Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore, MD, http://www.abet.org.3. Vollaro, M.B., “Field Trips: An Innovative Approach in Teaching Manufacturing Processes to Traditional Undergraduates”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.4. Todd, R.H., W.E. Red, S.P. Magleby, and S. Coe, “Manufacturing: A Strategic Opportunity for Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 3, American Society for Engineering Education, July, 2001, pp. 397-405.5. Liou, F., “Curriculum Development for an Interdisciplinary manufacturing Engineering Program”, Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
leading aerospace manufacturing companies andprofessional societies to develop model curricula materials for manufacturing technicians andengineers working in the aerospace industry. This effort is funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF). These curricula will cover the gamut of the needs for manufacturingtechnologists in the aerospace industry and will also provide a common fluency in aerospacemanufacturing procedures, processes, and terminology. The need for a pool of skilled technologyworkers in this industry is highlighted by the aging of the existing workforce and demands forincreased manufacturing efficiency with an increasingly complex product. The civilian andmilitary aerospace industries share some common problems thereby making
Paper ID #19069Teaching Lean Principles through Simulation GamesDr. Faisal Aqlan, Penn State Behrend Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an assistant professor of industrial engineering at Penn State Behrend. He earned the B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering from Jordan University of Science and Technology in 2007 and 2010, respectively and the Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the State University of New York at Binghamton in 2013. Prior to joining the faculty at Behrend, Dr. Aqlan was a faculty member in industrial and system engineering at the University of New Haven where he taught undergraduate and graduate
position that enabled him to lecture in a number Arab countries. In Jordan he served as the Chairman of the Math and Computer Science department at Al-Isra University. In The United States he worked as an adjunct faculty at Wayne State University, University of Detroit Mercy and Oakland Community College. He held a position of the Math program leader at Focus: HOPE for several years. Sabah has been involved in engineering education paradigms since 1996, he coordinated work with university partners to develop new curriculum in engineering education with a support of NSF grant. Dr. Abro has work as a consultant in six sigma training and certification where he was exposed to manufacturing facilities and their practices. He
best grasped as a graphic representation of the edifice of the manufacturing sector. The original conception of the Four Pillars also identifies an extensive selection instructionaltopics that further define each of the pillars.8 As with all such topical specifications, there are farmore highly relevant topics than can practically be accommodated as distinct courses in a time-and resource-limited undergraduate curriculum. The crucial topics must, therefore, beincorporated into a curriculum as modules integrated throughout the curriculum. Moreover, theextensiveness of the list of relevant topics becomes a powerful argument for creating an bThe major events were: Manufacturing Education
vision, simulation and off-line programming. Actually, robot hands-on experience plays a key role in engineeringeducation. It is an effective tool for student learning, as well as for encouraging participation inclass learning and in research outside the classroom. In general, industrial robot programmingsubject can be integrated with the MET curriculum in three different ways: (1) for manufacturingautomation class that is specifically designed to teach students how to program differentindustrial robots; (2) for Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) class that is designed toteach students how to integrate industrial robots into a production system; (3) for advanced levelprogramming classes or other specific topics such as robotic simulation
theoverall distribution indicates that a cutoff of 10 publications is reasonable. Disregarding the Other topiccategories, the two highest occurrences are papers on Curriculum and Lab Based Learning. That thesetwo topics are so common is not very surprising, after all this is in an engineering education venue.Figure 2 – Top Paper Keyword Distribution Over All Years Page 25.155.4The Laboratory Learning papers, Figure 3, have grown to a high of 16 in 2009. The steady increase in thenumber of papers validates the importance of, and interest in, labs and laboratory work to manufacturingeducation. The data suggests that the number of lab papers
lower cost, ease of modifica-tion and the broad availability of replacement parts. In addition, the machines themselves are rel-atively easy to operate and require minimal training.This paper presents the selection and integration of desktop-scale, hobbyist CNC machines tominimize risks in an educational laboratory environment, and the integration of modern digitalfabrication CNC technology in the undergraduate mechanical engineering curriculum at the Uni-versity of Massachusetts Lowell. Through the use of lower-cost desktop CNC machines, studentsdirectly interface and interact with advanced machining technology and will be able to discoverthe rewards and challenges derived from translating a design to a functional prototype. Moreo-ver, through
AC 2011-2717: ACTIVE LEARNING THROUGH SAE BAJA COMPETI-TIONArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris UniversityTony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University Tony Kerzmann received both a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2004. After graduating, Tony Kerzmann enrolled in graduate school at the University of Pittsburgh where he graduated with a Master in Science and a Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Currently, he is an assistant professor at Robert Morris University, where his research goals include, hybrid concentrating photovoltaic systems, energy system life cycle
classroom. Teachers are also introduced to a rigorouscurriculum based on materials from the STEM Academy©. Project leaders and teacher-participants explore cross-curricular connections between Tennessee math, science, and CTE Page 23.383.2standards in addition to the integration of standards from the STEM Academy© curriculum. Theteachers are exposed to various advanced manufacturing technologies and machines available atTennessee Tech University to build real models of objects they have designed [2]. These tools,along with pedagogical best-practices in secondary education, are modeled for teacher-participants through case studies paired with problem
