have been used to satisfy ABET criteria for accreditingengineering colleges and schools, and considers the effectiveness of these courses in broadeningthe education of engineers
, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses; that work resulted in Engineering Justice: Transforming En- gineering Education and Practice (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2018). His current research grant project explores how to foster and assess sociotechnical thinking in engineering science and design courses.Jacquelene D. Walter, Colorado School of Mines Jacquelene Walter is a third year undergraduate student at Colorado School of Mines pursuing a major in Electrical Engineering. She has been a general tutor at Colorado School of Mines for first and second year students and will continue to assist with the research in sociotechnical integration until her graduation in 2020.Dr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of
of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is a Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Electrical Engi- neering. In the Fall 2011, she was a visiting
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Reclassifying Teaching Methods based on a Comparison of Student and Faculty Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility in the ClassroomAbstract Though Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been identified as an important part ofundergraduate and graduate curriculum for the Mining and Petroleum Departments by both industry andprofessors, there seems to be a difference between student identification of CSR content that could indicatea difference in teaching styles and possible effectiveness. We know very little about engineering professors’experiences of teaching CSR to engineering students. Previous research has investigated how
Knowledge,” Handb. Sci. Technol. Stud., p. 377, 2008.[20] R. Duschinsky, “Tabula Rasa and Human Nature,” Philosophy, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 509– 529, 2012.[21] S. M. Wilson and P. L. Peterson, “Theories of Learning and Teaching: What Do They Mean for Educators? Working Paper.,” Natl. Educ. Assoc. Res. Dep., 2006.[22] M. G. Jones and L. Brader-Araje, “The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning,” Am. Commun. J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2002.[23] E. Wenger, Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.[24] C. D. Wylie, “‘I just love research’: Beliefs about what makes researchers successful,” Soc. Epistemol., 2018.[25] A. L
and opportunities to harness it for social andenvironmental wellbeing, rather than considering social responsibility as somethingcompartmentalized away from the practice of engineering itself. Therefore, our results should notbe interpreted as assessing the influence of a particular style of CSR instruction. Our study hereanalyzes the influence of “new” CSR content being included in courses designed for engineeringstudents.3. Data analysisFor the purposes of this analysis, we considered only the students who gave informed consent toparticipate in the research and who took both the pre- and post-course surveys. We assigned eachstudent a unique ID to match their pre- and post-course surveys. We then conducted paired t-testsand calculated the
Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers.” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 88(1), 43–51.4. Koelsh, J. R. (2011). “Is Writing an Essential Skill for Engineers?” Automation World, December. Retrieved from .5. Evans, D. L., Beakley, G. C., Crouch, P. E., and Yamaguchi, G. T. (1993). “Attributes of Engineering Graduates and Their Impact on Curriculum Design.” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 82(4), 203-211.6. Ford, J. D., and Riley, L. A. (2003). “Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at Curricula, Courses and Support Systems.” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 92(4), 325-328.7. Schriver, K. and Hayes, J. R. (2009). “Bioengineers as Professional Communicators: Assessing the
Motorsports class is required inthe engineering degree. The LA website even credits E&T in their description of the program:“The Certificate is interdisciplinary and draws on the expertise of the School of Engineering andTechnology and their BS in Motorsports Engineering, and, depending upon a student’s interests,may include courses taught in the Schools of Business, Journalism, and Physical Education andTourism Management.”12Additionally, faculty members from motorsports engineering and the history departmentcombined to write a grant proposal for a unique research project which would have assessed oneof America’s early roadways, the Pennsylvania Turnpike, and its impact on the development ofhigh speed travel. By looking for common ground and
community and conducted research at the Highlander Center to exposeillegal dumping of hazardous wastes in their community, which had rendered their rivers un-fishable, among other negative environmental impacts. The citizens in the community beganwith no prior expertise and some without a high school education. Their research forced the stateof Tennessee to take action and end the illegal dumping. As the cleanup progressed, thecommunity members became not only citizen scientists, but also citizen engineers as theyprovided input into design processes for environmental remediation.21While the use of the word citizen is clearly problematic in the term citizen science or citizenengineering because of its connotations of national citizenship, we chose
for the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. Rider is a Research Collaborator with the Sustainability Science Education program at the Biodesign Institute. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s de- gree in Environmental Management from Harvard University and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc.Rachel Sinclair, University of Virginia Rachel Sinclair is a graduate with a