Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2007.[2] B. R. Cohen, J. S. Rossmann and K. S. Bernhardt, "Introducing engineering as a socio- technical process," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[3] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, "Engineering education - Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol 3, no. 2, pp. 2- 16, 2003[4] M. Taks, P. Tynjala and H. Kukemelk, "Engineering students' conceptions of entrepreneurial learning as part of their education," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 53-69, 2016.[5] J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, "The flipped classroom: A survey of the research," in ASEE Annual
Page 25.798.9discipline. Below are key points for student learning in any course that integratesentrepreneurship and innovation into the subject material. Like Steve Jobs and StevenChu, students should be encouraged to do the following: 1. Cast a wide net. Keep up with what is happening in your field and in the world generally. 2. Actively seek out problems to solve or areas opportunity where you would be the first person to do the particular type of work you are doing. Even freshman students can find something new to add to a conversation. 3. Figure out who has been talking about this problem or working in a similar area. 4. Get up to speed on the conversation of the field(s) regarding this topic so far. 5. Do
every student and that is automobiles.The particular technology of interest here is the engine type that powers the vehicle. This storywas adopted, adapted, and expanded from a concept by Teich19 (2008) and titled by the author ofthis paper as “The Better Technology.” The Better Technology In the early 1900’s, gas-powered cars shared the roads with those powered steam engines, such as the well known Stanley Steamer’s. Another small player was the electric cars. Eventually, internal combustion engines captured the market and the old steamers disappeared. But why? The usual assumption is that the two contenders went head to head and the best technology won. But there is a lot
Education Conference and Exposition, 2017.[4] NAE, “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century,” Washington, D.C., 2005.[5] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” 2006.[6] S. Danielson, A. Kirkpatrick, and E. Ervin, “ASME Vision 2030: Helping to Inform Mechanical Engineering Education,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2011, p. T1J– 1.[7] J. Creswell and D. Miller, “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry,” Theory Pract., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 124–130, 2000.[8] AICHE, “Body of Knowledge for Chemical Engineers,” 2015.[9] “The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025 | ASCE.” [Online]. Available: http://www.asce.org/vision2025
some assumptions. Identifies context(s) when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa).By necessity the rubrics are written such that they can be applied to the broad range of topics thatfall under the FYS umbrella. Particularly relevant to the premise of the FYS Bridge course arethe rubrics that address establishing the background, exploring ambiguity, questioningassumptions, and identifying context, but applied to challenges in engineering, technology, andscience in society. With this in mind, the authors have selected tentatively the following topicsand readings for the course:The questions that science, engineering, and the humanities can answer… and those theycan’t. Selected
.. Engineerinng Ambassaddors givetheir outreach preesentations tot science an nd math classses in teams of two. Thee careersassem mbly presenttation is giveen in teams of o four to sixx, dependingg on how maanyambaassadors visit the school.. In these carreers assembbly presentattions, the am mbassadorshave the opportun nity to reinfoorce the messsages from Changing thhe Conversation. Leadersh hip. In additiion to commmunication traaining and eexperience, aambassadorssgain valuable v leadership skillls. At Penn State, S for exaample, ambaassadors are required toread the t book Lin nchpin: Are You Y Indispen nsible 8 by S
Experience 2 1 Foundations of Mathematics 3Extra Disciplinary Seminar 3 Development Across the Lifespan 3 15 16FALL - Junior Crd SPRING- Junior CrdStatistics for Scientists & Engineers 3 Engineering Education 1 4Computer Applications 3 Educational Psych & Instr Practices 3Curriculum and Assessment 3 Literacy Acros s Content Areas AYA/MA 3Foundations in Geometry 3 Technical Elective 2 3Technical Elective
namingpotential contradictions in our inherently messy world of cultural, social andorganizational complexity. While CHAT cannot develop universally correct solutions,by identifying common problems CHAT can mitigate some of the stress resulting fromambiguity and encourage a mutual exchange of strategies and techniques to rein in suchcomplexity. CHAT-based research may not solve managerial concerns outright but canprovide a foundation for dialogue and purposeful discussion of common concerns.References[1] ABET - Criteria for Accrediting Applied Science Programs, 2012 - 2013: 2011. http://abet.org/asac-criteria-2012-2013/. Accessed: 2011-12.[2] Albanese, M.A. and Mitchell, S. 1993. Problem-based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its
