Asee peer logo
Displaying all 22 results
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 8
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University; Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
who wishto implement these technologies in their teaching and learning. Furthermore, the extant literatureoften fails to convey the plans and details necessary to replicate or expand upon studies in thisline of research, as detailed descriptions of the FDM tooling solutions used in variousexperiments are not often clearly described in an easily reproducible way. This paper (poster)presents the results of an engineering technology student capstone project that sought to developa low-cost, flexible, and modular end-of-arm 3D printing tool that can ultimately be used todemonstrate fused deposition modeling (FDM) concepts using an industrial robot. To achievethis goal, students considered which, if any, widely available desktop FDM components
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 3
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
generation born into a digital world, they are often nottechnologically adept. They frequently face challenges using technology for educationalpurposes and require training on how to effectively use the Internet, despite having had lifelongaccess to it [6]. Figure 1: Grade distributions of 15 on-level geometry students.Existing WorkExisting lesson plans on angles were reviewed.Geometry Tools: Angles & Reflections [7]. This lesson plan introduces students to commongeometry tools such as protractors and Miras, learning to create and measure angles andreflections. The lesson includes a historical overview and modern applications of these tools,practice problems, and a worksheet to reinforce concepts. Students discuss their
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 6
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Y Chiou, Drexel University; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Md Fashiar Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
other machines [3]. In addition to the technical aspects, this projectaims to teach prospective STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) students about thevarious components of a typical automation process [4-13]. Through detailed guides, manuals, andvideo demonstrations, key information will be provided to make sure faculty and studentsunderstand the operation of a work cell while ensuring safety. In section 2, the design andarchitecture is discussed. Section 3 presents the experiments and results, which is followed bylesson plans and economics in section 4 and conclusion in section 5.2. System Design and ArchitectureSystem ArchitectureIn the proposed system, the 3D printer is tasked with the initial production of a part
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Weihang Zhu, University of Houston - COE; Mariam Manuel, University of Houston - COE; Paige Evans, University of Houston; Peter Weber, University of Houston, College of Technology (MERGED MEMBERSHIP WITH COE)
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
code, STL, slicer TK 6 Part 2: 3D modeling SolidWorks Apps for Kids; open source TK,CK models 3 Part 2: 3DP Print quality, calibration, post-processing, TK troubleshooting maintenance II 6 Invention design Each group prototype an innovation using PK,PCK I challenge 3D printed parts and standard components TPK that can be purchased IV 12 Curricular development Preservice teachers’ own lesson plans TPCK The course is structured into four modules, as summarized below:Module Overview: I. Introduction to
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gimantha N Perera, University of Arizona; Hannah Budinoff, The University of Arizona; DAVID MANFORD, The University of Arizona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
covered topics. Thiscourse redesign included the introduction of a course project, providing students with knowledge aboutI&E resources on campus, and highlighting small business owners and entrepreneurs in manufacturingindustry through a guest speaker and industry tours.For the team project, teams of four students engaged in hands-on projects to prototype and plan the scale-up production of products using manufacturing techniques discussed in class. The student teams weretasked with identifying their own unmet need in their community or lives to design and prototype as partof the project. After identifying a need, students interviewed potential users to compile needs,brainstormed solutions, and started to design and prototype their solutions
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 7
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Arif Sirinterlikci Ph.D., CMfgE, CPEM, Robert Morris University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
had to be modified (manually).• Platinum-cured silicone rubber shell mold was made using the pattern.• Resulting part can be seen (with a similar silicone rubber material) [6]. Figure 4. SOLIDWORKS Tutorials Figure 5. Injection molding insert to be modified (ejector side)author also encouraged the participants to design their own patterns for the indirect rapid toolingexercises planned within the upcoming activities, especially if they felt good about their CADskills.3D Printing Preprocessing: STL, OBJ, and other intermediate data formatsAfter completion of the CAD activities, the author presented a module on 3D printing pre-processing including the intermediate file formats
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 5
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Md Fashiar Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Richard Y Chiou, Drexel University; Jakia Sultana, University of Texas at El Paso; S M Atikur Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Selim Molla, University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
, and 3) Scenario Based analysis showing the outcomeof the user defined decision variables.Decision Variables: In this section, the following figure (Figure 2) illustrates the interactivedecision parameters that enable users to dynamically modify maintenance schedules and operatorsettings. Key components include the 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑀 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐸𝑛𝑑𝑀 buttons, which allow users to manuallycontrol the initiation and completion of maintenance schedules for specific machines or sections,providing flexibility in scheduling. 𝑁𝑂𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 , 𝑆𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑀𝑆 buttons further enhancecontrol over maintenance activities. 𝑁𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 turns off planned maintenance to prioritizecontinuous operations, while 𝑆𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 5