AC 2011-1492: CLICKER CLICKS ITWayne P Hung, Texas A&M University Dr. Hung is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M University and has a joint appointment with Depart- ment of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution and Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is an active member of ASEE, SME, HTEC and enjoys teaching and researching in the field of ad- vanced materials, micro manufacturing, and medical manufacturing. Page 22.330.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Clicker Clicks It!AbstractManufacturing requires
Engineering Education, 2013 An Application of the SME Four Pillars of Manufacturing KnowledgeIntroductionThe Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) published a detailed study of manufacturingeducational needs entitled “Curricula 2015: A Four Year Strategic Plan for Manufacturing Education”.A principle component of the study is the organization and visual representation of the key topics formanufacturing education into a graphical form that has been designated the"Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge". (See Figure 1 below)To assist in program and curriculum improvement of manufacturing engineering or technologyprograms, a survey was conducted of a broad audience including industry practitioners, managers,company owners and educators. The
by industrial/research communitiesincluding Rolls-Royce, Alstom, Newport News Ship Building, and Commonwealth Center forAdvanced Manufacturing (CCAM) etc., which partner with the Digital Manufacturing & DesignInnovation (DMDII) Institute in NNMI [2]. VSU recently received a generous NX PLM (ProductLife Management) gift from Siemens. NX PLM software integrates outstanding capabilities ofComputer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), computer-aidedengineering (CAE), product data management (PDM) and digital manufacturing. It is anexcellent platform for companies to manage the entire lifecycle of a product from ideation,design and manufacture, through service and disposal in an efficient and cost-effective way
students to embrace more elaborate, discipline-specific, critical thinking requiredof them in future courses. At sophomore, junior, and senior levels, courses were selected forcritical thinking, and professional ethics emphasizes. The students were encouraged to use criticalthinking skills to analyze requirements and constraints which would apply for advanced real-worldproblems. Significant improvement in critical thinking skills of students have been achievedthrough this sequence. An integrated thinking approach is adopted by Katz [3] to bridge the educational gapbetween analytical and design thinking for mechanical engineering students. The suggestedapproach is implemented by reforming science engineering courses by stressing the
, coach and educator. She has worked over 30 years as a leader in public, private, and non-profit sectors; most recently as the head of Organizational Effectiveness and Leadership Effectiveness at Honeywell, International. She has earned graduate degrees in Educational Psychology, Industrial Relations and Organizational Leadership. She is an author of several publications and two published books. Her specialty is developing leadership capacity to create high performing organizations. She focuses on styles and behaviors that fuel significant and sustainable change in leaders and organizations. She uses an integrated model that balances the inside-out and outside-in to developing leaders
, there is not an actual educational plan to integrate virtualtechniques into classroom teaching in order to improve the technical skills of the new upcomingworkforce15. The main goals of the cyber RP simulator are: 1) Motivate students in studyingmore internet based rapid manufacturing systems, 2) Strengthen and build up the technical,problem solving and communication skills of students in order to practice in the classroom, andapply it in the real working world.Problem IdentificationMany manufacturing industries are trying to virtually connect all its operations; an example of Page 23.361.6this is using E-manufacturing16. By E-manufacturing it
System. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Design and Construction of An Aesthetically Pleasing Vertical Axis WindTurbine (APVAWT) – A Case Study of Art and Engineering Collaboration in Engineering Capstone CourseAbstractThis paper proposes an enhanced approach for the capstone design course, as a part of theundergraduate engineering curriculum, through collaboration of art and engineering by designingand building an Aesthetically Pleasing Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (APVAWT). Suchcollaboration brings creativity to art and engineering students through an interdisciplinary projectconsidering both functionality and beauty for wind generation system.In order to assist the capstone
-sigma. This has hadrepercussion in the academic curriculum as well. More manufacturing engineering andmanufacturing technology programs alike have courses in lean manufacturing and six-sigmaquality management as a result. However, the actual impact of these efforts can be realized onlywhen an academic unit’s “product” (students) can deliver it at the workplace. In order to build apositive student learning in the 21st century world, one needs to follow different and moreinnovative and active learning approach in the classroom. This paper presents a conceptualframework of student learning lifecycle during a semester long course. The paper uses twodistinct case examples to demonstrate the proposed framework for enhancing the studentlearning in a
Page 22.558.3assessment from the introduction to engineering course are presented. A brief section on thecurrent state of the summer camps is also covered before the conclusions.ENGR 1010 Introduction to Engineering Course ProjectThis section presents the most recent attempts on integrating animatronics into ENGR 1010Introduction to Engineering course with a semester long project. The main objective of thisopen-ended team project is to design and develop an animated robot or puppet. The teams arecomposed of three to four students and required to follow a process based on product design anddevelopment. Main stages of the process are described below in their actual sequence: Concept Development: Through a brainstorming activity students
43 55%A crude conclusion that can be drawn from the data suggests that the respondents feel as if theywill have an impact but are inconsistently receiving support or encouragement from outside themanufacturing community.4. Curriculum ContentIt is the authors experience that there are multiple opinions about what should be taught in theManufacturing Curriculum. Ideally all of these topics would be included in a program. Howeverthe reality is that given the current time limitations adding new content requires the reduction/ Page 15.946.4removal of other content, development of new teaching methods, increase of degree time, post
