workplaces, which can positively affect productivity,commitment, and performance [20].Theoretical FrameworkWithin engineering education, the role of values remains relatively underexplored (perhapsbecause engineering culture often positions itself as free of values or biases), but outside ofengineering education, examining these issues is not new. Researchers in social andorganizational psychology have examined values through numerous approaches and frameworks,e.g., [46]-[49]. For this study, we turn to Schwartz et al.’s values framework [50] [51], which weleverage due to its seminal and popular nature and proven utility in understanding how valuesinfluence behaviors and priorities in a range of domains (e.g., workplaces [51] [52]). WhileSchwartz et
could—nor are we supporting newcomers to engineering communication aswell as we could. The study reported here is a step in the direction of creating a network ofpeople interested in engineering communication across divisions of ASEE. We welcomecollaborators in this effort.References: Works We Directly Cited1. Allen, N., & Benninghoff, S. T. (2004, March 1). TPC Program Snapshots: Developing Curricula and Addressing Challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 157 - 185.2. Bauer, D. H. (2020, June), WIP: Integrating Writing Throughout the Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--355483. Boettger, R.K., & Lam, C. (2013, December 1
• Discuss paradox of • Values in engineering significance of something that the Streets. New Haven: Yale development related practices might seem simple or distinct University Press, 2020. to Roman Empire • Environmentally and • Undermine assumptions about S. Alaimo. Bodily Natures: Science, • Identify and describe socially responsible what comprises the “one” Environment, and the Material Self. different ways of engineering person, force, thing, or being Bloomington: Indiana University seeing nature in under investigation
-centered design typepedagogies and the parallels between students’ interdisciplinary learning and faculty learning tonavigate institutional processes to create interdisciplinary courses [20]. Her recent research hasbeen to integrate social, political, and economic contexts into technical engineering courses. Asan actor in engineering education working to integrate broader societal contexts into theengineering curriculum at Tufts University, Ozkan’s positioning as a practitioner and researcherof pedagogical change informs and motivates her to pursue this collaborative research oncontextualization.Human-Centered Design: Contextualization for Better Design(s)Research on engineering design education demonstrates how treatment of design
has been anecdotal with favorablereports from students, other instructors and employers. In essence, program moderators arehearing that assignments, content and writing process are helpful. As mentioned, it is now timefor a more scientific assessment to see whether the program itself is built to sustain the habits ofprocess writing, audience analysis, and reflection.The assessment will be based on a series of data points: Assignment Grading Rubrics (2015 -pre-embed program and 2016-2021 embed program), Student Course Evaluations, “EngineeringLearning Community: Mentorship Program Student Survey,” “Semester/Year E&S Co-opStudent Questionnaire,” “Co-op Experiences – Summer/Year as told by students in Fall/YearENGR 1021,” and performance in
?. Science, Technology,& Human Values, 39(1), 42-72.8. Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K., Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Moskal, B. M., & Cordova, O.(2018). Measuring change over time in sociotechnical thinking: A survey/validation model forsociotechnical habits of mind. In 2018 Proceedings of the American Society for EngineeringEducation.9. Malazita, J. W., & Resetar, K. (2019). Infrastructures of abstraction: how computer scienceeducation produces anti-political subjects. Digital Creativity, 30(4), 300-312.10. Slaton, A. E. (2015). Meritocracy, technocracy, democracy: Understandings of racial andgender equity in American engineering education. In International perspectives on engineeringeducation (pp. 171-189). Springer, Cham.11. Riley, D
[23]–[25].The value of fields external to traditional computing are explored through frameworks which canhelp orient one's praxis within computing. This includes frameworks for thinking about activism(i.e. praxis, intersectionality), interactions between technology and society (i.e. sociotechnicalsystems, technological determinism, and technological solutionism, and the New Jim Code [26]),and intervention (i.e. critical participation). By exploring alternative ways of orienting one'spraxis in computing, students are empowered to consider the central question of the module—from where do I want to frame my interventions and what could my conceptual framework(s) tolook like?The second module, titled “Inclusion as Intervention,” explores what it
]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2016-2017/.[3] C. Gonzalez, “Decision-Making: A Cognitive Science Perspective,” in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science, no. April, S. E. F. Chipman, Ed. Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 264–270.[4] D. H. Jonassen, “Engineers as problem solvers,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 103–118.[5] E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, N. J. McNeill, Z. T. Malcolm, and D. J. Therriault, “Moving beyond formulas and fixations: Solving open-ended engineering problems,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 627–651, 2012, doi
as lifestyle and a meritocracy of difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.[3] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, "“I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp. 103-115, 2007.[4] E. Godfrey, A. Johri, and B. Olds, "Understanding disciplinary cultures: The first step to cultural change," Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, pp. 437-455, 2014.[5] D. Eisenberg and S. K. Lipson, "The Healthy Minds Study 2018-2019 Data Report," 2019.[6] A. Danowitz and K
