Cooperative Learning (PB-ACL) ApproachFigure 1 shows the overall framework of the project-based active and cooperative learningapproach. This approach consists of three well-integrated tasks. Task 1 focuses on developing acomputer software program for machining simulations. Task 2 focuses on developing theassociated business plan. Task 3 focuses on the written and oral presentation of the project. Task 1: Develop a computer simulation software program
. Inventory is very cost and should be reduced without other considerations. B. There is no consequence in using of plant machines and equipments. C. Production lines should have a straight-through flow for all products. D. Manually operated machines are economically better than high-tech NC controlled equipment. E. Lot scales should be reduced significantly.This topic can help students to learn how to plan the business strategy for some small butwell-known and aggressive companies, and to use lean manufacturing guidelines toassess the manufacturing / production process control and validation assessment.Case study 3:One manufacturer makes many types of consumer products. Recently this
≠ Emerging methods of educational delivery ≠ Manufacturing topics in non-manufacturing named programs ≠ Manufacturing education programs; associate, baccalaureate, masters ≠ Integrating bio-, nano-, and electronics-manufacturing in curricula ≠ Manufacturing education within non-manufacturing named programs ≠ Pipeline development and recruiting into manufacturing careers ≠ Collaboration among relevant professional societies with interest in manufacturingThe two forums are part of a longer term plan for regular similar gatherings and larger, open-attendance conferences. Plans are being developed for a large conference in the summer of 2009.OverviewThere has been massive change in global manufacturing
Page 14.1154.9 then repeated until the game limit of twenty rounds of orders is reached. While playing the beer game players must take care not to talk to the other participantsduring the game or to show what orders they are planning for the next week. The retailer mustnot peek at future end-customer demand data, provided by the instructor. At the end of thetwenty weeks (or shorter if time does not permit) players determine the total cost of theirinventories and back orders on the inventory record sheet. Figure 5 shows the inventory recordsheet the author uses. The Beer Inventory Record Sheet Game Your Supply Chain Role: Your Name: Team Number: Week
the Executive Committee of the Applied Science Accreditation Commission of ABET. His current research interests are in nanofabrication, enterprise resource planning, software applications for ERP and supply chain, technology policy and manufacturing education. Page 14.1036.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Role of Manufacturing Programs in Engineering Workforce Development V. Raju, Ph.D. Professor, Manufacturing Engineering Technology Director, Science and Technology Programs ( raju@farmingdale.edu
such as business, planning, controls, andquality. The Curricula 2000 and Curriculum 2002 documents also defined sample curriculumand delineated differences between engineering and technology programs.Since the Curriculum documents were published there have been a number of new developmentsincluding; ≠ A recognized increase in the role of business knowledge ≠ New methods such as Lean manufacturing ≠ Globalization ≠ Computer software and control methods ≠ New manufacturing processes ≠ New manufacturing sectors Page 14.393.3To this end the work in the previous
”: mechanics in the 17th and 18th centuries and thermodynamics in the 19th century.These origins have been reflected for well over a century in Mechanical Engineering (ME)curricula [1]. In January 2002, The National Science Foundation chartered a workshop on“Redefining Mechanical Engineering” to explore new possibilities for ME education.Recommendations were made to streamline and update ME curricula by introducing emergingknowledge related to micro/nano technology, product design and realization and etc. andexposing students to computational methods and design practices employed by practicingengineers [2]. To keep up with the national trend in ME education, we plan to implement threetrack areas in the program: (1) Mechatronics; (2) Design and
– 4] such as the interdisciplinarynature of the subject matter, non-linearity of structure - property interactions, and theever-expanding array of modern materials and manufacturing processes. In a previouspaper [4], the author outlined the utilization of a two-tier teaching plan to effectively dealwith these challenges. In the first tier, called as ‘essential teaching plan’ all of theessential teaching elements were included (class notes, assignments, exams, labexperiments and so on). The second tier, termed the ‘course enrichment plan’, a range ofinnovative ideas were described that are in-tune with the contemporary teaching –learning environment such as multi-media resources. However, it was realized at thattime that perhaps more efforts
