, and artificial intelligence.Dr. Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at The University of Louisville. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton.Dr. Marci S. Decaro, University of Louisville Marci DeCaro is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Louisville. DeCaro’s research applies principles of cognitive psychology to study learning and performance in educational contexts.Dr. Hui Yang, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Hui Yang is a Fellow of IISE, a Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
of Engineering, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology.Jakia Sultana, University of Texas at El PasoMr. S M Atikur Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso S M Atikur Rahman is a Research Assistant in the Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (AME) at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Currently, he is pursuing his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering at UTEP. He has completed his B.Sc. degree in Industrial and Production Engineering (KUET Bangladesh) and MSc in Industrial Engineering (UTEP USA). Mr. Atikur is working in the field of Simulation (AnyLogic), Deep Learning, and Smart Manufacturing Systems
Paper ID #47437Capstone Project: Development of FDM 3D Printer Tool for Industrial RobotJeritt Williams, Illinois State University Jeritt Williams is an assistant professor of Engineering Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches applied industrial automation and robotics.Dr. Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at Illinois State University. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a masterˆa C™s in business administr
the EOP framework serves as a model for sustainable engineering education,highlighting the potential for curricula to not only improve technical proficiency but also instill acommitment to ethical and sustainable practices in the next generation of engineers.References 1. B. R. Ruben and A. P. Vinodh, "State of art perspectives of lean and sustainable manufacturing," Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 234–256, 2019. 2. G. Miller, J. Pawloski, and C. R. Standridge, "A case study of lean, sustainable manufacturing," J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–32, 2010. 3. C. Alves, F. J. Kahlen, S. Flumerfelt, and A. B. Siriban-Manalang, "Fostering Sustainable Development thinking through lean engineering education
ScienceFoundation grant #2141674. Their support is greatly appreciated. W. Zhu acknowledges thefunding from the University of Houston Advanced Manufacturing Institute, University ofHouston Division of Research, the support from National Science Foundation grant #1855147,#1950036, #2141674, US Department of Education grant P116S230007, and US Department ofAgriculture grant #13111855, #13424031, and National Academy of Science grant #200011064to the University of Houston.ReferencesBuehler, E., Comrie, N., Hofmann, M., McDonald, S., & Hurst, A. (2016). Investigating the implications of 3D printing in special education. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(3), 1-28.Chai, C., & Koh, J. (2017). Changing teachers’ TPACK and design
Innovation, Wages, andWealth”. 2015. Yale University Press. Available: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/books/342.[5] M. Valiente Bermejo, M. Eynian, L. Malmsköld, and A. Scotti, “University–industrycollaboration in curriculum design and delivery: A model and its application in manufacturingengineering courses,” Industry and Higher Education, p. 095042222110642, Dec. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211064204.[6] S. Spaulding and A. Martin-Caughey, “The Goals and Dimensions of Employer Engagementin Workforce Development Programs,” Employer Engagement in Workforce DevelopmentProgram 2015. Available:https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/76286/2000552-the-goals-and-dimensions-of-employer-engagement-in-workforce-development
review Preview Tuesday10 References[1] Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation, “New Defense Department Program Aims to Transform U.S. Metal Manufacturing in Casting and Forging Industry.” https://iacmi.org/new-defense-department-program-aims-to-transformu-s-metal- manufacturing-in-casting-and-forging-industry/.[2] “American Foundry Society.” Metalcasting: About Metalcasting and Industry Statistics. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online] Available: https://www.afsinc.org/[3] “Data USA Foundries.” Accessed: Sep. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://datausa.io/profile/naics/foundries[4] “METAL.” Accessed: Sep. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.metalforamerica.org/[5] “OUSD A&
, build plate or bed temperature, scanning speed, and layer thicknessrespectively.Figure. 2. (a) Butterfly wing structure [22], (b) computer model of butterfly wing inspiredTPMS lattice structure, (c) Fused filament fabrication (FFF) tool, and (f)-(h) PLA-TPU TPMScomposite structure.Table. 1. Print Parameters used in this study for PLA and TPU polymers: Filament Te (oC) Tb (oC) v (mm/s) h (mm) Infill (%) PLA 210 60 40 0.3 100 TPU 230 60 20 0.3 1002.2 Processing and Characterization: After printing the TPMS samples, heat treatment was conducted at two differenttemperatures as
. Fidan, I., & Gupta, A., & Hasanov, S., & Henrie, A., & Fidan, P. (2022, August), FlippedClassroom to Increase the Student Success in Manufacturing Courses Paper presented at 2022ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--4123311. I. I. de los Ríos Carmenado, F. Rodríguez López, and C. Pérez García, “Promotingprofessional project management skills in engineering higher education: Project-basedlearning (PBL) strategy,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. Extra1, Part B, pp. 184–198, 2015.12. G. Berselli, P. Bilancia, and L. Luzi, “Project-based learning of advanced CAD/CAEtools in engineering education,” International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), vol