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenton Blane Fillingim, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Lauren Heinrich, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Ashley Gannon, Oak Ridge National Lab; Thomas Feldhausen, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 withthe US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the articlefor publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable,worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to doso, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsoredresearch in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (https://www.energy.gov/doe-public-access-plan). Integrating Computer-Aided Manufacturing Users with Directed Energy Deposition Guidelines Kenton Blane Fillingim1, Lauren Heinrich1, Ashley Gannon1, Thomas Feldhausen1,2
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 8
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David E. Culler, Oregon Institute of Technology; Colin Carroll, Oregon Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
Measurement Machine), and TIG welding. After graduation, Colin plans on continuing his work in industry with focus in automation of manufacturing processes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Pedagogical Framework and Course Module for Building Awareness and Know-How Related to the Digital Thread and Smart Manufacturing Using STEP AP242AbstractTraditional manufacturing and mechanical undergraduate courses fall short in addressing agrowing industry need for more skilled and versatile engineers that can use digital technology tobridge the gap between design, manufacturing, inspection, and enterprise functions. Internationalefforts to develop and implement the
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University Erie, The Behrend College; Mark Rubeo, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Christopher Henri Annear, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
plans.2 Program BackgroundThe METAL program was launched by The Institute for Advanced Composites ManufacturingInnovation (IACMI), also referred to as The Composites Institute, in December of 2023 incollaboration with the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) and the University ofTennessee Knoxville (UTK). Headquartered in Knoxville, TN, IACMI was established in 2015as the fifth Manufacturing USA Institute with the goal of hastening the development andadoption of manufacturing technologies for advanced polymer composites to support theautomotive, aerospace, and power generation industries. Financial support and technicalguidance for the METAL program are provided by the DOD’s Industrial Base Analysis andSustainment (IBAS) program with
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 5
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ryan Petitti, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
projects that students areintegrated into the team and experientially learn project planning, project execution, and professionalskills necessary to be a key contributor in the biomedical and healthcare fields.Biomedical engineering and clinical experts utilize 3D printing and other traditional manufacturingmethods to assist clinicians, faculty, and industry innovators in translating their needs into models anddevices that enhance patient care. The team of biomedical, mechanical, electrical, software, and qualityengineers support the design, testing, and fabrication of a breadth of medical products. The M4 teamdesigns with the medical device product development regulatory pathway in mind, thus leading tooutcomes that take innovations from “bench-to
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Md B. Sarder, Bowling Green State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
(APICS), the Transformation Team on the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the Research Committee of Intermodal Freight Transport committee, Freight Transportation Planning and Logistics committee of Transportation Research Board (TRB) among others. Dr. Sarder chaired the Industrial & Systems Engineering Annual Conference in 2016 and 2017, and the Engineering Lean Six Sigma Conference (ELSS) in 2013. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Mechanical Performance of Additive Manufactured Bioinspired Lattice StructuresAbstract This summary report presents the outcomes and advancements in the field of FusedFilament Fabrication (FFF
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Arif Sirinterlikci Ph.D., CMfgE, CPEM, Robert Morris University; Kristopher Connelly, Robert Morris University; Ryan Szekely, Robert Morris University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
identifying these patterns with accumulated paint. However,LIDAR software struggled to pick up depth from floor to painting and grabbed frame causing thevisible issues in Figure 10 a. Figure 10 a) A problematic scan b) matching color imageFigure 11 below demonstrates the finished full-color scans. However, these scans are not yetready to be printed. As this paper being written, the team was planning to convert the scan results(STLs or (surfaces files) to watertight manifolds for 3D printing to replicate them including thepainting in Figure 12. Figure 11. Finished full-color scans Figure 12. Most recently scanned painting with pronounced paint brush strokesStudent FeedbackThis section includes
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 7
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oluwadamilola Daniel Afe, Virginia State University; Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
) database, for manufacturing operations. Theresults developed through this project potentially can be used in the “Manufacturing Automation”course to teach students concepts related to the MTConnect.The research team plans the future research as follows. 1) To further develop the software withdata analytics capabilities for other applications such as quality control, system monitoring, etc. 2)To scale up the current system from a single machine to a fleet of machines such as a combinationadditive and subtractive manufacturing machines. Ideally, the team visions to have all the CNCmachines and 3D printers in the School machine shop to be integrated using MTConnect and/orOPC UA standards. Such an integration provides a prototype of “Smart Factory
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 7
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandra Walter Huffman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Kaitlyn Becker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Rebecca E Zubajlo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Warren P. Seering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
judgment. In the second oral assessment, the students had to interpret data in order‬ ‭to diagnose and solve a potential problem. They had to think through a troubleshooting process‬ ‭and make a plan that tested their ideas. In both oral assessments, the students had to work within‬ ‭a context-specific motivation with flexibility and nuance, and were assessed on their‬ ‭domain-specific technical communication and use of appropriate jargon.‬I‭ n engineering work, “the social and technical are almost inextricably tied up together in any‬ ‭engineering project, at least in any project that is realized successfully”‬‭[20, pg 121]‬‭. Because the‬ ‭oral assessments were individual assessments, it was important to incorporate some