program. With about 99% studentparticipation in the bridge design project, the motivation among the students is high andconsiderable enthusiasm and interaction is seen among the students. Finally, the students are ableto successfully plan, design, and construct a bridge project on a small budget within a relativelyshort time frame.Bridge Design ProjectWhen MET 322 students finished the first part of the five-times-a-week five-week staticslectures, they use this knowledge to build a bridge. The objective of the project is to help ourstudents successfully apply their knowledge to create a successful bridge design. A successfuldesign is one that satisfies all the design specifications, meets project budget, and cuts downconstruction time
Production Planning Manager WS-4 Wheel Assembly 1 WS-5 Rudder Assembly 1 Plant Manager WS-6 Aerolon Assembly 2 WS-7 Cockpit Assembly 1 Industrial Engineers WS-8 Engine Assembly 1 1 WS-9 Tank Assembly 1 2 WS-10 Inspection 1 3 Sales Manager Customer Figure 8. Operations and Jobs
discuss the advantages, factors, costs, and problemsinvolved with implementing these online courses, based on our research and experience. Alsoincluded are twelve learned Best Practices for asynchronous online and a “Take Home StrategicOnline Planning Sketch” to help foster other online learning models. Student learner feedbackalso included.The Good:“It is not necessary to change, survival is not mandatory” W. Edwards Deming. It was in 2004where the spirit of this quote coupled with broad university strategic support for innovativeonline course and program course conversion, that the department began the journey to meet thecall for competitive change. With the Higher Learning Commission’s recent awardedaccreditation approval for Minnesota State
-123JSpring-2006/CourseHome/index.htm 5. http://www.sfi.mtu.edu/About_SFI.htm 6. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/lcaccess/ 7. Pre Product Industrial Consultants "Eco-indicator 99 Manual for Designers: A damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment" 2000, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment. 8. Diamond J. “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed” 2005, Penguin Group USA. 9. Lovins A., Lovins, H., Hawken P. “Natural Capitalism Creating the Next Industrial Revolution” 2000, Little Brown & Company. 10. Coulter, S., Bras, B., Foley C., “A Lexicon of Green Engineering Terms” Praha, August 22-24 1995, International Conference on Engineering Design
their attention on how engineering principles can be applied to social issues.No engineering principles of social problems were given as examples. The answers were dividedinto two categories - engineering principles and social problems. The reason for the distinctionwas due to the fact that there were coupled themes throughout the data.Figure 5 is organized where each bar represents certain engineering principles collected fromstudent answers. The raw data is in A3. The engineering principles include: general methods (3 Page 14.10.12students), process plan (1 student), force multiplies (1 student) and not sure (4 students). Notethe not sure group
AC 2009-576: DESIGN, BUILD, TEST, COMPETE: A BATTLEBOTJanet Dong, University of Cincinnati Janet Dong,Ph.D is an assistant professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering Technology at University of Cincinnati. She holds a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering and a MS degree in Manufacturing Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University in 2003. Her academic interests include CAD/CAM, manufacturing engineering technology, process planning, control and automation, robotics, engineering education and research, and manufacturing applications in the dental field.Janak Dave, University of Cincinnati Janak Dave PhD, PE is a Professor in the
Page 14.283.6lack of structure for the experiments. Several teams used English units, somemetric, two teams measured from the table top to the tip of the metal rod while theremaining teams measured from the top of the box to the tip of the rod. This wasexpected and reinforced the importance of communication.V Conclusions & Future WorkBased on the student feedback the black boxes were an effective teaching aid forDOE. Opening up the black boxes and comparing the internals to the studentspredictions I believe heightened the importance of gathering data and modeling.For future classes I plan on changing the levels so that one variable does notdominate the response and perhaps adding an additional variable or perhaps two.The data collection by
and the instructor as Good.Thus with the exception of basic cost analysis it is shown that all topics can be taught at anacceptable level.Analysis and Results of Key QuestionsKey Question 1) Can the "new" subject matter be learned effectively by freshmen? The resultsare shown in Table IV. Table IV: Performance in New Topics New Topic Winter 2008 Performance Summer 2008 Performance Electronic Manufacturing Good Good Design Methods and Acceptable Acceptable Methodologies Manufacturing Planning Acceptable Good (Work Design) Basic Cost Analysis Unacceptable