. The lesson will be evaluated using a pre-test, a post-test, and a survey of 25 students. Student feedback indicates that the use of GeoGebra software,the angle addition simulator, and hands-on tools like protractors significantly enhanced theirengagement and comprehension of geometric concepts, making learning more interactive andeffective. Overall, this study aims to demonstrate that the designed tools positively impactstudents' learning in angle measurement.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the Research Experiences for Teachers Programunder National Science Foundation award no. 2206953. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not
, Microsoft.MixedReality.Toolkit.UI),HoloToolkit.Unity (e.g., HoloToolkit.Unity.Buttons, HoloToolkit.Unity.SpatialMapping,HoloToolkit.Unity.InputModule).The UnityEngine namespaces provide tools for creating scripts for managing graphics, physics,audio, and UIs, enabling the creation and manipulation of assets, game objects, and scenes. TheMicrosoft.MixedReality.Toolkit and HoloToolkit namespaces include prefabs, assets, and UIelements needed for MR development, supporting devices like the HoloLens and HoloLens 2.The developed scripts enable interactions such as object grabbing, near and far manipulation,spatial mapping, spatial awareness, eye/hand tracking, and UI controls optimized for HoloLens2’s articulated hand input.This MR setup successfully creates a spatial
, "Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing Validated Through a User Study," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 141, no. 041101, pp. 1-8, 2019, doi: 10.1115/1.4041051.[12] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longman New York, 1956.[13] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., 2001.[14] M. E. Hoque, "Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor," The Journal of EFL Education and Research
ve egat e gat egat ositi P o ely N h at N nor N h at P ely m w ve ew e m tre me siti om xtr Ex So P o S E t h er
”, which providesnot only an excellent pedagogy resources to educate next generation of engineers on conceptsrelated Industry 4.0., also an outstanding research infrastructure for Smart Manufacturing.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by a subaward from GENEDGE through the Department of Energy GrantNo. DE-MS0000029. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the DOE andGENEDGE.Reference[1] MTConnect® Standard Part 1 - Overview and Protocol, Version 1.3.0, 2014[2] MTConnect®Standard Part 2 –Device Information Model, Version 1.3.1, 2015[3] https://pypi.org/project/requests/[4] https://pypi.org/project/xmltodict/[5] https://pypi.org
Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University Irina Ciobanescu Husanu, Ph. D. is Associate Clinical Professor and Director of the Engineering Technology Program, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. She received her PhD degree in mechanical engineering from College of Engineering at Drexel University and her BS/MS in Aeronautical Engineering from Aerospace Engineering College at Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Romania. Dr. Husanu’ s educational background is in propulsion systems and combustion. Dr. Husanu has more than a decade of industrial experience in aerospace engineering that encompasses extensive experimental investigations related to energy projects such as development of a novel method of shale natural gas
most: theEnder 3 Pro and the Sovol SV06. The Ender 3 Pro, a very common hobby-grade printer, is highlyinexpensive and benefits from a large aftermarket parts supply and open-source software. TheSovol SV06, although more expensive, offers additional features that enhance automation andlongevity. Also, the SV06’s PEI-coated spring steel build plate, which self-releases the part whenit cools, is crucial for preventing difficulties with cobot-assisted part removal. For these reasons, theSovol SV06 printer was chosen, and it has performed as well as expected.IFM O2D520 CameraIFM O2D520 Object Inspection Camera has been used in the project for inspecting the printedpart. After inspection, camera sends digital input to robot for performing further
://www.manufacturing.gov/docs/DMDI_overview.pdf, accessed on 12/2/2024.[4] A.B. Feeney, S.P. Frechette, and V. Srinivasan, “A Portrait of an ISO STEP TolerancingStandard as an Enabler of Smart Manufacturing Systems,” from the National Institute ofStandards and Technology from 13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, May11-14, 2014; Hangzhou, China, A Keynote Paper.[5] R.R. Lipman and S. Kwon, “NIST Advanced Manufacturing Series 200-12, STEP FileAnalyzer and Viewer User Guide (Update 7)”, National Institute of Standards and Technology,U.S. Department of Commerce, available from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.200-12.[6] U. Urbas, R. Vrabic, and N. Vukasinovic, “Displaying Product Manufacturing Information inAugmented Reality for Inspection”, from the
Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(2), 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000360Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.003Cox, D. (2017). Development of Hands-on Laboratory Resources for Manufacturing Engineering. Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.Da Silva, G., De Barros, M., & Costa, H. (2015). Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6A), 1701–1710
theLinkages*. Res High Educ 47, 1–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9[3] F. E. Causer, M. Baranowski, A. V. Masters, and A. M. Williams, "Quiet eye training: Reviewand future directions," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 840180, 2022. [Online].Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840180/full.[4] Cerbin, W. “Improving student learning from lectures.” Scholarship of Teaching andLearning in Psychology, 4(3), 151–163. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000113[5] Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. Student engagement inhigh school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2),158–176. (2003) https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq