was a search for a significant engineering concept related to solidification.The search started with defining and quantifying the process. If the process is done in a fluid (airor water), then convection is prominent and can be described in the equation below: q=Q/t=A*h*∆Twhere: q is the heat flow rate (amount of heat per time) Q is the amount of heat t is time A is the area of contact between the two objects (cast material and cast mold) h is the ‘film coefficient’ (related to the interface of cast and mold) and T is the Temperature (∆T is the change in temperature)Once the cast material (soap) and molds were chosen, the film coefficient and area is set. Theavailable heat is also set by the melt
material to the classlectures. For example, a group researching on polyethylene will give their presentation duringthe weeks when the lecture material is on polymers.This group project is a mandatory assignment that accounts for 20% of the overall grade for theclass. The project reports are graded by the instructors based on overall quality and completenessof each required sections, while the oral presentations are graded by both the instructors and thestudent audience based on presentation quality, education content, hands-on demonstrations, andgroup performance in the question and answer (Q&A) session.In one of the ChE classes, the group projects are managed slightly differently. Students turn indifferent sections of their report with
is remedied by providing better training to the lab instructor.Table 4 lists one question covering a key concept from each lab that most of the studentsanswered correctly in the 2008-1 term. Column “N” indicates the number of responses, and “%”column shows the percentage for easier comprehension. Correct answers are shown in bold inthe “Key” column. In the online quiz system, the responses are randomized. Table 4: Key Question from each lab that most students answered correctly in 2008-1L#/Q# Multiple Choice Question from each lab Key N %L1/Q9 In tensile testing of metallic materials, uniform plastic deformation begins when the N 52 100 applied stress equals
conductivity is awell known material property, and can either bedescribed in the in terms of material structure,heat transfer properties, with analogy toelectrical conductivity, or in a separate chapteron thermal properties. However it isintroduced, it is by relatively simple extensionthat the biology-oriented property of thermalconductance is introduced. As illustrated inTable 3, thermal conductance is used todescribe the heat-retaining capabilities ofbiological species, particularly hair- and fur-bearing animals. Whereas heat flow, Q, isrelated to thermal conductivity, k, cross-sectional area, A, and a temperature gradient,dT/dy, according to the following equation Q = -kA(dT/dy)the same quantity is related to thermal
, price and cost information that enables production cost to be assessed in a simple cost model.References1. See Granta Design homepage, URL: https://grantadesign.com/education (available February 3,2020)2. Ashby, M. F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (5th edition) Butterworth Heinemann,Oxford, 20163. Figuerola, M, Lai, Q, Ashby, M., Kahlmeyer, E., The CES EduPack Products, Materials andProcesses Database - a White Paper, https://grantadesign.com/teachingresource/papers/(available February 3, 2020)4. Fredriksson, C., Melia, H. and Cesons, J., An Introductory Teaching Resource for MaterialsScience and Engineering, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle (USA), June 14-17, 20155. C. Fredriksson, An Innovative Digital Tool
, e.g. Assessment and Feedback1. Understand point Read Li et al. “Defect 5-min quiz and solutions, Conceptual questions indefects, including energies of graphite Q+A session assignmentadatom, vacancy, Stone- Density-functionalWales defect in carbon- calculations”, Phys. Rev.based materials. B 72, 184109 (2005)2. Prepare your own Payne et al. “Iterative Create a computational Computational modelingcomputational modeling minimization techniques modeling input file to questions in assignment,input file. for ab initio total-energy determine
, K.T. Nguyen, and D. Hui, Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018. 143: p. 172-196.9. M. Abshirini, M. Charara, P. Marashizadeh, M.C. Saha, M.C. Altan, and Y. Liu, Functional nanocomposites for 3D printing of stretchable and wearable sensors. Applied Nanoscience, 2019. 9(8): p. 2071-2083.10. L.A. Chavez, B.R. Wilburn, P. Ibave, L.C. Delfin, S. Vargas, H. Diaz, C. Fulgentes, A. Renteria, J. Regis, and Y. Liu, Fabrication and characterization of 3D printing induced orthotropic functional ceramics. Smart Materials and Structures, 2019. 28(12): p. 125007.11. Q. Gao, H. Gu, P. Zhao, C. Zhang, M. Cao, J. Fu, and Y. He
learningmodules encouraged students towards positive attitude to work more in study. The most negativeagreement (3.8%) was in Question 9, regarding to the development of the thinking and problemsolving skills by the POGIL activities in classroom. Such neutral and negative responses of Q 7and Q 9 indicate that students, who had limited experiences in active learning environment,might find some difficulty to adapt a new learning strategy to study the subjects by means ofthese POGIL activities.Consider the large number of the positive agreement responses in Q6-9 that stand out stronglyagainst the neutral/disagreement regarding the value of the POGIL based learning environment;for example, a total (11.5%) of the disagreement and neutral response in Question
questions about the student’s perceptions ofthe visits from GLs. To encourage meaningful responses, the students were offered extra crediton one of the course exams for providing complete and thoughtful responses. 27 students (of apossible 28, 96%) participated. Survey questions are listed in Table 2.Table 2: Questions asked in the survey. Subset Q Question(s) # Word Cloud 1 List 3 words to describe the experience of having presentations and Analysis of video interviews from visiting engineers and scientists during this overall tone class this semester. Benefits of the 2 What were the benefits, if any, of these visits
