Conference Session

Research and Multidisciplinary Experiences

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Robson, California State University, Fullerton; Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University; Hassanein Jaleel Radhi, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

California State University attached a robotic arm to theASEP platform and the assembled new arm-rover system was called Articulated SuspensionExploratory Platform System (ASEPS).There are twelve planned weekly labs during the semester, each consisting of two portions. Thefirst portion covers the description of the lab project, including objective(s), required parts/partdescription and step-by-step tutorial instructions. The second part requires the students to applythe knowledge learned from the lecture and the first lab portion to solve the specific project. Toincrease the quality of writing [13] and presenting, the students will be asked to submit designoverview reports in the end of each lab and give bi-weekly oral presentations on their

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids and Heat Transfer I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University; Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; Selin Arslan, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (2005) “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 87-101.7. Smith, K. (2011) “Cooperative Learning: Lessons and Insights from Thirty Years of Championing a Research-Based Innovative Practice.” Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD.8. Prince, M. (2004) “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-331.9. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., and Bunting, C. F. (2011) “Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course.” Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids and Heat Transfer I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Devshikha Bose, Boise State University; Krishna Pakala, Boise State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

-2214. 2. Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7. 3. Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228. 4. Lan, Y-F., & Huang, S-M. (2012). Using mobile learning to improve the reflection: A case study of traffic violation. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 179-193. 5. Wallace, S., Clark., M., & White, J. (2012). ‘It’s on my iPhone: Attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Benson, Arizona State University; Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

exposed is the wide range of skills andproficiency with pre-requisite knowledge and skills that are often assumed as second nature at this Page 26.1426.8level of education. Students in this course had issues with content such as the equation for astraight line and the conversion of units from rpm to rad/s. In addition, student reflections oftenprovided only cursory responses to the questions and had a right/wrong-bias or behaviorallyfocused mindset. For example, in response to a question on calculating the torque-angular speedrelation for a linear motor, a considerable number of students remarked that their errors weredirectly related to their

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emad W. Jassim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, 2013 pp. 574-577.[7] C. H. Ramming and J. J. Phillips, “Improving Retention of Student Understanding by Use ofHands-on Experiments in Statics,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,Indiana. June 2014. https://peer.asee.org/20610[8] L. Albers, and L. Bottomley, “Six Hands-on Activities Designed to Improve StudentAchievement in and Attitude Towards Learning Fluid Mechanics,” 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012. https://peer.asee.org/21916[9] S. Das, “Development of a Low-cost, Portable, and Programmable Solar Module to FacilitateHands-on Experiments and Improve Student Learning,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2016, 10.18260/p.26800.[10] J.R

Conference Session

Improving Mechanics & Structural Modeling Courses

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Echempati, Kettering University; Enayat Mahajerin, Saginaw Valley State University; Anca Sala, Baker College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

respectively,were “True/False Questions; Selection of best models for specified sets of data” and 64%. Thismeans that the CLO is not met. Analysis of this midterm exam with action taken for continuousimprovement reveals the following:• Results for Problem #’s 1 and 3 were “Very Good” with the “Objectives met” to a great extent.• Few students missed points on Problem #2 because they did not make the matrix diagonally dominant. As a result, it took more number of trials for the iterative process to converge. This was pointed out when the tests were returned to students.• For Problem #4, the results were “Fair”; there were 29 questions and one-third of students did not manage the time properly. As a corrective action, the problem for

Conference Session

Improving ME instructional laboratories

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Elahinia, University of Toledo; Constantin Ciocanel, University of Toledo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Figure 4. This is believed to be due to the more focusedquestions addressing these issues.In conclusion, we believe that the redevelopment had an overall beneficial impact on thestudents’ learning and we are going to closely monitor the course for the next twosemesters. Page 11.1075.11References[1] Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R., “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, American Society of Engineering Education, January 2005, 94(1):87-101.[2] Fink, L., Ambrose, S., and Wheeler, D., “Becoming a Professional Engineering Educator: A New Role for a New Era,” Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Introducing Active Learning into ME Courses

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim Olwi, King Abdulaziz University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

asked to find your density, so you entered in a cylinder full of water. The cylinder was 2 m high while its diameter was 1.4 m. As you entered the tank an amount of 0.5 m3 spell over the floor. As you stood straight up in the tank, your body floated such that half of your head was above the water level. Make necessary assumptions to calculate your density?2. The city municipality installed several artificial falls to the attractions the city already has. Water flows down one of those mountains at a flow rate of 0.186 m3/s, through a 5 cm diameter pipe. Find the pump power required to pump the water to the top of the mountain which is 16m high.3. AssessmentIn addition to the pleasure both the instructor and the students find, the

