2006-225: TECHNOLOGY, CULTURE AND THE MANUFACTURING ENGINEER:HOW STUDYING SME’S IN CAMBODIA CAN TEACH MANUFACTURINGSTUDENTS ABOUT GLOBAL ENTERPRISEVal Hawks, Brigham Young UniversityMichael Miles, Brigham Young University Page 11.1242.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Technology, Culture and the Manufacturing Engineer: How studying SME’s in Cambodia can help teach manufacturing students about global enterprise IntroductionIn his book “The World is Flat”, Thomas Friedman describes what he calls “the quiet crisis” asthe “erosion of America’s science and engineering base, which has
hours after Bob received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering Technology from California Polytechnical University, he began his career with General Motors in Southern California. Bob had many challenging assignments in the vehicle assembly side of the business on the factory floor in Industrial Engineering, Tooling, Production Supervision and Future Production Planning. His manufacturing expertise lead to assignments in vehicle design bringing real world production concerns and processes into the product engineering activity to design in quality and buildability. Bob’s manufacturing and engineering expertise were also applied during an assignment at Hughes Aircraft on
industries (biomedical equipment). • Attending sessions at professional conferences and trade exhibits: Students attended Materials Science and Technology ’05 conference, trade exhibition, and a four hour Materials Camp organized by ASM. Materials camp consisted of eight displays: bio-, and cryogenic- materials, manufacturing engineering, non- destructive testing, corrosion, plastics, mechanical testing and shape memory alloys. Students gained valuable experience through their participation in the hands-on exhibits at these displays. The students also enjoyed the exhibit in the MS&T trade show by the Pittsburgh Artist – Blacksmiths Association, where an induction coil was set up to heat bars of
processes’, such as has been taught for manyyears on many campuses. Such an option would also draw upon other commonly offeredcourses in mechanics, materials, electronics, quality control and engineering economics. Theinvestment for the minimalist scenario is quite small The ‘process engineering’ course in this scenario should focus on product engineering andprocess engineering. The product engineering portion of this course would concentrate on partsthat would be fabricated and subsequently assembled into usable products. Parts would bedefined in some detail as to features, dimensions, tolerances, fits, finishes and the processesthrough which the material transformations are affected. Basic concepts of group technology arequite useful in this
was recently modified by the author who is the new instructor. During theplanning stage, the author studied the existing literature 1,2,3,4,5,6 and came up with hisconcept. His initial objective was to present a variety of different control technologies asoptions to prospective manufacturing engineers without contradicting the current coursedescription and the objectives as presented below in Table 1 This course provides an in-depth treatment of the methods and techniques used for the implementation of automated device control, both digital and Course analog. The student will achieve a mastery of both open and closed loop Description control methods and algorithms including
learned, moretime and money should be allocated for this type of project. The engineering studentsneeded to practice communicating more frequently and effectively with CDP staff, andassessment tools should be carefully designed to probe for evidence of intended studentlearning outcomes.5. References[1] Chan Wirashinghe, “Engineering Education for Leadership in the 21st Centry,” In theProceedings of the Technological Education and National Development Conference,“Crossroads of the New Millennium” April 8-10, 2000, Abu Dhabi, United ArabEmirates.[2] Donna C.S. Summers, Charlie P. Edmonson, “Are We Asking Our Students to DoToo Many Projects?,” Proc. 2004 ASEE Annual Conf., Session 2249, CD-ROM, 9 pages,June 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.[3] Vladimir
2006-884: USE OF PHYSICAL SIMULATION AND A COMMON PRODUCTTHROUGH A SERIES OF COURSES TO ILLUSTRATE INDUSTRIAL ANDMANUFACTURING ENGINEERING PRINCIPLESCharles Winarchick, Sinclair Community College Associate Professor Industrial Engineering Technology at Sinclair Community College since 2001. Prior to that had 32 years industrial experience with General Motors and Delphi.Tom Carlisle, Sinclair Community College Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology at Sinclair Community College for 26 years. Page 11.1370.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Use of Physical Simulation and a Common Product through a
2006-2116: MANUFACTURING SIMULATION FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECTSPaul Nutter, Ohio Northern University Paul Nutter, CMfgE, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technological Studies at Ohio Northern University. He has been teaching industrial technology for six years, and has 26 years experience in manufacturing and industrial engineering. Paul is active in the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, serving as chair of the Student Relations Subcommittee for 2005, and on the Member Council for 2006. Page 11.910.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Manufacturing
2006-721: MANUFACTURING LABORATORY LEARNING MODULES ONCAD/CAM/CMM AND ROBOTICSR. Radharamanan, Mercer University Dr. R. Radharamanan is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. He has twenty-eight years of teaching, research, and consulting experiences. His previous administrative experiences include: President of International Society for Productivity Enhancement (ISPE), Acting Director of Industrial Engineering as well as Director of Advanced Manufacturing Center at Marquette University, and Research Director of CAM and Robotics Center at San Diego State University. His primary
2006-545: COGNITIVE SUPPORT FOR LEARNING PLC PROGRAMMING:COMPUTER-BASED CASE STUDIESSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Sheng-Jen (“Tony”) Hsieh is an Associate Professor and member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is a Halliburton Faculty Fellow for 2005-2006. His research interests include intelligent manufacturing system design, virtual instrumentation, thermal profiling for process and product characterization, and simulation and modeling. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory, a state-of