role in the mini-project / term Project presentation Integration development of societies and paper (written report and Q/A session industries and oral presentation) Actively participate in class Assessment record of Lecture and class discussions active participation discussion on Human Avoid plagiarism in report writing, Assessment of reports professional and ethical Dimension - and properly cite published sources for plagiarism and responsibility (including Self
design requirements and an understanding of material behavior. Q12 – I feel confident discussing material behavior with my peers. Q 13 – I feel confident discussing material behavior with my instructors.Tables 7 and 8 summarize the results.Table 7: Changes in student-reported confidence and perceptions by delivery method and performancerequirement. Q11 Q12 Q13 Pre Post Delta Pre Post Delta Pre Post DeltaDEDP 3.54 3.75 0.21 3.08 3.83 0.75 2.92 3.42 0.50OC ‐ Traditional 2.89 4.14 1.24 2.70 4.19 1.49 2.62 3.84 1.22OC ‐ SCALE‐UP 2.60 4.00 1.40 2.57
. and Lawrence, C.R., 2001. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature, 414(6859),pp.33-34.17 Zheng, Y., Bai, H., Huang, Z., Tian, X., Nie, F. Q., Zhao, Y. & Jiang, L. (2010). Directionalwater collection on wetted spider silk. Nature, 463(7281), 640-643.18. Vollrath, F., & Knight, D. P. (2001). Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature,410(6828), 541-548.19. Das, S. (2001). The cost of automotive polymer composites: a review and assessment ofDOE's lightweight materials composites research (p. 47). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge NationalLaboratory.20. Joost, W. J. (2012). Reducing vehicle weight and improving US energy efficiency usingintegrated computational materials engineering. Jom, 64(9), 1032-1038.21. Skszek, T. W., Zaluzec, M
. Q12 – I feel confident discussing material behavior with my peers. Q 13 – I feel confident discussing material behavior with my instructors.Tables 7 and 8 summarize the results.Table 7: Changes in student-reported confidence and perceptions by delivery method and performancerequirement. Q11 Q12 Q13DEDP/Campus 80 Req/Not Req Pre Post Delta Pre Post Delta Pre Post DeltaDEDP Req 3.00 4.43 1.43 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.77 3.43 0.66DEDP Not Req 2.93 4.18 1.25 2.21 4.09 1.88 1.93 3.64 1.71OC Req 2.83 4.03 1.20 2.53
) <=where R is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), T is the temperature in Kelvin, n is the net numberof electrons involved per mole of Aluminum oxidized, and Q is a ratio of electrolyteconcentrations produced by the net oxidation-reduction reaction,For 𝐴𝑙 + 3𝐴𝑔' → 𝐴𝑙 &' + 3𝐴𝑔 (3) [@A BC ] 𝑄= (4) [@EC ]Band [Al3+] indicates the molar concentration of the Al3+ electrolyte solution in contact with theelectrode.The origami battery design provides an opportunity for the student designers to apply theseequations to change the open circuit voltage, E. In
value of E or tensile strength that determines the best materialfor a weight constrained application (aircraft or bicycles, for example). The “singing rod” is amemorable and amusing demonstration to introduce the concept and initial assessment datashows a more memorable way for them to still understand by the end of the term. This activity iseasily accessible and transferable to other institutions. In fact, we have found studentsperforming this demonstration to other students on campus after the in-class demo.You can purchase “singing rods” in science supply stores. However, all you really need are solidor hollow rods made from particular materials. Physicists most often use an aluminum rodbecause they have a high Quality Factor (Q), which
E E ET E E ET E Normal stress σ σ σ s σ σ σ σ σ S s s σ Shear stress τ τ τ ss τ τ τ τ τ Ss ss ss τ Strain ε ε ε e ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε Poisson's ratio ν ν ν μ μ μ ν μ μ μ μ μ Point load P P P P F P P F P P P P P Stress K K K k k K K Kt k concentration Radius of gyration k r r q r k k k k
learned from a product realization ret site: Maximizing success for teacher research and high school student impact. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2008).24. Benson, L., Medders, E. & Cass, C. Teachers as scientists: A qualitative study of outcomes for an RET program. in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20, 2010 - June 23, 2010 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2010).25. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. (Sage Publications, Inc, 2001).
tailored to the needs of the projectand may include open-time for team discussion and problem solving, learning activities, mini-lectures with Q&A sessions, computational analysis of data as well as fabrication and assemblyof parts. There is no rigid schedule and the students work in teams composed of 4-6 students.Design Methodology for PBL ActivitiesSeven faculty spent two weeks during the summer of 2006 to develop the PBL design activitiesfor our Junior Experience. We followed a collaborative process for systematically designing eachproject-based series of activities as outlined below:Step 1: We began by identifying a profile of our customer’s needs and values. First we listed thevalues that our students have expressed over the years
Used to Load BridgeNewA 1000lb Q-Test tensile/compression machine was adapted for use in the bridge testing. Thebottom grip is removed and a support structure put in its place. This structure has a span of 22inches to accommodate the 24 inch long bridge. The upper grip is replaced with a welded steelU- shape. On the bottom of the U are openings for insertion of the steel rod(s). The machine isthen put into compression mode at a constant speed. The software controlling the machine isTestworks 3 from MTS. The loading is much smoother than before and the bridge top staysparallel to the ground. Since using this new method, the students are happier with the testingprocedure. More ‘A’ grades have resulted than with the old tester. The new tester is