AGREE NOT SURE DISAGREE DISAGREE BEFORE AGREE STRONGLY BEFORE AGREE STRONGLY TODAY TODAY The activities on nanoscience and engineering made N a n o t e c h n o lo g y p re s e n t a t io n me more confident that I can do science/engineering 8 10
-1 -1.5 -2 0 5 10 15 Carbon Black wt%Figure 3. Log Resistivity vs. % Carbon Black concentration- emulsion based Polyvinyl Acetatepolymer. Percolation limit appears to occur at 2% Carbon Black concentration1 www.nano.gov2 T. S. Creasy, J. C. Grunlan, and R. B. Griffin, “An Undergraduate Laboratory: the Effect of NanoparticleMicrostructure on the Electrical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites,” Proceedings of IMECE06, ASME
the bottle on the right contains Page 12.1095.4only hydroxyapatite.Bibliography1. Hogg R, Healy TW, , Fuerstenau DW, Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions, Trans Farad Soc, 62, 1638(1992).2. Kim S, Zukoski CF, A model of growth by hetero-coagulation in seeded colloidal suspensions, J Colloid InterfaceSci, 139, 198 (1990).3. Borum L, Wilson, Jr. OC, Surface modification of hydroxyapatite. Part II. Silica. Biomaterials 24, 3681 (2003). Page 12.1095.5
. This is especially important in the interpretationof the effect of thermal treatment on phase behavior and the correlation of the resultantmicrostructure to materials’ properties.References 1. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 2. Hestenes, David, Wells, Malcolm, Swackhamer, and Gregg (1992). “Force concept inventory.” The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141-151 3. Hestenes, David, Wells, and Malcolm (1992). “A mechanics baseline test.” The Physics Teacher, 30:159- 166 4. Hake, R.R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand survey of mechanics test
focus on materials selection and multiple constraints, the factors involved in materials processing and design, and the use of data sources. The students completing this course will have useful solutions to standard problems in industry and a working knowledge of the materials selection software. The methods of assessing students include homework, quizzes, a midterm exam, design project report(s) and a final exam.“ 3 cr.The students were required to have the following text, software and ancillary materials. Text – Ashby, Michael F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Third Edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann © 2005 Software - CES EDUPack 2005; Virtual Classroom account
. For the non-functionalized alumina, the procedure involves the ultrasonic agitation of composition(s) (%wtof resin weight) of alumina in EPON™ resin. A 500W sonicator with a 20Khz frequency is usedto disperse alumina in the low viscosity resin. Sonication is carried out at 40% maximumamplitude with a unit mass rate of 3-5 mins. / gm of alumina. High amplitude and elongatedsonication can cause localized elevation of temperature in resin. This rate is also higher thanalumina dispersion in water and methanol mixture due to the higher viscosity of the resin system.It is also important to note that mechanical stirring is also carried out during sonicationprocedure to circulate the mixture and to avoid intercalated dispersion. For
evaluating the demonstrations indicated (94% agreement) that the SMA interactivedemonstrations are “very effective” or “effective” in demonstrating the concept of SMA.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation(Grant No. 0341143 and Grant No. 0305027). This interactive demonstration was an outcomeof an interdisciplinary senior design project.References1. Ambrose, S. A. and C. H. Amon. “Systematic Design of a First-year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 173-181, April, 1997.2. Felder, R.M. and L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering of Education, Vol. 78, pp.674-681
. Place the pane flat with the edges supported on two chairs so you have a platform 18" or so off the ground with about 12"-18" of glass unsupported between the chairs. (You may also suspend the pane on 2"x4"s placed on the ground.)2. Slowly stand on the pane such that your entire weight is on the unsupported portion of the glass. The glass should hold up to 400 pounds easily. (N.B. It is extremely rare that the pane will break. If the glass does break it will break in the pane of the glass meaning that glass pieces will fly out parallel to the floor. It is best to have students remain at least 10 feet away and wear safety goggles while doing this demonstration.)If you wish to demonstrate the effect of a flaw in the glass, the
