. Page 24.1350.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Using the Four Pillars of Manufacturing Engineering Model to AssessCurricular Content for Accreditation PurposesAbstractMany manufacturing programs seek accreditation from ABET1 (formerly The AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology) and ATMAE2 (The Association of Technology,Management, and Applied Engineering). Both ABET and ATMAE provide accreditationstandards, proposed and endorsed through professional organizations such as the SME3, that areused for self assessment by manufacturing programs. On a regular basis ABET and ATMAEevaluate compliance of accredited programs, including visiting institutions to review assessmentprocesses for
that could be rapidly reconfigured to meet changes to a product’s design or production volume. Sponsors of this work included Ford, GM and Chrysler. In 2003 he joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia as junior chair of an NSERC sponsored research program in Virtual Machining. After 3 years at UBC, he moved to the Department of Engineering Technology at Western Washington University to focus on teaching. His teaching and scholarship interests lie in the areas of design, CAD/CAM, CAPP and CNC machining. Dr. Yip-Hoi is currently director of Western’s Manufacturing Engineering Program.Dr. David Gill P.E., Western Washington University Dr. David Gill is an
Paper ID #34464Factory 4.0 Toolkit for Smart Manufacturing TrainingDr. Joseph Dennis Cuiffi, Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington Dr. Joseph Cuiffi is the Program Coordinator for the Electro-Mechanical Engineering Technology pro- gram at Penn State New Kensington. He is a graduate of Penn State with an honors B.S. and a Ph.D. in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, focused on semiconductor processing. His current interests are in Smart Manufacturing education and workforce development.Prof. Haifeng Wang, Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington Dr. Haifeng Wang has received degrees of Doctor of
Paper ID #22050MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engi-neering Design CourseMr. Seref Yagli, Harmony Public School I have coached four different robotics clubs this school year, which are: Wex’s robotics club, FTC (First Tech Challenge) club, FRC (First Robotics Competition), and SeaPerch Underwater Robotics. My teams have won championships, as well as technical and designing awards at FLL competitions. I also began teaching Robotics and Automation and Concepts of Engineering and Technology, classes in which stu- dents learn to apply engineering and designing skills as well as robotic coding
AC 2009-1652: THE INTEGRATION OF HANDS-ON MANUFACTURINGPROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS WITHIN ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES: AWORK IN PROGRESSGeorge Gray, Texas Tech GEORGE D. GRAY Mr. Gray is an instructor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas. He is the former Dean of Applied and Engineering Technologies division at Wichita Area Technical College in Wichita, Kansas and former department chair and associate professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department at Texas State Technical College in Waco, Texas. Page 14.1230.1© American Society for
Paper ID #13651MAKER: Applying 3D Printing to Model Rocketry to Enhance Learning inUndergraduate Engineering Design ProjectsDr. Sven G. Bilen, Pennsylvania State University, University Park SVEN G. BILEN,´ Ph.D., P.E. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Electrical Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering at Penn State and Head of the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs. His educational research interests include developing techniques for enhanc- ing engineering design education, innovation in design, teaching technological entrepreneurship, global product design, and systems
, NASA, DoEd, KSEF and LMC. He is currently serving as an editor of Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces.Dr. Aditya Akundi, University of Texas, El Paso Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering department, and Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems at University of Texas, ElPaso. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Intrigued by Systems Engineering , he earned a Ph.D in Electrical and Computer Engineering, with a concentration
AC 2008-1165: A PROJECT-BASED ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURINGLABORATORY COURSE FOR LOWER-DIVISION ENGINEERING STUDENTSJianbiao Pan, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Jianbiao (John) Pan is an assistant professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA. After completing a PhD at Lehigh University in Industrial Engineering in 2000, he joined the optoelectronics center at Lucent Technologies/Agere Systems as a member of technical staff. He received a M.E degree in Manufacturing Engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, and a B.E. degree in Mechatronics from Xidian University, Xian, China. Dr. Pan's research interests include
Paper ID #12556Anatomy of Assessment of Manufacturing Design Engineering Academic Pro-gram – Do’s and Don’tsDr. Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor at the Department of Applied Engineering at National University, Cali- fornia. Dr. Viswanathan is an educator, researcher and administrator with more than twenty-five years of industrial and academic experience encompassing engineering and environmental consulting, research and development, and technology development. Career experience includes teaching at the University level, conducting fundamental research, and developing continuing educational
. 346-374, 2013.[5] – C. Spezia, D. Thomas, “Tool, Techniques and Class Experience with On-DemandMultimedia Content in an Electric Machines Course,” in Proceedings of the 2012 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. June 10-13, 2012, SanAntonio, Texas, American Society of Engineering Education, 2012.[6] H. Sheybani, G. Javidi, “Teaching an Online Technology Course Through InteractiveMultimedia,” in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition. June 12-15, 2005, Portland, Oregon, American Society of EngineeringEducation, 2005.[7] K. Williams, and C. Williams, “Five Key Ingredients for Improving Motivation,” Research inHigher Education Journal, vol. 12
