internal team leadership needed toresolve common behaviors within dysfunctional teams. While no new theoretical results onteamwork are presented, the authors have focused instead on applying their experience asmanagers of teams in major corporations and institutions of higher education to explore what aneffective teaming curriculum might include and to develop related assessment tools. This paperoutlines a strategy for integrating deliberate teaming instruction into senior-level engineeringcapstone or project courses. The curriculum focuses on building team leadership skills andtechniques for addressing challenges such as planning and execution, social loafing, andprocrastination. Models for assessing students‟ teaming skills and for providing
its own College orSchool, as is often the case at other universities. The placement of the department in MCAS isintended to facilitate engineering as a liberal arts subject. The plan is for the program to becomeaccredited as well. These institutional factors meant that we had a substantial amount ofinstitutional support to design an ambitious, interdisciplinary program of study for our students.5. Theoretical frameworksIn thinking about how to develop MMW into a Core course that fulfills requirements in naturalscience and history (as well as a course that can contribute to ABET accreditation), we decidedto introduce students to a series of theoretical frameworks that integrate engineering andtechnology with problems of context.One of the
thedepartment interacts with students, and that this is important on a department level.We found that across engineering disciplines there is a different expectation about pursuing anengineering career after graduation. Students pursuing bioengineering, for example, were lesslikely to indicate that they planned to pursue an engineering career, which might be expectedgiven the interest of some bioengineering students to attend medical or dental school.Self-reported stress, anxiety, and depression was found to be high in our study [14], which agreeswith previous work on mental health in college students [5]. However, while we found that theaverage self-reported stress, anxiety, and depression scores of all participants do not differ acrossengineering
addition to thestudents in the program, family members were invited to participate in the activities so that itbecame more of a family affair than simply a student-only program. Twelve students participatedin the program that was remotely delivered over a period of two months. A pre-program survey ofthe participants was performed before the start of the program and a post-program survey wasconducted after the program. Additional details of the program, the surveys, and the measuredlearning outcomes will be presented in this paper along with plans for program expansion.IntroductionPhiladelphia has the highest poverty rate among the largest 10 cities in the country[1]. Reflectiveof the high poverty rate, Philadelphia residents are more likely than
, likely have implications forengineering students’ interest in continuing in engineering and professionals’ plans to stay intheir engineering jobs. Indeed, persons with disabilities are equally likely to enter engineeringmajors, but graduate with engineering degrees at lower rates. Similarly, only 65% of personswith disabilities who have an engineering or science degree are employed in STEM, versus 85%of persons without disabilities [9]. I thus examine students’ and professionals’ intentions to stayin engineering in the future.MethodsEngineering Students: ASEE Diversity & Inclusion SurveyThe ASEE Diversity and Inclusion Survey (ASEE-DIS) includes 1,729 students enrolled in anengineering program in one of eight US colleges or universities. 4 A
of the intervention was postponed to the summer semester due to the globalcoronavirus pandemic, so we will describe the planned activity instead. In this phase, each teamexpands their literature review and proposes recommendations for pursuing future design andresearch efforts. These proposed efforts should create value in some way for a stakeholder groupthat is negatively impacted (or not positively impacted) by the current design. Students will writea report quantifying how their proposed improvements could create value for their chosenstakeholder group via changing the dynamics of bias in the situation being modeled.In contrast to Phase 1, where teams wrote for a non-technical audience, students are told to writethis deliverable for a
problem.Iterations and revisions of the student work are required. Each update report requires the teams tobuild upon the content included in their initial design plan. The final report requires the teams tobuild upon the midterm report by including a results section that provides information for each ofthe steps included in the design plan. The process of returning to the same core of informationfor each of the reports and presentations encouraged the students to reflect upon the feedbackand evaluation given on the previous report and address problematic issues in the current reportor presentation they were working on. This allows students to build on learning as they applytheir engineering skills to solve the problem. Besides writing reports, students