2006-37: AUTOMATION LABORATORY DEVELOPMENT ENHANCESSTUDENT LEARNINGDavid Farrow, University of Tennessee-Martin David Farrow is an Assistant Professor at the University of Tennessee at Martin. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. degree from the University of Texas at Arlington in 1989, 1990, and 1995, respectively. Dr. Farrow has taught courses in solid modeling, mechanical vibrations, automatic controls, automated production systems, and instrumentation and experimental methods at the University of Tennessee at Martin for three and a half years.Robert LeMaster, University of Tennessee-Martin Robert LeMaster is an Associate Professor at the University of
2006-878: RECRUITING STUDENTS WITH A NEW IMAGE OFMANUFACTURINGGilah Pomeranz, Sinclair Community CollegeMonica Pfarr, Sinclair Community CollegeSean Falkowski, University of Dayton Page 11.1069.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Recruiting Students with a New Image of ManufacturingWhether it is in spite of or because of an apparently improving American economy, theUS is facing a national shortage of highly skilled employees for today’s advanced, highlytechnological manufacturing industry. The already existing shortage is growing rapidly,and both government agencies and industry are consistent in this single message: Findand educate new workers and upgrade the skills of
2006-1514: STANDARDIZATION – LEARNING FROM THE PAST; PREPARINGFOR THE FUTUREAlan Leduc, Ball State University Alan Leduc is an Associate Professor in the Manufacturing Engineering Technology program at Ball State University. Page 11.1146.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Standardization Learning from Past; Preparing for the FutureAbstractThis paper will look at the importance of standardization on manufacturing. The paper willcompare and contrast ANSI B4.1 Preferred Limits and Fits for Cylindrical Parts and ANSI B4.2Preferred Metric Limits and Fits and
2006-1216: ASSESSMENT OF SHORTFALL: A BOARD GAME ONENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONMAKINGDonna Qualters, Northeastern University DONNA M. QUALTERS is an Associate Professor in the School of Education and the Director of the Center for Effective University Teaching at Northeastern University in Boston, MA. She is responsible for supporting excellence in teaching for faculty and graduate teaching assistants at NU. Her research focuses on learning/teaching, educational assessment, and teacher identity.Jacqueline Isaacs, Northeastern University JACQUELINE A. ISAACS is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University in Boston, MA. Her research focuses
2006-2133: CAN MUSEUM BE A GOOD VENUE FOR MANUFACTURINGEDUCATION?Zbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Dr. Pasek is an Associate Professor at the Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor, Canada. He was previously with University of Michigan. His research interests include manufacturing automation and system design, engineering education, and decision-making processes in organizations. Page 11.305.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Can Museum Be a Good Venue for Manufacturing Education?AbstractA growing gap between technology use and
2006-544: AUTOMATED ROBOTIC WORKCELL DESIGN TOOLKIT -PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Sheng-Jen (“Tony”) Hsieh is an Associate Professor and member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is a Halliburton Faculty Fellow for 2005-2006. His research interests include intelligent manufacturing system design, virtual instrumentation, thermal profiling for process and product characterization, and simulation and modeling. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory, a state-of-the-art
2006-15: TEACHING LEAN MANUFACTURING ON A DISTANCE LEARNINGPLATFORM USING VIRTUAL SIMULATIONMerwan Mehta, East Carolina UniversityRichard Monroe, East Carolina University Richard W. Monroe is associate professor of Technology Systems focusing on Distribution and Logistics at East Carolina University in Greenville, NC. He completed his Ph.D. at Old Dominion University in 1997 and completed his M.S. at Western New England College in 1990. His dissertation research was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. He has almost 20 years of industry experience in industrial engineering prior to his academic career. He is a member of ASEM, APICS, ASQ, and a senior member of IIE
2006-1708: EDUCATING THE BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGERS OF THEFUTURE: THE SIX SIGMA TECHNIQUESPatricio Torres, Purdue University Mr. PATRICIO TORRES, M.B.A. earned a double major: Business Administration and Law in his native country, Ecuador, S.A. In 2003, he obtained an M.B.A. degree with a major in Operations in Purdue University, Indiana. His professional experience includes Finance, Marketing and Operations. He was a Mathematics teacher in the Catholic University of Ecuador (1991-1995). He published an article in the journal "The Progressive," (Ecuador, 1998) and in the "American Society of Engineering Education," where he also presented a conference (U.S.A. 2005). A
Students, Proceedings ofthe 1999 ASME Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nashville TN, Nov. 1999,ASME Publ. DE-Vol. 102, Mechanical Engineering Design Education: Issues and Case Studies,pp 1-6.4. Gol, Nafalski, and McDermott, “The Role of Industry-Inspired Projects in EngineeringEducation”, Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, session F3E,Reno, NV, October 10-13, 2001.5. M. Miles, D. Melton, M. Ridges, and C. Harrell: “The Benefits of Experiential Learning inManufacturing Education”, Journal of Engineering Technology, Spring 2005, pp. 24-28. Page 11.1457.9
2006-2513: THE DISTRIBUTED RECONFIGURABLE FACTORY TESTBED(DRFT): A COLLABORATIVE CROSS-UNIVERSITY MANUFACTURINGSYSTEM TESTBED.Jonathan Luntz, University of MichiganE. Emanuel Almeida, University of MichiganDawn Tilbury, University of MichiganJames Moyne, University of MichiganKeith Hargrove, Morgan State University Page 11.1274.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 The Distributed Reconfigurable Factory Testbed (DRFT): A Collaborative Cross-University Manufacturing System TestbedAbstract As a collaborative effort between the University of Michigan (UM), and Morgan State Univer-sity (MSU) in Baltimore, a Distributed Reconfigurable Factory Testbed
the faculties of the University of Texas at Arlington, University of Arkansas at Little Rock and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign prior to joining the UT-Tyler faculty.David Beams, University of Texas-Tyler DAVID M. BEAMS is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler. He received his BS and MS degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in and the Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has had over 16 years of industrial experience in addition to his 8 years with UT-Tyler. He is a licensed professional engineer in Wisconsin and Texas and holds or shares four patents