] analyzed the “low-choice culture” of engineering curricula, particularly incontrast to other fields of study. In the context of new research demonstrating the value of selfdetermination or autonomy for students in motivating learning, enhancing self-efficacy, andsupporting persistence, the relative inflexibility of engineering curricula stood out starkly. Withinindividual courses, studies have shown the “power of choice” to positively influence studentoutcomes, for example, when students may choose from among a menu of design projects[45, 46], and recommendations have been made for the design of self-determination supportiveengineering-student learning experiences [47, 48]. However, Forbes, et al.,’s statistical analysis ofthe curricula at 46
. References[1] J. R. Davis, Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching : new arrangements for learning Phoenix, AR: American Council on Education and the Oryx Press, 1995.[2] M. E. Gorman, V. S. Johnson, D. Ben-Arieh, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Eberhart, J. Glower, K. Hoffmann, A. Kanda, Kuh, A., Lim, T.W., Lyrintzis, A., Mavris, D., Schmeckpeper, E., Varghese, P., and Wang, Y., “Transforming the Engineering Curriculum: Lessons Learned from a Summer at Boeing,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 143-149, January 2001 [Online] Available: Wiley Online, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00582.x[3] K. Dong, “Multi-disciplinary teaching to instill integration in a
Claire, WI: PESI Publishing & Media, 2017.[6] M. Price and et al., “Effectiveness of an Extended Yoga Treatment for Women with Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 300–309, 2017.[7] T. Gard, N. Brach, B. K. Holzel, J. J. Noggle, L. A. Conboy, and S. W. Lazar, “Effects of a yoga-based intervention for young adults on quality of life and perceived stress: The potential mediating roles of mindfulness and self-compassion,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 165–175, 2012.[8] C. Smith, H. Hancock, J. Blake-Mortimer, and K. Eckert, “A randomised comparative trial of yoga and relaxation to reduce stress and anxiety
,benevolence) with varying degrees of importance.”His value system consists of basic values which all people hold, but in varying rank or orderaccording to personal relevance, importance and priority. This “tradeoff amongst the relevantvalues” [75, p.12] within the value system of a person, is what classifies which category(named Higher Order Value) of the human value system this person resides in, and thereforehow this person’s motivation and decision-making processes are driven.All values and Higher Order Values of the Schwartz Personal value system map ontoSchwartz et al.’s Circular motivational continuum [76, p.7], shown in Figure 3, for clearerrepresentative indications of the Higher Order Values and their underlying basic values
and being.Finally, following [11]’s lead to draw the audience into the experience, we stepped, well beyondour comfort zone, into the unknown and its possibilities to bare our souls to our community.What follows are only a part of the outcomes of that fearful yet determined step. We hadintended to perform our respective narratives; however, due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic, that is not feasible at this time. Therefore, as you read through ourrespective narratives, we ask that you attempt to fully enter into the experience by exercisingyour imagination. Try to imagine the countenance of each subject. Try to hear their voices. Tryto visualize their movements. Are they uncertain or forceful, elegant or awkward? What
-wide focus on the student experience, https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/Learning_Reconsidered_Report.pdf , Jan. 2004.3. H. Schattle, The practices of global citizenship, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008.4. A. W. Chickering and L. Reisser, Education and identity, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.5. L. Patton, K. A. Renn, F. M. Guido, S. J. Quaye, D. S. Forney, & N. J. Evans, Student Development in College, 3rd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.6. M. S. Hevel, “Toward a History of Student Affairs: A Synthesis of Research, 1996- 2015,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 844-862, 2016.7. D. P. McAdams, “The psychological self as actor, agent, and author
, including those many subtle layers of educational experience conveyed via the hiddencurriculum.AcknowledgementsThis material extends from work supported by the National Science Foundation’s CultivatingCultures of Ethical STEM program under grant number 1635887. The authors would like tothank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful input. 11References[1] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design, 2nd Edition ed., Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005.[2] I. Villanueva, L. A. Gelles, M. D. Stefano, B. Smith, R. G. Tull, S. M. Lord, L. Benson, A. T. Hunt, D. M. Riley and G. W. Ryan, “What does
the sorting task. Each sorter was presented with all of the final ideason a set of numbered cards with one idea per card. They then sorted the cards into groups ofsimilar ideas and created a descriptive name for each group. Finally, they recorded their groupname and the ideas (numbered cards) were placed in that group. Each idea was only sorted intoone group. Once the ideas were sorted by the stakeholders, this raw data was structured intomatrices of 0’s and 1’s using the open source programing language R [31]. This step generatedindividual and total matrices, which served as an input for the representation step. The sortingstep was an onsite activity and was completed in two hours, with each stakeholder sorting theideas individually. Prior
3 Jung Typology Extrovert (E) 2 9 5 Introvert (I) 7 8 4 Sensing (S) 1 7 4 Intuition (N) 8 10 5 Thinking (T) 4 12 8 Feeling (F) 5 5 1 Judging (J) 7 15 5 Perceiving (P) 2
world we live in.Joseph Carl PriceCol. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from West Point, a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Missouri S&T, a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has served in the military for 23 years as an Engineer Officer with assignments around the world to include Afghanistan, Egypt, and Bosnia- Herzegovina. He is a licensed
Politics of Progress. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.7. MacInnis, B. and Krosnick, J.A. (2020). Climate Insights 2020: Partisan Divide. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. (https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/climateinsights2020-partisan-divide/); also see, Funk, C. (2021). Key Findings: How Americans’ Attitudes about Climate Change Differ by Generation, Party, and Other Factors. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/26/key-findings-how-americans- attitudes-about-climate-change-differ-by-generation-party-and-other-factors/); Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M., & Gustafson, A. (2019
outcomes, and interpersonal outcomes. Empathic processesresemble the skills dimension of Walther et al.’s [6] model of empathy in engineering andmanifest through perspective-taking, self/other awareness, and related skills. As this modelemphasizes, however, one’s orientation to others and one’s behavioral dispositions also play akey role in determining whether one will empathize. Thus, as one example, numerous factorsinfluence ‘team member understanding.’ Moreover, as Davis’s model emphasizes, this type ofintrapersonal understanding can promote interpersonal action or behavior.Second, empathy can promote positive teaming environments. Such positive teamingenvironments may be evident through a lack of negative valences, such as limited frustration
Summary (if known) Author Becca First-year engineering Fall 2018 Female, probable first-year, K. Johnson projects course, other data not collected University B Dorothy First-year engineering Fall 2019 Female, first-year, other data J. Blacklock projects course, not collected University B Cleopatra Second-year Spring Female, self-described S. Claussen introduction to 2019 sophomore, probable ME mechanical major, other data not
look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E
, "Community Engagement in Engineering Education: Needs and Learning Outcomes," in Developments in Engineering Education Standards: Advanced Curriculum Innovations: IGI Global, 2012, pp. 301-317.[8] E. A. Davis, A. S. Palincsar, A. M. Arias, A. S. Bismack, L. Marulis, and S. Iwashyna, "Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 24-52, 2014.[9] V. Svihla, T. Kubik, and T. Stephens-Shauger, "Performance assessment practice as professional learning," Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019.[10] P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder, 1970.[11] L. T. Smith
what has happened in the past when it hasn’t been sufficiently accounted for.” (8 Nov 2019). “I’m struggling with how to set-up these lectures…as I am writing this, I am going through [Professor D]'s [faculty reflection log] and learning a lot about what worked and what didn’t work in the classroom. I am hoping that the students gain knowledge from this assignment but I am already predicting that there will be pushback from the students…I can’t emphasize enough what great timing this interview assignment was with regards to reviewing [Professor D]’s [faculty reflection log] and also working on the ASEE paper focusing on the interview assignment. Although I am sure I can do better with preparing
] H. S. Truman, "Statement by the President making public a report of the commission on higher education," December, vol. 15, p. 1947, 1947.[5] J. McFarland et al., "The Condition of Education 2019. NCES 2019-144," National Center for Education Statistics, 2019.[6] L. Berkner, C. C. Wei, S. He, S. Lew, M. Cominole, and P. Siegel, "National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS: 04), 2003-04: Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates for 2003-04 by Type of Institution. ED TAB. NCES 2005-163," National Center for Education Statistics, 2005.[7] D. J. Boyd, "Public research universities: Changes in state funding," in American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015.[8] U. S. D. o. L. Bureau of Labor
, “Stereotyping and its threat are real.,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 680–681, 1998. 6. C. L. Walker and S. J. Rakow, “The Status of Hispanic American Students in Science: Attitudes,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–245, 1985. 7. A. Meador, “Examining Recruitment and Retention Factors for Minority STEM Majors Through a Stereotype Threat Lens,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69, 2018. 8. D. Sadegh, S. Perkins-Hall and K. Abeysekera, “Tested Strategies for Recruiting and Retention of STEM Majors” in International Association for Development of the Information Society: Proceeding of the 5th International Association for Development of the
educationresearch [13]. Figure 1 leverages this model to show how the engineering and labor theory ofchange fits into this study of engineering graduate students engaging in a strike. The modelconnects Mejia et al.’s critical consciousness model [17], which engages Freire’s principles ofcritical pedagogy [18], with Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions [19]. “Mejia etal.’s model is represented in the center of this model, showing relationships between theory,action, reflection, and concepts of scholarship, praxis, concientização, and liberation that resultfrom their overlap. Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions is overlaid, with theoverlap taking the form of reflection as an assessment method and action as a learning method”[13