techniques to diverse audiences.In short, after completing the course, students should be able to understand the economicimplications of various courses of action.The course has been taught as a fairly traditional course on engineering economics, using astandard textbook. The learning activities and format for the course have varied depending on theinstructor. The instructor who taught the course in Spring 2019 used a traditionallecture/homework format. In other recent semesters, the instructor has designed a partially“flipped” format. In this format, to prepare for class meetings students are asked to read one ormore sections of the textbook, watch one or more short video clips, and attempt 1-3 problemsbased on the concepts in the reading(s
, D.C.: National Academy Press.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77- 101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCandy, P. C. (2000). Reaffirming a proud tradition Universities and lifelong learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(2), 101-125.Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional science, 24(1), 1-24.Flavell , J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier
difficult to get along with, very shy, or skilled at forging relationshipswith others. While interpersonal obstacles are not always related to discrete work tasks, anengineer’s social skills can influence how tasks are carried out.An engineer who is particularly well connected socially can have an easier time gatheringinformation to complete a work task, particularly if s/he needs to gather backchannel informationor rely on colleagues’ candor. In one example, Hannah, a member of the Quality Team at a steelmill, needed to find out why a slab of steel was being transported back and forth between twostorage locations, especially since she had submitted written documentation weeks before tohave it taken to the scrapyard. One constraint in her situation
, international relations in the sphere of transport communications, iternational logistics and supply chain management, sustainable development and ecology.Mrs. Karalyn Clouser, Western Transportation Institute at Montana State University Karalyn Clouser is a GIS and planning specialist with the Western Transportation Institute. She has expe- rience editing and managing spatial data to support transportation planning and implementation projects, and offers skills with numerous GIS tools and platforms. At WTI, she has provided GIS and planning support to the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Technical Assistance Center, which assists with the de- velopment of alternative transportation on federal lands. Her experience includes
. structure oversees 5-18 peer tutors. tutors from that department. Central program director oversees departmental managers and cross-departmental activities. Composition of peer Graduate students and Graduate students and Undergraduate students coaching team postdocs postdocs Location of dedicated At least one designated One designated office Conference room in coaching space(s) room within each space campus makerspace
Question 3 W M S Avg. W M S Avg. W M S Avg.First-year 2 0 5 2.4 2 4 1 1.9 2 3 2 2.0Upperclass 2 6 4 2.2 5 4 2 1.6 3 6 3 2.0Entire class 4 6 9 2.3 7 8 3 1.7 5 9 5 2.0Figure 3. Scores and weighted averages, separated by class levelAveraging the scores for all three questions gave us the student’s overall score of a weak,moderate, or strong grasp of the connections between primary sources, engineering, and STSconcepts. First-year students contributed 2 weak, 3 moderate, and 1 strong
. Leydens won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice— at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C. Lucena
Technology Doug Carroll is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Missouri S&T and is the Director for the Cooperative Engineering Program, a cooperative effort with Missouri S&T and Missouri State University. Dr. Carroll founded the student design center at Missouri S&T and served as its first director. He also served as the advisor for the solar car project for 12 years, including two national champion teams. He has worked with many students on design projects in his career. Page 24.964.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
what has happened in the past when it hasn’t been sufficiently accounted for.” (8 Nov 2019). “I’m struggling with how to set-up these lectures…as I am writing this, I am going through [Professor D]'s [faculty reflection log] and learning a lot about what worked and what didn’t work in the classroom. I am hoping that the students gain knowledge from this assignment but I am already predicting that there will be pushback from the students…I can’t emphasize enough what great timing this interview assignment was with regards to reviewing [Professor D]’s [faculty reflection log] and also working on the ASEE paper focusing on the interview assignment. Although I am sure I can do better with preparing
might social classshape FLL teams’ preparations and performances? Future work could compare FLL teams fromcommunities that represent different socioeconomic conditions. What is more, studying FLLteams from different racial and ethnic communities might help us think about culturally respon-sive robotics education. How might FLL teams engage with identities, heritages, families, andother local community assets as sources of socio-technical innovation to support their achieve-ment at FLL competitions? These questions suggest that there is much work to be done by criti-cal engineering researchers and pedagogues on the social, economic, and cultural factors thatshape pre-college robotics competitions.References 1. S. Papert, The Children’s Machine