AC 2009-2150: APPLYING AXIOMATIC DESIGN AND KNOWLEDGE-BASEDENGINEERING TO PLASTIC DRUM DESIGNJaby Mohammed, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at Indiana Purdue University at Fort Wayne, IN. He received his PhD in Industrial engineering from University of Louisville in 2006. His research interest includes advanced manufacturing; design methodologies, computer aided design, six sigma, and enterprise resource planning. He is a member of IIE, ASEE,ASQ, SME, POMS, ITEA, NAIT, KAS, and Informs.Jared May, Morehead State University JARED MAY is currently a junior at Morehead State University. He is pursuing his Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology
with which to educate undergraduate students on topics of current importance tomanufacturing such as agile assembly systems, flexible work cells, virtual simulations, roboticsand robot integration. The following project was thus commissioned in June 2007 to build afunctioning robotic work cell to address this need.A robot platform similar to the one we will build could easily cost tens of thousands of dollarsfor new equipment but with this project we would prove it could be done for considerably lessmoney. To keep costs low we first located several obsolete but mechanically functional robotsknown to be available at OIT. We then planned to retrofit the robots with a modern PC-basedcontrol system and build tooling in-house to complete the
rapid prototyping machines.(a) Student working on the 3D printer (b) Student working on the FDM machine(c) Making a component in the FDM (d) Final componentmachineFigure 3. Students working on their medical device team projects.2.4 Project report and presentationTeams submitted their project written reports with the following information: problem definitionand potential customers; product design and engineering specifications; material requirements,proposed manufacturing process plan; project timeline and results; and future development planfor mass production. Each team presented their project results via a formal presentation anddemonstration of their prototypes. Students were instructed to use interactive
institutions to launch or expand programs in short order. This infusion of resources enables institutions to build their infrastructure, subsidize its offerings, and even provide additional assistance for truly needy students. However it is incumbent upon the institution to develop and implement a realistic sustainability plan that will enable the continuation of programs beyond funding lifecycles. Networking with like-minded individuals and organizations is highly recommended. STEM outreach programs may be found at virtually every institution and institutions must network with affinity groups to glean/share best practices as part of their continuous improvement efforts. Tracking the responses of student and teacher participants in
). ≠ Utilizing at least two type of switches/sensors in navigation (i.e. bumper switch, ultrasonic range finder, light sensor, limit switch etc.) ≠ Writing an Easy C program to conduct the navigation process. ≠ Deliverables: ≠ Demonstration of successful robot operation. ≠ Delivery of the robot. ≠ A final report that includes the robot design including actuators and sensory inputs, the strategy utilized and associated robot program. ≠ Additional credit will be given to any added value to the basic design and programs.In Fall of 2008, multiple groups of ENGR 4400 students worked on this assignment. Each groupstudied the Learning Factory main laboratory area and devised a plan or strategy
(NSF) covers student stipends and their related expenses. • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) in Mexico provides seed funding for the study while encouraging inter institutional collaboration between TAMU and CIDETEQ.CollaborationThis project was successful after careful planning of activities to cover schedule, funding,equipment and resource sharing, people power, and cross-cultural communication. TAMU tookthe initiative to define the project, identify participating partners, and secure funding. Theprogram leveraged from the strength of each committed partner. CIDETEQ coverselectrochemistry, Agilent provides end-user specifications and precision tooling, CONACyTprovides seed funding for equipment and travel
slanted at both sides. Each module again has a corresponding female geometry thatconstrains the module in the mobile robot’s tool space. The main difference between thisgeometry and that of the footholds, though, is that this geometry is constant along thedirection of the forks. As such, the modules are fixed in only 5 axes, allowing for slidealong the fork under substantial force to break static friction.Navigation and orientation for the autonomous shuttle are carried out predominantly byan overhead machine vision system. Across the workspace floor, position and orientationof the mobile shuttle is monitored through a standard machine vision program. These dataare used to continually update the status of the robot and plan its path to reach its