., Vanasupa, L., Savage, R. and London, B. "Training the Eco-conscious MaterialsEngineer for the Future", Materials Science & Technology 2005, Pittsburgh, PA: September2005.10. Woods, D.R., Problem-based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL, Woods Publishing,Waterdown, 1994. Page 12.367.1511. Triplett, C., and S. Haag, “Freshman Engineering Retention,” Proceedings of 2004 ASEEAnnual Conference, February 24, 2005,http/www.foundationcoalition.org/events/news/conferencepapers/2004asee/triplet.pdf12. Knowles, M. S., Self-Directed Learning: A guide for learners and teachers, EnglewoodCliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge, 1975.13. Vanasupa, L., Stolk, J
.pdf.4. R. H. Cole, J. G. Berberian, S. Mashimo, G. Chryssikos, A. Burns, and E. Tombari, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 793 (1989).5. N.E. Hager III, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65 (4), 887 (1994). Page 12.934.10
- Static Strain Measurement – Students determined the elastic modulus of 6 cantilevered, strain-gaged beams.• Lab 2 – Dynamic Strain Measurement – Students used the same 6 beams to study vibrational characteristics of the materials.• Lab 3 – Pressure Vessel Measurement – Students mounted strain gages to soft drink cans to estimate the pressure inside the can.• Lab 4 – Tensile Test – Students tested steel and aluminum specimens according to ASTM E8 standards and estimated a variety of material properties.• Lab 5 – Statistical Analysis / Tensile Testing of Manufactured Components – Students tested a large number of bolts according to ASTM standards.• Lab 6 – Fatigue – Students generated S-N curves for both aluminum and steel specimens
, S. Gupta, and L. Pruitt, “Undergraduate Students Teaching Children:K-8 Outreach within the Core Engineering Curriculum,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2006.6 E. Rothstein, “At the Exploratorium and the Tech Museum, 2 Views of Science,” The New York Times,August 12, 2006; http://travel2.nytimes.com/2006/08/12/arts/12muse.html7 A. Daniel, “A Powerful Force,” Prism, Jan. 2005;http://www.prismmagazine.org/jan06/feature_powerful.cfm8 A. Chamberlain, “AT THE EXPLORATORIUM: Teaching Art and Science,”Journal of the College ofEducation, University of Hawaii, 1987.9 http://www.exploratorium.edu/10 http://www.thetech.org/11 http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/12 http://ice.chem.wisc.edu/catalogitems/ScienceKits.htm#Amorphous13
Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp 443- 461, 1998.4. Kuhn, Matthew and Vaught-Alexander, Karen, “Context for Writing in Engineering Curriculum”, Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol 120, No 4, pp 392-400, 1994.5. Henderleiter, Julie, and Pringle, David, “Effects of Contextual-Based Laboratory Experiments on Attitudes ofAnalytical Chemistry Students”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol 76, No 1, pp 100-106, 1999.6. Paretti, Marie C. and Burgoyne, Christine , “Integrating Engineering and Communication: A Study of CapstoneDesign Courses,” Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 2005. 7. Dragga, S., “Responding to Technical Writing”, The Technical Writing Teacher, Vol 18, No. 3, pp 202-221,1991
Experiences,” Published by Jossey-Bass, 2003.4 M. Ohring, “Materials Science of Thin Films,” Academic Press, 2002.5. L. Maissel and R. Glang, “Handbook of Thin Film Technology,” McGraw-Hill, 1970. Page 12.1332.126. L. B. Freund and S. Suresh, “Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution,” Cambridge, 2003.
, pp. 917-924.7. Muryanto, S., “Concept Mapping: An Interesting and Useful Learning Tool forChemical Engineering Laboratories,” Int. J. Engng. Ed., Vol. 22, No. 5, 2006, pp. 979-985.8. Evans, D. L., McNeill, B. W. and Beakley, G. C., “Design in Engineering Education:Past views and future directions,” Engineering Education, July/August, 1990, pp. 517-522.9. Dym, C. L., Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views, Cambridge University Press,New York, 1994.10. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, Longman, NewYork, 1956.11. Safoutin, M. J., Atman, C. J., Adams, R., Rutar, T., Kramlich, J. C. and Fridley, J. L.,“A Design Attribute Framework for Course Planning and Learning Assessment,” IEEETransactions on Education, Vol