] H. S. Truman, "Statement by the President making public a report of the commission on higher education," December, vol. 15, p. 1947, 1947.[5] J. McFarland et al., "The Condition of Education 2019. NCES 2019-144," National Center for Education Statistics, 2019.[6] L. Berkner, C. C. Wei, S. He, S. Lew, M. Cominole, and P. Siegel, "National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS: 04), 2003-04: Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates for 2003-04 by Type of Institution. ED TAB. NCES 2005-163," National Center for Education Statistics, 2005.[7] D. J. Boyd, "Public research universities: Changes in state funding," in American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015.[8] U. S. D. o. L. Bureau of Labor
engineering to include sociotechnical work the dualism we are trying to challenge Selecting appropriate problem statements Instructor optimism and excitement to create with consistent qualities across the courses meaningful new assignment(s) for impact was difficult given the diverse course contexts their students’ views of engineering and and student populations (year, major, etc.) abilities to engineer sociotechnically Logistical considerations, e.g. Who counts as a non-engineer? Can a student team divide up this assignment, or is it more fruitful to have them each work on it individually? Student perceptions of “true” engineering work as purely technical rather than sociotechnical
“softness” ofhumanities into the “hard core” engineering practice. My daily practice is that of being “another”– that uncomfortable state of continuous non-belonging: in a space replete with battlefieldanalogies and metaphors, I am a healer, a joy seeker, and an advocate.The analysis below uses color font to indicate which author (Vanasupa (V), Schlemer (S), orZastavker (Z)) is writing. We also preserve the students’ voice by using their chosenpseudonyms. ISIM refers to the course, Introduction to Sensing, Instrumentation andMeasurement.Reflective analysis of student responsesV: In terms of the focus group responses, I guess it wasn’t surprising to me that the visual layoutwas the first thing that students noticed. What was a bit surprising was the
: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1243-1254.5 Rude, S., Gortner, E. M., & Pennebaker, J. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition & Emotion, 18(8), 1121-1133.6 Wang, C. C., & Geale, S. K. (2015). The power of story: narrative inquiry as a methodology in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(2), 195- 198.7 Remenyi, D. (2005). Tell me a Story–A way to Knowledge. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 133-140.8 Paulos J, 1999, Once Upon a Number – The Hidden Mathematical Logic of Stories, Allen Lane Press, The Penguin Press, London.9 Kelchtermans, G
of framing an engineering problem as being composed of discretesystems, the Circle Way recognizes that the parts are not only interacting, but that the boundariesbetween them are shifting, arbitrary, and often far from clear. The Circle Way challengesparticipants to shift their orientation from a collection of individuals to a co-creating community.For instance, consider a technical project team: one typical approach would be to break down theproject into the electrical, mechanical, and software (etc.) engineering sub-projects, assign eachto the student(s) of that major, and integrate the completed parts into the whole system at thevery end. If instead students used the Circle Way approach to discuss and share ideas about thewhole project
, community,or other source, contextual listening has a broader meaning. It refers to A multidimensional, integrated understanding of the listening process wherein listening facilitates meaning making, enhances human potential, and helps foster community-supported change. In this form of listening, information such as cost, weight, technical specs, desirable functions, and timeline acquires meaning only when the context of the person(s) making the requirements (their history, political agendas, desires, forms of knowledge, etc.) is fully understood [19, p. 125].Although students in IFCS did not engage with an actual community, the posing of the tankproblem underscored the value of listening to a community to
communication as their 1particular mode of autopoietic reproduction” (p. 3) As leading systems theorists Capra andLuisi[9] described: [Because] communications recur in multiple feedback loops, they produce a shared system of beliefs, explanations, and values – a common context of meaning – that is continually sustained by further communications (p. 308).Applying this theory to systems of higher learning, we argue that the social life (or “culture(s)”)of engineering colleges and departments is maintained by a network of communications fromwhich messages or stories emerge that reflect this “common context of meaning”. What, then,are these
thinking part). Forengineering students, this will be followed by reflection on engineering solutions to improve thecase-study framework (the doing part), and making a presentation on their alternate solution(s) toa group of professional engineers (the knowing part). It is hoped that these students, when theyeventually choose a capstone design project in their senior year, will build a relevant engineeringsolution (the making part). By monitoring these various stages with rubrics, we will be able toput the process on a firmer footing to learn from and improve.Assessment Strategy:Bransford et al. (2000), a National Research Council sponsored committee on developments inthe science of learning, recommend conducting research on formative assessment