Conference Session

Hands-on/Experiential Learning

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, Miller, J., Ruff, S., Lehr, J., & Nichols-Belo. A. (2006) The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2). 107–122.3. Lohmann, J. R., Rollins Jr., H. A., & Hoey, J. (2006). Defining, developing and assessing global competence in engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 119-131.4. Brown, B. F., Sr. and Brown, B.“Problem-Based Education (PROBE): Learning for a Lifetime of Change.” ASEE Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1997.5. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Ozgur, E., Fry, D., Leifer, L., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.”Journal of Engineering Education, Vol, No 94, January 2005, pp. 103.6. Savage, R

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment III

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Horacio Vasquez, University of Texas, Pan American; Arturo A. Fuentes, University of Texas, Pan American; Robert A. Freeman, University of Texas, Pan American

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Saad, M., Abu-Lebdeh, T., Pai, D., Waters, C., 2007, “Recitation in core engineering mechanics courses: Implications for retention and student performance”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.5. Rais-Rohani, M., Walters, A., Vizzini, A. 2010, “ Emporium based redesign of statics: An innovative approach to enhance learning and reduce costs”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.6. Mackey, K., Freyberg, D., 2010, “The effect of social presence on affective and cognitive learning in an international engineering course taught via distance learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, v 99, n 1, pp 23-34.7. Sorby, S. A., Vilmann, C., 2011, “Going

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mathew Hagge, Iowa State University; Gloria Starns, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Quantification of LearningTheories abound for ways of measuring learning. Fundamentally, learning is about contrasts:contrasts at points in time regarding knowledge, understanding, and skill that is transferred fromthe instructor to the student. The transference of information alone does not constitute learningin its full measure, although this mode of learning is easily quantifiable (exams for example). Ahigher mode of learning is using facts to arrive at understanding. To quantify understanding it isnecessary to frame the instrument of measure in the context of the central concept(s); Ericksoncalls this a “conceptual lens” [22]. For example, after learning the facts about expansion andcompression, the concept of heat transfer becomes more apparent. A

Conference Session

Design Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Joseph J. Rencis, University of Arkansas; Ashland O. Brown P.E., University of the Pacific; Christina Kay White, Columbia University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

. Page 22.1121.21 10. Myers, I. and M. McCaulley (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the 19Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA.11. Felder, R. and R. Brent (2005). "Understanding student differences." Journal ofEngineering Education. 94(1): 57-72.12. Felder, R. (2004). "Changing times and paradigms." Chemical Engineering Education.38(1): 32-33.13. Smith, K. and A. Waller (1997). "New Paradigms for Engineering Education." InCampbell, W.E. & Smith, K.A. (Eds.). New paradigms for college teaching. Edina, MN:Interaction.14. Smith, K., S. Sheppard, et al. (2005). "Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-basedpractices." Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Randall D. Manteufel, University of Texas, San Antonio; Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

that the passing rate in the secondcourse in thermodynamics is higher for those students who completed the first course with theinstructors who were tough graders, that is those who issued lower GPAs in the prerequisitethermodynamics class5. Page 25.233.5 Table 1. Cumulative Grade distribution for sections of Thermodynamics-I taught by each instructor. Inst- GPA N S %A %B %C %D %F %W % DFW Type

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions - Mechanical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Green, LeTourneau University; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin; Katja Holtta-Otto, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[9] Ulrich, K. and S. Eppinger, 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill.[10] Hannukainen, P. and K. Holtta-Otto, 2006, "Identifying Customer Needs -- Disabled Persons as Lead Users," ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Philadelphia, PA, Paper Number: DETC2006- 99043.[11] Otto, K.N. and K.L. Wood, 2001, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.    Page 15.571.15Appendix A: Extreme Experience Design Project Assignment (ENGR 1812, LeTourneau U

Conference Session

Student Learning and Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Randall Manteufel, University of Texas, San Antonio; Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

  n A − n B − nC − n D − n F − nW / 2 To compare either a class GPA or instructor GPA with the average for the course (overother classes and other instructors), one uses the pooled error: S12 n1 − S 22 n2 n1 − n2PE ? n1 − n2 / 1 n1n2Here, n1 is the total number of students in the class being evaluated and n2 is the totalnumber of students having taking the course in the past 5 years excluding those who tookthe course with the same instructor. A number of different ways were evaluated beforedeciding to exclude the same instructor from the course average. One instructor couldpossibly dominate the average if they taught the class more times with more studentscompared with other

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brandon Field, University of Southern Indiana; David Ellert, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

is in the high 4’s, and none of the students have ever selected lowerthen 4 (“Agree”) on this question, indicating that the students did not find the use of referencematerial to be a detriment. Page 15.993.5 4Content of LecturesThe exact timing and content of the semesters varied widely between each of the three semestersand from course to course. The F/TD class, since the students had been exposed to the thermalfluids curriculum, was able to start into applied material early in the semester. The T-HX class,being the first formal introduction to the topics needed to start at more of the

Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Eric Nauman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics

. Krousgrill HigherEd 2.0: Web 2.0 in Higher Education, in Interactive Multimedia, I. Dellyannis, Editor. 2012, Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.[16] Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., and M. Spence, To Blog or Not to Blog: Student Perceptions of Blog Effectiveness for Learning in a College-Level Course. The Internet and Higher Education, 2010. 13(4): p. 206- 213.[17] Huang, T.-C., Huang, Y.-M., and F.-Y. Yu, Cooperative Weblog Learning in Higher Education: Its Facilitating: Effects on Social Interaction, Time Lag, and Cognitive Load. Educational Technology and Society, 2011. 14(1): p. 95-106.[18] Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., and G. Conole, An Empirically Grounded Framework to Guide Blogging in Higher Education. Journal of Computer Assisted

Conference Session

How We Tackled the Pandemic

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Carl W. Luchies, The University of Kansas; Molly McVey, The University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

within ZOOM with breakout rooms.6. Teaching presence matters. Establishing and maintaining a teaching presence, which is important for student learning, should be woven through the fabric of class time. The structure of TBL provides many opportunities for teaching presence during each class time, without the need for the traditional lecture (in TBL as in flipped classrooms, the lecture is provided on the LMS and viewed before class time). For example, providing brief feedback regarding the readiness assurance quiz questions is an opportunity to provide insight into the concept(s) covered. During team development, which consists of an ice breaker question and a question related to “how to become a highly effective team,” each

Conference Session

Software and E-learning in the ME Curriculum

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John-David Yoder, Ohio Northern University; Mihir Sen, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

access to at their home institution. 5) Giving students the opportunity to implement algorithms in the laboratory is helpful in their learning of such algorithms.The authors would be glad to work with others who are interested in developing such acourse, laboratory, or additional remote experiments. All course materials are availableupon request.Acknowledgements: "This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 0410863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation." The authors would further like to thank the students in this

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirstie Plantenberg, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Engineering Society of Detroit(ESD) and a member of the Michigan State Licensing board. After the guest speaker(s) becamepart of the class, student motivation increased and the number of complaints about the amount ofcourse work required decreased. Another motivational tool is the exam fee reimbursementprogram. If a student takes and passes the FE exam, the registration fee (currently $155) is Page 13.634.6reimbursed by UDM’s college of Engineering and Science. Getting the students to complete the assigned online homework was a challenge. Wesuccessfully dealt with this by making the homework worth 20% of the course grade and basedthe respective

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erik Wilhelm, Paul Scherrer Institut; Irene Berry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Mathew Stevens, University of Waterloo; Warren Schenler, Paul Scherrer Institut

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

EPA Test Cycles ECE Test Cycles Average Positve Acceleration (m/s^2) ARTEMIS - Urban 1 ARTMIS - Secondary Rd ARTEMIS - Main Rd ARTEMIS - Motorway 0.8 0.6 0.4

Conference Session

Improving Mechanics & Structural Modeling Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pramod Chaphalkar, Grand Valley State University; Shirley Fleischmann, Grand Valley State University; Janice Pawloski, Grand Valley State University; Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

independent course in FEA. Its impact will be judged by the employers’ andstudents’ surveys conducted after every co-op semester. Instructors’ feed back is important interms of pacing of the teaching, fine tuning the course content and changing the teaching methodbased on student’s response and performance in the tests.As stated earlier, the main objective of the paper is to disseminate the innovative approach andseek the constructive comments from engineering educators. A follow up paper will be writtenon initial findings after two or three semesters.Bibliography[1] Steif P. S., Dollár A., “A New Approach to Teaching and Learning Statics”, Proceedings of the 2003 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2003.[2

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Miller, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 10. Foroudastan, S. D.. Campbell, I.D., “Student Projects: Hands-on Experience with Mechanical Engineering Technology,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 11. Gregory Branch, G., Kumar, V., Wheeler, M., “Bringing Reality to the Classroom: Two “Hands On” Labs for Use with a Machine Design Course,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 12. Widmann, J., Birdsong, C., Ridgely, J., Owen, F., “Integrating Experiment, Modeling and Design using a

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Recktenwald, Portland State University; Robert Edwards, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Douglas Howe, Portland State University; Jenna Faulkner, Portland State University; Calvin Hsieh, Portland State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

