Asee peer logo

Diagnosing Students' Misconceptions On Solubility And Saturation For Understanding Of Phase Diagrams

Download Paper |

Conference

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Honolulu, Hawaii

Publication Date

June 24, 2007

Start Date

June 24, 2007

End Date

June 27, 2007

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Teaching Methods for the 21st Century: Part 2

Tagged Division

Materials

Page Count

12

Page Numbers

12.540.1 - 12.540.12

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/1699

Download Count

1604

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Stephen Krause Arizona State University

visit author page

Stephen J. Krause is Professor and Associate Director of the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches courses in general materials engineering, polymer science, characterization of materials, and materials selection and design. He conducts research in innovative education in engineering, including a Materials Concept Inventory, and also in adapting design, engineering and technology concepts to K-12 education. He is currently working on an NSF sponsored MSP developing courses for high school teachers connecting math, science and engineering.

visit author page

biography

Amaneh Tasooji Arizona State University

visit author page

Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from here experience as a researcher and a manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop new assessments to to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Diagnosing Students' Misconceptions on Solubility and Saturation for Understanding of Phase Diagrams Abstract

Students in introductory chemistry classes often harbor or develop misconceptions about solubility concepts of solutions that inhibit their ability to understand of the nature of solution behavior. Subsequently, when these prior misconceptions are carried over into introductory materials engineering classes, they also inhibit students' ability to understand the liquid and solid solution concepts necessary to effectively understand and use phase diagrams. The end result is that students may never fully comprehend and appreciate the relationships between phase diagrams, materials' microstructures and associated correlations to materials' properties. This research, which is associated with misconceptions revealed from a Materials Concept Inventory (MCI), has investigated students' understanding of concepts of solubility and saturation that are associated with liquid and solid solution behavior necessary to understand phase diagrams. Student knowledge of solution behavior was studied with two-tiered questions. For the first tier- question students chose a schematic diagram that represented the solution characteristics that portrays their mental model about some aspect of solution behavior. In the second-tier response students then described the reason for their choice of a given diagram for the first-tier question.

Misconceptions about liquid-solid solution behavior in chemistry classes have been moderately well studied. Those related to the concepts of solubility and unsaturated, saturated, and supersaturated solutions are also pertinent to the study of solid solution behavior. In fact, the prevalence and persistence of solution-related misconceptions is demonstrated by the fact that changes of student understanding on a solution-concept related item on a previously administered MCI only moved from 39% to 67% correct on pre and post class administration of the MCI. For example, in a salt-saturated water solution, with water-saturated salt resting at the bottom of a beaker, students often believed that putting a small additional amount of salt in the beaker would increase the concentration of salt in the solution. One student said, "adding salt to an already saturated salty solvent will increase concentration slowly." The most common misconception in this research was that a supersaturated solution contained both liquid and solid phases instead of a solution with solute concentration above equilibrium. The diagnosis of this and other misconceptions represents identification of faulty mental models of the physical behavior of solutes and solvents and creates the possibility of devising interventions to address the misconceptions. Thus, the misconceptions about solution behavior carried over from chemistry classes need to be first diagnosed and then addressed in introductory materials engineering classes in order to more fully understand and use phase diagrams. Additional details on the nature of the misconceptions and suggestions about possible interventions to address them are discussed.

Introduction

The science of learning is moving forward rapidly, as described in How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School1, which summarizes and highlights some of the most important findings in the field of cognition of teaching and learning. One important finding about how experts and novices learn and transfer knowledge to new contexts suggests that, to develop

Krause, S., & Tasooji, A. (2007, June), Diagnosing Students' Misconceptions On Solubility And Saturation For Understanding Of Phase Diagrams Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/1699

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015