AC 2007-263: INDIVIDUAL PROJECT-BASED APPROACH TO DEVELOPRESEARCH APTITUDE IN MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING STUDENTSJitendra Tate, Texas State University-San Marcos Dr. Jitendra S. Tate is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology at Texas State University-San Marcos. He teaches courses in Materials Engineering, Plastics and Composites Manufacturing, Engineering Design Graphics, and Computer Aided Engineering. His research interests include low cost manufacturing of composites, mechanical characterization of composites under static and dynamic loading, fatigue life prediction modeling, finite element analysis, CADD, and statistical analysis. He is a member of several
engineering education. He has developed flipped classroom modules and also implements project based learning activities in his class activities.Dr. Aditya Akundi, University of Texas, El Paso Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering department, and Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems at University of Texas, ElPaso. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Intrigued by Systems Engineering , he earned a Ph.D in Electrical and Computer
proposedthat the teaching – learning environment could be enhanced, enriched and made more effectiveby incorporating digital technology as an integral part of the teaching methods. The variousdigital resources incorporated into teaching a set of courses in Manufacturing Engineering majorare listed. The effectiveness of these resources and the new teaching method is demonstrated viaABET outcomes assessment and student feedback survey. Page 13.904.8References 1. Manohar P. A.: A Memo to the Budding Professor, July 2007, TMS, http://materialstechnology.tms.org/TECarticle.asp?articleID=1051 2. Friedman T. L.: The World is Flat: A Brief
Paper ID #15109Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) Integration throughout aManufacturing Engineering CurriculumDr. Daniel J. Waldorf, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Dan Waldorf, Professor in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, joined the Cal Poly faculty in 1998 after two years in Chicago as a Quality/Manufacturing Engineer at ATF, Inc., a supplier of specialty cold-formed and machined components for automotive applications. At ATF he implemented process control technologies, taught and instituted quality control systems, and designed experiments in a tra- ditional manufacturing environment
provides a variety of professional development for STEM and technology secondary and post-secondary educators focused on advanced technologies. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Environmental) from the University of South Florida, where her research fo- cused on membrane separation science and technologies for water purification. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curricula for engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high school, and post secondary institutions, including colleges of engineering. Dr. Barger has presented at many national conferences including the American Association of
AC 2009-284: A PROJECT-BASED ACTIVE AND COOPERATIVE LEARNINGAPPROACH TO IMPROVING MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING EDUCATIONNing Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education in the College of Engineering at Utah State University. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes, and lean product design. He earned his PhD, MS, and BS degrees in Mechanical Engineering and is the author of more than 60 technical papers published in refereed international journals and conference proceedings. He is a Senior
Green Fund committee. His research interests are in Systems Engineering & Architecture, Complex systems, Systems testing and Application of Entropy to Complex Systems. Email: sakundi@miners.utep.eduDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and graduate levels
AC 2012-3073: PRACTICAL HANDS-ON INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS LAB-ORATORY DEVELOPMENTDr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a professor of engineering at Robert Morris University School of Engineering, Math- ematics, and Science. He also serves as a Director of Engineering Laboratories, as well as Co-head of the Research and Outreach Center. He has been an active member of ASEE and SME, serving as an officer of both societies and engaged in engineering education and K-12 outreach. Page 25.1050.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Practical
same time reduce theneed to seek special variation acceptance when the part has not been made to the specifiedtolerance.Our manufacturing engineers, technologists and managers, should be thoroughly taught theseconcepts so that they can promote these ideas to front line manufacturing people on the shopfloor to achieve world-class manufacturing quality levels.i Keeping it Clean and Lean, Australian manufacturing Technology July2007http://www.leandesign.com/pdf/AMTIL_July_2007.pdfii Bhote & Bhote, 2000, World Class Quality, AMACOM - American Management Association, NYiii Ross, P. J., 1987, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineersiv Bhote & Bhote, 2000, World Class Quality, AMACOM - American Management Association, NYv Mehta
Tucker, Tucker Innovations Dr. Tommy Tucker is the CEO and owner of Tucker Innovations. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He has over 15 years of experience writing computationally intensive software applications for engineering, medical, and defense applications. After spending the early part of his career at high tech start-up companies, Dr. Tucker founded Tucker Innovations to fa- cilitate his software consulting activities. Through Tucker Innovations, Dr. Tucker has aided various organizations in producing software applications from concept to product launch and continuing through multiple release cycles. Clients range from small high tech startup companies to