supplemented with case studies and student research on real world design processes. The course could be divided into modules, with each module focused on one project. Forexample, a module could be centered on building a toothpick bridge. At the beginning of theunit students could be given a set of design criteria for a bridge they must construct. The criteriacan include weight and size constraints, material constraints, how much load it must handle, orany number of other requirements. As students plan their solution, different bridge designs canbe introduced such as suspension bridges, truss bridges, or arch bridges. Case studies of thedesigns of famous bridges can be used. This can include bridges which work are lauded forinnovation and those
disciplines and student groups. The survey also included an open-ended responsecomponent that will also be analyzed for themes and in the context of the survey subscale results.We also plan to use the quantitative survey data to identify candidates for interviews to furtherunderstand the relationship of stress, engineering identity, and engineering culture. Interviewswill allow participants to describe their individual experiences and allow us to identify commonthemes and triggers of student stress, anxiety, and depression as related to being an engineeringstudent.Ultimately, the results of the study will produce recommendations for faculty, advisors, andadministrators, who directly impact the climate and reputation of engineering programs
design problem and their plans for future work. The attention to specific wordsand their consequences forces students to clarify their thinking about their problem as they revisetheir statements.Example: Mid-term status reports and claims assignmentThe following example demonstrates how one team used mid-term status reports and claimsassignment to make a good design decision. The goal of the team’s project was to design apressurized tank, for use by veterinarians at Shedd Aquarium. The veterinarians will use thetank, similar in function to hyperbaric chambers used for treating decompression sickness inscuba divers, to experiment with a novel approach to treating Gas Bubble Disease in sea horses.During their status report presentation, one
assessment of theeffectiveness of the national workshop, and the future plans to sustain the network.Introduction: Penn State’s Engineering Ambassador Program Penn State established an Engineering Ambassador Program in 2009 with anoutreach mission by employing the marketing lessons from the National Academy ofEngineering’s Changing the Conversation through the partial support from the National Page 23.495.2Science Foundation (http://www.engr.psu.edu/ambassadors/index.html). After havinglearned advanced presentation skills and the messages of Changing the Conversation,select undergraduate engineering students, mostly females, traveled to high
engineeringconcepts to explain to students. The undergraduates also gained leadership, management,and communication skills from building and presenting lesson plans. Each year at Gannon University since 2008, an average of 66 middle schoolstudents have participated in the “Mechanical Engineering Day.”13 The ASME StudentChapter, the SWE Student Chapter, and the Mechanical Engineering faculty at GannonUniversity have hosted the event. Again, the feedback from the participatingundergraduate students showed an improvement in leadership, communication, andteamwork skills. In addition to these skills, Gannon reported that their students were alsoexposed to executing a project with budget and time limitations. The students gainedthese skills from working in
respondents on the preference of covering recenttechnology or the entire history of technology combined with the desire for modularity suggeststhe possibility of developing a sequence of two or three chronologically-based courses.Therefore, the authors intend to work with their association to develop a business model that willenable such a course to be planned and delivered. A critical component of the business plan willbe the development of metrics (besides such obvious ones of number of institutions that sign onand number of students to take the course) to assess the efficacy of the course. In fact, a coursedelivered to multiple institutions has the potential to provide a test bed for the assumedimportance of history in engineering education, since
personal path led me from a [university] BS/MS in 1969/70 to industry experience in [state]. After balancing family obligations and career motivation in the late 70’s and early 80’s, I returned to school and received my PhD from [different university] in 1985. My continued commitment to education led me to the newly created chemical engineering department at [another university] in 1986, where I started as an assistant professor just before turning 40.” – Diane Dorland, dean, Rowan UniversitySally Ann Keller gained leadership experience at the National Science Foundation and LosAlamos National Laboratory before becoming dean: “When I look back on my career, I can honestly say I did not spend much time planning
a situated, incremental curriculum plan in all seven departments in the college. Her responsibilities include faculty development (she has facilitated numer- ous college-wide workshops), TA training (approximately 15 graduate students from the Humanities work with CLEAR to develop the communication competence of engineering undergraduates), programmatic and basic research, instructional development, and assessment. Dr. Kedrowicz received her Ph.D. in Communication from the University of Utah in 2005. She also holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Organizational and Corporate Communication from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.Maria Dawn Blevins, University of Utah Department of Communication
