and a nuanced depth of conceptualunderstanding of the material.IntroductionThe idea of integrating science and art has existed for hundreds of years, and in fact a divisionbetween humanities and science has only emerged in modern times. Great historical scientists likeLeonardo DaVinci were also known for artistic skill. The project Thermodynamics in the Artswas developed as a classroom exercise to allow undergraduate students to explore thermodynamictopics intellectually and creatively.The importance of creativity in the engineering education seems clear as current students willjoin an engineering work-force that demands innovation. Prior studies indicate that engineeringstudents are creative,1, 2 and that creativity can play a role in
shown toimprove student learning [1]. We decided to integrate this approach into our undergraduateNewtonian dynamics class to leverage technology, optimize active learning with instructorspresent, and reduce faculty tutoring loads. In this method of teaching, the in-class time isdedicated to active learning, while the lectures leverage technology to supplement in class timewith on-line videos.The lower levels of learning in Bloom’s taxonomy [2], such as remembering and understanding,are delivered to the students through on-line lectures. The higher levels of learning, such asapplying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating, take place in the classroom with the instructor as aguide. To achieve this, in class time is devoted to guided instruction
paper to refer to such facilities which havea variety of descriptive names. Typically these new types of design spaces combine technologyaccess with education in a format similar to community-based “makerspaces”1. Both the Page 24.1320.2academic and community based versions of a makerspace generally include two components: theinfrastructure and the community. The physical infrastructure includes equipment (such as tools,machine shops, electronic benches, design software and digital fabrication equipment) to design,prototype and test creative systems that solve problems. Equally important are the communitiesof users that tend to make use of
Microprocessors and Microcontrollers; Number Systems, Binary 1 Arithmetic 2 Digital Logic; Memory and Memory Addressing Microprocessor Architecture and Internal 3 Operations PC Familiarization, Software 4 Instruction Set Overview, Addressing Modes Development Environment 5 Assembler Directives; Branching and Looping 6 Subroutines & the Stack, Passing Parameters Assembly Language Programming, 7 Peripherals, I/O Interfaces Digital I/O 8 Parallel I/O Ports 9 Serial Communications, UART, ASCII Conversion 10 Interrupts 11 Interrupts
: A Public Research University PerspectiveAbstractThis paper describes an experiment at the University of California, Irvine (UCI)that uses a combination of technology and pedagogical approaches to improvelearning outcomes for engineering students while reducing course delivery costs.Like most public research universities, UCI faces the challenge of improvinglearning outcomes in the face of declining State and Federal funding. Thischallenge has many elements; 1) As class sizes increase, student participation ishindered and class enrollments often exceed classroom capacities; 2) A lack ofimmediate feedback on student learning hinders timely interventions that wouldotherwise help students succeed; 3) Operation of classes is burdened
student performance.MethodsProblem ComplexityAs problem complexity increases, students’ ability to frame a problem decreases. Therefore, weneed a method for assessing problem complexity so that we can create problems in a controlledfashion that achieve the appropriate level of difficulty. Students and instructors were surveyed onproblem complexity for problem sets based on the following simple survey instrument based ona Likert scale. This provided a means of calibrating our results in terms of the level of difficultythat students will experience during problem framing. Please rate how complex (i.e., difficult) you think this problem is. □ □ □ □ □ 1 2 3 4 5Least complex
-year Mechanical Engineering majors at the University of Virginia. A fleet of 2Dball-point-pen plotters, called “HooPrints,” were designed and constructed out of plastic partsformed using state-of-the-art 3D printers. Students were then given blank 3 x 5 index cards andtwo design objectives: 1) Develop a manual, fly-by-wire “etch-a-sketch” mode through whicheach member of their team must write out his or her initials as quickly and neatly as possible and2) Program their HooPrint to automatically/autonomously draw something interesting (andsophisticated in terms of programming technique) in under two minutes.Background According to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and IEEE,Mechatronics is defined as “the synergistic
engineeringstudents to design a small size low cost split Hopkinson pressure bar in a form of senior designproject. The objectives of this project are to engage a student: 1) to design a well-structuredHopkinson bar by means of fundamentals of mechanics and finite element simulation 2) to builda working prototype of the apparatus for future research activities; and 3) to develop high speeddeformation experiments for instructional purposes. The designed Split Hopkinson bar consistsof two metallic bars with a specimen placing in between, a striker assembly, an air compressor,an instrumentation and data acquisition system. The experiments for using the split Hopkinspressure bar are conducted as an impact is made by the striker on one of the bars, whichgenerates
