Paper ID #33060Collaborative Learning in an Online-only Design for ManufacturabilityCourseMiss Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Taylor Tucker graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a Bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics. She is interested in engineering design and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring how to improve ill-structured tasks for engineering students in order to promote collaborative problem solving and provide experience relevant to authentic work in industry. She also writes for the Department
published in several venues, including Computers & Education, American Journal of Distance Education, Educational Administration Quarterly, and the Journal of Educational Research. Page 26.1363.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Self-Evaluation of Design Decision-Making Skills Gained through Student Generated Learning Aids Page 26.1363.2AbstractThis paper presents the findings from research in improving undergraduate engineering designdecision-making skills. This work is motivated by the need to provide
distance learning. Distance learning appealsto mature working students and their employers as it does not disrupt the working day. Bourneet. al.1 discuss the impact of online learning on continuing education of graduate engineers anddegree seeking engineering students. They recommend that engineering colleges explore,implement, and extend blended learning and the collection of data and distribution of knowledgeabout successes and failures, as well as to continue to build-out the use of technologyimplementations that increase the quality of online courses. Mulligan et. al.2 describe case Page 25.1224.2studies for teaching online Manufacturing
Paper ID #30769Transforming an Engineering Design Course into an Engaging LearningExperience using ePortfoliosMiss Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Taylor Tucker graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a Bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics and is now pursuing a master’s in Curriculum and Instruction through the Digital Environments for Learning, Teaching, and Agency (DELTA) program. She is interested in engineering design and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring how to improve ill-structured tasks for
links between each team member’s perception of shared team experiencesand the team’s overall levels of effectiveness. Based on these findings, it seems reasonable toconclude that analysis of perceptual data from a larger number of team members would yieldincreased levels of understanding of these interactions. For these reasons, this expanded studyshared research questions similar to the original case study: ≠ How do individual members of Capstone Design Teams perceive and describe types/forms of team communication and collaboration? ≠ How do team members support their own perceptions? ≠ Does a relationship exist between team members’ perceptions of shared group experiences and the ability to transfer “lessons learned
process, the technique is collaborative learning. Ifformal structures exist to guide student interaction, the process is considered cooperativelearning.6,7 PBL, a form of cooperative or collaborative learning, introduces engaging real-world, ill-defined, scaffolded problems for students to solve, usually as part of a group.8 Previouswork has shown that PBL activities can substantially improve student learning9 and thatcooperative learning in general promotes academic success, quality of relationships, and self-esteem.10This work details the problem-based learning application of a fluid-powered gantry crane,previously designed and fabricated on a small scale by senior mechanical engineering students11,to courses including: Mechatronics, Fluid
out in these landmark works:1. Encourage contact between students and faculty.2. Develop reciprocity and cooperation among students.3. Use active learning techniques.4. Give prompt feedback.5. Emphasize time on task.6. Communicate high expectations.7. Respect diverse talents and ways of learning.Traditional face-to-face instruction provides on-going opportunities to structure the learningenvironment in class in ways that incorporate these best practices. Cooperative learning strategies(See [4]) and classroom assessment (See [5], [6]) are well-established pedagogies that we haveboth used for years. Teaching online and face-to-face concurrently in the same course provided uswith opportunities to incorporate these effective
design solution. During the first semester, the students present their research to one another with potential solutions to problems. Faculty act as moderators attempting to keep the students on track, and within some reasonable budget. The big question for this project was whether to use an equatorial3 or altitude azimuth4 design for the telescope’s rotation. The equatorial is a far simpler design for tracking the stars as it only needs to rotate about one axis once it is set up. However, the mechanical issues were far more difficult, and an altitude azimuth arrangement was chosen. Fortunately for this project, the students continued to work on the design issues through the fall semester while they were doing their last
, rather than listening passively to a lecture. If students informally assist one another inthis process, the technique is deemed to be collaborative learning [2]. PBL builds on ACL byintroducing engaging real-world problems for students to solve as part of a group [2]. A newtwist on PBL is the inclusion of student skills associated with an entrepreneurial mindset, such asintegrating information from many sources to gain insight and/or identifying unexpectedopportunities to create value. The resulting EML activities emphasize “discovery, opportunityidentification, and value creation with attention given to effectual thinking over causal(predictive) thinking” [3].Atman et al. [4] reported on the Academic Pathways Study to address research questions
innovation, and because Ahmedabad, Gujarat in specific is theleading powerhouse of technology and infrastructure-building within India. Ahmedabad is the fastestgrowing city in India and the third fastest growing city in the world.For the second iteration of the workshop, thirty participants were carefully chosen from among thesenior engineering education faculty of nine universities within the state of Gujarat. This version ofthe workshop was sponsored by Gujarat Technological University in cooperation with the authors’home university in the south central United States. For the second version, we retained the two goalsfrom the first version and also added a third goal:C. Evaluate Experiential Learning and (Meta)Competencies. We explored issues and
Page 24.788.10 Education & Research community with input from a large number of academic, industry, government, and association professionals over the period from 2008 through 2011.8. Future Directions for the Collaboration between Mechanical Engineering Education andManufacturing Engineering EducationDiscussions among the ASME Board on Education and the SME Center for Education haveidentified several areas of potential strategic alignment regarding the recommendations in theSME white paper Workforce Imperative: A Manufacturing Education Strategy8 and effectivestrategic and tactical ways of collaborating are being planned. The following points describepotential areas of alignment, extracted from the March 5, 2013 letter to Dr
settings and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. Ava R. Wolf, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ava Wolf, PhD supports faculty in developing courses that emphasize active and engaged learning, and conducts research on interactive learning spaces, effective teaching strategies, and the integration of tech- nology.Mr. Nattasit Dancholvichit, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Nattasit Dancholvichit was born in Bangkok, Thailand in 1990. He received a B.A. degree in mechan- ical
building up the next-generation engineers.Takuma Odaka, Kogakuin University I am a graduate student of the mechanical engineering program at Kogakuin university. My research interest; Educational Engineering, Physiological Psychology, Team Working, Team Education, Behavior Analysis. I specialize in creating measurement systems and analyzing data using languages such as Python and MATLAB. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Toward Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Japan: Developing Team-based Learning Experience and Its AssessmentAbstractOver the last ten years, the Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education (JABEE) hasincreasingly emphasized the importance of
Higher Education.4. Johnson, D., R. Johnson, and K. Smith (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the collegeclassroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.5. Barr, R., and J. Tagg. (1995). From teaching to learning: a new paradigm for undergraduateeducation. Change, Nov., AAHE.6. Astin, A., L. Vogelgesang, E. Ikeda, and J. Yee. (2000). How service learning affects students. UCLA:Higher Education Research Institute. Retrieved March 8, 2006, fromhttp://www.gseis.ucla.edu/heri/PDFs/HSLAS/HSLAS.PDF.7. Eyler, J., and D. E. Giles. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, p. 182.8. Clary, E.G., M. Snyder, and A. Stukas. (1998). "Service-learning and psychology: lessons from thepsychology of volunteers' motivations," in R