0.36 C/min 22 0 100 200 300 400Figure 2: Time (s) Average thermocouple temperatures as the blender speed increases from puree to liquify with one liter of water in the pitcher. Nominal power consumption is 113 W during puree and 281 W during liquify.Everyday Technology: Toaster ExercisesThe Blender exercises are an example of how everyday technology can be used to illustrateengineering principles. In the Engineering of Everyday Things project, laboratory exercises havebeen also developed for hair dryers, bicycle pumps and toasters. In this section the use of toasterto explore mixed mode

Conference Session

Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Instruction

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald Mueller, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

scientistsassess information. Students are directed to the IPFW library webpage and the IntegratedInformation Foraging Environment for a more detailed discussion of information literacy.ProjectsThe first project dealt with the properties of air, which was treated as an ideal gas withtemperature-dependent specific heats.8 Students were give two options—use NASA curve-fitsor a table look-up scheme—to produce the thermophysical properties h, s, and cp and thetransport properties o, k, and c. This first project was designed to familiarize students with thecomputer.The second project required the students to model the compression of an ideal gas withtemperature-dependent specific heats. Students were given a simple MATLAB computer codeto solve a similar

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment in ME 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Bo Tao, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

; Cayabyab, J. (2015). The Effect of Peer Tutoring on Achievement of Students in DiscreteStructures. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5).4. Chen, C., & Liu, C. C. (2011). A case study of peer tutoring program in higher education. Research in HigherEducation Journal, 11, 1-10.5. Zhao, CM. & Kuh, G.D. (2004), Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement, Research inHigher Education, 45:1156. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of engineering education, 94(1),57-72.7. Topping, K.J. (1996) The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review ofthe literature, High Education (1996) 32: 321.8. Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karim Altaii, James Madison University; Colin J. Reagle, George Mason University; Mary K. Handley, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

approach is Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory (CAT)introduced by Collins et al. (1991) and Rogoff (1991). As a social cognitive theory, CAT positsthat students learn from experts by observation, imitation, and modeling. The instructor(s) serveas coaches to bring tacit processes out in the open. In flipping the course described herein,students spent more time actively observing and learning from the instructor than was possible inthe traditional lecture format. Coaching was more targeted and problem solving became anexploration where strategies were learned, reflection was built in with student peers workingtogether, and informed inquiry prior to coming to class enabled scaffolding.Structure of the Flipped CourseDuring the flipped portion of the

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment in ME 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Andrew Roney, University of Denver; Breigh Nonte Roszelle, University of Denver; Matt Gordon P.E., University of Denver; Bradley Davidson, University of Denver

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

FE Exam had student G.P.A.’s that were similar over all thesame years as shown in Table 3, and small changes in these do not seem to correlate with passrates. Subject areas that are typically covered in the 2000 level course are Thermodynamics,Fluid Dynamics, Heat Transfer, Statics, Dynamics, Materials, Mechanics of Materials,Engineering Economics, and Machine Design. For these reasons, we believe that the changesassociated with preparation for the 2015/2016 year affected the pass rate, and not the quality ofour students.Table 1: Overall pass rates of the Sophomore Assessment exam for the past four years. Year Number of Examinees Total Exam Average Pass Rate 2013 40 65% ± 9

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Mechatronics & Simulation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Reihaneh Jamshidi, University of Hartford; Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004.[12] J. Saunders, C. L. Nehaniv, and K. Dautenhahn, "Teaching robots by moulding behavior and scaffolding the environment," in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, 2006: ACM, pp. 118-125.[13] M. Panitz, K. Sung, and R. Rosenberg, "Game programming in CS0: a scaffolded approach," Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 126-132, 2010.[14] K. Wright, I. Milanovic, and T. Eppes, "Implementing collaborative projects using a National Academy of Engineering (NAE) grand challenge: provide access to clean water," in ASEE 125th annual conference & exposition, 2018.[15] L. S. Vygotskiĭ, Thought and

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Capstone and Design

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Farid Breidi; Jotam E. Chen, University of Southern Indiana; Madelyn D. Sturgeon; Justin Michael Amos, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Materials, 371, 739-743.[3] Case, J., & Marshall, D. (2016). Bringing together knowledge and capabilities: A case studyof engineering graduates. Higher Education, 71(6), 819-833.[4] Auburn, S. (2018, October 15). Careers: What engineering employers are looking for inprospective employees. Retrieved from https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/careers-what-engineering-employers-are-looking-for-in-prospective-employees[5] Pate, K., Marx, J., and Breidi, F.*2018. Design of a Transparent Hydraulic EducationalDemonstrator Utilizing Electrically Controlled Valves. Proceedings, 2018 IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE). Oct 3-6, 2018. San Jose, CA[6] Daneykin, Y., Daneikina, N., & Sadchenko, V. (2016). Implementation of CDIO Approach