impact of using these slides(and the attendant instructional approach) on student performance and perceived learning.Two student cohorts were considered: (1) the 2005 and 2009 classes (47 students), who weretaught by the first author using the traditional method; and (2) the 2010 and 2011 classes (42students), who were taught by the first author using the revised method. Student performancewas assessed by examining the Statics grade distributions in each cohort as well as the finalexam scores. (The same final exam was administered to each class.) In addition, perceivedlearning was assessed via questionnaires that asked the students to evaluate their proficiencyrelative to seven specific course learning objectives. Student grades in freshman
courses.Course GoalsThe course goals of Design and Manufacturing I are that students, after completing the course,will be able to: 1. Generate, analyze, and refine the design of electro-mechanical devices making use of physics, mathematics, and engineering principles. 2. Describe, analyze and select common machine elements including fasteners, joints, springs, bearings, gearing, motors, pneumatics, clutches, couplings, belts, chains, and shafts. 3. Apply experimentation and data analytic principles relevant to mechanical design. 4. Communicate a design and its analysis (written, oral, and graphical forms). 5. Develop basic machining and fabrication skills.These topics are introduced during twice-weekly lectures and during weekly lab
curves /tables and equations on key seats will be presented. Thepreliminary stress concentration factors of both profile and sled runner key seats under bending,torsion and axial loading for shaft designs are presented in this paper.1. Introduction The geometric discontinuities on shaft are unavoidable due to some required functions.But geometric discontinuities will cause significant stress concentrations. Step shoulders withfillets, retaining-ring grooves and key seats in shafts are the typical geometric discontinuities. Inlots of mechanical component design textbooks[1,2,3], the stress concentration factors for thestep shoulders with different fillets on shafts are fully explored and presented by sets of stressconcentration factor
buy-in from the sheet metal company as aresult of the kick-off meeting with the faculty, having the students contact them and figure outhow their design could actually be built was an excellent learning opportunity. Besidesequipment and labor donations, students also benefited from a safety training for variablefrequency drives which are used in the Air Handling Unit and Air Duct Simulators. As shown inTable 1, students had to cooperate with several companies providing them with practice incommunicating on a professional level and management skills. Note that some companies wereinvolved in more than one project, a total of six companies were involved. Table 1 Overview of Projects
possible solution to a problem identified in therecent research literature: despite decades of efforts dedicated to the improvement of engineeringeducation, and despite the many advances that have been well-researched and are readilyavailable in the literature, the faculty are not readily adopting them because the time required todevelop them exceeds substantially the normal course preparation. There are several positiveindicators that the summer immersion program is working; however, it is still too early todetermine if it has achieved “systemic and sustainable change”, and if there is an effect onretention rates, graduation rates, and employer satisfaction. The study has also uncovered twoprincipal weaknesses that must be resolved: 1
placing the focus of the majority of classtime on lower level knowledge skills (remembering and understanding).Following the team-based learning (TBL) approach, students are assigned to learning teamsduring the first day of classes and remain in those teams throughout the semester. While thetraditional TBL approach consists of Pre-Class Preparation (no in-class time), ReadinessAssurance (1-2 class periods), and Team-Application of Course Concepts (1-4 class periods), theapproach was adjusted to provide students with more guidance during the Preparation Phase (3-450 minute class periods), which in this work will also be referred to as the Basic KnowledgeAcquisition Phase due to its extended nature. Here the objective was to shift basic
inculcate a systematicapproach to problem solving, e.g., see Hodge [1], Hodge [2], and Hodge and Luck [3]. In thispaper the authors describe a different aspect of mathematical CAD software: the ability toperform symbolic manipulations. This latter feature of some mathematical CAD software can beexploited by engineering instructors to help emphasize conceptual thinking while reducingunnecessary frustration on the students due to long algebraic steps and other repetitive analyticalcalculations required in differentiation, integration, and minimization of mathematical formulas.With less time spent on evaluating integrals, performing complex differentiations, and solvingsystems of equations, more time is available for students to engage in higher-level