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 7
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julia L Morse, Kansas State University Salina Aerospace and Technology Campus; Eduard Plett, Kansas State University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
-onexperience with equipment), but the university commits to making flexibility for the student tobe at the workplace some days in the week. Because student intern schedules may differaccording to the needs of the employer, engineering technology programs accommodateflexibility through HyFlex course offerings, which allow students the choice of attending classesonline or in-person “lecture” sessions.HyFlex class sessions require the instructor to plan for the same learning objectives to besatisfied by the students either during the in-person class meeting or through online courseactivity [4], [5]. For time feasibility, the instructor must adopt strategies to offer both in-personand online asynchronous modalities in ways that minimize extra work on the
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 3
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anis Fatima, Michigan Technological University; John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University; Muhammad Wasif, NED University of Engineering and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
explained by Irwin et al. [5]. This area included the most revised topicsalong with the Process Design area that experienced major revisions with topics such as DigitalTwin and Computer Aided Process Planning. Coskun et al. [6] proposed a comprehensive three-pillar roadmap for integrating Industry 4.0 technologies into engineering university curricula.This roadmap focuses on curriculum development, laboratory support, and the establishment ofstudent clubs to foster hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies. Similarly, Onar et al.[7] conducted an evaluation of 124 engineering programs across various institutions and foundthat these programs are increasingly offering interdisciplinary courses that combine productiontechnologies with ICT
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 6
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Zhen Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
Communication Channels: Creating platforms for regular dialogue betweenemployers, educators, and training providers can facilitate a better understanding of needs andpriorities. Collaborative planning sessions, workshops, and feedback mechanisms can help alignexpectations and foster stronger partnerships.Flexible Program Setting: Offering employers support in integrating PWD program tasks intotheir operational workflows (e.g., allowing flexible program-hour options) can enhanceemployee enrollment and organizational buy-in.These strategies not only address employers’ expressed preferences but also position PWDprograms as essential partners in workforce development.5.3. LimitationsOne limitation of this study is the potential bias introduced by the PWD
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 3
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rumena Begum, University of Louisville; Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville; Marci S. Decaro, University of Louisville; Hui Yang, Pennsylvania State University; Richard Zhao, University of Calgary; Jason J Saleem, University of Louisville; P. Karen Murphy, The Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
traditional frameworks and sensor-based measures to assess team efficiency andeffectiveness, emphasizing factors like team composition, coordination, and prior VR experience[12]. On the other hand, a unified framework was proposed that integrates VR with human-robotsimulations to enable human interaction with production equipment to address the challenges indesigning flexible, adaptable, and safe human-robot workspaces [3]. By employing event-drivensimulations, these frameworks support human-robot cycle time estimation, process planning,layout optimization, and robot control programming.A study demonstrated the use of VR technology to simulate digital factories and enhanceproduction efficiency by employing simulation software [11]. It showed how VR
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea Camacho-Betancourt, University of Florida; Katie Leanne Basinger, University of Florida; Iris V. Rivero, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
survey. Each student had the option to opt in or out of the data collection process at thebeginning of each survey and only responses from those who opted in are included in this paper.Differences between the surveys for each cohort were primarily to accommodate for differencesin the speed of which the topics were covered. High school students answered questions aboutvarious labs within one survey whereas college students had a survey correlating with each lab.CohortsThe first cohort was in Fall 2021 where college students learned first on a desktop five-axisPocketNC, then transitioned to a three-axis HAAS VF3. This first cohort did not finish all theassignments planned for the semester due to underestimating the time needed to learn skills
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 8
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University; Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu, Drexel University; Richard Y Chiou, Drexel University; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
are required to complete a year long three series of capstonecourse that is MET 4XX Senior Design Project. This three-quarter sequence aims to train the students inidentifying projects of relevance to society, in planning and scheduling a solution, and in entrepreneurialactivities that may result from the project. This course is worth three credits per quarter every offering. Thecourse is also intended to cover an industrial project starting from the proposal writing and conceptual designto final prototype building and concept realization steps. The senior design course sequence goals aim to (1)integrate experience that develops and illustrates student competencies in applying both -technical and non-technical skills in successfully solving
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Israa Azzam, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Khalid Bello, University of Louisville; Farid Breidi, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
] and Microsoft HoloLens [32], whichenables holographic MR experiences by projecting virtual content directly into the user’s field ofview. This technology is valuable for teaching complex manufacturing tasks such as assemblyprocedures, design validation, and collaborative production planning. It allows educators toprovide their learners with advanced training environments that mirror the complexities ofmodern manufacturing, preparing them for future industry-specific roles.Therefore, the features of both VR and MR offer significant advantages over AR, particularly formanufacturing training. Both technologies provide a higher level of immersion compared to AR,which has been proven to enhance information retention and skill acquisition [33