engineered, who isengineering, and how engineering is enacted from social and political considerations and context(Cech, & Sherick, 2015; Holly, Jr., 2021). Introducing students to engineering aligned with anideology that decontextualizes and separates the social from the technical makes studentsconceptualize the social as an afterthought or, worse, unnecessary (Erickson et al., 2020).Attempts at sociotechnical integration in engineering education are certainly not new. Neeley etal. (2019) used a text mining approach to chart the history of attempts at applying STS toengineering education, which often is enacted by adopting a sociotechnical approach toengineering education in the ASEE PEER repository. They found that while between 1996 -1999
Education, 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432527Burleson, G., Herrera, S. V. S., Toyama, K., & Sienko, K. H. (2023). Incorporating Contextual Factors Into Engineering Design Processes: An Analysis of Novice Practice. Journal of Mechanical Design, 145(2), 021401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055780Claussen, S., Tsai, J., Boll, A., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019). Pain and Gain: Barriers and Opportunities for Integrating Sociotechnical Thinking into Diverse Engineering Courses. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 33151. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33151Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT
by Recognizing the Framing Power of Implicit Messages Kathryn A. Neeley University of VirginiaI. IntroductionSince the founding of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission in 2011, interest andactivity in diversity have grown in ASEE, culminating with the establishment of the Year ofImpact on Racial Equity (2021-2022) and the formation of the Equity, Culture, and Social JusticeDivision in 2020. These initiatives were preceded by several ASEE programmatic effortsincluding the Year of Action on Diversity (2014-2015), the Best Diversity Paper Award (2015),the Deans Diversity Pledge (2017), the Diversity Recognition Program (2019), and the
questions, we walk’: How should engineering education address equity, the climate crisis, and its own moral infrastructure?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 447–452, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20295.[10] E. Godfrey, “Understanding Disciplinary Cultures: The First Step to Cultural Change,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 437–456. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.028.[11] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[12] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in
identity development.AcknowledgementsThis worked is supported by the Department of Engineering and King’s InternationalFoundation at King’s College London. The views expressed are my own.References[1] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[2] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26428. doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[3] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, “Resilient
the lower-level properties. For the human brain, the total mass of allthe neurons is a resultant, while consciousness is an emergent [32]. Although a requirement forthe Macro-level, emergence exists across all hierarchical boundaries (Micro-Meso and Meso-Macro).Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Flows Between the Micro, Meso, and Macro levelsDynamics within each of the Micro, Meso, and Macro levels are influenced by the conditions ofthe other levels. A high Micro-level of thriving might prevent a decrease in Meso thrivingfollowing a disruption at the Macro-level. For example, a community of resilient individualsmight have minimal disruption to their ASEE student chapter meeting schedule during theCOVID pandemic due to shifting their meetings
creativeproblem solving and educational foci outside of traditional engineering disciplines, including ininterdisciplinary areas such as robotics and energy studies as well as in thematic areas thatotherwise could only be covered via electives such as community development, corporatesustainability, and STEM teaching. A “focus area” component of the curriculum was included asa mechanism for achieving these diverse goals.Our program’s first incoming cohort arrived Fall 2019, so those students suffered the disruptionsof the Covid-19 pandemic in the midst of their second college semester. Nevertheless, 17students graduated in May 2023—our first full cohort of program graduates. Despite thepandemic disruptions, we continued to iterate and improve our program
to be the space in which to help prepare students for their careers,enabling smooth transition to professional practice [9-11]. Researchers have gone a step furtherin considering what the transition looks like for engineers as they move from a senior student toan entry level worker in the engineering field. Ford et al. (2019) provides a better understandingof the experiences that engineering students face in the introduction phase to the work phase bycharacterizing how and to what extent the design capstone course prepares students forengineering workplaces [12]. Technical work and teamwork/communication appeared asemerging themes from the qualitative analysis of student experiences. These findings alsoshowcase barriers students face when
help create a culture where students can learn, grow, socialize, andenhance their engineering identity.This paper shares the student research team’s journey through creating an interview protocol, seethe appendix for the complete protocol, conducting interviews, and performing an initialanalysis. The work-in-progress version of this paper attempts to engage with some of the workbeing done at ASEE by others interested in exploring makerspaces, retention, and the impact ofidentity formation on underrepresented student groups. For the final version after year two of thestudy, we expect to engage much more deeply with the broader literature on the subject. Whilethe recommendations are site specific to our university, we expect some of the
Grant No.2306178. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendation expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] J. Trevelyan, “Transitioning to engineering practice,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 821–837, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1681631.[2] Z. S. Byrne, J. W. Weston, and K. Cave, “Development of a Scale for Measuring Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Professional (i.e., Soft) Skills,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1417–1433, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11165-018-9738-3.[3] R. P. Aleman and et al, “Mind the Gap: Exploring the Exploring the Perceived Gap Between Social and Technical Aspects
engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor and Associate Head of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing teams has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on
stress, pain, and illness, 15th anniversary ed. in Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness, 15th anniversary ed. New York, NY, US: Delta Trade Paperback/Bantam Dell, 2005, pp. xxxiii, 471.[5] R. Stevens, D. Amos, A. Jocuns, and L. Garrison, “Engineering As Lifestyle And A Meritocracy Of Difficulty: Two Pervasive Beliefs Among Engineering Students And Their Possible Effects,” in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2007, p. 12.618.1-12.618.17. doi: 10.18260/1-2--2791.[6] H. Dryburgh, “WORK HARD, PLAY HARD: Women and Professionalization in Engineering—Adapting to the Culture,” Gend. Soc., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 664–682
[3] J. Canino and K. B. Teichert, “A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering Design Project,” inProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, USA, June 2019. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/a-frankenstein-inspired-engineering-design-project[4] S. Ambrose, M. Bridges, and M. Lovett, How Learning Works: Seven Research-BasedPrinciples for Smart Teaching, San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[5] B. Lincoln, Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship, Chicago, IL, USA:University of Chicago Press, 1999.[6] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible Selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp.954-969, Sep. 1986.[7] P. Nagy, R. Wylie, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. “Facing the Pariah of Science: TheFrankenstein Myth
more authentic moral commitment than chicanery. Moreover, the strictmetrics for accomplishing good made clear sense of MacAskill’s claims that EA has alwaysrecruited most successfully in STEM fields [2], appealing to a small subset of philanthropicquants that he affectionately but self-consciously labels “moral weirdos” [3]. EA amounts to acutting-edge version of utilitarianism’s traditional appeal among those students. Nelson andPeterson’s 1982 title might overgeneralize—“If You’re an Engineer, You’re Probably aUtilitarian”—but it’s hard to argue with their assessment that the utilitarian’s methodical“quantification is attractive to engineers.” [4]For ASEE and LEES, that attraction is worth examining for several reasons. First, EA creates
Know,” New Dir. Community Coll., vol. 2006, no. 135, pp. 21–28, 2006, doi: 10.1002/cc.[2] K. J. Cross, K. B. H. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The Double Bind of Race and Gender: A Look into the Experiences of Women of Color in Engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2017.[3] A. E. Slaton, “Engineering Improvement: Social and Historical Perspectives on the NAE’s ‘Grand Challenges,’” Int. J. Eng. Soc. Justice, Peace, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2012.[4] A. Aparicio and A. Ruiz-Teran, “Tradition and Innovation in Teaching Structural Design in Civil Engineering,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 340–349, 2007, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133.[5] L. White, “‘Liberal
proposes a more responsible and sustainable approach to forestmanagement. One of its applications is a market-oriented approach where companies can becertified if they follow the responsible forest management standards and guidelinesestablished by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) [26]. The FSC is an international non-profit organization that advocates for sustainable forestry. FSC certifies companies as “foreststewards” [27] when they demonstrate zero deforestation, protection of animals and plants,fair compensation for workers, and respect for local communities’ rights. As of 2019, theCanadian province of British Columbia was the region with the most forest stewardsworldwide [28].Stewardship in Indigenous ContextsIn a variety of Indigenous
Riddle Aeronautical UniversityKatrina Robertson, Embry Riddle Aeronautical UniversityTrey Talko, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Small Shifts: New Methods for Improving Communication Experiences for Women in Early Engineering Courses Abstract: This paper outlines methods and initial data from an educational intervention based on previous research published at ASEE. Students in introductory engineering courses face challenges communicating and integrating their ideas in team projects. Often these challenges with team communication fall along gendered lines, where women students experience marginalization in team settings. This paper builds from previous research in the field of engineering education which integrated
Psychologist, vol. 0, pp. 1–18, 2018, doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1480373.[5] D. L. Driscoll, J. Paszek, G. Gorzelsky, C. L. Hayes, and E. Jones, “Genre knowledge and writing development: Results from the writing transfer project,” Written Communication, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 69-103, 2019, doi.org/10.1177/0741088319882313.[6] C. Venters, L. D. McNair, and M. C. Paretti, “Using Writing to Link Procedures and Concepts in Statics,” in Proceedings of the ASEE 2013 Annual Conference and Exposition, June 23- 26, 2013, Atlanta, Georgia.[7] S. R. Goldberg, J. A. Rich, and A. Masnick, “The use of metacognitive writing-to-learn prompts in an engineering statics class to improve student understanding and performance,” in Proceedings of
Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955.Bhattacharya, K. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.Byrd, N. (2021). Bounded reflectivism and epistemic identity. Metaphilosophy, 53(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534Carrell, J., Cruz, J. M., Herbert, A. M., Laver, M. S., Lazarus, E., Rivero, I. V., ... & Tabassum, N. (2023, June). Board 346: NSF DUE 2142666 and NSF DUE 2142685. Collaborative Research-Engineering Empathetic Engineers (E^ 3): Effects of the Humanities on Engineers’ Critical Thinking and Empathy Skills. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L
/0950017020902968.[2] B. A. Schuelke-Leech, T. C. Leech, B. Barry, and S. Jordan-Mattingly, “Ethical Dilemmas for engineers in the development of autonomous systems,” International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, vol. 2018-Novem, pp. 49–54, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638282.[3] E. A. Cech and C. J. Finelli, “Learning to prioritize the public good: Does training in classes, workplaces, and professional societies shape engineers’ understanding of their public welfare responsibilities?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20590.[4] D. Oliver, “Whistle-Blowing Engineer,” vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 246–256, 2004.[5] J. Metcalf, E. Moss, and danah boyd, “Owning Ethics
About Gen Z So Far." Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/14/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and- facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far-2/ (accessed 1/8/24.[23] D. Riley, Engineering Thermodynamics and 21st Century Energy Problems: A Textbook Companion for Student Engagement (Synthesis Lectures on Engineering). Williston, VT: Morgan Claypool, 2011, p. 97 pages.[24] K. Johnson, J. A. Leydens, and B. M. Moskal, "Reflections on the integration of social justice concepts into an introductory control systems course (Work In Progress)," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016: ASEE.[25] C. A. Roberts and S. M. Lord, "Making Engineering