passing rates in thethermodynamics section are low for mechanical, electrical and civil engineering students.8National averages for the past ten years are given in Table 1 and the standard deviation (ifavailable) is given in brackets. The table shows the lowest score recorded (27%) was for civilengineering students in 2004, while the highest score (71%) was that of mechanical engineeringstudents in 2009. Figure 1 shows the trend in student’s performance in graphical form. It is clear Page 23.1280.3that there is not a clear improvement during the past ten years. For the most part, students’performance falls in the band from 40% to 65%. The figure
, the slow motion videois used in conjunction with computer-based animations from a finite element analysis program,providing the students with an additional visual aid and also providing some validation for thestudents that results from the finite element analysis software are valid. The pros and cons ofvarious camera settings, and also some limitations of this low-cost alternative, are discussed.Also, some advantages of combining video from the high speed camera with video from othersources, such as video from screencasting software, are illustrated.BackgroundEducational benefits of using videos to capture phenomena are demonstrated in other works.One example is the work reported by Swanbom, et al.1, in which an off-the-shelf camera wasused
Education, 2013 Use of Process-oriented Approaches in Content-Intensive Courses: Some Insight in Teaching / Learning of Machine DesignIntroduction and Literature:The idea of learning in contexts that promote real-life applications of knowledge extendbackward more than two decades. Resnick's bridging apprenticeships [1] connected theoreticallearning in the classroom to the application of knowledge in the work environment. Also,Collins's idea of situated learning, "learning knowledge and skills in contexts that reflect the waythe knowledge will be useful in real life" [2], addressed knowledge applied in authentic contexts[3]. Process-oriented teaching [4] is aimed at the integrated teaching of learning and thinking, onone hand, and
of typical, but not inclusive, papers and archival journal articles related to animations.ASEE references include conference papers and articles in ASEE-sponsored archivalpublications such as the Journal of Engineering Education and Computers in Education. Typicalconference paper examples include Shen and Zhu [1], Giro et al. [2], Abulencia et al. [3],Balazinski and Przybylo [4], Ziegler [5], and Hoorfar et al. [6]. These papers generally discussin detail the structure of the animations involved and present some assessments, perhapsanecdotal, of how effective the animations were in conveying the salient features of thephenomena. The time scale is about a decade, indicating the length of time of animationinvolvement by ASEE members. Typical
as entropy. This shows that the majority of the class may be reached using this methodwhile allowing for more specific tools to be used for the rest. 1. Introduction As a disclaimer and assurance of the validity of this study, one must have anunderstanding of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. This theory is a model for the motivators of astudent. The Hierarchy is applied in such a way that if one’s more basic needs are not met, theless basic needs cannot and will not be fulfilled. Education does fit into this model and isrelatively high on Maslow’s Pyramid. Figure 1: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs1 The pyramid’s foundation is physiological needs. These call for homeostasis and a foodsupply. The next
, all engineering programs requesting accreditation for the first time or seeking re-accreditation by Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET must demonstrate thatprogram meets a set of criteria that include both the general criteria for baccalaureate andassociate degree programs and the program criteria required by the program lead society (e.g.,ASCE, IEEE, ASME) [1]. The programs must also meet all the requirements listed in theAccreditation-Policy-and-Procedure-Manual of ABET [2]. The general criteria consists of eight(8) components: (1) students, (2) Program Educational Objectives (PEO), (3) Student Outcomes(SO) (4) Continuous Improvement, (5) Curriculum, (6) Faculty, (7) Facilities, and (8)Institutional Support and Financial
. Typically, presenters from outside the department and/ordepartment faculty give weekly seminars and the students are in the audience4. Otherapproaches include having each graduate student present a topic of his/her selection5,community building through seminars6 and Ph.D. students collectively identifying andpresenting topics related to challenges they face in the program7.Although students get to practice oral presentation, two important components tend to bemissing: (1) Feedback to improve specific presentation skills for each student, and (2) Achance to present again after incorporating the feedback. In this paper, we present agraduate-level seminar course where the primary purpose is to give the students anopportunity to practice presentation
, uncertainty analysis, hypothesis testing, design of experiments,statistical process control, linear and nonlinear modeling, and multivariate statistics in Excel,Minitab, and Matlab. These courses are required courses for mechanical engineering students ata large, land-grant University in the western United States. Mechanical Engineering has abachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering (ME) and a bachelor’s degree in biomedicalengineering (BME) that includes coursework in mechanical engineering (9.6% BME, 1st year,and 8.3% BME in 4th year course). The only non-mechanical engineering majors in this studywere 1 physics major, and 3 engineering science majors in the 1st year course. Students in both courses were unaware of the study when they
