Manufacturing.Amir Javaheri, Virginia State University Amir Javaheri is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and a member of graduate faculty at Virginia State University. He received his M.S. degree in Operations Management from Case Western University and a PH.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Cincinnati. His current research interests are primarily in the assessment of student learning in various stages of program objectives, program outcomes and course learning outcomes.Stephen S. Tompkins, Virgina State University Stephen S. Tompkins – Currently an associate professor in Manufacturing Engineering at VSU. Areas of major interest are solid mechanics, materials and thermal
procedure with variable time step size adjuster. The time step size isvaried between 10-4 second and 10-6 second, such that convergence is achieved. Page 13.1115.6The following numerical values are used in the numerical computationsMx = 90kg, My = 120kg,Kx = 108 N/m, Ky = 108 N/m,Cx = 1900 N-s/m, and Cy = 2200N-s/mThe above damping values are based on a damping ratio of 1% of the critical dampingcalculated from the stiffness data. The mass and stiffness values correspond to that of atypical CNC machine. The stiffness values correspond to those of the lead screwsdriving the two tables. These values may vary somewhat from the nominal values, butfor this
Corporate Strategy.3 In his book Fusion Management, Stanley Marash notes that since the 1960’s more than 32quality programs have come and gone at an average of almost one per year. He further noted theemergence of a common pattern: “A few pioneer companies adopt or develop a program andachieve great success. The business press takes notice and other companies seek to emulate thepioneers. But as the idea spreads it becomes diluted. Senior management tries to adopt the modelwithout ever really comprehending what is required to make the program successful.”4 It appearsfrom the review of recent articles there is some lack of understanding regarding the evolution ofSix Sigma and Lean.What is Six Sigma?While Six Sigma began as a quality program at
" " S A c a d e m i c t a r t Y e a r
’ solutions, and repetition through the term to reinforce the concept that Lean is a processand not an event. This paper contains recommendations for other instructors based on theexperience at Cleveland State University, and at other institutions.References[1] K. W. Stier, “Teaching Lean Manufacturing Concepts through Project-Based Learning and Simulation”, J. Industrial Technology, 19 (4), Aug.-Oct. 2003. Page 13.834.12[2] J. K. Liker, The Toyota Way, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.[3] P. T. Terenzini, A. F. Cabrera, C. L. Colbeck, J. M. Parente, and S. A. Bjorklund, “Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students
software, further optimization is required by doing a series of testruns.Even for small-manufacturing runs, this approach can be applied. The performance baselinesmake a very good starting point to help use the machine’s capabilities fully. A well-plannedapplication of HPM can see a 50% or better cycle time reduction, increasing the manufacturingthroughput by a factor of two. The time expended in applying HSM methodologies pays offalmost immediately, since the performance gains can be applied to manufacturing processes forboth existing and new parts.Bibliography1. Woody, B. A. & Smith, S. K. (2006). High Speed Machining Technology Basics, SME Technical Report.2. Arone, M. (1998). High Performance Machining. Hanser Gardner Publications.3. Oberg
project to facilitate student learning of the newsoftware.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the Center for 21st Century Teaching Excellence for their supportof this project through the Innovative Teaching Grant.Bibliography1. DARPA http://www.darpa.mil/mto/mems/presentations/memsatdarpa3.pdf2. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., “Learning by doing”, Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 37(4), 2003, pp. 282- 283.3. Hall, S. R., Waitz, I., Brodeur, D. R., Soderholm, D. H., and Nasr, R., “Adoption of Active Learning in a Lecture-Based Engineering Class,” 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.4. Impelluso, T. and Metoyer-Guidry, T., “Virtual reality and learning by design: Tools for integrating
companyrestrictions (e.g.; US citizenship) the project is designated and arrangements made for a plantvisit. Typically, a 1-2 hour meeting with the company includes an explanation of their business, ageneral description of the operation(s) to be simulated, and a tour of the plant and specificoperation(s). Data is provided then and upon request, including pictures and videos if available.The team observes the plant operations, discuss the issues and company expectations, gatherrelevant data and information, and begin creation of the simulation. Additional plant visits andcompany communications are the responsibility of the students. A Gantt chart from MicrosoftProject is submitted weekly, and the professor monitors project progress. Technical support atDelmia
. (2006). Introduction to Sustainable Quality Systems Design. Lexington: KY: Arlie Hall, Ed.D., LLC.4. Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study. Cambridge, MA.5. Senge, Peter. F. (1985) The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday, New York, NY6. Shingo, S. (1989). A study of the Toyota Production System: From an IndustrialEngineering Viewpoint. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Management Association.7. Hall, A. (1987). Structured Videotape Instruction. Lexington, KY: IBM Corporation8. Slavin, Robert E. .(1981). Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. Published in Education Leadership,Volume 38, #8.9. Cho, Fujio. (1994). Toyota Production System at TMM Georgetown Plant: A