students’communication skills and is important for the development of a quality end-product. Whilecompleting projects for persons with disabilities or the underprivileged is not unique to ourprogram, it is a critical component to the success of our virtual teams because it appeals to thestudents’ desire to complete the design successfully and motivates them to work through anydifficulties encountered with team dynamics.Program planning and managementPrior to the start of the semester, faculty from each institution carefully organize and discuss the Page 24.873.3course organization, delivery, and management (Figure 1). Two main faculty, one at eachinstitution
Paper ID #10531The Grandest Challenge: Models for Communication Development in Tech-nical ContextsDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include techni- cal communication, assessment, accreditation, and the impact of pen-based technologies on learning and teaching. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education, IEEE Transaction on
research infrastructure and educational opportunities to ensure an innovative and productivescience and engineering enterprise, and supports the advancement of our nation’s most pressingchallenges, as reiterated in the most recent strategic plan “Empowering the Nation throughDiscovery and Innovation—NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2011-2016.” The strategic plansupports NSF’s mission, providing programmatic and operational underpinnings, and setting thecontext for a broad, balanced NSF portfolio2,3.To maintain its high standards of excellence and accountability, in 1997, the National ScienceFoundation incorporated a policy that would evaluate proposals submitted to the agency under twoMerit Review criteria: Intellectual Merit and Broader
groups’ ensemble-based experimental planning. Yet the classensemble did indeed learn “correct” things about pendulums, along with firsthand knowledge ofthe process by which we generate knowledge through empirical means.Dr. Gross’s experience illustrates several themes that came up among our intervieweesconcerning accepting and building on offers in a STEM paradigm.1. A generous initial offer from the instructor.An offer that serves only to test or evaluate members of an ensemble is rarely a generous offer.Generous offers help the ensemble to succeed together. When offering prompts for activelearning, a certain generosity helps the activity to be educational and satisfying. As Dr. Grossremarked, “If your goal is ‘I want this set of undergraduate
research professor in instructionaldesign, had designed and taught the course for five previous semesters. In addition, a graduatestudent in human-centered design was present in each of the classes as well as in planningsessions with the instructors to observe and offer additional support. As the course also aimed toget students to engage in cross-disciplinary discussions, it was critical to offer a variety ofperspectives and areas of expertise. As such, the instructors created a list of guest speakers toperiodically visit class. These guests included representation from industry (strategy planning,user experience, design, marketing) as well as other departments (industrial design, business,library science).To help move through the design process
because of its size Denmark provides us with a kind of social laboratorywithin which to map out some of the responses that have been unfolding under Bologna. Thisbeing said, the institutional responses in Denmark are complicated enough to provide quiteinteresting things to report.The National Responses of DenmarkThe unique response of Denmark, along with the other Scandinavian countries, is partly due totheir social democratic traditions. While shortly after our visit there were student protests aroundthe planned reductions in government subsidy for students, historically Denmark has spent alarge percentage of its wealth on public education.9 Based on 2009 World Bank data, Denmarkspent 8.7% of its GDP on public education, as contrasted against
students who aremajoring in electrical engineering (EE) or mechanical engineering (ME) at the target institutions.The research questions that frame this investigation are as follows: RQ1. What exposure to social justice concepts have students had in their university courses prior to taking our Introduction to Feedback Control Systems (IFCS) course, which is required for both EE and ME majors? RQ2. How do students report their perceptions of control systems classes that explicitly include engineering and social justice units compared to similar classes that do not include social justice? RQ3. How does targeted social justice instruction impact student plans to pursue additional control systems courses and student ability to