functions in the real world,making the software easier to learn. Unfortunately this first attempt yielded less thansatisfactory results. The most obvious problem with this plan dealt with time constraints andcompeting class priorities. Because the instruction on off-line programming came at the end ofthe semester, many students were still struggling to complete other assigned hands-on projects inthe class. Furthermore, workloads from final projects assigned in other classes also preventedstudents from spending quality time working on the RobotStudio lab activities that may havebeen perceived as being “tacked on” the end of the class. Some students also commented that itwas difficult for them to complete the assignments in a timely manner because
” threedimensional objects. There is very little limitation (if there is any) on the shape of the threedimensional design that an RP machine can make. Therefore, the RP process is also known as Page 14.144.6free-form manufacturing process. Unlike milling or turning, an RP process does not requireprocess planning or tool path generation. Some recent models of RP machines require little setupand operate similarly to a desktop printer. Due to the simplicity, it is a perfect manufacturingprocess for younger students to learn and practice if they do not have much backgroundknowledge about machining processes. As a result, the integrated CAD and RP systemrepresents
professor in charge usedPBL as the basis for defining common goals and guiding the students’ progress:1) From a project perspective≠ Identify the steps required to plan for and manage a project?≠ Identify resources and know-how required for success?≠ Identify the structure of the collaboration process?≠ Identify technologies (hardware and software) needed?2) From a teaching perspective≠ What knowledge should the student possess?≠ What skills will the project teach students?≠ What values and ethics are the most important?≠ How does the project prepare one for employment?BackgroundRapid Prototyping (RP) is a whole suite of technologies collectively referred to as “Additivefreeform fabrication” which includes Selective Laser Sintering
consolidation (f) Parts removed from the mold(g) deburring (h) packaging (i) stapling (j) product shippingFigure 3. Major manufacturing steps in the initial production run.2.2 Kaizen meetingWhen they completed the initial production run with the existing manufacturing system,the students realized that there were a lot of wastes or Muda. After conducting brief VSManalysis, the students had a Kaizen meeting to reduce the wastes identified and improvethe manufacturing system. This 15 to 30 minute meeting allows the students to havebrainstorming to identify reasons of the low production and produce worthwhile ideas forimprovement. By the end of the meeting, the students were asked to document thedetailed plan for
including working as consultants, expert witnesses9, and safety, health, andenvironmental officers. Future plans to further enhance the law content encompass extending aninvitation to a renowned Pennsylvania injury lawyer for a presentation on liability cases, andadding a second movie on Environmental issues to the existing curriculum. Page 14.1138.9Bibliography[1] Goetsch, D., L., Occupational Safety and Health For Technologists (6th Edition), Engineers, and Managers,Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.[2] www.osha.gov[3] http://catalog.njit.edu/courses/ie.php[4] http://interpro-academics.engin.umich.edu/mfgeng_prog/courses.htm[5] http://www.min.uc.edu/me
sensor nodes and visualizing Page 14.487.8the measurement results. The data of selected sensors are collected and sent to the Web GUI atfixed time intervals. Fig. 9 Architecture of the wireless sensor network systemConclusionsIn this paper, we proposed web-based environments to support self-directed learning of MEMStechnology at a distance. By means of such an environment, students can explore the essence ofMEMS technology, selection of process parameters, and process planning. A wireless sensornetwork is used to collect students’ motion and machine operation conditions. The VRimmersive visual environment provides an
one alternative if appropriate. As mentioned earlier in thepaper, this particular dilemma occurred at Wichita State University within their MechanicalEngineering program. They were able to solve the lab and equipment shortages by enlisting thehelp and support of Wichita Area Technical College (WATC) who had very strong hands-on andapplications oriented manufacturing programs. Working with the WATC instructors, the WSUprofessors were able to formulate a plan to ensure their students would be provided with themandated hands-on manufacturing experiences in the areas of machining, welding andcomposites. The course was submitted to and approved by the Kansas Board of Regents and inthe spring of 2007 the course was offered as an elective for the