, Belgium. http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/lce2006/139.pdf 3. D. M. Qualters, J.A. Isaacs, T. P. Cullinane, A. McDonald, and J. Laird, “Assessment of Shortfall: A Board Game on Environmental Decisionmaking”, Proceedings of ASEE 2006 Annual Conference and Exposition, June 18 - 21, 2006, Chicago IL, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC, CD-ROM. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=10324/ Page 13.654.124. S. Sivak, M. Sivak, J.A. Isaacs, J. Laird, “Evolution of Multiplayer Educational Simulations: Board Games to Broadband”, GLS: Games, Learning & Society Conference 3.0, July
, J., & Chen J., (1995) The Role of Decouplers in JIT Pull Apparel Cells. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology. Volume 7 Number 1, 17-35 2) Black, J., & Hunter, S. (2003) Lean Manufacturing Systems and Cell Design. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers 3) Kolar, R., & Sabatini, D.A. (2000). Environmental Modeling- A Project Driven, Team Approach to Theory and Application. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 201-207. 4) Liou, F., Allada, V. Leu, M., Mishra, R., Okafor, A., & Agrawal, A. (2002). A Product Focused Manufacturing Curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2709-2718. 5) Monden, Y., (1993) Toyota Production System an Integrated Approach to Just-In
, C., McMillin, S., “Using Scan Data for Reverse Engineering”, Society of Manufacturing Engineers – Technical Quarterly # TQ 98PUB32, 1998.4. “Manufacturing Technology Awareness Module for Pre-College Curriculum,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers – Technical Paper # TP90PUB123, 1990.5. Cox, L., “Developing a Reverse Engineering Project for Computer Integrated Manufacturing Course,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers – Technical Paper # TP05PUB223, 2005.6. NextEngine Inc., https://www.nextengine.com7. Roland DGA Corporation, http://www.rolanddga.com/asd/products/scanners/8. Polhemus, http://www.polhemus.com9. 3D Digital Corporation, http://www.3ddigitalcorp.com10. McNeel North America, http
alsocontribute to lowering the costs of operating laboratories. Additionally, online virtuallaboratories will provide the opportunity for students to explore the advanced technologiesapplied in implementing web-based remote control/monitor solutions, so to prepare them fortheir future careers.Current technology enables the remote access of equipment and instruments via the Internet.With the rapid developments of computer networks and Internet technologies along withdramatic improvements in the processing power of personal computers, online virtuallaboratories are now a reality [2]. In the early 1990’s, the first remotely shared control systemlaboratory was proposed in the 1991 ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference. The systemenables sharing of
layout. The established B-24 bomber facility was assembling anairplane a day, and there was felt a need to increase production to 25 bombers a day. Sorensen,using his 35 years of experience in designing and building manufacturing plants was able toenvision how the plant should be structured after an overnight thinking spree on the day he andEdsel Ford visited the old bomber manufacturing facility. The proposed macro-flow of the plantwas created by Sorensen on a piece of paper, and was accepted and signed by Edsel Ford.Eventually, the US Government funded the two-hundred million dollar manufacturing plant fromwhich 8,800 B-24’s rolled off the assembly line in six years with over 34 thousand employeesworking at its peak employment level of what
Design Figure 4: Project Organization for Product Innovation in the Bison Microventure Innovation TeamUp-to-the-Minute: As this paper is being written, the Microventure team is expanding. Afterthe first month of working to the prototype-development tasking, it became apparent thatadditional skill sets are needed. Three new engineering students and two microbiology majorswere added to the Team in January. Two of the new engineering students have assumed theassignment for testing, and the other is partnering in the process design task. The student(s) frombiological sciences support the material, coating and testing groups by providing moreknowledgeable input on such matters as bone growth mechanisms and
the front and Page 13.865.7back end for the team managing the run. Each production run consists of the followingactivities: • Lab (factory) set-up: The afternoon and evening before the production run, the management team takes charge of the lab/s needed for their production run. They reconfigure the lab (as allowed) including moving workstations and selected equipment. They set up all equipment, tooling and processes per their production plan as well as the inventory control system per their materials management plan. The quality control system they designed is set up including measurement and data
automated systems for use as a learning tool and reference.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0238269. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Hsieh, S. "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15, 2005, Portland, OR.2. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, RP. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goal and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.3. Abelson, R.P. (1981). Psychological status of the script
Students through a Project-Based Cooperative Learning Approach,” Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontier in Education Conference, November 6-9, 2002, Boston, MA, Section F2A, pp. 1-6.23. Fincher, S. and Petre, M., “Problem-Based Learning Practices in Computer Science Education,” Proceedings of 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference.24. Ju, W., Oehlberg, L., and Leifer, L., “Project-Based Learning for Experimental Design Research,” Proceedings of International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, September 2-3, 2004, Delft, the Netherlands.25. Thomas, J.W., “A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning,” available at https://www.bie.org/files/researchreviewPBL.pdf26. PCB Design Tools’ Webpage at http