instructor is progressively scaling up the course toaccommodate larger numbers of students than what an instructor could handle in traditionaltechnical writing courses. In the fall 2017 semester, the instructor accommodated 50 students intwo sections, and in the spring 2018 semester, the instructor allowed that number to rise 75students across two sections. For the fall 2018 semester, the plan is to accommodate 100 studentsacross two sections. To assist the instructor in the mentoring and grading, the course uses a teamof undergraduate mentors. These undergraduates have excelled in the engineering writing course. While technical writing courses such as at the University of Texas at Austin [3] andengineering courses such as in the Mechanical
a graduate student, Rudolpho Azzi, who happened to be an experienced teacher, thegroup worked to assemble a research program and teaching laboratory in behaviorism at theUniversity.15This work was deemed a success, and Bori and Keller were invited to take their work to theUniversity of Brasilia, Bori to create a new department of psychology, and Keller to continue onas advisor. With the university’s doors yet to open, they had the time and space to plan. It was inthe course of designing from scratch an introductory course in experimental psychology that thegroup came up with PSI. Pressed to be experimental in form as well as content, the group beganconsidering how their knowledge of behaviorist principles could be applied to the
learned in the course.Additionally, there is a focus on effective leadership and networking in the course.Description of Events in the FYS coursesIn the summer of 2011, a team consisting of three chemical engineering professors, the advisorof Engineering Ambassadors, the coordinator of first-year seminars in engineering, and aneducational psychologist from the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of EngineeringEducation at Penn State developed a plan to include presentations by the Ambassadors inCollege of Engineering First Year Seminars. Initial funding for the project was provided by theLeonhard Center. The goal of using the Ambassadors in the first-year seminars is two-fold. Oneaim is to increase students’ understanding of engineering
needs to be athoughtfully planned arts integration. With this in mind, the arts must also visualize what it isthat STEM might offer at this deeper level where all five of these disciplines might stand onequal ground.In reference to your comment about empathy and caring being absent from the STEAMconversation, the authors of Sparks of Genius present “empathizing “ as one of the thirteenthinking tools of the most creative individuals from across disciplines. Recall that we also foundthat Howard Gardner and Daniel Pink discuss empathy as they envision the necessary minds ofthe future. Is it that our society (or maybe STEM education) does not value this type of creativethinking? Or is that most people do not think of the ability to empathize as a
Introduction to Blended, Flipped, Mastery Learning Document: FYI The objective of this unit is to familiarize students with the technologies used in this course, to aid students in creating a personal plan for success in this course, and to begin to establish peer-peer interaction among students. By the end of this module, students should: 1) be able to access Canvas for course materials 2) be familiar with the vocabulary and concepts that differentiate classroom and online education 3) understand the concepts of ‘adult learning’ and ‘mastery learning’ 4) have, in mind, a plan for successfully completing this course 5) complete at least one
aims to graduate engaged professionals and community members.AcknowledgmentsWe thank the students who shared their time and insights as participants in our study and theinstructors who helped us recruit participants. We also thank Beata Johnson, Casey Wright, JosieNardo, Donovan Colquitt, and Elizabeth Sanders for reviewing an early draft of this paper andsharing constructive feedback. We also acknowledge the National Science Foundation forsupport under the Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) under grant number DGE-1842166. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] “AACU 2018-22 Strategic Plan
time, however, I constantly feel an obligation to take on more work because I can do itwell, and I want people to see that a woman can fill the roles that men have typically filled untilnow. I still am not sure how to reconcile those pressures.DevlinI found myself responsible for starting and guiding the group of students Lorena discussed. Inaddition to planning how to establish these groups for other students, the working groupfunctioned as pilot test where we attempted to enact the practices and achieve our goals.My intent was to establish clear goals for the group and then focus on supporting the students’authority and autonomy. Based on past experience I assumed that it was impossible to designthe authentic connections that would be
. For many, the ambassador rolebegins during a large, multi-institution workshop. Post-event surveys reveal high levels ofability, confidence, and preparedness to create and deliver outreach presentations. Post-workshopinterviews reveal that the training offers a platform for role identity development. Theambassador role aligns career-related motivations, resonance with messages contained in theNational Academy of Engineering’s Changing the Conversation report, beliefs about the missionof the EAN, and plans for fulfilling the Network’s mission. After the initial training, students’role identities reflect an integration of their undergraduate engineering student role with the newrole of ambassador, with the intermediary role of an effective