a course are. When these direct competency exams are offeredthroughout the semester, they improve student learning through low stakes assessment and giveimmediate feedback to the instructor10,12-14. Mehta and Schlecht (1998) have shown that dailycompetency exams (1-3 questions) are useful in learning material and are more beneficial forstudents with a GPA less than 2.7 (American 4.0 scale), especially in large classes2.This study is the first attempt to define, measure, and assess students’ core chemistry knowledgethrough an online platform in a traditional lecture-based course blended with online material. Thespecific aims were twofold: the development of a direct competency model and an assessmentmethod through an online platform for real
Page 26.886.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impact of reflective learning practices on students' learning of engineering dynamicsIntroductionEngineering is known as a challenging major that many students withdraw because of lowacademic achievement 1. Component Display Theory defines learning in two dimensions:content and performance 2-4. Content includes accepting facts, concepts, procedures, andprinciples; while performance refers to three phases of learning including remember, application,and generalities. Higher levels in both dimensions suggest a higher understanding degree anindividual gains. However, students’ feedback and assessment results suggest
principles in Dynamics,Physics, and/or Statics. Students mentioned that they could not develop the connections betweenspecific problems and the dynamics principles due to their superficial understanding.To apply the dynamics principles to solving engineering problems, students should be able to“recall or recognize information, ideas, and principles in the approximate form in which theywere learned” and “translate comprehend, or interpret information based on prior learning 1.”Constructivism suggested a person learns by relating things in a meaningful way and thestructure of current knowledge determines the learning process: There are two ways in which learning serves the future. One is through its specific applicability to tasks that are
CNCMilling, Manual G-coding and 3D printing assignments will be discussed. Students are asked tocut a plastic keychain with their own design using CAD/CAM software and CNC milling as afirst assignment. As a second assignment, they are asked to design and cut the various shapes ofslots in a piece of plastic without any CAD/CAM software (Manual G-coding). As a thirdassignment, students design and fabricate aluminum gusset. As a fourth assignment, Studentsbring their own 3D CAD model to 3D printer and fabricate their final semester project parts.Students are given maximum 4 weeks for each assignment and present their final products to aninstructor. In this paper, following topics will be explained and discussed. 1) History of the classprojects, 2
. For example, patternrecognition techniques can be applied to musical signals in order to classify a musical artist11. Infact, this form of engineering technology has been implemented into phone applications, e.g.SoundHound, to in order to identify popular music. Since music can be analyzed as a timedomain signal, it provides a natural medium for exploring time domain signal analysis12. Otherresearch has used music as inspiration for improving engineering control systems13. One of themost appealing aspects of integrating music and engineering education is the direct analogiesbetween concepts, examples of which are offered in Table 1. These analogies can serve to eitherapply knowledge of music to better understand engineering, or vice versa
FEA results with the theoretical hand-calculation results. The second project was a team design project which was to baseline thestructural strength of a real device and then redesign it according to the design specifications.During the successful implementation of the two projects in spring semester 2015, the majorityof students had strong positive feedbacks about the projects based on the data collected bothdirectly and indirectly. This paper will provide details of the two projects, their implementationand the analyzed results of a student survey.1. IntroductionOne of the main outcomes of any mechanical engineering program is that mechanicalengineering students are able to develop product designs within specified constraints. One ofthe
the classroom with videotechnology and uses class time to engage students in problem solving that is facilitated by theinstructor. This paper describes students’ perceptions and reactions to one college professor’sattempt to utilize a flipped classroom model with his engineering students. Further discussion isoffered in the paper analyzing the ways in which the course structure evolved and the lessonslearned.IntroductionThe “flipped class” has several variations.1 Flipped classrooms are generally structured to havepre-recorded presentations of the course materials followed by in-class activities. Theexpectation within flipped classrooms is for students to view and study the material prior toclass. For some flipped classes, students complete