Leadership WorkshopsABSTRACT This paper describes enhancement of green energy and manufacturing subjects using aproject based learning and leadership workshops as an educational strategy in a newmanufacturing engineering program. There are a number of challenges facing green energymanufacturing from industrial perspective. For example, green energy manufacturing is acomplex and technology-concentrated set of processes; therefore, it requires a very specializedand experienced workforce. In this paper, a LEGO® based project and various “Green EnergyManufacturing (GEM)” leadership workshops, which are used to enhance student’s professionalsuccess, are introduced. Basically, a semester long GEM project using LEGO® and a fewgeneral and technical
of Engineering Technology, Senior Research Fellow and Maker Space Co-Director for the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research at Texas State University, and a licensed Professional Engineer. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. from the University of Texas at Austin in Structural Engineering. Her undergraduate degrees in History and in Construction Engineering and Management are from North Carolina State University. Dr. Talley teaches courses in the Construction Science and Management Program, and her research focus is in student en- gagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: kgt5@txstate.edu c American Society for Engineering Education
smart phones and cloud-basedsoftware to help develop new course materials while the students in the class were exposed to 3Dscanning with 123D Catch. This reverse engineering technology content is in addition to thereverse engineering project student teams have to complete by usually studying a commercial toythrough the reverse engineering methodology.3D Scanning with Conventional Equipment and Smart PhonesTypical commercial 3D scanners involve either the use of a mobile laser source, camera and asoftware program in the case of a FARO arm or a still camera, turntable, and a software programin the case of Konica Minolta Vivid 910. Software programs make use of multiple scans fromdifferent angles to put together a 3D object. The Konica Minolta
Conference of American Society of Engineering Education.[5] Singh, P. J., Feng, M., & Smith, A. (2006). ISO 9000 series of standards: comparison ofmanufacturing and service organisations. International Journal of Quality & ReliabilityManagement, 23(2), 122-142.[6] Poksinska, B., Jörn Dahlgaard, J., & Antoni, M. (2002). The state of ISO 9000 certification: astudy of Swedish organizations. The TQM Magazine, 14(5), 297-306.[7] Park, C. W., et al. (2009). Energy consumption reduction technology in manufacturing—Aselective review of policies, standards, and research. International Journal of PrecisionEngineering and Manufacturing, 10(5), 151-173.[8] Goldberg, J. R. (2009). Preparing students for capstone design [senior design
secondary and post-secondary Career and Technical Education programs; and provides a variety of professional development for STEM and techni- cal educators focused on advanced technologies. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Environmental) from the Uni- versity of South Florida, where her research focused on membrane separation science and technologies for water purification. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curricula for engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high school, and post secondary institutions, including colleges of engineering. Dr. Barger serves on several national panels and
learned, moretime and money should be allocated for this type of project. The engineering studentsneeded to practice communicating more frequently and effectively with CDP staff, andassessment tools should be carefully designed to probe for evidence of intended studentlearning outcomes.5. References[1] Chan Wirashinghe, “Engineering Education for Leadership in the 21st Centry,” In theProceedings of the Technological Education and National Development Conference,“Crossroads of the New Millennium” April 8-10, 2000, Abu Dhabi, United ArabEmirates.[2] Donna C.S. Summers, Charlie P. Edmonson, “Are We Asking Our Students to DoToo Many Projects?,” Proc. 2004 ASEE Annual Conf., Session 2249, CD-ROM, 9 pages,June 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.[3] Vladimir
engineering students, and engineering students with mental health disabilities.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab that aspires to elevate the experiences of marginalized populations, dismantle systematic injustices, and transform the way inclusion is culti- vated in engineering through the implementation of novel technologies and methodologies in engineering education. Intrigued by the intersections of engineering education
for Design Research (CDR). Currently teaching at Stanford ME 310I: The Essential Elements of New Product Development: Business and Industry PerspectivesMs. Yulia Yadgarova P.E., Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMs. Anastasia Stelvaga, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Anastasia Stelvaga received Ms. Degree in Physics from Novosibirsk State University in 2014. Currently Anastasia is involved in the Master program at Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology held in conjunction with Massachusetts Institute of Technology , program title Advanced Manufacturing and Product Design. She specializes in automation and robotics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
. Eachtechnology provides teams with the ability to increase the complexity and effectiveness of therobots they design and build. Although there is a significant time constraint on this project, theaddition of rapid prototyping has led to better designed, well-engineered, more efficient, andmore capable robots. These technologies have benefited the design project by not only aidingstudents in the ability to develop more complex ideas, but it has also allowed the program todevelop more difficult course objectives. With this advanced technology and greater ability todesign and fabricate innovative solutions to the objectives, FEH can create more intricate robotcourses in the future without poorly impacting the student success rate in the project.There are
years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be