Educational Psychology, in the Instructional Psychology & Tech- nology program at the University of Oklahoma. Her broad range of research work and interests include: engineering education, teaching assistant professional development, instructional design, faculty work, performance standards, program evaluation, performance assessment, health professions, informal and community education.Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair and is the Director of the School of Aerospace and Me- chanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma. Farrokh’s current research focus is on learning how to attain a net zero energy / eco footprint in the built environment. His
rates and the likelihood ofcontinued research participation and higher education. A new initiative at the University of Texasat Austin (UT Austin), the Freshman Introduction to Research in Engineering (FIRE) program,offers a select group of first-year students with an opportunity to participate in semester-long,faculty-sponsored mechanical engineering research and development projects. In addition to theirresearch, students attend bi-monthly lectures that introduce them to various topics in mechanicalengineering and current research in the field, the successes (and roadblocks) in engineeringresearch and how to overcome them, and career opportunities in engineering. An end of semesterposter session allows students to showcase their research
the entire curriculum that (1)reinforces student understanding and retention through reinforcement at short intervals, and (2)minimizes fading of conceptual knowledge due to extended disuse – as is often problematic inthe traditional ME curriculum.IntroductionHistorically, engineering education has followed a linear model in which engineering topics aretaught in separate, disconnected classes that “serially encapsulate” the course material in thestudents’ minds. In contrast, our newly developed first-year course sequence, funded by a CourseCurriculum and Laboratory Improvement Phase 1 Grant from the National Science Foundationtitled “Design-Based SPIRAL Learning Curriculum” (DUE-0837759), strives to integrate avariety of engineering topics in
studentsto contextualize their coursework with anticipated professional work and can also improveinstructor evaluations [14]-[16].ePortfolios also serve to connect the academic setting with the professional engineeringenvironment [17], [18]. Additional value of the ePortfolio is rooted in its connective power,including its inherent ability to help students establish links among a range of experiences [10],[19]. When used for reflection, the ePortfolio can contribute to students’ development ofmetacognitive skills that support them to transition into their future careers [20], [21]. Its use inhigher education encourages proactive, student-centered learning and promotes interconnectionof concepts through knowledge acquisition and greater student
working prototype is the courses’ objective. Traditionally, exposure to the design process anddesign project was not seen by students until their third year. As such, one of the primarychanges made to the course after the instructor change was the addition and emphasis of thedesign process. It is for that reason a semester-long design project was added to the course. Figure 1: The Engineering Design Process [7]Additional education objectives are for the students to develop proficiency in Arduino andSolidworks. As a result, the students are required to perform a number of assignments in the twoprograms, both of which are directly used for their project. Instruction in Arduino andSolidWorks is delivered through the lab with
the labs and hands-onexperiences.This paper focuses on the new sophomore level design course which has been piloted as anabbreviated ten-week quarter long version in Autumn 2011 and Winter 2012. The sophomorecourse fills, in part, the major gap in design education that exists between the fundamentals ofengineering course sequence (and its honors equivalent, both of which serve as a prerequisite tothe major) and the senior-year capstone design course. And while the first year course sequencesinclude a design-build project, there exists a wide variance in the machine skills and experienceof entry-level Mechanical Engineering students. This new sophomore course attempts to level-set the practical knowledge of machining among students in addition
used for misconceptionidentification. Potential MEA topics and a sample MEA are provided and discussed in detail.Introduction to Model Eliciting ActivitiesThe following is an introduction to a comprehensive four-year effort by a team of researchersfrom six universities that focuses on models and modeling as a foundation for undergraduateSTEM curriculum and assessment. This effort is focusing on improving engineering education,with the present discussion focusing specifically on using models and modeling to elicit studentmisconceptions in thermal sciences.Our approach builds upon and extends a proven methodology: model-eliciting activities(MEAs)2,4,5. MEA research, which originated in the mathematics education community6, usesopen-ended case
aboutstudent skill development, engineering identity, education, and entrance into the workplace.Among other findings about student perceptions of design in the Academic Pathways Study finalreport, many students feel unprepared for capstone design projects and wish capstone occurredearlier in the curriculum [4]. Another finding was that students engaged in design projectsgenerally do not consider broad context [4]. A thrust of the current college-wide curricularmodification is the inclusion of PBL and EML in the junior year, such as the present work. Thisshould positively impact capstone design experiences in senior year by providing additionalsmaller-scale design experience (PBL and EML) and encouraging students to consider allstakeholders and the
the Professional Development of Engineering Graduate Students,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2019, vol. 2018-Octob, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659192.[18] N. F. Liu and D. Carless, “Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment,” Teach. High. Educ., 2006, doi: 10.1080/13562510600680582.[19] J. W. Gikandi, “Promoting Competence-Based Learning and Assessment Through Innovative Use of Electronic Portfolios,” in Handbook of Research on Promoting Higher- Order Skills and Global Competencies in Life and Work, IGI Global, 2018, pp. 181–208.[20] C. E. Watson, G. D. Kuh, T. Rhodes, T. P. Light, and H. L. Chen, “ePortfolios–The eleventh high impact practice,” Int. J. ePortfolio, vol. 6
faculty of Wayne State University for 25 years, where she developed and implemented both undergraduate and graduate programs in biomedical engineering and helped to establish a department of biomedical engineering. Her endowed professorship at MSU focuses on research to increase the success of students in engineering through creative pedagogical techniques. Dr. Grimm completed her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at The Johns Hopkins University in 1990 and her Ph.D. in Bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania in 1994. She has just finished a 3-year rotation as a program director for three BME-related programs at the Na- tional Science Foundation. During this time, she served as co
are excluded from participation bycultural and structural elements of the teams. This paper offers recommendations to advisors,departments, and engineering educators about the scaffolding necessary to offer more authenticlearning opportunities and build teams that are more diverse.IntroductionThe development of individual skills such as leadership and communication along withopportunities for collaborating with diverse individuals in a team environment are consideredessential to prepare undergraduate engineering students to meet the grand challenges facingsociety.1, 2 This consideration is informed by the global need for engineers who can workeffectively toward solving complex issues in an increasingly diverse yet inter-connected