courses in which engineering design is included. These courses are: • ENGR 200-Engineering Graphics, • MANE 310-CAD/CAM, • MANE 315-Manufacturing Automation, • MANE 420-Simulation, • ENGR 430-Quality Control, and • MANE 450-Manufacturing Design Implementation. Page 15.352.3These six major courses and some other courses distributed throughout the curriculum include elementsof design that adequately defines an integrated design experience for students in the manufacturingengineering program. During the senior year, students also may gain additional design experience in theirchosen ENGR/MANE elective
curriculum because of time and spacelimitations6,7. The integration of design and manufacturing experience into the undergraduatecurriculum is not a new challenge8,9. Design and manufacturing integration in the curriculum hasbeen usually done by including hands on project experience using Engineering Design course injunior level and Senior Projects10. However there has been always a barrier between design andmanufacturing courses. An attempt to integrate design projects into the Manufacturing Processescourse (MET1161) has been studied in this paper.2. MET1161 Manufacturing Processes CourseAt the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, Mechanical Engineering Technology students arerequired to take MET1161, Manufacturing Processes. This is typically
, University of South Florida Richard Gilbert is a Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida’s College of Engineering . Richard is the Co-PI for the grant that supports the NSF designated Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education in Florida, FLATE. FLATE, now in its 10 year of op- eration, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The latter was for the development of an engineering curriculum for elementary school
. Sustainability is an important issue for any organization in thetwenty first century and has become an integral part of the engineering practices and policies.Engineers have a critical role to achieve this with sustainable development. Engineers should notignore the challenges and opportunities that arise from the needing sustainability development,and sustainability is a key driver for new directions in engineering all the way from design tomanufacturing. Systems thinking, problem-finding, visualizing, improving, creative problem-solving and adaptability are the six types of cognitive abilities that engineering students need todevelop as identified by the Royal Academy of Engineering [1]. All the above mentionedrequires an understanding of multiple
AC 2008-2236: OUTCOME ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN A MANUFACTURINGENGINEERING PROGRAMJahangir Ansari, Virginia State University Jahangir Ansari is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering in the Department of Engineering and Technology at Virginia State University. He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1979 and Ph. D. degree in Mechanical Design and Production Engineering in 1983 both from Seoul National University. He joined the faculty at VSU in 2002. He has over 18 years of industrial experience in different areas including shipbuilding and cement plant industries. His research interests include Structural Vibration, FEM, CAD/CAM/CNC, and Computer Integrated
) State University of New York – Farmingdale, NY 11735Abstract:The project leading to this paper was carried out as part of SME’s efforts to prepare themanufacturing curricula for the year 2015 and beyond. In doing so, it considered the roleof manufacturing in the global economy, the factors affecting the scope of manufacturing,and the current efforts to revitalize manufacturing in the various parts of the world. Itthen reviewed the curricular models proposed to address the needs of the manufacturingindustry. As an extension of the analysis, recommendations were made on the key aspectsof a manufacturing curriculum with an emphasis on innovation and entrepreneurship.Further, the recommendations included the creation of a flexible degree program
this robot will provide an opportunity to educators to explore theknowledge of mechatronics that will eventually open a whole new world of learning to them.IntroductionRobots are much more likely to be used as learning tools for several subjects across theengineering curriculum. Designing a simple and low cost educational robot has become anincreasingly popular project for engineering and technology programs [1-2]. Robots are currentlyused in engineering and technology classrooms and are being incorporated into education. Mostof the schools use a robotics project in the Introduction to Engineering course to expose thefreshmen students to assembling, programing, and integrating systems to perform the task.The intent of this project is to design
AC 2012-4158: CASE STUDIES IN ENGINEERING ECONOMICS FORMANUFACTURING COMPETITIVENESSDr. Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University Priyadarshan Manohar is an Associate Professor of engineering at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, Penn. He has a Ph.D. in materials engineering (1998) and graduate diploma in computer science (1999) from the University of Wollongong, Australia, and he holds a bachelor’s of engineering (metallurgical engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a postdoctoral Fellow at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2001-2003), and at BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Prod- ucts, Australia (1998-2001). Manohar held the position of Chief Materials Scientist at
thoroughly. There is a logical path to befollowed in the realization of the product. The rubric can be most readily illustrated through thefollowing instructions that are issued to students undertaking a project to design a manufacturingsystem for a given product.9 The context is that student teams in a ‘production engineering’class fulfill the learning objectives for the course through a semester-long project. Student teamsdesign a production system for an existing product. The products have been as varied as caststeel flow control valves, printed circuit boards and fishing reels. Integrated into the fabric of theproject, students are challenged to critique the product design to improve manufacturability andreduce cost. The first three stages of
Engineer in Florida.Dr. Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida Richard Gilbert is a Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida’s College of Engineering . Richard is the Co-PI for the grant that supports the NSF designated Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education in Florida, FLATE. FLATE, now in its 13 year of op- eration, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The latter was for the development of an